Tucson Citizen.com

Immigration Brings Out The Caveman In All Of Us

by on Jan. 04, 2012, under Keystone State

By Robert S. Nix

My favorite commercial is the one where the spokesman tries to apologize over dinner in a posh restaurant to two cavemen whom he has inadvertently insulted while touting how easy it is to use his company’s website. Says the contrite spokesman, “seriously, we apologize – we had no idea you guys were still around.”

“Yeah, next time, maybe do a little research,” the first caveman snorts back sarcastically. The other caveman, sunglasses perched atop his head, wearing a white Miami Vice sports coat with white shirt, orders the roast duck with the mango salsa. But the first caveman hands his menu back to the waiter, adding curtly: “I don’t have much of an appetite, thank you.” He glares across the table at his host with an insolent smirk.

I love the GEICO cavemen; they portray perfectly the quintessential modern, civilized man-about-cave. But, then again, I can relate because I’m something of a modern caveman myself. We all are, actually. And, like it or not, we all possess some residual caveman mentality, too.

It’s the only thing that adequately explains the predictability of our gut level, xenophobic reaction –unsupported by meaningful economic or social data — to any notable wave of immigration into our midst. As a species, we’ve always been like that.

We originally developed the reaction as a survival mechanism back when we really were cavemen. Of course, we no longer need that instinct to survive, but it hasn’t completely evolved away yet either. Still residing somewhere deep in the most primitive part of the brain is this ancient instinct that helped our species survive.

You see, a million years ago, cavemen almost didn’t survive. Scientists say that primitive man nearly starved to extinction, basically because life was too hard – what with all the ice ages, and not yet having made it to the top of the food chain, and all.

No doubt, you’ve heard someone say before, “I can’t eat that – it’ll go straight to my thighs.” The cliché originates from another survival mechanism. Scientists say that the caveman’s metabolism specialized in converting almost anything it could eat into body fat, to efficiently stash away sustenance for lean times. Sadly, it seems we haven’t been able to lose that particular trait to evolution either.

The xenophobic instinct is a response to competition over scarce resources. In an already adverse environment of a million years ago, if different groups of primitive hominoids had found themselves competing with each other over the same food supply, it might have been disastrous. Reflexive xenophobia kept the groups far enough apart from each other for each group to have a better chance of survival. Evolving from hunter-gatherers to farmers who settled the land, we retained an instinctual fear of foreigners, creating nation-states and defending from outsiders the lands upon which we were dependent to survive.

That primordial distrust of foreigners still surfaces occasionally today as anti-immigrant sentiment in an interconnected world of nations, mega-corporations, and a global economy, where the scarce resources might be jobs, government services, or economic opportunity.

Right now, in this country, we’re experiencing a nativist backlash against a large immigrant wave of Hispanics, primarily from Mexico. Prior to that, in the early 1900’s, the same sentiments were directed against large immigrant waves of Poles and Italians. In the mid 1800’s, the same sentiment greeted the waves of Irish immigrants fleeing the great famine in their own country.

Thus the current highly emotional debate over immigration reform, giving rise to anti-Hispanic sentiment and English-only movements, is only the most recent manifestation of a behavior we’ve been exhibiting since we were cavemen.

But that doesn’t justify or excuse xenophobic behavior. If anything, it suggests that, perhaps, we haven’t evolved as much as we’d like to think. But at least if we can recognize our anti-immigrant sentiment for what it really is, a caveman reaction, then maybe we can begin to address immigration reform issues at a more evolved intellectual level rather than as a base primitive reflex.

In the meantime, before boasting that your website is “so easy, even a caveman can use it” – try doing a little research first – because you just may find that we’re all still around.

Robert S. Nix is a government relations consultant and lobbyist who can be reached in Philadelphia at robertnix(at)phoenixstrategiesllc(dot)com.

original



  • Gery

    Lo mas simple del mundo es obedecer las leyes del Estado o Pais como es requerido en todos los lugares del planeta y si alguien me puede decir de algun pais que no tenga leyes de cualquier tipo, especialmente de imigracion que me diga para yo visitarlo. Los imigrantes ilegales no son victimas de nuestro sistema judicial, ellos son victimas y consecuencias de sus propias aciones criminales e ilegales. Si tanto desean marchar, piquetear, protestar o exijir porque ellos y todos los tontos que tanto los defienden no hace todo eso en sus propios paises, cambian sus sistemas socio-economicos y politicos y nos dejan a nosotros en Paz porque nadie les pido que entraran aqui ilegalmente y todos les pedimos que se marche de una buena vez si no pueden o quieren adjerirse a nuestras leyes.  Es hora que dejemos de hacerlos a ellos victimas y comencemos a tratarlos como cualquier otro criminal o delincuente que viola nuestras leyes.

  • blanca

    uno tiene derechos a justicia hacia igual como otro crimines.  ojala q no te toque un juez como tu si un dia te encuentras en las cortes en el otro lado de la ley.   todos somos iguales.  comemos y respiramos igual.  unica diferente es q unos hacen mas para ayudar la gente q otros.  deja de ser amarga y para de armargar la vida de otros.
     
     

  • Bob Quasius, Sr.

    La esclavitud estaban la ley también, pero la ley no hizo la esclavitud moral.

  • http://none JimBodkins

    Homosapiens began approximately 200,000 years ago. We have ‘cave man’ ancestors, but we were never cave men.

    We began 200,000 years ago as two groups in northern africa and combined about 100,000 years ago and migrated to southern africa. At about 60,000 years ago we migrated north out of africa to australia, india central asia, china, europe and north and south america. We are essentially the same today as we were 60,000 years ago. In fact our ancesters from that time are still there. 

    https://genographic.nationalgeographic.com/genographic/lan/en/atlas.html 

    You are correct, in my opinion, to describe this attitude of cultural sociopaths as primitive. I dont believe you are correct to imply (my reading) that it is somehow universal. I dont believe it is.

    Are you saying that ‘nativist’ is ‘white’ (cultural european)? 

    As a note – as a consequence of the civil rights legislation of the 1960′s, many of the racist fundamentalist (and previously pro slavery) democrats of the deep south are now fundamentalist republican conservatives. (Due in large part to the work of Reagan subsequent to the passing of the civil rights legislation). King was a pre-modern republican as were most blacks due to their opposition to slavery (… read – pro slavery southern democrats). But then, so was Javits(sp) – who wouldnt be welcomed by the current republican party. Things have radically changed. Eisenhower was progressive (interstate highway system) as were T Rooseveldt (minimum wage/standard of living), Nixon (EPA) and most of the republican party in the 60′s who passed the civil rights legislation with liberal democratic support (over the objections of the racist fundamentalist democrats of the deep south – who are now republicans).