President Barack Hussein Obama is kicking Mexico around, again. It must be campaign-for-reelection time.

We know that Presidential-appointed politicians supervised a massive gun-running program to Mexico benefitting the drug cartels. And that even after the Department of Justice Inspector General’s 18-month investigation that revealed the wildly unsuccessful program littered Northern Mexico and Arizona with dead bodies not a single Democrat office holder has been fired.

We know that during his initial campaign for President Barack Obama let everyone know that he wanted to renegotiate the fabulously successful North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) that was instrumental in tripling trade between the U.S., Mexico and Canada and was critical to the creation of 20-million jobs President Clinton claimed between 1994 and 2000. Obama took the AFL/CIO propaganda line that NAFTA stole millions of American jobs and sent them to Mexico. That was untrue. Over its first ten years of operation, 50,000 jobs a year were documented to have been lost because of NAFTA which hardly balances out to the 20-million-plus American jobs created during its first six years.

Obama was just talking politics, for he sent a secret emissary to a Canadian Consul in Chicago to inform him that his renegotiation talk was just campaign mumbo-jumbo and to not worry about any renegotiation which Canada and Mexico were against.

So, now that Obama is running for reelection he desperately needs the State of Florida to vote for him again because if he loses Florida to Mitt Romney Obama probably loses the election. What does that have to do with Obama’s vendetta against Mexico? The answer: TOMATOES!

According to the New York Times (September 27^th, 2012), one in every two tomatoes consumed in the U. S. comes from Mexico, mostly through Arizona.

The Times: “The United States Department of Commerce signaled then that it might be willing to end a 16-year-old agreement between the United States and some Mexican growers that has kept the price of Mexican tomatoes relatively low for American consumers. American (mostly Floridian) tomato growers say the price has been so low that they can barely compete.”

Florida’s tomato growers used to sell $500 million dollars worth of tomatoes in the U.S. The Mexicans, however, have organized their tomato growing and marketing to such a high degree that Florida’s tomato crop only brings in $250-million.

Bruno Ferrari, the economy minister of Mexico, told the Times that Mexico’s tomato exports to the United States had more than tripled to $1.8 billion since the agreement of 1996. He told the Times that the Mexican tomato industry supports 350,000 jobs. Trade exerts recall the high tariffs Mexico slapped on United States producers of potatoes, pork and toilet paper — $2.4 billion worth of goods — during a trade fight over trucking that began in 2009 when Obama became President.

The Teamster-union backed Obama trucking fight with Mexico caused potato exports to Mexico to fall by more than 35 percent and growers lost $64 million in revenue as Mexicans shifted buying to Canada, the other NAFTA partner. American pork producers estimate that if Mexico slaps tariffs on pork, they will not only lose business to a major market but simply be unable to handle the millions of dollars they will lose if Mexico retaliates because of tomato import restrictions.

Obama’s  Commerce Department will not, of course, admit that its move to respond to complaints from Florida is political but with regulations calling for the Department of Commerce to announce a decision on the complaints be made 40 days after publication, just before the election, only  a chimpanzee would think this is not political.

Given, then, that (A) Obama actively campaigned against NAFTA one of the world’s largest and most successful trade agreements with Canada and Mexico, and (B) the Obama Administration created a gun-running program that delivered more than 2500 American weapons into the hands of Mexican drug cartels and caused hundreds of Mexicans and at least one American to die; and (C) instigated a 2009 attack on a  cross-border trucking agreement that was part of the 1994 NAFTA agreement that caused American farmers and industrial producers to lose millions of dollars worth of business and lost jobs – Obama’s very public vendetta against Mexico and Mexicans must come to an end.

If Obama is successful in his attack against Mexican tomatoes, millions of Americans will have to pay the higher prices American retailers will need to charge for inferior Florida tomato products. Higher prices mean fewer tomatoes will be sold at higher prices and millions of dollars that consumers currently keep to spend on something other than higher food prices will flow into the hands of a few Florida families.

Higher food prices and fewer Mexicans working; guess where unemployed Mexicans go to look for work.

Editors note: as with all blog postings that appear with a by-line, the opinions presented are the author’s and not necessarily the positions of Cafe Con Leche Republicans.

####

Raoul Lowery Contreras (1941) was born in Mexico, raised in the USA. Former U.S. Marine, athlete, Dean’s List at San Diego State. Professional political consultant and California Republican Party official(1963-65)…Television news commentator, radio talk show host…published Op-Ed writer (1988 to present)…author of 12 books (as of 1-05-12). His books are available on Amazon.com.

P. T. Barnum’s oft-quoted “There’s a sucker born every minute” is appropriate today in the US of A. Why? Because of illegal immigration that has generated an April session in the Supreme Court of the United States on the State of Arizona’s declaration of war on the United States and the Constitution that formed and governs the country.

Defenders of Arizona’s anti-Mexican SB 1070 law often insist that the infamous law enjoys considerable public support. It certainly doesn’t have much support in the federal courts what with an Arizona-based federal district judge stopping the law’s critical provisions cold. The 9th Circuit upheld the judge’s injunctions and now those injunctions are up for review by the United States Supreme Court.

Most polls taken after the law’s passage showed something between 60 and 70% public support nationally. Of course, most people are ignorant of the Constitution as a whole in particular of Article 1, Section 8 which explicitly enumerates the power of the United States Congress “to establish a uniform rule of naturalization,” which means immigration.

Millions of people are unaware of the constitutional congressional mandate on naturalization/immigration, nonetheless P.T. Barnum “suckers” line up to support the Arizona law, especially the “usual suspects” who apparently lack detailed knowledge of the Constitution.

When I speak, I speak of people like Bill O’Reilly at Fox News and Laura Ingrahm, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity of radio fame and myriad other constitutionally unread public figures, the “suckers.”

There really aren’t that many suckers because if there were the Supreme Court would have been inundated by mountains of legal briefs supporting Arizona’s law. It wasn’t and those that were submitted look like “cut and paste” jobs by legal shops that represent a monolithic Arizona defense that is at best ludicrous and unconstitutional in spirit and in word. These silly supporting briefs are mostly from ultra-conservative congress people, a few other conservative officials and a number of hate groups organized by the country’s most active racist, Dr. John Tanton. These are hate groups like FAIR and its non-profit arm, the Center for Immigration Studies (organized by Tanton to fight any immigration including legal especially Catholics from Mexico).

Numerous well-known and influential outside parties oppose the law:

• Sixteen current and former chief law enforcement officers filed briefs opposing SB 1070, including the former Phoenix police chief and the sheriff of Pima County, Arizona, which shares a longer border with Mexico than any county in Arizona. Two law enforcement officials – only – filed supporting SB 1070, including Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio who is being investigated by the federal government that accuses his deputies of the worst racial profiling in the country.
• One brief filed to oppose SB 1070 was joined by a former Secretary of State (Madeline Albright, Democrat), a former Secretary of Defense (William Cohen, Republican), and two former ambassadors to the United Nations (Albright and John Negroponte, Republican).
• Another was submitted on behalf of two former commissioners of the Immigration and Naturalization Service (Doris Meissner, Republican and James Ziglar, Republican). No member of any prior Presidential administration (Reagan, Bush I, Clinton, Bush II) joined a brief supporting SB 1070.
• Eleven states with a combined population of nearly 100 million—submitted a brief opposing SB 1070, including California, New York, and Illinois. More than 40 cities and counties filed opposition to 1070, three of which are in Arizona (Tucson, Flagstaff, and San Luis).
• A brief filed on behalf of 68 pro-immigrant members of Congress was joined by Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and other high-ranking members of the House Democratic leadership. No member of the House Republican leadership signed a pro-SB 1070 brief filed on behalf of fifty conservative lawmakers.
• The government of Mexico filed opposition to SB 1070 that was joined by sixteen other Latin American countries.
• Finally, a dozen briefs were filed on behalf of more than 50 national organizations ranging from the ultra-liberal ACLU, to the AFL/CIO, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and the conservative U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

Briefs here, briefs there, briefs everywhere. None with pro-signatures from the Republican Congressional leadership, none with pro-Governors other than the high school-only educated Arizona governor who did not attend a four year college or took academic college courses even in community college unless they came under her medical office worker certificate program.

The law’s sponsor, Russell Pearce (who was the Arizona Senate President then) was flushed down a recall toilet last November when his conservative constituency threw him out of office.

Arpaio is being investigated by the feds for alleged criminal acts. SB1070 supporting Arizona sheriff Paul Babeu (Boo-Boo) is also being investigated for criminal acts.

Support for and supporters of SB1070 are narrow in scope and numbers. Question: do they have five “sucker” supporters on the Court?

###

Raoul Lowery Contreras (1941) was born in Mexico, raised in the USA. Former U.S. Marine, athlete, Dean’s List at San Diego State. Professional political consultant and California Republican Party official(1963-65)…Television news commentator, radio talk show host…published Op-Ed writer (1988 to present)…author of 12 books (as of 1-05-12). His books are available on Amazon.com.