Comments for News from The Arizona Republic

Comment on Climate-change skeptic to talk to ‘tea party’ groups by Janearther

Janearther — Mon, 28 May 2012 01:48:00 +0000

He is a fraud who has been debunked numerous times by real scientists. What a farce.

Comment on Climate-change skeptic to talk to ‘tea party’ groups by Janearther

Janearther — Mon, 28 May 2012 01:46:00 +0000

He is a fraud who has already been debunked by real scientists. What a farce.

Comment on Global-warning skeptic to address ‘tea party’ in Surprise, Mesa by Gerry Nance

Gerry Nance — Sun, 27 May 2012 22:45:00 +0000

Earth’s temperature naturally cycles between extremes, and man may try, but will have little control. Besides, the USA can practice recycling, birth control, plastics-reduction, environmental protections of all sorts, but if the rest of the World is not in the game, then we are wasting our efforts. The Laws of Nature are simple, but Nature always wins.

Comment on Climate-change skeptic to talk to ‘tea party’ groups by John Havery Samuel

John Havery Samuel — Sun, 27 May 2012 13:10:00 +0000

Good to see the deniers and birthers all in one place and out of harm’s way.

Comment on Climate-change skeptic to talk to ‘tea party’ groups by Andrew Kilian

Andrew Kilian — Sat, 26 May 2012 22:29:00 +0000

Technically this ‘skeptic’ is a Denier. Skepticism is with holding judgment until the facts are in and then coming to a conclusion. When the facts are in and you’re still in denial… you’re a Denier.

Comment on Climate-change skeptic to talk to ‘tea party’ groups by silqworm

silqworm — Sat, 26 May 2012 22:01:00 +0000

AGW is a Rockefeller genocidal scam. The academic grifters will face judicial retribution under the federal Racketeering and Influence Peddling Corruption Organized Crime (RICO) statute. This is going to be fun to watch on Reality TV Grand Jury, live from the Star Chamber in Nuremberg, Pennsylvania.

Comment on Global-warning skeptic to address ‘tea party’ in Surprise, Mesa by Wil196

Wil196 — Sat, 26 May 2012 20:08:00 +0000

Mainstream scientists around the world do not all disagree. Increasingly, the scare has come into question. For a simple reason: Global temperature hasn’t increased since the 1990s, even though carbon dioxide has continued to increase.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203646004577213244084429540.html?KEYWORDS=climate+scientists+panic

And now it seems that even rising CO2 may not be connected to humans.

http://nocosurroundsthem.blogspot.com.au/2012/04/its-not-humans.html

Confronted with reality, even the green guru who promoted the scare has been forced to concede the obvious:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2134092/Gaia-scientist-James-Lovelock-I-alarmist-climate-change.html

Comment on Climate-change skeptic to talk to ‘tea party’ groups by windy2

windy2 — Sat, 26 May 2012 15:25:00 +0000

It is important for people to learn that the feedback estimates for catastrophic global warming have not yet materialized. The missing heat noted by NCAR’s Kevin Trenberth in the climategate emails, is still missing and has actually been reaffirmed by the latest ocean heat study by Levitus etal. The pause in warming in the Troposphere (where warming must occur first according to physics) over the last 16 years has caused James Lovelock one of the oldest and most respected promoters of global warming awareness to reconsider his views to the point that he is now sorry that he was an alarmist. The physics group at the Russian Academy of Scientists is now predicting cooling which has also been forecast by several prominent solar physicists around the world.

There is a group top climate scientists who are strong influencers that got Nobel recognition and are treated like rock stars. They have become used to the media attention and enjoy fame and fortune as they jet around the planet to promote their books, receive income for speaking and attend lavish conferences. It is likely that these scientists would ever reconsider their views, like James Lovelock, and face the prospect of becoming irrelevant and lose popularity. These scientists have done in the past and will continue to do in the future, all they can to prevent any other scientific point of view from reaching the public. So any forum that allows the public to hear new and viable alternative scientific views can only benefit the public knowledge base and discourse.

Comment on Climate-change skeptic to talk to ‘tea party’ groups by mememine

mememine — Sat, 26 May 2012 12:57:00 +0000

Voters equate Liberals and Liberalism with the “crisis” Fear
Machine now and are no longer willing to fear monger their families with a CO2 “end”.

The only saving grace for the climate change movement is for
the millions in the global scientific community to start marching and acting
like climate change is the “threat” they say it is. Millions in the world of
science have condemned their own children as well to a “catastrophic” end. They
need to prove they are genuine and are not exaggerating. The did give us
pesticides after all.

-condemning the voter’s children to a CO2 death has made all
of us the FearMachine and 26 more years of threatening and alienating the
voters will leave neocons in power for a decade or more.

-occupy does not mention CO2 in its list of demands; because
of bank funded and corporate run carbon trading stock markets ruled by Y2Kyoto
so get up to speed.

-Obama hasn’t mentioned the crisis in 2 state of the unions.

-socialist and now “climate change denying” Canadian voters,
voted in a climate change denying Prime Minister to a majority government and
who promptly dumped Y2kyoto without a whimper.

Our Iraq War was climate change and we can be sure the Bush
family laughed as we condemned our own children to the greenhouse gas ovens like
childish goose stepping greenzis.

History will not be kind.

Comment on Tucson District 8 candidates face off by fortbuckley

fortbuckley — Fri, 25 May 2012 16:49:00 +0000

What does “Tucson District 8 candidates face off” have to do with “Answer the question Jesse Kelly?”