Tucson Citizen.com
Baja Democrats - News & events of AZ Democratis, with emphasis on Southern Arizona Democrats

Mitt Romney thinks it would be “helpful” if he were Latino

by on Sep. 17, 2012, under Pol. & Govt.

I try to not post more than one article every couple of days, to give the many other great bloggers here a chance, and also to not tilt the terrific community aspect of Tucson Citizen too much into politics – I’m certain that many, if not most, TC readers will be quite happy when this election is over and all the noise is behind us.  But a number of videos of Mitt Romney speaking to the wealthy at private fundraisers surfaced today, and I think it’s important to point out who the real Mitt Romney is.

The first is Mitt joking to a wealthy, entirely white audience that his father, who was born in Mexico, was “unfortunately” not born to Mexican parents because if he were Latino he’d have a “better chance” of winning:

“My heritage, my dad as you probably know was the governor of Michigan and was the head of a car company. But he was born in Mexico, and, uh, had he been born of, uh, Mexican parents, I’d have a better shot at winning this. [Rich donors cracking up]

But he was unfortunately born to Americans living in Mexico. He lived there for a number of years. And, uh, uh, I say that jokingly, but it would be helpful to be, uh … Latino.”

Yeah Mitt, how unlucky you are your Dad was born to white, American parents in Mexico. Arizona and Texas, and some counties in California  are the only jurisdictions outside the old Confederacy to fall under the preclearance requirement of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act because of their long history of discrimination against Latinos in registering to vote and and voting. Latino Americans had to work long and hard to overcome prejudice and take their rightful place in our society. And Mitt Romney thinks it’s cleaver to joke about being born Latino when he’s clearly insincere. I’m old enough to remember a sign at a gas station in northern Florida that said “Notice: We do not serve n**gers, cubans, porto ricans [sic] or mexicans”.

And then here’s Mitt Romney telling more rich donors that 47% of Americans will vote for Obama because they’re leeches on the government dole and pay no income taxes:

“There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what. All right, there are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it. That that’s an entitlement. And the government should give it to them. And they will vote for this president no matter what…These are people who pay no income tax. My job is is not to worry about those people. I’ll never convince them they should take personal responsibility and care for their lives.”

Romney’s statement was centered on the myth perpetuated by the Wall Street Journal that 47 percent of all Americans don’t pay federal taxes. But that number only applies to the federal income tax. Two-thirds of those people still pay federal Social Security and Medicare taxes. And all of them pay state & local sales taxes, utility excise taxes, and many more. And just because they don’t earn enough to pay federal income taxes doesn’t mean they’re all on food stamps, medicaid, or Section 8 housing. And the one-third that don’t pay any federal incomes taxes or Social Security or Medicare? They’re almost entirely retirees living on Social Security. And they earned that by paying plenty of income, Social Security and Medicare taxes before they retired. But Mitt doesn’t think it’s “his job” to worry about them. I have two words for Mitt Romney: one starts with an ‘f’ and ends in ‘k’, and the other word is ‘you’. But I can’t use those words in polite company. So I’ll just say what a pathetic, out of touch, elitist snob. As Obama campaign manager Jim Messina said:

It’s shocking that a candidate for President of the United States would go behind closed doors and declare to a group of wealthy donors that half the American people  view themselves as ‘victims,’ entitled to handouts, and are unwilling to take ‘personal responsibility’ for their lives.  It’s hard to serve as president for all Americans when you’ve disdainfully written off half the nation.

 



  • tiponeill

    Romney was just repeating what is conventional wisdom among conservatives – they tell each other the same story all the time, and they won’t see anything wrong with it. They truly believe Reagan’s story about welfare queens in Cadillacs and see themselves as victims.

    Of course they are all old white straight males who have never bothered to look at Republican policies from anyone else’s point of view, so if you’re a female that wants birth control or an hispanic that wants a chance in life or gay or black or……… you are lumped into the welfare queen category no matter how hard you may have worked.

  • fortbuckley

    The money that retirees paid into SS and other entitlements years ago is gone. It got spent, by both parties. You can’t make up for it by taxing the rich—we don’t have enough rich people. Lots of people have known for a very long time that politicans were making unsustainable promises about federal entitlements. Republicans responded by starting to save more money; Democrats chose to just steal our children’s money by running up the national debt.

    Democrats breed a dependency culture, and everyone knows it. Romney is stating the obvious—-he’s the candidate of the “makers” in this society; Obama is the candidate of the “takers.”

    As for his comment about the benefits of being a Latino candidate—if the Republicans ran a Latino candidate for president, how could the Democrats cry racism? If Democrats can’t run on racism, they’re lost.

    • Your_Uncle_Karl

      Wait a minute, Don. I thought people who hid their money from the tax man were “job creators”. So, if you have a lot of money, but don’t pay your share of taxes, instead shipping it to little island nations all over the world and hiding it in a variety of shell corporations, you are a fine citizen; a “maker”; a “job creator”, but if you are poor and don’t make enough to pay federal income taxes, you’re a “taker”? Or, is it that if you come from a rich family and go to an Ivy League school wherein you learn how to make money by putting people out of work while shuffling a bunch of papers around on your desk, you are a “maker”, whereas if you work two jobs but still don’t make enough money to be required to pay taxes, you are a “taker”? Talk about sucking off the government teat – you and Romney both.

      • fortbuckley

        I LOVE it when the Communists speak up for the Democrats.

        • Your_Uncle_Karl

          I love it when MIttens speaks up on any number of subjects. He is steadily making himself un-electable. Methinks you should begin forecasting the dire consequences of Obama’s re-election.

      • fortbuckley

        I, a defense contractor, have already lost my job once due to federal budget cuts. I worked hard, went to school in the evenings to get additional skills and got another.

        I’m proud to be an American defense contractor. I’ve devoted my career to keeping the world safe from Communists and other forms of cancer.

        If I was really “sucking off the federal teat,” I’d be screaming for higher taxes for rich people. I’m not. First, it’s unfair to expect other people to subsidize me. Second, “rich” people make the investments and take the risks that drive a successful free-market economy. They’re not whipping boys/girls for class-warfare types, nor are they cash cows to be sucked dry.

        In this election, math is voting Republican. Look at ALL the bills the federal government has promised to pay, and compare that with ALL of the money we realistically have at our disposal. There’s a big, big gap between the two.

        Democrats see that gap…and scream racism.

        • fortbuckley

          “The costs of Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security
          are rising substantially. Paying for this spending solely through
          federal income tax increases would require more than a two-fold increase
          of current tax rates, even for the lowest tax bracket.”

          Follow this link to check out the chart for yourself:

          http://www.heritage.org/federalbudget/entitlements-double-tax-rates

          • BajaDemocrats

            Struck a nerve did we? Relax – Rmoney isn’t worth it, he’s toast. But, for all you “Amerika is broke!”, “we don’t have the money for all those entitlements!” folks, fixing is easy, it ain’t broke:
            http://finance.yahoo.com/news/social-security-fixable-changes-politically-113753453.html
            “- Apply the Social Security tax to all wages, including those above $110,100. Workers making $200,000 in wages would get a tax increase of $5,574, an amount their employers would have to match. Their future benefits would increase, too. This option would eliminate 72 percent of the shortfall. Two years ago, it would have wiped out 99 percent.

            —Increase the payroll tax by 0.1 percentage point a year, until it reaches 14.4 percent in 20 years. At that point,
            workers making $50,000 a year would get a tax increase of $500 and employers would have to match it. This option would eliminate 53 percent of the shortfall. Two years ago, it would have wiped out 73 percent.”

        • Your_Uncle_Karl

          Sorry Don, I guess it’s just difficult for about 47% of us to understand just how wonderful the 1% is and how kind they have been to the 99%; pulling us kicking and screaming towards prosperity through relentless self-sacrifice, never giving one thought to their own well-being, their only concern being the welfare of the “little people”.
          Truth is, Don, no matter how you try to spin it, I think your man Mittens has been exposed through his comment about the 47%. In an unguarded moment, he has revealed what he really thinks about the mass of people. He thinks he’s John Galt.

        • Your_Uncle_Karl

          “…keeping the world safe from Communists…”.
          So, that’s what you guys were doing in Iraq? Looking for communists? I thought it was WMD’s you were after. Did you find any, or did you just decide to declare that all the dead civilians were communists? Funny thing is, I believe the death toll of Iraqis resulting from your “keeping them safe” has exceeded Saddam’s wildest dreams.

    • Your_Uncle_Karl

      Another question for you, Don: What about the people who pay taxes, but whine about it constantly? You know, angry white people? Makers or Takers?

      • fortbuckley

        Ah, the race-baiting begins. “angry white people.”

    • BajaDemocrats

      Sorry to see you continue to apologize for America. The “money that retirees paid into SS and other entitlements” is still there, in special, protected, guaranteed funds. Only Republicans talk about raiding them.

      And that’s your best response to Romney joking about being Latino as helping him win, and accusing half the population of being freeloaders? That may play well on Redstate, but not Main Street.

      • fortbuckley

        Sorry to continue to see you steal from America.

        I triple dog dare you to show how the federal government can pay for all the entitlements it’s promised to American citizens. It’s been that way for decades.

        The money that’s been paid into those funds is way, way short of the money required to pay all the benefits that’s been promised from those programs.

        IMO, your statement above “The money…is still there, in special, protected, guaranteed funds” is a deliberate attempt to mislead people as to the real nature of our country’s entitlement problem.

        If Democrats really cared about people who relied on Social Security and Medicare, they’d make meaningful steps to keep those programs solvent. Instead, they’re putting those programs on a path to bankruptcy.

        • fortbuckley

          Sounds as if a LOT of Americans have been trained to look for a handout.

          “A multistate identity theft scam that claims President Barack Obama will pay your utility bills appears to have widened.”

          “According to MSNBC.com, more than 2,000 customers in Tampa, Fla., fell for the fake offer last week.”

          “The scheme was first reported in May,
          when Dallas-based Atmos Energy warned its 3 million customers in 12
          states that scammers had been asking for Social Security numbers to
          enroll in the faux federal program. According to the pitch—distributed
          via email, Facebook, text message, phone and, in some cases,
          door-to-door sales—the government would pay a month of energy costs
          through credits offered by the Obama administration.”

          “PSE&G, the New Jersey gas and
          electric delivery utility, issued a similar warning the same month.
          According to MSNBC, there were 10,000 reported victims in New Jersey in
          recent weeks, and thousands more in North Carolina, Indiana and
          Pennsylvania.”
          http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/obama-pays-bills-scam-163528180.html

          • BajaDemocrats

            Yeah, I hear a lot of folks think they’ll win millions in the lottery or think they’re going to get rich in Vegas as well.