Tucson Citizen.com
Baja Democrats - News & events of AZ Democratis, with emphasis on Southern Arizona Democrats

Take from the Poor, give to the Rich: A Culture of Greed

by on Nov. 11, 2012, under Pol. & Govt.

Remember Robin Hood, that English legend who stole from the greedy rich and gave their ill gotten spoils to the deserving poor? If he were alive today he would lower his head in shame for the Wall Street culture of greed who have reversed his legacy into a legend of absolute contempt for the poor and the working middle class families as it steals from them to fatten their already overstuffed wallets. Sounds like an outrageous accusation? One has to look no further than the story of Delphi Automotive to see what is happening in the world of Vulture Capitalism. Much of the story has been told by writer Greg Palast’s excellent article Mitt Romney’s Bailout Bonanza in the magazine The Nation. As you might surmise, the main point of Mr. Palast’s article, written in the midst of the 2012 Presidential race, was pointing our how Mitt Romney personally pocketed millions from the auto industry bailout by the U.S. government. Mitt Romney is defeated, he’ll never again be campaigning for anything. So, I’m done with him. But the story of greed and absolute contempt involved in the vulture capitalism takeover of Delphi Automotive is a story worth retelling.

Delphi Automotive was once the Delco unit of General Motors. It was was spun off into a separate company in 1999. Delphi foundered in a slowing economy and declared bankruptcy in 2005. But Delphi was an absolute critical parts supplier to not only GM but Chrysler as well, and it’s bankruptcy filing was a Chapter 11 reorganization bankruptcy, as the company sought to lessen its debt load and lower its cost structure in order to survive. Sensing an opportunity, vulture hedge funds began to buy up the company’s debt. As Delphi was in bankruptcy the bonds were junk, considered toxic by the banks holding them. So the hedge funds were able to pick up the bonds for pennies on the dollar of their face value. Enter the financial crises in the fall of 2008. Under President Bush’s pleas, Congress passed the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) and some funds were provided to the automakers, primarily their troubled financing subsidiaries that provided financing to buyers of the cars and trucks. Sensing even more of an opportunity the vulture Hedge Funds began circling, buying more Delphi debt at pennies on the dollar until they were in firm control.

In February 2009, less than a month in office, President Obama formed the Auto Task Force with the goal of saving GM, Chrysler, their suppliers and, most important, auto industry jobs. Delphi, which then employed more than 25,000 union workers in 29 plants across the U.S. and the major supplier of parts to GM and Chrysler, was crucial to the plan. The President’s task force held a closed-door meeting held in March 2009 with Delphi management and the hedge funds overlords. They demanded the Treasury and GM immediately, hand over $350 million to Delphi, threatening to withold all parts from GM if they didn’t. The hedge fund debt holders backed up their threat with an analysis that showed if Delphi were unwilling or unable to provide parts to GM, it would take years and tens of billions for GM to replace Delphi’s parts. In other words, if you want to save GM, you start by giving us exactly what we want. They got what they wanted, while GM and the Auto Task Force worked to find a way around the hedge funds blackmail. In June 2009 the Treasury and GM announced a bailout deal they’d crafted over months with the cooperation of the United Auto Workers. GM would take back control of Delphi via a joint venture with Platinum Equity, a buyout firm led by billionaire Tom Gores. The Platinum Plan was to close almost half of Dephi’s plants, leaving the remaining plants with UAW union workers, and return control of key Delphi operations to GM. The hedge fund managers flat out refused the deal, initially demanding they be bought out for forty-five cents on the dollar for their debt bonds – more than double what they had paid for them. Tense negotiations followed between Dephi, GM, the UAW, and the hedge funds. Dephi agreed to drop the Platinum Plan and remain under the control of the hedge funds, with one stipulation: Agree to maximize job preservation.

The hedge funds again said No, and forced the bankruptcy judge to hold an auction for all of Dephi’s stock. The hedge funds outbid Platinum Equity’s bid with a bid of $3.5 billion. Except it wasn’t really $3.5 billion. Under the rules of of Chapter 11 bankruptcy, holders of the company’s debt may bid the face value of their bonds rather than their current market value. The hedge funds were given “credit” for over five times what they had paid for those bonds. The bankruptcy judge awarded full control and all of Dephi’s stock for the equivalent of only 67 cents a share. And the hedge funds promised to continue the supply of parts to GM. And then they proceeded to carve up the carcass.

In February 2009, Delphi, claiming a cash shortage, unilaterally terminated health insurance for its nonunion pensioners. The Treasury’s Task Force uncovered “creative accounting” that hide the fact that the debt holders had deliberately withheld millions of dollars in cash sitting in Delphi accounts. Even after they were confronted with this the creditors still refused to release the funds and continue the health insurance previous Delphi management had promised its workers. During its previous economic problems Delphi had significantly underfunded its pension fund for retired workers. The same month the hedge funds won control of Delphi’s stock they announced not only would they not makeup the shortfall in the pension fund, but they would immediately stop paying any and all pension and health and life insurance payments. The government’s Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) was forced to take over Delphi’s pension payments – at a cost to taxpayers of $5.6 billion. But, by law, the PBGC can only payout only  60% of the promised pension benefits of pension programs it has to take over. Overnight Delphi retirees lost 40% of their pension, and what they did get was paid for by U.S. taxpayers instead of being paid for by the company that promised it in the first place. And the new hedge fund owners boosted their eventual profit by $1 billion dollars.

Critics of the auto industry bailout called a “big payday for the unions”. It wasn’t, it was one big payday for the vulture capital hedge fund managers. All in all, the hedge funds who bought up Delphi debt for pennies on the dollars got a $12.9 billion payday from the US taxpayers. The Treasury allowed GM to give Delphi at least $2.8 billion of (TARP) funds to keep Delphi in business. GM also forgave $2.5 billion in debt owed to it by Delphi, and forgave $2 billion due from the largest hedge fund, Singer and company(the hedge fund eagle eyed Romney invested in), upon Delphi’s exit from Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The money GM forgave was effectively owed to the Treasury, which had by then become the majority owner of GM. And then there’s the PBGC takeover of the pension plan at a cost to taxpayers of $5.6 billion. The hedge fund got Delphi stock for an investment equivalent to 67 cents a share. Today Delphi’s market value is approximately $10.5 billion, a return on investment of over 3,000%! Nice payday for the millionaire and billionaire investors. And what did those unions get? Retirees get 60% of their promised pension with no health or life insurance. The union workers who were still working all lost their jobs. You see, with that $1 billion Delphi saved screwing retirees out of their pensions Delphi purchased auto parts plants in Asia, primarily in China, and now make almost all their parts in Asia with cheap labor that gets none of those pesky benefits like health insurance or pensions. Delphi Automotive, which once employed more than 25,000 union workers in 29 plants across the U.S. now employs 5,000 non-union workers in the U.S., versus almost 100,000 employees overseas.

Pure, simple and evil greed. When is enough enough for these guys?  These millionaires and billionaires got over a 3,000% return on their investment by getting a $12.9 billion payday from U.S. taxpayers, cheating retirees out of their pensions, and moving 25,000 good paying U.S. manufacturing jobs overseas. Take from the poor and give to the rich. Much like what Bain Capital is doing at Sensata Freeport, shutting down a profitable auto parts plant and shipping all the machinery and jobs to China just to extract a bit more profit from their investment. Well, we are a democratic society with a free market economy. We can’t just pass laws demanding these vulture capitalist have at least some shred of decency, they clearly have none anyway.

These hedge funds made over 3,000% profit on their investment in Delphi. You guys just couldn’t stand for a measly 2,800% profit and pay those Delphi retirees their pensions and health and life insurance? American workers who worked all their lives believing that promises made should be promises kept?

You guys couldn’t stand for a measly 2,500% profit and keep many of those jobs right in America? You guys couldn’t stand a measly profit of 2,400% profit and repay some of that $12.9 billion dollars back to U.S. taxpayers?

We are a democratic society with a free market economy. But we don’t have to underwrite Vulture Capitalism. We need to take action to prevent future Delphis and Sensata Freeports from happening. We need to protect American jobs. First of all we need to stop tax breaks for exporting jobs overseas. Mr. Romney was partially correct in the 1st debate when he claimed there are no tax breaks for exporting jobs overseas – there are no specific tax breaks for exporting jobs. But Romney is no dummy when it comes to business and he knows full well that companies can deduct business expenses, lowering their tax liability. And those expenses can include the costs of moving a job to another state or even to another country. We need to change that – moving a job to another country? Sorry, not tax deductible. And like with Sensata Freeport, when companies move operations overseas they often ship the machinery out as well. It would be simple for them to transfer ownership of the equipment to an overseas subsidiary and claim they sold it for $1, enabling them to write off the true value of the equipment as a business expense. We need to change that – moving equipment overseas? Sorry, not tax deductible.

And then President Obama needs to use “Section 421″ of U.S. Tariff laws to impose a tariff of up to 55% on imports of auto parts from China. Section 421 allows the President to impose tariffs on imports from China when he determines certain products are flooding the U.S. marketplace and overwhelming domestically produced goods. We can call it the “Bain-Delphi Tax”. Let’s see how fast Bain and Delphi change their minds about moving more auto part plants to China when faced with a tariff of 55% to import them back into the U.S. And then we need to change bankruptcy laws that allow to buy up debt for pennies on the dollar and then claim full face value when bidding for assets of the company.  And then there’s those Bush Tax Cuts. Do I want to see the tax rates for the millionaires and billionaires revert back to the 39.5% rate they had under President Bill Clinton and they did just fine? To quote a certain former Alaska Governor: You betcha! And let the tax rate for Capital Gains income revert back to the 28% from the current 15%. Every dollar these hedge funds profited from Delphi were classed as Capital Gains and taxed at only 15%, while working middle class families earning $40,000 per year pay a rate of 25%.

I can already hear the Republicans crying “Class Warfare”! Well, you know what?

 



  • http://www.facebook.com/KitWarden Roy Warden

    It’s ALWAYS BEEN the story of the Rich squeezing the Poor.
    THAT’S the primary reason I began challenging Pima County and Tucson City Open Border Policy Way, Way Back in 2006:
    For decades, the Mexican Rich didn’t want to provide services for the Mexican Poor, so as a matter of Government Policy, they shoved them out of Mexico so they could come to America, earn remittances, and send them home, to the tune of 26 Billion dollars in 2006, which was just about the same amount Mexico earned from the sale of Oil. Pretty crafty policy, don’tcha think? To take your non-productive (non taxable) citizens, shove them out, and turn them into providers of foreign exchange. Of course the Pima County Rich were only too glad to work them to death, pay them half as much for working twice as hard constructing houses for the middle class to live in when they retired in Minnesota. Then, around 1998 the bankers began granting the impoverished Mexicans “liar loans” to buy houses they couldn’t afford, only to raise interest rates in 2006 and foreclose, taking out all the equity, thus setting into motion the Great Real Estate Collapse in 2008.
    History has always been about the Rich Exploiting the Poor!
    Roy Warden

  • http://www.facebook.com/jefffbo Jeff Forst

    Robin Hood did not rob from the rich to give to the poor. He robbed from the government to give the poor back their own money. The only rich poeple were the royal aristocracy of lords, ladies, dukes, squires, barons, etc. Merchants were not considered rich, nor did they own the land that the poor worked themselves to death on. The aristocracy were the local governors taxing local people, at sword point.

  • scottindallas

    we’ve got to raise capital gains rates to punish this type of activity. Also, those who actually use capital to produce (rather than liquidating and speculating with capital) enjoy depreciation, which is a bigger credit for them the higher the cap gains rate. It’s financiers, professionals, lobbyists, and media stars–cap lite producers who are hit by capital gains and higher top marginal tax rates. Keep in mind that they add not a dime to GDP, as they operate by exacting their own “tax” on the economy–we hope these people add “efficiency” to the economy, but if we suppressed/taxed the incomes of these top earners, wouldn’t they provide those “efficiencies” for less cost to the economy?

    Not all business is equal, not all production is the same. Capital intensive production builds things that add value to the economy, need workers to serve and maintain them. The higher the cap gains rate, the higher top marginal income rates are, the more we favor these type producers. This is because they have all that capital to purchase, service and maintain. They have many deductible avenues–like R&D, capital expansion, investment, innovation, maintenance, employee training, even hiring and employee benefits are DEDUCTIBLE, hence, more desirable the higher the nominal rate. Lowering and flattening the tax rates only helps these financiers, these speculators, liquidators, “pump and dumpers,” and “vulture capitalists.”

  • CarlosJM

    This analogy of not blaming the bank robber for the teller giving the robber the money has got to be one of the more peculiar comparisons I think I ever heard, or read, regarding what went on with the banking industry, auto manufacturing companies and the federal government. The teller doesn’t give the robber the money and the teller just might end up d-e-a-d, dead. So the teller gives the robber the money and stays alive; the details are sorted out later with the help of that same teller, the management, law enforcement and the courts; and, the bank and its customers’ money is recouped. Bottomline: We all learn from this very expensive lesson and don’t let it happen again. That’s basically what the election of Tuesday, November 6, 2012, was about. America, you see, knows better.

    Interesting that Romney and the conservatives in Congress claim that getting taxed at 14% on 20 million dollars while families earning $40,000 and getting taxed at 25% is something we need more of to create jobs and fuel the economy. When one asks where exactly these billionaires have been investing their money, like in the last 10 years of their mega-tax cuts, let’s say, the answers aren’t as forthcoming. Until one digs a little further as David has done, that is. And to think that Delphi and Sensata are just the tip of the iceberg for these folks…Thank goodness that America, like its President, Mr. Obama, knows full well that it’s high time that everyone do their part equally and not just have students, families, seniors and small businesses foot the bill.

  • http://twitter.com/CraigScott1988 Craig

    I agree the problems you point out do exist but i don’t agree with the solution or exactly the cause.

    You seem to blame “Vulture Capitalism” and claim we have a “free market economy” neither are true.

    Under a free market economy there would have been no bailout and therefore no greed or black mail.

    To blame the corporations is like blaming a bank robber for the bank throwing money at him.

    Unless we get the government out of the market and let companies rise and fall without support or help, then we do not have a free market.

    I don’t blame corporations, i blame government and the people as they are the ones with the power and hand outs.

    • BajaDemocrats

      I agree government should not be picking winners & losers, under normal circumstances. Under normal circumstances consumers pick the winners and losers. But the Great Depression and Great Recession of 2008 were not “normal circumstances”. In dangerous, extraordinary times it is in our national interest for the government to support crucial industries – like banking and auto making. And I think the government assisted restructuring of the auto industry was very successful. More successful then the bank bailout, because it’s pretty much back to business as usual for the banks, while the auto makers learned from restructuring, building better and more efficient cars, and building them more efficiently.

      I don’t agree with your bank robbing analogy – no one was throwing money at anyone, the hedge funds clearly had the attitude of “we have control of Delphi, you need Delphi to save GM & Chrysler, so if you want to save them give us what we want”.

    • scottindallas

      You forget an important principle of economics; there are utilities and there are free markets. Banking, commercial (neighborhood) banks are insured by FDIC and should be treated as utilities. Investment banking should not be so regulated, but likely needs some reporting requirements. We report our marriages, deaths and home purchases, it’s not absurd to expect multimillion dollar trades/loans/deals/puts/options to be posted in some “public” place.

      I agree that the gov’t shouldn’t bail out the “free market”–though trading is truly a “professional market” and not the free market either. Only a select few may trade, they’re licensed by the state to do so; they are generally held to fiduciary laws and duties. Though, I wonder if they’re fully representing their fiduciary role, and for whom they work. These three categories of utilities, professional markets and free markets are entrenched in Common Law, and are found in Adam Smith. Let’s be careful not to confuse free markets with utilities (where the public is not a customer but a “consumer” because demand is inelastic, such that we are chained to that good/service, without competition nor alternative (and constrained distribution, public support via loan guarantees, eminent domain and easements, pollution and other externalities)

  • http://twitter.com/Malcmoore52 Malc.Moore52

    An interesting article David Pinar there is outrage in the UK too about Firms closing Plants in England only to relocate to other EU countries while our government does not backup industry other EU countries governments do.One of my biggest Complaints is the UK is a small Island yet gives out Billions in Foreign Aid while new food banks open each week despite being a low wage economy our High streets have empty shops;Charity shops i see the Berlin wall as being a nightmare for the Average Brit.Despite high productivity Peugeot close its Plant in Coventry to relocate to Slovakia;Ford close Southampton only to open a new plant in Turkey.Meanwhile Foreign Aid is Ring-fenced and given to corrupt countries who do not need it.Middle England voters are starting to get hit but not half as much as the very poor.Ian Duncan Smith is the worst MP i have known his treatment of Soldiers injured in Afghanistan is a disgrace.Our Labor Party has abandoned the sick&the poor.I liker n Ian Duncan Smith to Rudolph Hess Hitlers right hand man who sent many innocent Jews to the gas chambers.I was horrified when i bought from America only to discover made in China on the Labels.