Comments for Christian Performing Arts

Comment on A Pain in the Prius by Easter

Easter — Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:24:10 +0000

the prius actually is fairly spacious for a compact automobile, fairly high tech within.

Comment on Jocks and Jesus! by Tip O'Neill

Tip O'Neill — Sat, 04 Feb 2012 16:32:40 +0000

> The food is provided by Chick-fil-a.

LOL

Comment on Jocks and Jesus! by bracket races gmp

bracket races gmp — Sat, 04 Feb 2012 16:03:30 +0000

You guys need to get tournament paintball signed up for this, there is an awesome christian team called the liberty flames, get them signed up

Comment on Theories of Where Oil Comes From and Why It Is Important by God

God — Sat, 14 Jan 2012 06:17:18 +0000

I hope you’re correct. Fingers crossed. Turn around on the spot three times click my heels together and say there’s no place like home. Fortunately you and your children will carry on burning the unlimitless magma fuels whilst the rest of us try to be a little more considerate to our fellow human beings whether they are heathens or not.

Comment on Theories of Where Oil Comes From and Why It Is Important by rjf

rjf — Wed, 24 Aug 2011 21:35:31 +0000

open your mind. How do other terrestial planets in our solar system off gas methane? Supposidly, only our planet contains life. Without life and the biomass, how is the gas being formed?

Could it be that a supreme being does exist?

in 50 years, we’ll laugh at the absurdity of “fossil fuels”. It will be derided like a flat earth.

Comment on Theories of Where Oil Comes From and Why It Is Important by rjf

rjf — Wed, 24 Aug 2011 21:30:20 +0000

abiotic is reasonable and explains the Siberian and Gulf of Mexico finds. If abiotic is renewable, then the world’s banking system has insufficient capitol reserves.

Civilization is resetting to skill sets and other natural resources that will be harvested for society. e.g. agriculture, infrastructure, manufacturing capability. What permits the diversity of ideas to expand in the USA is our freedom. Thank the military.

PS: 50 years ago, we were unaware of transitors let alone the electronic revolution. Don’t be soo dismissive of abiotic formation. Think of it as the body generating blood.

PS1: the theory supports the existence of a supreme being and intelligent design.

Comment on Stephen Hawking Says God Didn’t Create The World by Li Kong

Li Kong — Thu, 04 Aug 2011 01:24:46 +0000

Hawking quoted:
“Because there is a law like gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing…Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist. It is not necessary to invoke God…” (pg. 180)

As the earth revolves around the sun, the gravity follows the earth to revolve around the sun. Even if the earth would cease to revolve around the sun, the gravity would follow suit. Thus, the earth and gravity can never be separated since both of them are in unity. Yet Stephen Hawking mentions that gravity could exist at the collapse of stars that forms black hole and he also supports that gravity could exist prior to the creation of the earth as if that gravity could be present at the absence of any object, such as earth. Thus, his theory certainly contradicts the nature since how the gravity could exist at the absence of the earth.

Besides, Isaac Newton’s principle supports that gravity attaches to a big object, such as, earth. Departing from that object could cause one to experience the lesser and even no gravity. The theory of gravity has its founder to be Isaac Newton and yet Stephen Hawking develops his theory further from gravity as expressed by Isaac Newton. Yet his theory has contradicted the Isaac Newton’s principle in the sense that gravity could exist at the absence of big object especially he supports that gravity could exist prior to the creation of the universe. He assumes that gravity existed prior to formation of the universe. Or in other words, he assumes that gravity could exist even at the absence of anything. Thus, Stephen Hawking’s creation theory is full of conflict with Isaac Newton’s principle.

Stephen Hawking mentions that gravity and its effect of space and time take up a considerable amount of space. If that is true that gravity and its effect of space would take up a considerable amount of space, it implies that the existence of gravity would utilize some of the space so much so that you could not place any object in the boundary of gravity. In reality, a person could stand in the boundary of gravity and it seems to be that gravity does not occupy space or else there should be no vacant place for this person to stand on the earth since the gravity has occupied its place fully around the earth.

Comment on Kevin Leman, Ph.D., Visits Fellowship of Christian Athletes Bible Study by Fraser007

Fraser007 — Sat, 28 May 2011 08:27:19 +0000

Where does he get all of the research for his books?

Comment on It’s Party Time in Tucson with Nick Colionne and Paul Taylor by classifieds

classifieds — Thu, 28 Apr 2011 11:10:00 +0000

These guys rock! I missed them by a little. Hopefully they get some more fans and keep palying!

Comment on Author S. E. Cupp speaks to Christian Group by James Kelley

James Kelley — Mon, 14 Mar 2011 19:49:51 +0000

Well, I attended that luncheon and saw no anger, no zealotry, and certainly a geat deal of respect was shown to a speaker who is opposed to her audiences overall beliefs. S E Cupp made no apologies for her atheism, not did she demonize the audience members who do believe in God.
What I took away from the luncheon is that even someone who has no faith in a Supreme Being can see that a war is waging in our press, our education system and often even within our own governemnt against the Judeo-Christian foundation of our nation.
So I saw no one in the audience say you, Larry Fembo,t are believing wrong, I did see a whole lot of people that tolerate you on a daily basis.

In the words of Red Skeleton, ” Goodnight and God Bless”.