Tucson Citizen.com
Compound Captive - Missives about life, retirement and HOAs

It’s good to know that the economy is recovery as planned

by on Nov. 09, 2009, under Politics

Good thing we’re in a recovery

James C. Sandefer

Interesting how the unemployment rate moved into double digits last week and the government continued telling us how we’d turned the corner and were in a recovery period—the worst of it was over. Creative math is a wonderful thing when you can use it to your advantage as the Feds often do so well, but those several million folks without a steady stream of income aren’t buying it. For instance, the Feds counted employees in the “jobs created’ category because they received raises. Add to the list those who were promoted and you get the idea of the way creative job accounting works in Washington. The job counting con is just one example of why I’m not buying into the recovery sales pitch.

Select nearly any area of the economy and you’re likely to see a downturn and cutbacks. One of the most improbable examples is private clubs, the posh, snooty getaways catering to the well-healed and presumed recession proof segment of society. These venues are now feeling the sting of trickle-down budget tightening as former lifetime members, many whose memberships go back several generations, are opting out. Some of the hardest hit clubs are the ones having expensive-to-maintain golf courses in addition to posh clubhouses. As memberships are passed down to younger heirs, these recipients simply don’t have any interest in tying up an absorbitant amount of time going to one venue or doling out money in annual and monthly dues. Their interests and attitudes are quite opposite that of elder family members. The young and financially independent don’t want to tie up a set number of hours on the same time and day of the week on a golf course or sit around sipping overpriced martinis in a stuffy country club bar. They’d rather be actively engaged in something more invigorating such as a demanding hike or traveling to a remote location; they enjoy diversity and spontaneity. These youngsters are bailing out of club memberships in record numbers leaving the owners in a pinch and having to cut back on services while raising prices on those who choose to remain locked into the same old same old. Expensive perks and meal sizes shrink along with revenue and staff members, and this continues adding red ink to the bottom line. By year’s end a number of once-thought perpetual country clubs around the country will have either closed or scaled back to the point of near parity in offerings with public clubs.

Many retirement communities and active adult communities with homeowner associations are also feeling the drag of recession woes. The ones hardest hit are those with cost-heavy amenities and golf courses. Within the past two years mindsets and bank accounts have adjusted dramatically as retirement savings and investments evaporated and reality set it. Scaling back is no longer viewed as an inconvenience; it’s a pragmatic retirement survival methodology. This is especially relevant since Congress voted down 2010 cost of living increases for Social Security benefits and various other government controlled retirements (e.g., military pensions). And for those on Medicare or some other form of government run insurance plan, the news gets worse because those premiums are scheduled to increase next year while a sustained coverage level is on the chopping block with Congress. Of course, the politicians haven’t gotten around to voting down their own automatic annual pay raise that is scheduled to kick in as usual in January. A phrase from the United States Constitution that begins “We the people” appears to have been conveniently shoved aside by many of our elected representatives.

Last and certainly not least, late Saturday night, probably during commercial breaks while watching Saturday Night Live, the House of Representative managed to push through a health care reform bill by a mere five votes. Hardly a bi-partisan accomplishment, and the odds of any of them having read it, never mind comprehending what’s in it, is astronomically slim. By mid week many of them will be complaining of shoulder pain from patting themselves on the back for doing something they wanted to do rather than getting something truly worthwhile done for the people they represent. Pay close attention to their commentary over the next few days and you’ll hear the phrase “we” referring to “them” countless times. We’re going to hear what they’ve done for us, when in fact it may turn out to be what they’ve done to us. Naturally, they are exempt from what they’re hoping to impose.

We, the taxpayers, remain a necessary inconvenience and are only needed during elections. In the meantime we’re simply impediments to progress.

That said, something interesting has occurred lately, the memories of those who vote is getting sharper and tending to recall in between election times and the decisions of their representatives. November 2010 is shaping up to be a watershed moment in American politics, and those in power today may get a break from patting themselves on the back sooner than they’d prefer.

Good morning America, it’s good to see you again.

More in Pol. & Govt.:

Is War Dead In America?

  • tiponeill

    Agreed we definitely should have allocated and be spending more stimulus  money so that the recovery would be faster – but that’s really all we could get from the Repubs.
    It isn’t that easy repairing the damage done by 8 years of Republican rule – it will probably take President Obama a full 8 years to get us totally healthy again.

    • fortbuckley

      tip, I’ll bet you carry “Dreams From My Father” with you everywhere you go.  Much like those cute Chinese communist children carried “The Thoughts of Chairman Mao” everywhere they went during the Cultural Revolution.

      • spiritrebel

        It’s really very simple.  We are involved in a class war.  The Republicans represent the bourgeois, the Democrats the proletariat.  It’s a very old story, and both sides  will say or do anything to win.   Maybe someday we will have a party that represents everyone in a fair and unbiased way.

      • tiponeill

        I suppose you would consider making such a bet because your stereotypes derive from people like Rush, who talk all the time about things like Obamabots ?
        You would be wrong, of course – I have never read it. Unlike dittoheads I don’t regard government as a personal popularity contest or a sports event where you root for your team.
        My interest is in policies and laws, not the personalities behind them – in this case every responsible economist – even republican ones – realizing that deficit spending was required to prevent a depression on the one hand, and idiot ideologues who hate the federal government and would be happy to see the economy plunge into ruin as long as they could throw tea parties and call themselves patriots on the other .
        See – it has nothing to do with personalities at all, although I am sure you have some further cute little Rush stereotypes you can throw around rather than engage in actual issues.

        • compoundcaptive

          What I see here is name calling, desperate, defensive blame, and a complete lack of anything substantive.
          For example, how do you determine what is and isn’t a “responsible economist?”

          • tiponeill

            This letter, signed by 387 economists, including Nobel Laureates Joseph Stiglitz, Robert Solow, and George Akerlof, urges Congress to move quickly and decisively to pass an effective new economic stimulus package. The economists state that a stimulus package should be in the range of $300 to $400 billion per year and should be geared toward targets that inject capital into the nation’s economic system immediately.

            //

            //
            Your request is being processed…


            Economists Agree: Pass Stimulus Package Immediately
            While economists remain divided on the role of government generally, an overwhelming number from both parties are saying that a government stimulus package — even a flawed one — is urgently needed to help prevent a steeper slide in the economy.

            • compoundcaptive

              Another example of the confirmed expertise of Nobel winners…might as well throw your hat in the ring.

    • compoundcaptive

      Oh come on, the blame it on the Republicans line isn’t supportable since Pelosi and crew have had the majority and the checkbook for three years…

  • leftfield

    Hard to be too concerned about the state of the economy based solely on the examples given.  I can’t get too upset about country clubs closing or people living in developments with HOA’s.  But it is certainly true that conservatives are impediments to progress, as highlighted by their refusal to participate in health care reform.

    • compoundcaptive

      There’s a monumental difference between participating and being locked out of the process.
      Maybe in this case it was a good thing they weren’t invited behind the locked doors of the conference rooms where the Democrats hacked together a nearly 2,000 page bill that a few people are still wading through and trying to decipher.
      If you’re comfortable with such a piece of legislation, then please don’t complain when the reality of it is eventually makes its way into the open and enrages those being effectively marked as expendable. For example, cutting Medicare benefits
      while significantly increasing annual premiums won’t help those who need health care. And the primary care doctors stuck on the front lines of this mess will continue bailing out leaving patients in a lurch.
      Here’s a straightforward question that not has yet to be addressed. A few weeks ago President Obama commented during one of his many national news addresses that several areas of the Medicare system were identified as having significant
      fraud, waste and abuse issues. Why didn’t he initiate immediate corrective action to fix those areas? The Medicare wheel rolls, a bit bumpy, but repairing it would seem to be a much more realistic approach as opposed to casting it aside and attempting
      to create something totally new. The recently passed health care bill in the House is merely a mishmash of pet peeves thrown together by those invited to participate in the process. If the bill was so great, it’s curious that it only passed by a mere five votes.
      At some point, likely to be soon, someone is going to have to explain how a massive health care program makeover will be paid for. The taxpayers already know the answer…


 

November 2009
M T W T F S S
« Oct   Dec »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30