Supreme Court OKs Arizona voter ID rules

Photos & images All Slideshows »

ADVERTISEMENT

Most Commented Stories Today
Most E-mailed Stories Today
, , : a.m.
MARK SHERMAN
The Associated Press

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court jumped into the legal battle over voter identification laws Friday, ruling that Arizona may require voters to provide photo IDs when they cast their ballots next month.

The justices cautioned that they were not issuing a ruling on the constitutionality of Arizona's law. "As we have noted, the facts in these cases are hotly contested," the court said in an unsigned five-page order.

The ruling merely allows the Nov. 7 election to proceed with the photo ID law in place. Federal courts still will have to resolve a lawsuit contending that the law will disenfranchise numerous voters, particularly the elderly and minorities.

Courts in Georgia and Missouri have blocked similar laws.

Justice John Paul Stevens, in a brief concurring opinion, said the high court's action makes it more likely that the constitutional issues "will be resolved correctly on the basis of historical facts rather than speculation."

The law requires voters to prove citizenship when registering to vote and to show photo IDs or other documents establishing who they are at the polls. The law was meant to make sure illegal immigrants weren't casting ballots.

Opponents of the law contend it discourages some people from voting, including the elderly, poor and disadvantaged who don't always carry IDs. Arizona residents, Indian tribes and community groups filed suit in May.

A federal judge ruled the state could enforce the law. But the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals later blocked it from taking effect for the Nov. 7 election.

In his bid to allow the state to go forward, Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard told the justices that "voter registration at the polls is an emerging issue of national importance. States have a compelling interest in curbing fraud and protecting the integrity of elections."

Voters without proper ID may cast provisional ballots and furnish identification within five business days of the election.

Lacking photo identification, voters still can cast ballots during the state's early voting period. State officials said there is ample time to compare signatures on the ballot with those on registration rolls.

Read All Comments » 14 TOTAL COMMENTS
Oct 21, 2006 @ 8:51am
I had to show ID when I registered. They have the list. They need no more.

How many people tried to fraudulently vote in your precint last election.

Yeah that's what I thought.
Oct 21, 2006 @ 12:28am
We have to show a photo ID lots of places----what is wrong with that. Come on.......if you are for real you should be glad to show your face.
Oct 20, 2006 @ 8:49pm
wardenburnsmexicanflag;

Flying the Mexican flag upside down above the American Flag recently in southern California was a strategic mistake that cost la raza, reconquista, etc., big time.

Assimilation is the word!
Post a Comment »