Tucson Citizen.com
The Data Port - Politics, Literature, And The Little Disturbances of Man

Annexing The Foothills

by on Jan. 31, 2010, under Politics

In his State of The City address Mayor Bob Walkup had a message for the Catalina Foothills: Annex or Incorporate. Our communities are losing out on state revenue sharing… money which goes to incorporated areas.

The message was directed at other unincorporated areas as well, Vail, Green Valley and Casas Adobes…but it was the call to the foothills that grabbed the attention of the local press.

Some historical perspective is needed here. If you are a relative newcomer you probably don’t know that in 1997 there was a major move to incorporate the Foothills as an independent city.

Other unincorporated communities moved to incorporate, as well. Groups in Casas Adobes, Tanque Verde, and Tortolita organized incorporation campaigns, but it was in the Foothills that a kind of battle royal ensued.

(Journalism sidebar: The Star’s current political beat writer, Rhonda Bodfield, covered the story then.)

From this distance it’s hard to determine exactly what the motives behind the incorporation movement were. At the very least it’s safe to say that the organizers wanted to put paid to any possibility of annexation by the city.

Rightly or wrongly folks viewed annexation as costing them money in higher taxes. They also feared that joining the city would lead to to denser housing zoning. The foothills were then predominantly Republican and saw no future in being swallowed up by Democratic Tucson.

(Since then the state of Arizona has changed our election laws so that each city council rep will be elected on a ward by ward basis and not city-wide.)

The pro-incorporation forces had no really clear idea of what the long term costs of incorporating would be. Their opponents argued that the pro forces thought governing a city would be something like running a very large homeowners’ association; almost, but not quite, like something that could be done by volunteers working in a storefront office.

When the vote was held the incorporation forces were soundly defeated in every single precinct. It became clear that becoming your own city might be more trouble and expense than it was worth.

(The other incorporation efforts failed as well.)

All that was then, and this is now. No one fears being annexed because there is no such thing as a ‘hostile annexation.’ Before the Foothills could become part of Tucson,  fifty percent plus one of the properties involved would have to sign off on it; as would properties representing fifty percent plus one dollar of valuation.

Become part of the city? It might be a really good thing, but it ain’t goin’ to happen.

Text of Walkup speech.


More in Pol. & Govt.:

Is War Dead In America?

  • tiponeill

    Things are bad enough without increasing the number of Republicans in the voter base – leave them alone.

    • http://tucsoncitizen.com/dataport Art Jacobson

      Tip…
      I believe that an analysis of Foothills registration would show that Democrats and Independents now outnumber Republicans. That might make a difference.
      I’m pretty sure that the average age of Foothills people has lowered significantly sine the last annexation furor. Only my sense of things…don’t have any solid info. The census reports on the area should be interesting.

  • james

    Wow, That seems a bit extreme. Perhaps we should do the same with the south side and all the poor areas of town that are not contributing as much in taxes. this way they would have to support themselves.

    • leftfield

      Can’t make a bit of sense out of this, except to understand that you have an attitude of superiority towards people with a lower income; lack of personal responsibility and poor choices and all that propaganda.  Think of it this way – without them, who would you be able to feel superior to?

  • Ferraribubba

    God love ya Lefty. On top of everything else, you have that liberal, bomb-throwing Trotskyite’s ability to judge all others, and tell the world that if the views and beliefs of others don’t conform to yours and your beloved Central Committees’, they are the oppressors of the masses with massive superiorority complexes. 
    Point of clarification: Are you and Dion in any way related? Just wondering. . .
    Dr. Freud, Dr. Freud, calling Dr. Sizzy Freud . . . are you in, Dr. Freud?

    • leftfield

      FB – Bomb-throwing Trotskyite is a label I can live with.  Although I’ve never thrown any bombs, I do recognize the place and the need for armed struggle in the cause.  To call me a liberal is a deep cut indeed.  A liberal still believes that capitalism can be tamed and some measure of justice and equality will ensue.  I know better.  I realize that capital is the enemy of justice and equality.

  • Rush Crackhead

    Bombing some Republican waste of matter out of existance sounds like fun though.

  • Ferraribubba

    Hey Lefty: We didn’t actually throw bombs at the Volkspolitzei, but we’d booby-trap one out of the twenty or so drones that we flew over their border, then land it a few hundred meters inside their border, and just sit and wait for them to find it and try to open it to see what was inside. Then . . . 
                                                         - !*B*O*O*M*! –
    Those Krazy Krauts just never learned, did they? <g>
    Yer pal, Ferrari Bubba

  • Thomas D.

    To poster Art Jacobson:

    Republicans dominate the foothills. For that reason alone there will be no annexation. Check the political party affiliations for that area, it has not changed.

  • Framer

    The foothills are definitely not a Republican stronghold.  I have heard that it constitutes one of the strongest fundraising footholds for the state Democratic party, and is a huge bastion of Gabby votes (that I can verify).
    Annexing Casas Adobes would be a better move if Tucson was looking to add Republicans.