Tucson Citizen.com
The Data Port - Politics, Literature, And The Little Disturbances of Man

Occupy Wall Street and Political Action

by on Nov. 18, 2011, under 1st Amendment, Debt Crisis, Journalism, Occupy Wall Street, Politics

Critics of OWS seem to be obsessed with the notion that the movement needs to move on. “Okay,” they say, “You’ve made your point. It’s time to fold your tents and get organized politically.”

What these critics seem to want is traditional politics. Support candidates, run for office, vote. Something along these lines is certainly one way of being “political,” and the progressive movement is already ramping up to support candidates like Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders.

But one point that the Occupy movement has made is that the political system has become so dysfunctional that we need to broaden the definition of ‘political action.’ This has already happened. In two months OWS has shifted the nation’s debate away from the single issue of the deficit and, at least in part, refocused it on jobs and the reform and control of the financial system.

It would be a political act to hold marches and teach-ins the goal of which was to force the main stream media to expand its coverage of the influence of lobbying on legislation and the way in which our tax laws have been skewed to facilitate the flow of tax benefits upward to benefit the giant transnational corporations.

Critics of the OWS movement assume (or want us to assume) that the complaints of the occupiers are all personal, because so much of the messaging has taken the form of individual tales of hardship. Underlying all that (and some really amusing signs and slogans) is a very clear message:

This nation’s financial and political systems have become so dysfunctional that they no longer function to promote the general welfare.

So what is to be done? Certainly we should keep up the marches and General Assemblies; they are excellent tools for pointing out problems that need to be corrected and individual legislators do respond when their feet are being held to the fire of public anger.

We should support individual legislators at all levels of government, but we should be wary of being co-opted by any political party. The Obama administration would be enchanted to have the Occupiers leap upon the re-election bandwagon, but they tend to be more skeptical now than they were four years ago..rightly or wrongly. There’s still a year to go.

 


  • http://slperspective.blogspot.com/2011/11/occupy-wall-street-solidifies-message.html MSmith

    Art Jacobson said:
    “We should support individual legislators at all levels of government, but we should be wary of being co-opted by any political party.” 

    Take a close look and you will see that the Occupy Wall Street (OWS) movement is made up of and beholden to Liberals. Pul back the first layer of the “onion” and you will see that the Gay (LGBT)  agenda has “co-opted” the movement in an effort to advance their agenda under the guise of  political & economic equality. Look closely, you can’t miss it.

    Thanks,
    Marc

    • Tip O’Neill

      You can’t expect gays to find any support in the tea party.
      Of course they will look to “liberals” – they know what to expect drom “conservatives”. 

  • Jason Bloomberg

    Equal rights are not special rights.  As far as  I can tell. the only thing being asked for by the “LGBT Agenda” is equal rights.   Since the concept of  ”no taxation without representation” applies to all citizen regardless of sexual identity, then so long as one fulfills the duties citizenship, he, she, or whatever variation thereof is inherently entitled to equal rights, including but not limited to civil marriages between consenting adults, the ability to be a “family unit” for medical-legal purposes, and the same privileges enjoyed by any other couple.  It is not “the left” which is trashing the highest principles of our nation, indeed it is the so called “right” that has been and remains so wrong about them.   OWS can be proud of its patriotic support of fairness and equity for all people irregardless of sexual identity or any other reasonable distinction.   

    People who bristle at  OWS for not favoring the inculcated bigotry of its opposition need only look to recent history to see the ultimate destination for any public policy which is permissive of discrimination:

    http://www.ushmm.org/museum/exhibit/focus/homosexuals/ 

    The rising tide of Fascism, Jingoistic Nationalism ,  and Orwellian “double speak” should scare us, not spurious assertions against OWS.   It is the opposition which is morally bankrupt on this issue, not OWS.