Tucson Citizen.com
Fort Buckley - A virtual outpost, from which Don Smith discusses conservatism, politics, and national security matters

Our growing Culture Of Dependency: “The government will pay my bills” scam hits paydirt—UPDATE!!!

by on Sep. 18, 2012, under Uncategorized

Gee, where would Republicans like Mitt Romney get the notion that about 47 percent of the electorate “believe that they are victims, who believe that government has the responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing”?

Jim Geraghty of National Review answers his own question with several examples of where LOTS of people—not just Mitt Romney—might get that idea

He links to a YouTube of a woman who’s looking for the federal government to help pay her gas and mortgage bills.

Is she an isolated example. Sadly, no.

A multistate identity theft scam that claims President Barack Obama will pay your utility bills appears to have widened.

According to MSNBC.com, more than 2,000 customers in Tampa, Fla., fell for the fake offer last week.

The scheme was first reported in May, when Dallas-based Atmos Energy warned its 3 million customers in 12 states that scammers had been asking for Social Security numbers to enroll in the faux federal program. According to the pitch—distributed via email, Facebook, text message, phone and, in some cases, door-to-door sales—the government would pay a month of energy costs through credits offered by the Obama administration.

PSE&G, the New Jersey gas and electric delivery utility, issued a similar warning the same month. According to MSNBC, there were 10,000 reported victims in New Jersey in recent weeks, and thousands more in North Carolina, Indiana and Pennsylvania.

(Emphasis added).

Can you blame these people? Our government is handing out our children’s and grandchildren’s money, in the form of deficit spending, hand-over-fist. Why not get your “fair share?”

No doubt that people are struggling nowadays. No dispute from me that it’s hard to make ends meet in this economy.

But, isn’t it a bit unsettling to see evidence of such a widespread expectation, amongst Americans, for crying out loud, that the government will take care of them?

TOO MANY WORKING-AGE people are putting way too much effort into figuring out ways for the government to take care of them, and not enough effort into taking care of themselves.

TOO MANY Americans have been conditioned, when times are tough, to put out their hands and expect someone else to fill them.

ONE party is catering to that group of people this November, and I don’t need to tell you which one.

Unfortunately, there’s more evidence out there. Geraghty writes about a similar incident in Detroit in 2009, where “[r]umors that $3,000 stimulus checks from the Obama administration spurred heavy turnouts” — some put the number at 35,000.”

Much has been, and will be, made (or demagouged) about Romney’s surreptitiously-taped remarks to a group of GOP donors. In the tape, Romney says that he doesn’t expect to get the votes of those Americans who are dependent on the government and think of themselves as victims. Romney estimated the percentage of American voters who feel that way as 47% or higher.

Given the readiness amongst so many people to fall for scams that promise the federal government will take care of them, I wonder if Romney underestimated.

Geraghty closes his indispensable article by contrasting MSM/Left reaction to the videotape with Right reaction:

Folks in the media are asking, “how could he say this?” Folks on the Right, who see a growing dependency mentality sucking away the nation’s drive, work ethic and independence, are asking, “how could he say this only behind closed doors? “

(Emphasis added)

Look for Democrats and their supporters to label Romney’s comments as racist. What a surprise! What those statements are, though, are an affirmation of Republican beliefs that all Americans, of any background, can succeed in this country, and therefore should be expected to try.

(How is Romney’s statement an “affirmation” of those beliefs? That speech, and the conduct of his whole campaign, makes clear that Romney plans to win by targeting the other part of the American electorate…the part that still expects to make its own way and pull its own weight in our society. Now, if Romney felt there wasn’t an electoral majority amongst THAT group of voters, why would he not only target them, but also risk alienating our growing Dependent Class?)

It’s time to stop growing, and start shrinking, the Culture of Dependency. If you agree, vote GOP in November.

UPDATE: And y’all thought I was exaggerating, about the seriousness of the situation we face. Well…

College Voters for Obama Agree: Free Stuff is Awesome (Video)

Caleb Bonham hit the Charlotte streets during the DNC and questioned voters about how President Obama can make their lives better. What did Caleb discover?

Well, expectations are high should Obama be elected to his “fourth” term in November. The President’s supporters eagerly await forgiveness of their student loans, immediate jobs to college graduates and free checks to voters for unknown reasons.

Link to the article, plus Caleb’s video, is at the Revealing Politics website. Credit for the bolded title, plus a hat-tip for the article, goes to Ben Howe at Redstate



  • BajaDemocrats

    That’s all ya got? I hear alot of folks think they’ll win millions in the lottery, or strike it rich with the mega millions slot machines in Vegas as well.

    By your reckoning, I guess the ‘Culture of Dependency’ started with the Oklahoma Land Rush – “Free land from the Guvmint – come & git it!”.

    • fortbuckley

      That’s quite a compelling argument, Baja. What’s next? “Vote for Carmona—Jeff Flake Has Cooties!!!”

      • MrModerateAZ

        More like “vote for Carmona, the intelligent, balanced, and informed candidate…”

        • fortbuckley

          I’m sure that, in the debates, Jeff Flake will show just how intelligent, experienced and informed he is.

          Notice that I didn’t say he’d come off to you Democrats as “balanced.” “Balance” to Democrats means (a) cut defense and (b) raise taxes. I doubt Flake will embrace either.

          • MrModerateAZ

            who’ll be weaing the jackboots, though? I read through you “moderate” article about Carmona and Reid and I find it disingenuous of you to suggest it would be better to have someone (Flake and GOP) who could at least get legislation passed rather than someone who would have to press against those more extreme in their party for compromise (at least there are moderate dems). The bottom line is this: the only legislation that would get passed in a GOP house is more abortion bills and sabre-rattlin’ rhetoric, the GOP filibustered and failed to compromise, plus they loaded every bill with non-starters just to make sure it wouldn’t get done under a DEM leadership. Same thing over again, both sides put their heels in the ground for the sake of their “principles”, however flawed they may be. I think of the two, Carmona is less likely to endorse a reduction in necessary defense spending and has a greater sensitively to those who serve. Taxes, well, thats a loaded gun because Flake et al certainly would endorse lower high-end tax rates and still net up for most of us <$250K, (you included?, must be "no").

            • fortbuckley

              Anyone who starts off their um, argument with a crack about “jackboots” is certainly no moderate.

              Democrats: Civility For Thee, Not For Me.

              Have you heard of Godwin’s Law? It states that, eventually, someone injects a Nazi reference in an argument—normally the side that’s losing the argument.

      • BajaDemocrats

        No, I was going to say if you can’t vote for Obama then vote for Libertarian Gary Johnson – at least he says the same things in private that he says in public. And is a lot smarter than Rmoney as well. As an added bonus, I keep hearing conservatives that if Rmoney can’t win this they should just shut down the Republican Party.

        • fortbuckley

          That’s a ringing endorsement, by BajaDemocrats, of the Democratic Party’s presidential candidate.

          I must admit, though, it’s not as ringing an endorsement of your party as your stated reasons for supporting Richard Carmona: He’ll work to undermine and restrain, not support, Democratic Senate leadership in Washington!

          FYI, I Googled “Carmona King,” to see if there’s any evidence in the real world of King and Carmona partnering politically. Well, according to Google, there’s a “Carmona King” mattress (made by ComfortCare) and a racehorse named Carmona King…but no Carmona King political partnership.

          FYI, the mattress comes in Firm or EuroTop versions.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ado-Christian/100003744992896 Ado Christian

      Well Baja, you certainly are marching in lockstep with the Nanny State Party. How long have you been sucking that gub’ment welfare teat? The day will come when there simply aren’t sufficient tax paying Americans around to support an entitlement mentality. Who do you think the gub’ment is anyway?

      • BajaDemocrats

        ” How long have you been sucking that gub’ment welfare teat?”

        Why, what a wonderfully Christian thing to say. If you’re just dying of curiosity, I haven’t sucked at any teat since my mama switched to bottles and baby formula.

  • fortbuckley

    “For the slow-learners in the press corps, the reason it’s bad when
    nearly half the electorate doesn’t pay income tax isn’t that they’re
    somehow parasites. It’s that people who don’t have skin in the game
    don’t care about the game. In a better world, everyone would pay at
    least some income tax — enough to feel it, say 5% of gross income — and
    it would go up and down every year in proportion to government spending.
    If that happened, there would be political pressure to control
    government spending, and we wouldn’t have the $16 Trillion debt. Don’t,
    however, expect our corps of bylined Democratic operatives to stress
    that point, even if by some chance they manage to grasp it.”

    - Glenn Reynolds, in today’s Instapundit. http://pjmedia.com/instapundit/

    I’ll take some issue with Glenn’s use of the word “parasites.” I don’t begrudge many people—especially retirees and the unemployed—a break on federal income taxes. The problem is, though, the ever-growing part of our society that now expects the government to pay for a sizeable portion of their daily needs.

    Glenn also makes a very important point—”people who don’t have skin in the game don’t care about the game.” Dependency breeds more dependency.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ado-Christian/100003744992896 Ado Christian

      Hi Don, I agree with that quote, especially the 5% part that everyone pays, so long as it also includes every corporation and business owner as well. Like many other taxpayers, I found myself more than a little outraged when tax loopholes allow huge multi-national corporations(GE immediately comes to mind) to avoid paying any tax at all, in spite of having a year of record breaking sales and profits. That is just not right, IMO, no matter how legal the exemptions and write-offs were. A 5% bottom level that all income earning taxable entities must pay is a very good idea.

  • MrModerateAZ

    I’m sure that most everyone returned those little $600 Fed checks back in, when was it…2003? If a utility company was rumored to legitimately offer a government subsidy for utility expense, who wouldn’t investigate the opportunity? Shame on the ones who fell for it, they must all be poor welfare people on their Facebooks, huh? My guess, stupidity knows no party…

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ado-Christian/100003744992896 Ado Christian

      True, stupidity knows no party, but dependence on gub’ment checks, entitlement mentality, looking for cradle to grave security, and sucking the teats of their nanny state definitely does have a party. Most objective thinking folks can readily see that fact.

      • MrModerateAZ

        “Gub’ment”? you from ‘da south, or is this another side-of-mouth critique of those less fortunate than you, how civil! Unfortunately for you, most people are “objective thinking folk” who understand that most of your welfare free-loaders exist only in your online screeds. Do us a favor, just don’t go for the deluxe Medicare-special Scooter model and save us all a little money, a manual wheelchair should be fine…

        • fortbuckley

          So, you have a problem with Southerners? Colloquial speech? How uncivil!

          Heads up—if you continue with that kind of language, people might start wondering if you’re prejudiced.

  • fortbuckley

    “one of the least appreciated differences between the Republican and
    Democratic conventions is that the GOP put people on stage who had
    succeeded in life and the Democrats put a bunch of people on stage
    portrayed as victims.”

    Erick Erickson, of the conservative website Redstate. Tell it, Erick.

    http://www.redstate.com/

    • MrModerateAZ

      consider the source…

  • Jonathan_Duhamel

    I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them. -Thomas Jefferson

    “The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public’s money” -Alexis de Tocqueville

    A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul. — George Bernard Shaw

    We contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle. –Winston Churchill

    “The reason so many people misunderstand so many issues is not that these issues are so complex, but that people do not want a factual or analytical explanation that leaves them emotionally unsatisfied. They want villains to hate and heroes to cheer– and they don’t want explanations that do not give them that. “ Thomas Sowell

  • dorndiego

    As a good American and a Democrat I can only hope that more and more Republicans pour forth to defend what Romney said on tape at that Florida fundraiser. The more you defend lunacy the more obvious it becomes that you own it.

    • fortbuckley

      It appears that you—a self-proclaimed Democrat—think that raising the alarm over the “growing dependency mentality sucking away the nation’s drive, work ethic and independence” is “lunacy.” Thanks for clarifying and placing yourself on record. (Your party is ALREADY on record).

      • dorndiego

        Dear FortBuckle, does the MOD behind your name id you as a moderate? That is, you believe in the Romnoid?

        • BajaDemocrats

          FYI, the “MOD” stands for “Moderator” – each blogger can Moderate the comments in his/her blog, i.e., delete or edit comments.

          • dorndiego

            I’m gonna have to try harder to get deleted. How ’bout,
            Q. How many Romneys does it take to get elected President?
            A. One, but it’s going to take some therapy.

            • fortbuckley

              dorndiego, I’m keeping you around. You’re one of my favorite digital Democrats.

    • Fraser007

      I for one, am glad he said it. It will let the undecided conservatives finally know where he stands. he told the truth.
      Why do you think many blacks have weakened on Obama? My guess is that the big payoff didn’t come in. The same reason for the hispanics. They care if Obama will let their relatives who sneaked across the border become citizens. And therefore vote Democratic. Simple racial politics.I don’t think he made a mistake when he said it.
      We all knew it was true, he just said it aloud.

      • dorndiego

        Nahh… he didn’t say it aloud, he said it at a fundraiser where he thought it was safe to be a lunatic, which is unlike yourself, who chooses to spread his racist small self before a an equally small public forum.

        • fortbuckley

          BINGO! Time to take a shot! dorndiego just cried racism!

          • fortbuckley

            Having said that—-I just reread what Fraser wrote. Hmmm…in retrospect, it’s unfair of me to poke at you for raising race if you’re responding to another commenter.

            Guess I’ll have to take another shot…

  • BajaDemocrats

    I see Paul Ryan is out on the stump today parroting that “Government Dependency” line. Well, at least he knows what he’s talking about: His father died when he was 16, so he got Social Security survivors benefits until he was 18. He was able to save his Social Security to help pay for college. He paid for the rest of college with student loans – government backed, government subsidized student loans. He’s been on the government payroll as Congressman since he was 28. Before that he was on the government payroll working for Wisconsin Sen. Bob Kasten and Kansas Sen. Sam Brownback. So Paul Ryan sure knows about “Government Dependency”..

    Republicans love to preach. But the sermon is “Do as I say, not as I do”.

    • fortbuckley

      Baja, I’d tell you to stop twisting our words—or outright lying about what we’re saying—but I think it’s in your DNA.

      Follow the link above to the people in Geraghty’s article. THOSE people need to pull their own weight. That will allow federal entitlement programs to focus on the truly needy.

      YOUR party needs to stop promising them free stuff. You’re killing the spirit and drive that made our country great. You’re creating needy people. Think I’m exaggerating? Wel…

      “College Voters for Obama Agree: Free Stuff is Awesome (Video)”
      http://revealingpolitics.com/blog/video/how-can-obama-make-your-life-better/

      “Caleb Bonham hit the Charlotte streets during the DNC and questioned
      voters about how President Obama can make their lives better. What did
      Caleb discover?”

      “Well, expectations are high should Obama be elected to his “fourth”
      term in November. The President’s supporters eagerly await forgiveness
      of their student loans, immediate jobs to college graduates and free
      checks to voters for unknown reasons.”

      (Hat tip to Ben Howe at Redstate).

      • BajaDemocrats

        “Twisting your words” or “outright lying”???? Your title has the words “Our growing Culture Of Dependency”.. I pointed out the Paul Ryan is a beneficiary of government support (you prefer the word ‘dependency’) to help lift people out of their circumstances. He just wants to slam the door behind him. My party does not promise “free stuff”, despite your silly link faux story. We just want to see that everyone gets a fair chance at the American dream. Your party just wants everyone to follow the Golden Rule: He who has the gold rules.

        • fortbuckley

          Your party wants to define what “fair chance” means. And, you’ll define fairness to mean what you want it to mean. (Will you add a Department of Fairness to the Cabinet?)

          I’ll stipulate that most Democrats mean well. They’re simply incompetent. At diplomacy (giving a “Reset” button to the Russians), at military affairs (“The war is lost”—-Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid), at economics (unemployment rate at 8+% while thousands give up looking for jobs out of despair)….the list goes on.

          It’s time for the adults to take over now. Playtime is over.

          • BajaDemocrats

            Tell it to Osama bin Laden, who eluded Dubya for 8 years and Rmoney said it wasn’t worth moving heaven & earth for just one person.

            “Incompetent”? This from the party that led us into the two longest, two most expensive, wars in American history for “regime change”? The Arab Spring removed 3x times as many ‘ruthless dictators”.

            • fortbuckley

              Nice try. Bin Laden was killed by the Special Forces and PREDATOR drone fleet that George W. Bush built. No one with common sense thinks that Democrats would have built capabilities like that on their own. They’re more into Reset buttons.

              • BajaDemocrats

                I don’t think Dubya ‘built’ those forces. I do know that he didn’t give the the orders to go in and use them.

                • fortbuckley

                  I doubt you know very much about the improvements Bush and Rumsfeld made in our warfighting capabilities. I stand by my assertion that Democrats would have done far, far less to improve the Special Operations capabilities that eventually enabled us to find and kill Bin Laden.

                  After all, it was weak and irresolute Democratic national security leadership that made Bin Laden conclude that the US was a “paper tiger,” and thus vulnerable to attack. How do I back up that assertion? Mohammed Atta had already finished his flight training by November 2000, the month George W. Bush was elected.

                  • BajaDemocrats

                    And again, Osama waited until Dubya was President to attack on American soil. You claimed that Reagan had to rebuild our defensed after Carter dismantled them,. IF your claim about Dubta & Rummy are true, did Obama dismantle them? Obviously not. He put them to use in way Dubya & Rummy never imagined.

                    • fortbuckley

                      Unfortunately, Baja, history is not your friend.

                      The full compliment of al Qaeda hijackers didn’t arrive in the US until the spring of 2001. Specifically, the “muscle” hijackers who subdued the doomed passengers and crew while Atta and his colleagues flew the planes.

                      Are you trying to imply that Mohammed Atta and his colleagues made plans to conduct 9/11, plans that took years to plan and execute, simply because they expected that George W. Bush (or some other Republican) was possibly going to be elected president in 2000?

                      By the time that George W. Bush took office in 2001, al Qaeda had not only decided that America was a pushover; they’d already put in motion the detailed plans that led to 9/11. They had not only recruited suicide pilots—they’d trained them, gotten them certified in instrument flight and they were already casing their targets.

                      I think common sense is on my side in our argument here.

                      As for your assertion that President Obama is using Special Operations Forces (SOF) capabilities in ways that “Dubya & Rummy never imagined,” I triple-dog-dare you to show some convincing evidence to support your assertion. You’re really claiming that Bush and Rumsfeld never conceived of the kinds of SOF operations that were already ongoing in Afghanistan when President Obama took office, operations Obama wisely decided not to stop?

                      I never said that President Obama was going to dismantle our SOF defenses—like he dismantled the missile defense program we’d promised our Czech and Polish allies. (The same allies who are menaced by Russians, who now have a “Reset” button courtesy of our own State Department!) I said that Democrats would NEVER HAVE BUILT capable SOF in the first place.

                      Your confused reasoning here is a perfect example of why Democrats can’t be trusted with national security responsibilities.

        • fortbuckley

          You’re insinuating that Republicans are indifferent to the truly needy. Not true. We applaud and support government programs that support the truly needy. Unfortunately, Democratic Party programs too often CREATE needy people. You and your side should really stop doing that.

          I’m posting this because you deserved a more direct answer to your last post—my bust.

          • BajaDemocrats

            Male bovine excrement

            • fortbuckley

              To borrow your words—that’s the best you got?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Seth-Miller/100000285649260 Seth Miller

    The problem with conservatives’ understanding of welfare is that welfare isn’t THE problem welfare is a symptom of much larger social issues. As long as you view welfare as the problem it opens you up to blame the poor for being poor and the old for being old which ultimately was at that heart of where Romney erred in his comments.

  • alohapuna

    Republicans have been saying the same thing since before I learned to read. BajaDemocrats simply points out the hypocracy. Freeloaders exist but that is the exception, not the rule. As for Social Security, it is not an entitlement, it is an earned benefit. We’ve paid into it all our working lives and deserve to live in retirement without having to spend the rest of our lives greeting Walmart customers to make ends meet.