Christianity Fails!
by jason on Dec. 01, 2011, under Biblical Inerrancy, Christian Self-Righteous Arrogance, Christianity, Clarity, Critical Thinking, Faith, Fundamentalism, God & Bible, Logic, Reason, Religion, SanityThis post comes to us from Doubting Dave…
When I share my reasons for rejecting religious faith with believers, I get a handful of regular responses. The one that strikes me as the most honest is an admission that the religion makes the believer feel good, and that one just has to have faith. I may follow this by questioning why having faith should be considered a good thing, but overall this strikes me as an admission that the believer is more concerned with having beliefs that feel good, rather than beliefs that correspond with reality. Once you acknowledge that, there is really not much reason to pursue the conversation.
The other typical response is for the believer to accuse me of not having a sufficient knowledge of his or her religion to even evaluate it. I find this a little absurd and hypocritical especially since it more often than not comes from Christians. Specifically, it likely comes from Christians who have developed rather idiosyncratic versions of their faith, that are likely to be contentious with other Christians. That’s fine with me. I was raised in a very religious Christian home and know the version of Christianity I was raised in pretty well. I am more biblically literate than many self-identified Christians. As someone who has taken the time to reject the core beliefs held by the majority of this country’s population (as well as my own family) I have put a great deal of thought and study into this issue.
I know the basic tenants that define religion for most self-identified Christians and the most common evidences and arguments Christians present for why I should accept their faith. I find them all far from satisfactory. If your particular flavor of Christianity is different, it is up to you to present a case for it, which these dismissive Christians are frequently not willing to do. If they do, more likely than not, they will find that my objections still hold.
It strikes me as highly arrogant that some people actually believe that the savior of the world sent a message, but that themselves and a handful of their fellow congregationalists are the only ones truly with the understanding, brains and maturity to understand it. The fact that all religions develop into this type of sectarianism strikes me as a huge case against the whole program. To quote Arron Ra’s wonderful Foundational Falsehoods of Creationism video series:
“If any god exists, and it happens that there is only one of them, then surely every spiritually enlightened and visionary holy man from any nation or tribe should be able to sense it, if men can sense such things at all. There can only be one truth, and only one version of it… But rather than coming together as search for the one truth should, religions continuously shard further and further apart into more divided factions with mutually-exclusive beliefs, -and there are as many wrong interpretations as there are people claiming theirs as the absolute truth”
I really don’t care about specific importance you place on any bible verse, your theories about prophecy or end times, or your interpretations of the finer points of theology. If what you are saying sounds as insane as nearly all religions do, I will reject your beliefs for the same reason that you reject the religion others hold. My opinion of your religion is the same as yours is about all other religions except your own. You likely did not research the detailed claims of the different sects and factions of the religions you reject. I have no time to take arrogant people seriously when they would rather insult my intelligence than have a real discussion. Until evidence is brought forth the only responsible response to any religious claim is to reject it.
