Tucson Citizen.com
Freethought Arizona - Reason, Science, and Freedom of Expression

Christianity Fails!

by on Dec. 01, 2011, under Biblical Inerrancy, Christian Self-Righteous Arrogance, Christianity, Clarity, Critical Thinking, Faith, Fundamentalism, God & Bible, Logic, Reason, Religion, Sanity

This post comes to us from Doubting Dave…

When I share my reasons for rejecting religious faith with believers, I get a handful of regular responses. The one that strikes me as the most honest is an admission that the religion makes the believer feel good, and that one just has to have faith.  I may follow this by questioning why having faith should be considered a good thing, but overall this strikes me as an admission that the believer is more concerned with having beliefs that feel good, rather than beliefs that correspond with reality.   Once you acknowledge that, there is really not much reason to pursue the conversation.

The other typical response is for the believer to accuse me of not having a sufficient knowledge of his or her religion to even evaluate it.  I find this a little absurd and hypocritical especially since it more often than not comes from Christians. Specifically, it likely comes from Christians who have developed rather idiosyncratic versions of their faith, that are likely to be contentious with other Christians. That’s fine with me. I was raised in a very religious Christian home and know the version of Christianity I was raised in pretty well.  I am more biblically literate than many self-identified Christians.  As someone who has taken the time to reject the core beliefs held by the majority of this country’s population (as well as my own family) I have put a great deal of thought and study into this issue.

I know the basic tenants that define religion for most self-identified Christians and the most common evidences and arguments Christians present for why I should accept their faith.  I find them all far from satisfactory.  If your particular flavor of Christianity is different, it is up to you to present a case for it, which these dismissive Christians are frequently not willing to do.  If they do, more likely than not, they will find that my objections still hold.

It strikes me as highly arrogant that some people actually believe that the savior of the world sent a message, but that themselves and a handful of their fellow congregationalists are the only ones truly with the understanding, brains and maturity to understand it.  The fact that all religions develop into this type of sectarianism strikes me as a huge case against the whole program.  To quote Arron Ra’s wonderful Foundational Falsehoods of Creationism video series:

“If any god exists, and it happens that there is only one of them, then surely every spiritually enlightened and visionary holy man from any nation or tribe should be able to sense it, if men can sense such things at all. There can only be one truth, and only one version of it… But rather than coming together as search for the one truth should, religions continuously shard further and further apart into more divided factions with mutually-exclusive beliefs, -and there are as many wrong interpretations as there are people claiming theirs as the absolute truth”

I really don’t care about specific importance you place on any bible verse, your theories about prophecy or end times, or your interpretations of the finer points of theology.  If what you are saying sounds as insane as nearly all religions do, I will reject your beliefs for the same reason that you reject the religion others hold.  My opinion of your religion is the same as yours is about all other religions except your own.  You likely did not research the detailed claims of the different sects and factions of the religions you reject.  I have no time to take arrogant people seriously when they would rather insult my intelligence than have a real discussion.  Until evidence is brought forth the only responsible response to any religious claim is to reject it. 

More in Pol. & Govt.:

The Case for Newt Gingrich

  • JD

    Fact is atheist’s cannot prove god does not exist, nor can those who believe in god prove to a atheist’s “satisfaction god does exist”, this argument is moot! But one thing for sure when we all die, and we all do one day, then and only then will one know this lifes mystery!:-)

    • Tip O’Neill

      < But one thing for sure when we all die, and we all do one day, then and only then will one know this lifes mystery!:-)

      Can you prove that ? 

      • JD

        I know its difficult for folks with their minds made up that god does not exist to consider the “remote possibility when one dies they will either experience nothing or something”, but for sure one will experience one or the other!:-) No college degree required, no rocket scientist genius theory, nothing but common sense! Now I am sure a zealot atheist will argue till they are blue in the face god does not exist, and a zealot christian will try till the cows come home to convert a atheist to believe, I don’t worry who believes or does not believe, since its a full time job keeping me in order, on my narrow path I “believe in”, what path you choose is yours, what you eat will not make me fat!

        • myriad

          Send us a postcard when you get there and tell us if what you see is something or nothing.

          • JD

            Wow, my advice is keep your day job the comedy routine is not going to make you rich!:-) If I die and experience nothing as the atheist movement believes, then nothing exists, now if something does exist as I believe am sorry the location you will be at will not be possible for me to communicate with you via post cards, psychic messages etc., but am sure once we all make that great passage from this life to non existence on this old earth, you and I will discover either nothing or something!

            • myriad

              “then and only then will one know this lifes mystery”
              “you and I will discover either nothing or something!”

              OK, so forget the postcard. But if it doesn’t work out like you expected, you should feel free to use all the profanity you want once you are finished with all of your discovering and knowing.

              • JD

                I think in life we might indicate how we will react in the after life if something exists other than “nothingness”, since if we use profanity laced words in posts on line in our personal lives while we live on this earth then we will likely do so in a “somthing existence in the after life”, but my guess is if nothing exists how can one do anything at all!:-) I am always amused by the atheist claim of science is their icon of proof of everything, but seems to me if one cannot understand the simple fact of ones own argument “if nothing exists then nothing exists, zero experience of anything”, to think one can experience anything at all does not me sure you truly are a atheist, since if I can experience anything, vent some mystical profane unearthly language upon my death, then apparently you believe we have a spirit, soul which lives beyond our earthly demise!:-) Or maybe you just feel so angry at me it has made you loose your atheist motto of nothing exists past our earthly demise!:-) I am not confused on what I believe, just refuse to try and convert the atheist who reminds me of my fellow christians who can alawys see the splinter in their brothers eyes but cannot see the timber in their own!

                • myriad

                  Satire apparently isn’t for everybody.

                  “my guess is if nothing exists how can one do anything at all!”

                  This is a subtle distinction, but it’s interesting that you conflate not existing yourself with nothing else existing either.

                  “to think one can experience anything at all does not me sure you truly are a atheist”

                  This puzzle clearly hasn’t come together for you, nor should it since you are relying on some faulty pieces. Setting that aside, why is it that so many theists are unable to distinguish between their belief in divinity from their belief in immortality? One of those beliefs is definitely serving to prop up the other. You should keep in mind that, in theory, it’s possible that you could be essentially correct and yet still not discover anything when you die.

                  • myriad

                    edit fail: “distinguish between their belief in divinity AND their belief in immortality”

        • Tip O’Neill

          >I know its difficult for folks with their minds made up that god does not exist to consider the “remote possibility when one dies they will either experience nothing or something”

          It isn’t difficult at all, but that is now what you claimed. 

          You claimed ”for sure”  that one would experience something.

          So I asked – can you prove that ? 

          • JD

            One has to find the humor in the intellectual atheist who demands proof of things no one can prove or disprove, science cannot prove all theories since a theory is not proof but a theory, today a long held theory has been debunked, that many believed as gospel from Albert Einstein, who stated one could not exceed the speed of light, well today scienstists debunked that theory as wrong, will one day Jesus return to earth and do things which manking, science cannot explain? I don’t know if I will live to see that day, many folks have lived believing in god, jesus and such and never saw it happen, one cannot prove god exists nor can one prove he does not! I don’t care how many degree’s you have, how high your IQ is, but somethings in life cannot be proven beyond any shadow of doubt in some folks minds, some of us prefer to believe and have faith in something more powerful, wise than ourselves! Now I know some here hate god, hate anyone who believes in god, some to the point they run their blood pressure up to potentially premature cardiac arrest at worst or at minimum cause themselves unnecessary stress, since why do you all care if “we christians prefer to believe”? I don’t come here to convert, tell you your idea’s are wrong and mine are right, no I merely state how I feel, believe, its a full time job keeping myself headed where I want to go, got no time or energy trying to pluck them splinters out of your eyes while I got a huge timber in mine!:-)

            • leftfield

              “One has to find the humor in the intellectual atheist who demands proof of things no one can prove or disprove…”

              It’s not unique to atheists, intellectual or otherwise.  It is just an established principle of logic that you can’t prove a negative.  The consequence of this principle is that, for someone claiming the existence or one thing or another, the burden of proof is on them. 

              The term “theory” has a different meaning in a scientific context than it does colloquially.  Think of the “Theory of Evolution” or the “Theory of Relativity” or even acting theory or medical theory.  What you are thinking of is more properly referred to  as a hypothesis. 

                

              • JD

                Theory or hypothesis….guess proves my mere meager high school education does not measure up the higher educated folks here who tend to be atheist’s, but some loose their cool, atheist belief’s when their “hypothesis” if you prefer is debunked with no proof can be shown that god exists or does not exist! The burden of proof is a legal term, did not know this was a court of law, and I was the prosecutor and the atheist the defendant?:-) One  might wonder is the site moderater the judge? Who is the jury of 12 of my peer’s?:-) Of course the legal term “burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt could apply”, but fact is this site is no court of law, I am no preacher/prosecutor, and atheist’s are not on trial nor am I as a “moderate christian” in fact I am moderate in most of my views, political as well, not a right winger/republican but a moderate democrat who is not extreme left wing, but that happy middle ground where I am happy at being!:-) I think we can banter words, hypothesis till the cows come home, only time any of us will ever know the answer to this lifes mystery is upon our deaths, then all doubt will be removed one way or the other, now if the Atheist is correct/right and nothing exists upon our demise, then one will experience nothing, no lake of fire, no disappointment at no bright light/jesus waiting to meet us, just simply going to sleep with a bit of dreamless end to it all, now the only ones who can experience anything is if those of us who believe we have a immortal soul, that leaves this earthly flesh and of course the non-believers who will experience awe and shock, that they were wrong, now as to where they go, depends on what that after life truth is, will it be the christian belief Jesus/God or the Muslim belief, Hindu, Buddhist, Pagan etc., if something exists some will be disappointed, some sadly shocked, but if nothing exists then one can experience nothing, why worry if your so sure nothing exists, I don’t worry  if nothing exists, my worry is if something does, did I follow that wide easy path of living my life as I wished and caring for no one but my own greeds, lusts, wishes or did I follow that narrow hard one trying to care for the poor, hungry, naked those sick of illness of the body, those sick of mind/soul in the prisons, since that is my belief, no one can convert me with arguments of science hypothesis, theory etc.! Sorry I am not a preacher, priest, have no mission to convert anyone, its a full time job just handling me!:-)

                • JTK

                  You are being evasive.  That is a sign of dishonesty.  You chose to have this conversation, please at least be honest with yourself and respond with the truth as you see it.
                   
                  Don’t make false claims about the burden of proof.   You are being dishonest and evasive.  You are using many of the common logical fallacies that believers trot out when they can’t deal with honest discussions.  People behave that way when they have no other choice.  Thus, you have revealed that you will lie and cheat to justify your religious beliefs.
                   
                  Thanks for playing.  Get yourself an education before you make a fool of yourself in public again.

            • Tip O’Neill

              >”One has to find the humor in the intellectual atheist who demands proof of things no one can prove or disprove”

              Or one can find humor in posters  who claim ”for sure” things which are nonsense on the surface and have no evidence whatever to back them up.

              Your postings are pretty funny – but very repetitious after a while. 

              • JD

                I don’t recall I ever stated to you that I can prove god/jesus exists, its you who swears with all your atheist knowledge, science, college degree’s that swears you can prove they do not exist and that I am delusional, believe in fairy’s, mystical after life! I merely stated a fact, no one can prove who is right or wrong on this life mystery till we die, then the debate will be ended for all eternity!:-) Now believe in nothing, if I prefer to believe in something is that not beautiful, that I have that right, and you cannot force me to adopt your belief, nor my less that stellar zealot brethren who in times past called folks like you heretic’s, burned you at the stake, tortured you in the spanish inquisition, and today roam the middle east and would put you to death by stoning if they could for not believing! I think the sad thing on earth all through out history is folks who were zealots of all types, shapes and categories felt so sure of their beliefs that they would commit murder, torture to get obediance to their “ideology/theology”! I thik I will say a prayer today thank god I live in america and not in some past spanish inquisition era and be labeled a heretic, or some pagan world where one could be sacrificed to some mythical gods or the present day middle east where one is either a muslim or a infidel, or a jewish country where we would be seen as mere ungodly gentiles!:-) Sorry two things have caused more horror, war, misery in this old world than anything I know of “religious zealots and secular political zealots!:-) 

                • Tip O’Neill

                  > I merely stated a fact, no one can prove who is right or wrong on this life mystery till we die, then the debate will be ended for all eternity!:-) 

                  For the third time – you keep claiming a “fact”, but you have no evidence to support your “fact”.
                  It’s really just “belief” in fairies - which is fine, but constantly going around saying “I believe in fairies” gets really annoying after a while.
                   

        • Don Lacey (AZAtheist)

          JD,
          You never cease to amaze me!  You claim to not care what others believe then spend so much time replying to things and sharing your opinions on subjects you know nothing about. For example, “atheist will argue till they are blue in the face god does not exist.” You can’t prove that! To begin with most Atheists I know, and I know quite a few, never say that “god doesn’t exist.” They say, “I don’t believe in God, or gods.” Those are two quite distinct statements. Even Richard Dawkins doesn’t state that there is no god. What he states in his book, “The God Delusion” is that he is a 6 out of 7 in his belief scale. With that he says, “I cannot know for certain but I think God is very improbable and I live my life under the assumption that he is not there.”
           
          What I eat may not you fat but what you “believe in” may make me think that you’re stupid.
           
          Don Lacey
          Arizona State Director, American Atheists

    • myriad

      “But one thing for sure when we all die, and we all do one day, then and only then will one know this lifes mystery!:-)”

      I expect that when I die I will know very little. Suddenly uncovering the mysteries of the universe seems pretty far from being the “one thing for sure” we can agree on.

    • David

      Atheist don’t need to prove God does not exist.  The burden of proof is on those claiming that a God does exists.  I would say that not only can you not prove the existence of God to an atheist satisfaction, but that you can’t even prove it to your own.  That is why faith is required to be a believer.

      • Pacific Babe

        Well you know David Anon3 and Jeff Franklin know a god exists.  Neither are willing to put their faith on the line, but they KNOW they have not just a god, but the only god. They have The Truth and we have the facts.  Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof (Sagan) and yet they seem totally content without any verification.  Any speculation why the A-team needs verification and the C-team does not?  Meme gene? Lack of free will? Or are they simply the most gullible among us?  Babe

    • highdudgeonaz

      JD,

      That’s not true. There are all manner of truth-claims about the existence of god, and these can be examined both in terms of the argument’s logical consistency and the empirical evidence both for and against. Not suprisingly, of course, the few claims that manage to not employ one fallacy or another fail spectacularly in the light of science.

      I can assure you of one thing: no atheist will ever be convinced by any argument presented by a functionally-illiterate buffoon whose entire argument rests on vague threats offset by smiley emoticons. 

      • JD

        All one has today is writings by mankind which can be dated to about 6,000 years old, which does not explain every mystery of life, one can carbon date earths age, several billion years old, one can date fossils of mankind in his various stages of development, the secular atheist’s believe all this proves we crawled out of some primordial ooze with no meaning but a chance occurance etc., I am reminded of a very old passage in the bible where Jesus and Nicodemus were in a conversation about being born again, Nicodemus asked Jesus how could a man be born twice of a womans womb, Jesus told him one cannot see the wind and air, but its there, and that man was not meant to know! I have read many writings on this subject of our souls existence and the belief of some we “re-incarnate/rebirth” till the end and the final judgment, a man whom often is written about, documentaries have written about wrote a book before his death in 1945 on the mystery of god and the soul, Edgar Cayce, often referred to as the sleeping prophet, he mentions this bible passage in his book, I had never read it till then, no doubt read it in bible but never really pondered its possible meanings! Edgar Cayce mentions a hypothetical situation in a 90 year old man and 1 year old childs demise, the 90 year old man lived long, sinned all his life, the 1 year old child died in a house fire, under the traditional christian belief the child could not have sinned and went to heaven, the old man directly to lake of fire, his belief, was we all will face our maker and may have lived 900 times or so each, and if god was this loving father many believe he is would he give his children one chance or many to do right? Edgar Cayce believed the death of the child was a karmic lesson to the childs parents, and god when he does judge us will have given us many times to do right once, but his belief was that man was not meant to know this lifes mystery since if one knew it for a fact to many might be tempted to say I will do right next time, but this life we live today might be the last!:-)

        • JTK

          So when a question is too tough for you you trot out the “some things people aren’t meant to know” line?
           
          Intellectual cowardice at its finest.  You should be ashamed of yourself.

    • http://www.youtube.com/user/caveman73 Caveman73

      HA! I can prove it, with the current evidence at hand there is no god. Do you have some NEW evidence?

      • JD

        One can arrogantly believe anything one wishes in america is that not beautiful!:-) Now the real beauty to me is I have the same right as you do, only difference is I don’t care if you believe as I do, I don’t get angry at atheist’s or their belief’s, the moderate atheist’s are much like me, live and let live, but the zealots of both ideologies/theologies on the other hand go to court and try to force the other to kow tow to their extreme inability to allow others to merely live their lives in peace!:-) You leave little doubt in my mind where you fit in this rule of thumb measurement I have of a zealot or a non-zealot!:-)

        • JTK

          You obviously do get angry with atheists because your posts are full of hatred.
          Not to mention evasions and lies, am I right?
          Those who disagree with you get called zealots.  That is your way of not caring if people believe as you do?  Again, you lie.
          You leave no doubt in anyones mind that you are a true zealot.  Based on reading a small selection of your tripe I can safely conclude that you are a hateful liar who needs lies to justify his inability to justify his own beliefs.  I’ve seen that before in many people like you.
          Own up to your beliefs.  If they are honest and truly held you will never need to lie to justify them to yourself or anyone else.
           

    • Keith

      First, there is no need to atheists to “prove god doesn’t exist.”  The person making the extraordinary claim is the one that is required to provide the proof.  Second, I don’t know of any atheist that isn’t open to evidence.  The problem is, there is absolutely NO evidence that supports xianity and there are mountains of evidence that DISPROVES xianity.  Just because we can’t ignore that evidence, doesn’t mean we are closed-minded.  Just because we don’t buy into delusional superstitions, doesn’t mean that we will not accept evidence.
      You are correct, we will all see what happens when the time comes.  But since there is so much evidence to disprove xianity (and all other religions, for that matter), for now I don’t really see any justification for xians shoving their superstition down every one else’s throats.

  • Al

    Written with a high degree of I strain.

    • JD

      One can type with ten fingers, or one, I happen to type with all ten, no strain on my fingers or eyes, merely my view, am sure the die hard atheist’s will believe what they wish, us moderate non-zealot christians who do not feel a duty to try and convert and save the world know its a full time job not falling prey to seeing that splinter in our brothers eye when we need to concentrate on that timber in our own!:-)

      • JTK

        Passive agressive insults!  How nice.
        Sloppy writing implies sloppy thinking.  Try to take that splinter out of your eye and improve yourself.

  • http://none JimBodkins

    For an atheist, your life appears to revolve around god (not existing).

     

    • highdudgeonaz

      JimBodkins,

      Has it occurred to you that perhaps it is the other way around? That the Christians, who ought to simply be content in their faith and with living their lives in accordance with their scriptures, seem to be overly preoccupied with not only proving that their god exists, but insisting that anyone and everyone else accept the said same claim at face value, without question? 

      Perhaps if the Christian culture warriors had the true courage of their convictions, they would not feel so threatened by social and philosophical changes, nor the frantic need to write their dogma into to our civil and criminal justice system. Perhaps then the atheists would not feel the need to object, peacefully or otherwise, to being coerced into remaining silent in the face of such utter and blatant hypocrisy, cruelty, greed, and willful ignorance.

  • rachel

    “I have no time to take arrogant people seriously when they would rather insult my intelligence than have a real discussion”  

     me either …that’s why I’m outta here! your tone is arrogant and uninviting

  • Pacific Babe

    Anon 3:  Herman Cain has come clean about his 13 yr affair … when will you come clean to your kids that tell them it’s all made up …. it’s just a myth?

    • anon 3

      “ Herman Cain has come clean about his 13 yr affair … ”

      What that Herman Cain have anything to do with me?

      “when will you come clean to your kids that tell them it’s all made up …. it’s just a myth?”

      Probably a little bit after you stop beating your husband.  
      Would you please stop with these loaded questions?  

       

      • Pacific Babe

        NO.

      • Pacific Babe

        Anon3, I overlooked why I brought up Herman Cain. Like you, Herman Cain lied.  If he is big enough to come clean, then you should consider doing the same.  I agree with Jason when he said there are appropriate times to lie, but raising your children and telling them biblical myths are true is not fair to your children.  Raising your kids and telling them if they’re not good they could go to hell or your god could command you to sacrifice one of them, is not healthy.  It’s child abuse.  As I’ve said in the past, I totally support children being surrounded by adults so that they come to understand good morals and good ethics. And no Anon3, I’m not going to define ‘good’, I’ll leave that for you to define however you care to.  You have failed to answer why you believe it’s better for your children to be raised by lying to them than being honest.  You have failed to answer how christians have better morals than atheists.  You don’t need to get into deep philosophical issues, it’s all rather simple.  It’s fine to teach your children religious studies, but come clean with them.  Let them know the bible was used for centuries by parents to teach children morals and that you want to continue with the tradition.  But tell them, that now we know the world evolved and there are other ways to teach morality and other books that aren’t as hateful as the bible.  Admit that Paul likely plagiarized his work, that Noah could not have lived to be 900 yrs old, that the great flood never happened, that the world wasn’t ‘poofed’ into existence and that jesus is more than likely a composite of many good people.  Much, much, much more harm can come to your children when you lie than when you are honest.  Children learn to rebel when their parents haven’t been level with them.  I can’t imagine how Jason’s kids would ever rebel, b/c he’s letting them make most of the decisions and he’s being honest.  How do you rebel against that? Tell them ‘sin’ is a flawed concept and that there are many things that can be considered wrong behavior and teach them how to get out of a difficult situation and to ditch the prayer, as YOU know it’s worthless.  In other words, Anon3 get real!  Babe

        • jason

          “I can’t imagine how Jason’s kids would ever rebel”

          Never underestimate a teenager. :-) The most likely scenario, just becuase it’s so common with teenagers, is to rebel against morality in general in favor of simple hedonism. We try to give them the tools and knowledge of how & why to avoid that, but they might choose to do it anyway.

          Or they could decide to become fundamentalist Christians. Funny sort of rebellion, but given our atheism and the exposure to fundamentalism from all the rest of our family it remains a possibility.

          Sort of the ultimate antithesis of us would be for them to become Amish Christians – both accepting a pretty extreme faith and rejecting science and technology. I don’t think that’s likely; they like their electronics too much. But if they got a bug to really tick off their parents that might be a good way to try it. :-) They’d be free to do it (OK, maybe I’d draw the line at keeping a horse and buggy in the back yard) but it’s not a decision we’d “support” in the sense of hiding our negative opinions about it.

          But because we’ve already thought of all those possibilities and on some level accepted them, if they’re really creative they’ll think up something we’ve never thought of and go “ha…whatcha gonna do now?” Just part of parenting.

          • Tip O’Neill

            I once got a big scare when I found out that my son was routinely going to the Hare Krishna temple.

            He reassured me that he was just doing it for the free food. 

        • anon 3

          “You have failed to answer why you believe it’s better for your children to be raised by lying to them than being honest.”

          You have failed to ask a question worth dignifying with a serious answer.

          “You have failed to answer how christians have better morals than atheists. ”

          You have failed to define ‘good’ morals, so your question is meaningless.  You also have failed to note that I’ve never said or implied such a thing.

          “Children learn to rebel when their parents haven’t been level with them.  I can’t imagine how Jason’s kids would ever rebel, b/c he’s letting them make most of the decisions and he’s being honest.  How do you rebel against that? ”

          Wild imagination again?  

          • Pacific Babe

            Very weak response Anon3. 

            • anon 3

              It’s called a proportional response.

    • JD

      Herman Cain the womanizer/adulterer, right winger, Edwards the left winger, womanizer/adulterer, one could spend all thier lives researching whose political party had the most of these sinners!:-) I think in the end, when if what I believe occurs and a final judgment comes, there will be about a equal number of right wing sinners as left, about as many secular atheist’s as sinful believer’s who one chose not to believe, one chose the wide and easy path but irony is both in my opinion and I emphasize my opinion only will end in one common place and can debate for all eternity where they went wrong!:-)

  • jim

    in my religion of birth and rebirth , we don’t even use our savior’s real name (Yahshua ha Nazorean) nor do we know His real birth date nor do We acknowledge His true lineage of John the Baptist (Yahya),Yahshua ha Nazorean, James the RighteousOne (Yahkov ha Zaddik)…..we buy into the roman creation of the new testament with it’s supremacy of saul (paul the christian), who was called “the spouting liar” by the original followers, the Nazoreans……at the core of most of our problems in the USA is corrupted religion….the christian church….Thomas Jefferson called us to this WAKE UP…..the spirit baptism and teaching of Jesus is sufficient for perfecting society…..paul and the historical lineages associated with the new testament are at the root of our problems as a people.    may understanding prevail and our country be cleansed of this puritanism and ignorance of the perfect way of tolerance and cooperation….aloha always

    • JD

      My mother was a college educated woman, well read, used to take me to the public library twice a week, had me read anything I wished at least two books a week, dad was a high school drop out, used to call me a book worm, which did hurt my little immature feelings but alas I grew up, mom was a avid reader of Edgar Cayce a contradiction in that he was a christian, believed in god, but seemed to have some strange abilities of the psychic nature, I sometimes mock the psychic but one cannot deny if one is a christian that bible does mention such things as those gifted with prophecy! I think Atheist’s/Christians fall into two main categories divided by one is zealot one is not, one demands adherence to their view/belief and the other demands nothing of anyone!

  • JD

    I do love the statement the burden of proof is on christians to prove god/jesus exist! Now that is a funny statement, even I would not be so arrogant to say to a “atheist he/she has the burden of proof to prove he does not exist! I think the problem with this age old argument between the atheist’s & christians and all the other religions whom the atheist’s also see as unintelligent, ignorant, foolish believers in fairies, etc., is they cannot prove god/jesus does not exist so what is their best argument, demanding proof of their existence which is not possible, no one can prove or disprove it! All the biblical writings were done by mortal men, who had flaws, even the icons in the bible were flawed men/women, committing many sins, abominations, etc., one can believe in nothing exists when one dies, its not going to effect anyone but them if something does exist, they will know, and if nothing does then “nothingness is pretty self explanatory”, nothingness is nothingness…..!

    • Pacific Babe

      RH, if I make the claim that there is a spaghetti monster in the sky, then I would need to prove that.  You wouldn’t need to disprove it.  So therefore, if you and yours are making a claim that there is a sky fairy, it is up to YOU to prove it.  In the 14 billion years the world has existed there has been not one iota of evidence.  The only things that can be verified in the bible are historical events and even then the authors of the BS got it wrong!  You have been suckered! Babe

      • JD

        The fact you stay angry 24/7….bitter, unhappy and seem obsessed with proving that god does not exist and that all those who do are in some fantasy land of “sky faries” or now you new cute word spaghetti monster in the sky, proves to me I am glad I am not you, since no matter what my beliefs, I am happy, contented, feel no need to denigrate anyone to boost my ego, self esteem, one can tell you try to not ad hominem attack the posters you come across whom you disagree/dislike, but for all that you cannot hide you inner demons, why do you care what I believe or what I think of atheism? You stalked me to another web site on a political story and seems you are the one who has doubts, worries, not I, this issue of god existing or not will never be solved on this side of life, only when we die, will anyone know! I know that must terrify you but it does not me, since if nothing exists why fear nothingness it can do one no harm, now if I prefer to believe my soul inhabits this flesh & blood temporary vessel and one day will leave it and move on to “something else” seems to me it ought to not concern you but for some odd reason it obsesses you!:-)

        • leftfield

          Personally, I’ve never had the impression the your friend PB is bitter or angry, but I can’t speak for her anyway.  Speaking for myself, I am neither angry or bitter about religionists, right up to the point that they start taking their personal beliefs about abortion, prayer, blue laws, etc.  Then I get absolutely quite angry.  Go ahead, handle snakes, roll on the floor and speak in tongues, worship at your altars, whatever; just keep it to yourself and out of public policy.

          • leftfield

            Whoops!  Too tired, I guess.  That should read “right up to the point that they start taking their personal beliefs about abortion, prayer, blue laws, etc, into the public sphere.

          • JD

            I don’t think I have ever stated anything about your comments, as to my personal views on the subjects you mentioned, am anti-abortion…but not pro-laws which prohibit it, would I have one no, but then I am male so the issue is really moot unless it was my child then I might feel a legal obligation to contest it not on the mere basic moral issue but on my rights as contributing 1/2 of the genes!:-) My personal view is if a woman has a abortion she has committed murder, and its on her soul, not mine, since we pay for our sins individually, as to other issues such as prayer in school, religous issues, my view is one ought to have the choice to particpate or not, no compulsary participation at all, guess that is where I fit in the moderate range, of both religion and politics, am pro-2nd amendment but don’t feel the need to own a bazooka, machine gun to hunt deer, elk etc.!:-) Firmly believe in separation of church and “state” or government but one does not have to cut with a chain saw when one can use a scalpal, if a cross or religous icon is on a government property it ought have no more significance than something one has a free will to view or ignore, I don’t think ones religion or lack thereof is a issue of importance in a elected officials ability to serve, as a vietnam era veteran, knew many who served with honor, bravery who did not believe in god, saw some call for their mothers at that time their life was ebbing away, some called on god, some had no time to call on anyone! Am sure some I served with were gay, cannot say I cared on wit, some were black, brown, etc., they bled red blood just like me! As to blue laws, I quit drinking at age 25, so guess that discomfort is long past me caring!:-)

  • Aition

    I personally am not interested in theories about the afterlife or other such things regarding realities we cannot yet experience within human existence.  As a man discerning discerning priesthood, my only care is showing unconditional love to all people without regard to myself.  Divine love is the true and primal expression of religion, everything else is secondary.

    The is no burden of proof on any party for whether God exists or not.  You either believe or you don’t.  Its that simple!  Why put so much energy into fighting against a non-existent Being, the very reality you deny exist is given reality by your own fight.  Just drop it.

    Jason, you never mention any specifac points which you disagree with.  Your article in general seems to just be a general complaint against believers.  Would love to hear are your specific issues/points with the theology and philosophy put forth by the different religions.

    “Until evidence is brought forth the only responsible response to any religious claim is to reject it.”

    Do you have evidence for this claim?   

    • jason

      Per the first line in the post, I didn’t write this article.

      But speaking for myself rather than Dave, some specific points I disagree with Christianity about:
      - The treatment of some sources (God, Jesus, The Bible) as infallible.
      - The treatment of sacrifice and the endurance of suffering as morally virtuous.
      - The assumption that knowledge can be gained by faith.
      - The treatment of faith in the face of contrary evidence as morally virtuous.
      - The treatment of submission to (some) authorities as morally virtuous.
      - Supernatual claims (God, Jesus, Holy Spirit, Miracles, Angels, Demons, Heaven, Hell, etc.) 
      - ”Judge not lest ye be Judged.” Instead, I agree with Ayn Rand’s rejoinder: “Judge, and expect to be Judged.” 

      Equally important are some things I actually agree with Christianity about:    
      - The importance of morality and making moral choices.
      - Some of its basic rules of morality like:
        – Don’t murder
        – Don’t steal
        - Don’t rape
        – Don’t lie.
        – The golden rule – treat others the way you’d like them to treat you.
      - The rejection of (some) authorities.  
      – The idea that you reap what you sow applies to all parts of life, not just agriculture.

      • anon 3

        “The treatment of sacrifice and the endurance of suffering as morally virtuous.”

        What is your theory on virtue?  I haven’t been able to get a straight answer about that.

        “Supernatual claims (God, Jesus, Holy Spirit, Miracles, Angels, Demons, Heaven, Hell, etc.) ”

        And volition, consciousness… and personhood… and rights…

        All this chest-thumping about proof seems disingenuous when science and logic can’t even prove the veracity of objectivity and existence.

        “The golden rule ”

        Implicit to this rule in its Christian manifestation is that it applies even if others don’t follow the rule in their conduct toward you.  Given your comment disagreeing with the endurance of suffering, I’m not sure that you actually agree with this Rule.

        “Some of its basic rules of morality like:”

        Forgiveness?  Mercy?  Love?  

        In Christianity (and Judaism, I suppose), it is permitted to lie, even to a judicial authority, to save an innocent life.  Even if it meant risking your own life, you are even obligated to lie.  (Is that a virtuous act?)  For all the feigned agreeing that you all do about some general rules (like some of the 10 commandments), there are underlying principles which seem divergent.  

        Why must you not lie?  Why must you not kill?  As far as I can tell, the justifications for these rules in atheist ethics are essentially ad hoc socioeconomic theories which don’t fall under the purview of the scientific method.

         

        • jason

          “What is your theory on virtue? I haven’t been able to get a straight answer about that.”

          Virtue is that activity which furthers rational values – the most basic of which is the preservation and enhancement of your own life. One of the major moral imperatives implied by rational values is the growth of knowledge – what we’re doing here, on a good day. :-) I’ll write a blog entry on that some day.

          “And volition, consciousness… and personhood… and rights…”

          Tip thinks these require a belief in the supernatural. I ask again (to either you or Tip), what do you think of Deutsch’s argument on the reality of abstractions? I think this is a rather important question, but have not settled on it yet.

          “All this chest-thumping about proof seems disingenuous when science and logic can’t even prove the veracity of objectivity and existence.”

          I try to avoid such reference to proof in my own writings, though sometimes old habits die hard. The correct method of determining truth is conjecture and refutation. Every God conjecture of which I am aware that is consonant with Christianity has been refuted to my satisfaction, which is why I am not a Christian. More broadly, the God conjectures most people refer to by the word “God” have all been refuted to my satisfaction, so I call myself an atheist. This is not a matter of proof that there is no God, or even lack of proof that there is a God. As I’ve said before, with regard to some unusual and narrow God conjectures (“God is only the difference between living matter and dead matter”) I am not an atheist.

          “Implicit to this rule in its Christian manifestation is that it applies even if others don’t follow the rule in their conduct toward you. Given your comment disagreeing with the endurance of suffering, I’m not sure that you actually agree with this Rule.”

          I would not wish for anyone to endure suffering on my behalf. Therefore, not enduring suffering on behalf of others is consonant with the golden rule for me.

          “Forgiveness? Mercy? Love?”

          Forgiveness – Quite often moral, as it is most often the rational choice. The value that can be obtained by restoring good relations with a fellow human being often outweighs any value that could be obtained by resentment or vengence. In fact, most often resentment and vengence carries negative value for the resentful and vengeful.
          Mercy – The trouble with this one is in the definition. There are two common meanings: One is roughly, “don’t be as harsh or as stingy as one’s power, or law, or contract allows.” Like forgiveness, mercy is quite often the most rational choice, for approximately the same reason. The other meaning of “mercy” is part of the broad panoply of names for sacrificing one’s own values to the values of another, which is never rational and never moral.
          Love – In the Christian sense of the word (“agape” – unconditional love), it is not moral. This is one of the major problems with Christianity – it just didn’t occur to me to cite it in the original list. The kind of love I consider moral is never unconditional, and instead reflects support and affection for the people who further one’s own values. This is not as hard-hearted as it may at first appear, because one rational value is human life. With rare exceptions like Osama Bin Laden, each of us is better off for the presence of the other people in the world. So in that sense, it is rational to love everyone. But that love is not and should not be unconditional. There is even further nuance to be applied to statements like “love your enemies.” One should never love one’s genuine enemies (those who seek to destroy one’s values, like Osama Bin Laden) and Christianity is immoral to demand such. However, one should also recognize that most people commonly referred to as “enemies” are not actually enemies in that sense.

          “For all the feigned agreeing that you all do about some general rules (like some of the 10 commandments), there are underlying principles which seem divergent.”

          Some are, as in the example of love above. Mostly, though, there is nuance in moral statemens like “don’t lie” which was not reflected in my short summary. The people hiding Jews in Nazi territory were being profoundly moral when they lied to the SS.

          “Why must you not lie? Why must you not kill? As far as I can tell, the justifications for these rules in atheist ethics are essentially ad hoc socioeconomic theories which don’t fall under the purview of the scientific method.”

          As I covered above and previously, justification is not the correct means of determining truth. The correct means is conjecture and refutation. The moral rules I accept as working moral theories are those of which I am aware, that have good explanations and that have not been refuted. This permits both the nuance I referenced regarding lieing to the SS about hidden jews (the prohibition against lieing in that case is refuted by the rational value of human life), and the improvement of one’s moral rules over time.

          • anon 3

            “Tip thinks these require a belief in the supernatural.”

            I wouldn’t disagree with Tip on this.  ”I” is a supernatural being.
             

      • JD

        If one uses mankinds writings to verify or debunk ones beliefs there is one error in this mankind’s writings are just that written by man! I read a variety of books not so much now as I am old, but in my youth before the advent of home computers, cell phones, VCR’s, DVD players etc., written medum was my thing, but Edgar Cayce was a christian, some believed he was a prophet, some a psychic, he did write a lot of interesting thought provoking books, much as the bible, koran & torah might evoke some to become zealots some of us are not zealots in this life, have no desire to be a preacher, imam or a rabbi and go off into the world and convert others, some seem obsessed with this life mission, but one thing I have realized just as many religous zealots exist as secular zealots exist, in my view mankinds curse is a zealot of any type, since they have one flaw they refuse to let others live their lives in peace and will committ murder, torture, any illegal act known to mankind to further their sides view!

  • jim

    those who control the questions
    also control all the answers…..we
    never learned to ask the wisdom-
    based questions….NOW is the time
    to break free of the manipulation
    of the new testament and listen
    to our critics….they are correct !
    our beloved christianity is a
    failure, it is not the way of the
    Nazoreans (the keepers of the
    original way)….Jesus spoke
    directly about this….Be Man
    or Woman enough to face the
    truth…we were sold a bill of
    goods…the gospel truth 
    has always been Clearly
    about BeingLived by Spirit.

    belief and believers are 
    religious terms for the
    moneymakers in the
    temple,church and mosque. 

    WAKE UP…you have been 
    lied to…..as we all hear subtly
    the loading of american weapons
    and the hymn
    “onward christian soldiers
    marching off to war with the
    cross of Jesus…” and pollution
    of our food supply with GMO’s
    and our minds with TV,etc…. 

    • Aition

      dude, the gospel truth is about love.  we are called to love others, will the good of them solely for the sake of them, and love so deeply until we can no longer.  we are called to follow the example of Jesus Christ and put ourselves on a cross so that our friends might have a chance to live the happy life through our sacrifice. 

      • Tip O’Neill

        You first :)

        • Aition

          gladly!

          • jim

            without constant SpiritBaptism, this love you speak about….may start out as spiritually strong but it fades because of lack of insight,lack of free energy and free attention and believing in deluded epistles….go deeper than your usual rituals of christian-bible reading and petitionary prayer…take some time and investigate the original lineage of our lord and saviour,Yahshua ha Nazorean…go beyond (i say this in the kindest way) your holy teacher,saul of tarsus….you may find,what was obvious to the original disciples, who received the blessing directly from the lord himself> saul was a deceiver,only teaching his own teaching<later to be called christianity….i, currently live in a muslim country and everyone here, who has studied the semitic lineage knows…saul corrupted Yahshua’s teaching>this is why Gabriel came to Mohammed to bring the true way back to the people…this is one the reasons Islam has been the fastest growing religion for a long time.Even, Thomas Jefferson said “Paul was the first corrupter of Jesus’ teaching”….i say all of this as a gift to you and everyone who is listening….our history have been tampered with… to lead us away from the Way,the Truth and the Life of compassion, cooperation, tolerance, equanimity,love,understanding and freedom Itself.

            • JD

              In the new testament much is written of the disobediant churches of god, funny how the moslems the more moderate ones do not accept Jesus as son of god but do accept him as a prophet of god, now the real irony is the jewish faith saw jesus as a heretic, sinner and worked hard to have the romans put him to death since his teachings contradicted their torah/old testament beliefs and they just could not accept it!

            • Pacific Babe

              Jim:  And why do we need a bible or the word of a god to teach compassion, co-operation, tolerance, equanimity love, understanding and freedom itself?  My personal take is that people who have been raised without religion twisting their minds are at least as kind, compassionate etc if not more so than their religious counterparts.  If you’ve been following this blog, you’ll know that Anon3 lies to his children about a god (and likely many other things).  Since atheists are comfortable with no supernatural beings, they don’t have any need to start lying to their children.  Anon3 will have a difficult time correcting that pattern as his children grow, particularly when they have access to facts on the internet.  Just search out atheists on Wikipedia and you’ll see a long list of highly compassionate ethical people.  When you’re in the grocery store turn around as there are likely atheists around you who simply haven’t come out of the closet yet. Babe

              • anon 3

                “Just search out atheists on Wikipedia and you’ll see a long list of highly compassionate ethical people.”

                Did you add yourself to the list?
                 

                • Pacific Babe

                  Thanks for your thoughts Anon3.  It takes more than compassion and a fine set of ethics to get on to that list.  Babe

          • Pacific Babe

            Should I get you the cross or can you did that up on your own?  Can we have a bible burning at the same time?  Babe

            • jim

              good question ,babe…..we don’t need a bible if it is corrupted or used for controlling the masses….one thing the corrupted bible is good for is sharpening our consideration of what we are doing  here. once we see the blatant contradictions- we go deeper into the text to find more….the bible or any other holy book doesn’t produce true compassion, co-operation, etc….the reading of religious texts produce a temporary sense of realization, it produces a talking school, a structure based on righteous languaging…..true realization comes through transcendental spirit baptism, which comes through mysterious-spontaneous means, not exclusive to any cultic orientation or religion ….anyone who is honest knows atheists–> who are  more humane,compassionate, tolerant, etc than the religious types.

              In BuddhaDhamma, Adi Buddha discovered and revealed  in Brahma Vihara-> the fruit of Consciousness and Emptiness(not adding anything to what IS) falls from the tree of Perfect Surrender and Freedom from all forms of religion….many christians consider buddhists atheists…not knowing the progression of the buddhist argument against false religion (moodmaking or exchanging one idol for another idol)…one of the deep problems of the semitic lineages is the shutdown of the perfect godman (christian,ends with jesus/islam ends with mohammed)….in india, the godmen and women never cease in appearing , the reality truth is not trusted to an old collection of writings, truth comes in a LIVING form in NOW time….my wife is from japan, she was raised without religion and the purity of her heart is way beyond any christian i have known (and i grew up in the bible belt)

  • anon 3

    “I will reject your beliefs for the same reason that you reject the religion others hold.”

    Which is… by faith. 

    • Don Lacey (AZAtheist)

      Or you will stick your fingers in your ears and say “LALALALA.” Same deal!

      • Pacific Babe

        LOL!

  • usmctrucker

    This year scores of elected governments and billions of people will observe Christmas, celebrating the birth of Jesus Christ, the son of God. The Bible is the number one all time print publication, and is available in any language. Hundreds of thousands of missionaries are doing the work of Catholic, Protestant, and Evangelical churches the world over and charity outreach is still strong. Even Obama, through gritted teeth, acknowledges Christianity and it’s positive influence on world civilization. The Beatitudes, Love thy Neighbor as thyself, and the praise of the Living God are words to live by for millions. And during this Holy Season, even during these hard economic times, people give and volunteer to help their fellow man; friends and strangers alike. Inspired by the life and teachings of Christ and his apostles and thousands of martyrd saints throughout the history of the world, the outpouring of love and charity of this season is unmatched by any secular movement in any part of the world. I think Christianity has won.

    “And He said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.” Mark 16:15.

    Hallelujah! Jesus Lives!

    • Tip O’Neill

      >” I think Christianity has won.”

      Actually I think Islam is coming is catching up fast – with 1.5 billion adherents.
      Praise Allah and his prophet ? 

    • jim

      have you ever lived outside the united states ?
      sounds like no

      let me recommend for you….get real clear on
      what the gospel is….use ”only jesus” as your
      wisdom source….your gospel sounds alot
      like a sales pitch or propaganda for consumers.

  • JD

    This debate is fun, and am sure it excites the atheist, christian zealots to no end to have a place to ad hominem attack one another and spar like tow boxer’s on who lands the hardest knock out punch, who is more intellectual, educated, has the better grasp of english language but sadly all this is meaningless, none of us will ever know this lifes mystery until we die! It is fun no doubt to debate and try to convert others to your view, but one thing we all do alone, and that is die alone, each of us will find out this one mystery some day, if the atheist is right and nothing exists, no lake of fire, no shock and awe for anyone, now if on the other hand we do have this immortal soul, and it leaves this flesh & bone body and goes somewhere, then something awaits us all!:-)

    • Pacific Babe

      RH are you claiming to participate in a debate because you’re not.  You need to be willing to answer questions posed to you by Tip and others.  In the past you’ve refused to answer any questions.  You can only learn what the flaws are if/when you answer questions.  Anon3 refuses to answer questions or answers them with one word yes or no answers which get no where … I expect he’ll pass that trait to his children.  So open up and answer the questions otherwise move to a different blog.  Babe

      • JD

        Which is you wish answers to the mysteries of life which no one has any answers too or you wish me to disapear from your private cyber bridge? Or do you demand a toll for my crossing it? I guess some folks demand things and some folks refuse to oblige!;-)

        • Pacific Babe

          You need to answer questions left by Tip and Leftfield. 

        • Pacific Babe

          And now RH you need to address the comments for you left by Don Lacey, the State Director for American Atheists as well as the comments left by myriad … Really spend some time on your answers and THINK thru what they’ve said to you. Break it apart one comment at a time rather than rambling.  You’ll be surprised, you might actually grow.  Babe

      • JD

        Oh, now I see you have been appointed the local atheist judge, I am the defendant, the plaintiff’s are your fellow atheist’s……, and I must answer your interrogation/questions or what? You will have me banned, removed, made to disappear? Sorry I don’t recognize your authority over me to tell me to present any case before your “atheist court”, my view is you lack two things authority over me and jurisdiction!:-) I am sure you can find a visiting christian zealot to play with, ad hominem attack their character, intelligence, and they tend to be easily tricked into arguing with those who remind of my late grandfathers old mule, he had blinders on to keep him plowing them old fields and not stray from his job at hand! I owe no one any education, answers to any questions, I comment here, many places on many things, merely commenting, really find is sad some seem obsessed with engaging folks in a tit for tat exchange for the mere entertainment of boosting their egos, I have no low self esteem, no ego that  needs boosting to prove to anyone why I believe what I believe, if you read what I post and apparently you read it for some odd reason which I cannot fathom, but I do not answer anyones demands!:-)

        • Pacific Babe

          RH, I was really hoping there was a tiny chance that you might learn how to debate instead of rant.  Go back to your booze or pills or whatever it is that makes you tick. Babe

        • JTK

          Your posts reek of dishonesty and delusions.  Honest people can have discussions.  Those who are afraid of honestly need to rely on evasions and lies.
          The behavior you exhibit is that of someone who is dishonest in his dealings with others and presumably dishonest with himself. 
          Believing the rantings of Edgar Cayce alone would be enough for me to recommend a psychological examination. 

  • Tip O’Neill

    > each of us will find out this one mystery some day

    You keep repeating that, but do you have any evidence to support it ?

    Or do you just enjoy repeating things you know are false over and over ? 

    • JD

      I find it funny you claim to know what I think, know? I would never try to guess what one knows, and if your looking for answers to the things in life which will remain a mystery till we die, sorry you will just have to as everyone else wait till your time is up on this old earth and rest assured of one thing, either the atheist is right, nothing exists, therefore no one will experience anything, zero, ziltch etc., any other cute final words one wishes to use, but if something exists some will be not surprised, some might be surprised it was not quite what they expected, and some will be in total shock and awe since they expected nothingness!:-)

      • Tip O’Neill

        >”I find it funny you claim to know what I think, know?”

        I don’t. I have no idea what you think, I am just quoting what you write here. 

        What you write shows almost no evidence of thought – it’s more like free association. 

        But I can certainly understand why you have been banned in the past – the dishonesty you exhibit is certainly annoying. 

        • jason

          RH/JD went back to his repetitive, vacuous, Madelyn O’Hare referencing style that he never really got away from. So I put him back on moderate.

          If he says anything new, I’ll let it post. Otherwise it will go in the trash.
              

          • JD

            And I almost thought you were a non-zealot atheist!:-) Its ok, I mention her about as often as I mention Jim & Tammy Bakker, figure Tammy is where Madalyn is now, having a very interesting debate no doubt unless in those last moments as Tammy lay dying of the cancer she truly sincerely repented, and in those last moments before Madalyn was murdered she realized what her employee’s had in store for her, her granddaughter and son, she regained belief, guess no one will know on this side of the great divide we all will pass through one day!:-) You run the site, moderate it how ever you wish, but remember when you censor you prove one fact I have learned only zealots fear mere words, it terrifies them since they cannot control them!

            • jason

              It is not fear that is causing many of your posts to be trashed. It is annoyance at repititive, irrelevant rants.

              Try for quality instead of quantity. Try to come up with something brand new in every post. Try to make your comment directly relevant to the item you are responding to.

              I am not expecting perfection, just a better effort than you’ve demonstrated thus far. And when you do, I’ll let them post.

              You can occassionally come up with a good question or comment. It’s just that wading through 10 paragraphs of repetitive irrelevancy to get to one good comment or question is more than folks can be expected to reasonably do.

            • myriad

              In your downtime, JD, I recommend perusing the following page:

              http://tucsoncitizen.com/commenting-guidelines/

              Pay particular attention when you see the words “overposting,” “violate,” and “deleted.”

              • JD

                I do love the fact my greatest sin here is being a prolific poster, able to type with all ten fingers, being retired with plenty of time to enjoy reading a wide variety of web sites on various subjects ranging from politics, religion to the unknown mysteries of the world! One thing I never need is validation by demanding anyones posts be removed, censored, I ignore the ad hominem attack cyber trolls who are the denizons of the internet, one cannot make them go away, trying is like trying to eradicate flies, one has to learn to either avoid them or when one cannot just tolerate them since they will never go away! I might post lengthy posts, but so does the moderator of this site, but my lengthy posts seem to anger and cause some fear, terror since I am not the typical christian with a zealot view you folks need to be viewed as heretics, burned at the stake as ungodly!:-) I see you merely as misguided, following the path God allows you to do, to believe or not to believe! Unlike my christian brethren whom are zealots I don’t come here to convert, prove anything, one cannot prove such as god exists nor can one prove he does not, its one of them things in life no doubt which drives the atheist zealot with a agenda to convert everyone to a secular athesit believer to a foaming at the mouth rabid bite anyone who dares come near them! This site might be moderated but I doubt it is, some here post with as often as I do, seem to have carte blanche ability to post any form of personal hatred’s, ad hominem personal character assassination and they thank the moderator for censoring me, a mean old christian who uses no such tactics!:-)

                • jason

                  “my greatest sin here is being a prolific poster”

                  Not just prolific – generally repetitive and useless also. I came home to 6 pending posts from you, the original content of which is only in the sections I am quoting.

                  “being retired with plenty of time”

                  Congratulations. Most of us don’t have the time to wade through a bunch of text that says nothing new. If you can’t take this into consideration yourself, I use moderation to do do it.

                  Here’s a suggestion: Why don’t you start your own blog? Then you can post all of the repetitive stuff you want all day long, and those who want to read it can read it. Heck, I wouldn’t even mind if once a day you just posted a link to your own blog with your “responses” to this one. Those who want to read your stuff are welcome to follow such links. I just don’t want those of us who have neither the time nor the interest to have to wade through it all.

                  “some here post with as often as I do, seem to have carte blanche ability to post any form of personal hatred’s, ad hominem personal character assassination and they thank the moderator for censoring me”

                  There is a wide range of quality in the comments to this blog, as any blog. Your posts are of the lowest quality. PB does skirt the line sometimes, but has always responded to gentle hints which you seem incapable of doing.

                  You’ll note that unlike my predecessor I do not trash anon3′s posts, because his posts are generally of high quality. The fact that I disagree with anon3 does not enter into it. It is a judgement of quality and the interest level of most of the readers. That’s part of running a successful blog. As I said, I suggest you try starting your own.

                  • Pacific Babe

                    And again, thank you!  Babe

          • Pacific Babe

            Thank you Jason!  Babe

  • Pacific Babe

    Vladimir Potanin #34 in the list of the world’s wealthiest is giving his wealth away.  He’s not attached to any religion and he’s not listed as an atheist, but I always suspect when a prominent person doesn’t lay claim to any religion that they are likely an atheist.  I only include this as you might like to read about his gift giving … http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/russian-oligarch-gives-kennedy-center-5-million/2011/11/30/gIQAek60GO_story.html

  • Pacific Babe
    • anon 3

      What exactly would you like me to comment on?  Guttmacher’s “unpublished” tabulation of CDC survey data?  As an exercise, I tried to reproduce them from the raw survey data, but I haven’t been able to.  The 2006-2008 cohort has an ever-had-sex figure of 45.5% while the 2008-2010 cohort has 47.8%.  Until I can get some idea of why this simple calculations don’t match theirs, I have no idea how to comment on their actual numbers.

      But even so, the usual statistical caveats apply.   Looking at two data points and interpolating a trend is a statistical sin in which a lot of social “scientist”, politicians and journalists engage.

       

      • Pacific Babe

        Then I would suggest that you work to get the figures corrected, b/c I rely often on repeated studies which show verify the same information, which is … the more information you share with a child the better decisions they make.
         
        Now I suggest you read this, which was sent to me by a prominent retired scientist in Tucson.  Will it be your children who skip the biology class b/c of the dogma you’re teaching them?  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/8931518/Islam-Charles-Darwin-and-the-denial-of-science.html

        • anon 3

          “Will it be your children who skip the biology class b/c of the dogma you’re teaching them?”

          They’ll probably skip any class that teaches that mammals aren’t alive until they traverse the birth canal. 

          • Pacific Babe

            Ahhhh … I see where you are coming from.  Life at the cellular level.  How many children have you killed when you’ve left semen in your hand?  How many cells have you killed when you’ve picked your nose?  Babe

          • anon 3

            “Ahhhh … I see where you are coming from.”

            You give yourself too much credit. 

            • Pacific Babe

              Slippery, slippery Anon3 … Can’t answer any questions but certainly knows how to be coy.

  • http://jinnbad.blogspot.com Chris

    Beware the false prophets… ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes or thorns, figs or thistles…” Matthew 7:15-1711-11-11 sent 11:11 pm EST:GET THIS… After making their family fortunes on the backs of the American Working Class, American ideas/ingenuity and infrastructure paid for by the American TAXPAYER… these spoiled, Ivy League Aristocrats had the audacity to buy off our politicians and news media so they could ravage and expatriate most of our nation’s wealth and resources.The greatest looting in the history of mankind happened during the Bush/Cheney disaster.  A corporate crime wave of epic proportions and the Conservative wackos are stuck on stupid STILL blaming the Left.WHY or HOW has this happened? Well it’s all about false prophets, lots and LOT’S of false prophets. Go to any Evangelical Christian Fundamentalist church in the USA and really LISTEN to the message.Sermons from coast to coast seem to have basic underlying theme any right-wing primate could understand. (lol) “Liberal bad, Conservative good”. Ohhhh, and JESUS is a money changing, right-wing, war hawk who preached against abortion.It might be the Conservative think tanks… It might be FOX News or AM Radio Free Conservative… What about all the foreigners like Rupert Murdock, Communist Chinese and Saudi Royals buying up American assets?It may be the mailing lists. I’ll bet there isn’t a right-wing Christian in the WEST who hasn’t received a mailer hyping the famous Conservative transsexual Ann Coulter and her book “Godless Liberals”.LISTEN to the mental sickness and low grade thought processes coming from the mouths of Republicans. See the right-wing Evangelical Christian Fundamentalists get played like pitiful fools. Like GOD would have anything to do with all the greed, racism, hate speech and environmental degradation. These people are so deluded they actually believe JESUS (Prince of Peace) and war profiteers are on the same side. That JESUS (the healer) would be against affordable healthcare for all. COME ON!Christians need to learn a con is a CON! No matter in a back alley or from the Ivory Towers the trick is to RECOGNIZE IT… and not get played for a FOOL.I’ve been saying for years a few fanatical terrorists who perverted Islam don’t scare me near as much as those FOOLS who believe Capitalism can survive without ETHICS, RESPOSNIBILITY and ACCOUNTABILITY! The FIGHT is here at home… everyone in the USA needs to come together and get involved BEFORE the silver spoon, trust fund baby aristocrats throw you in debtor’s prison. These bastards would bring back slavery if they could but inmates working for 23 cents a day is the next best thing. Republicans turned us all into the United Suckers of America.Like I always tell my Conservative friends, this ain’t no Tea Party, this is a bleeping Class War”. I’ll tell you why the Republicans hate the US government so much. Our government is the only thing strong enough to hold this neo-con criminal enterprise accountable, but only if the people force the government to do IT’S JOB.”   See jinnbad.blogspot.com for more. QUOTE OF THE DAY:“…In Princess Ann Coulter’s Ivory Tower world, Reaganomics or Trickle-down economics hasn’t failed on a massive scale for the American PEOPLE. Let’s all conveniently forget Bush/Cheney almost destroyed Middle Class America… the important thing is that the billionaires are doing great, right?Maybe those 16 multi-national corporations (the Supreme Court and Chamber of Commerce bends over for on a daily basis) should start reinvesting in the USA. Ayn Rand or Machiavelli can’t explain away what these silver spoon, trust fund babies did to the American PEOPLE… If the Warriors had any balls they’d whack the Koch Bros, Rupert Murdoch and Karl Rove”   CHARLIE STUNATS

    • JD

      I like what you wrote, agree completely, am amazed the moderator of this atheist message borad allowed your post to slip by and get posted!:-) I don’t think god/jesus is right wing, left wing or even moderate as I am in my personal politics, figure he pretty much would have nothing to do with politics or the modern day pharisee’s we have running america today!

      • Pacific Babe

        JD, I would bet that if you post comments like this one more often, Jason won’t need to remove your comment.  As he said, the only reason that you’ve been removed, is because your rants are lengthy and contain the same info over and over again.  Babe

  • Pacific Babe

    Christianity doesn’t just fail on the personal level as mentioned by Doubting Dave, it’s also a vehicle used by the corrupt to rob the vulnerable … http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2011/10/21/new-birth-member-speaks-out-about-lawsuit-against-eddie-long/?hpt=hp_t1  I suspect this is more prevalent than we know … just as pedophilia is likely more prevalent in any religious/sports dogma than what’s become so apparent with the catholic church.
     
    Eddie Long is just another in the long list of christians who have taken advantage of people who trusted he had a direct line to a god.
     
    And, if you care to read about how creepy conservative modesty doctrines harm young women, read it here:
    http://www.alternet.org/story/153227/how_creepy_conservative_christian_modesty_doctrines_harm_young_women/
     
    Babe
     
     

  • Pacific Babe

    Another article dating back to late 2010 about protestants and pedophilia … are people so desperate for an imaginary sky fairy that they’ll risk their children?
     
    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/09/28/906089/-The-Protestant-Pedophilia-Sex-Abuse-Pattern
     

  • JD

    I truly don’t think anyone, any group, ideology, political party et al….has the corner on having sainthood, guess the fact atheist pedophiles do exist as do Christian ones proves what that mankind is a sinful, disobediant creature? I think if I wished to merely quote various stories one can find all over the internet on all manner of folks who live immoral, not stellar lives one could spend all their time doing this, but I think the real problem with atheism is its popular to certain types of people who might not be as bad as a pedophile, murderer, rapist but who like the hedonistic life style, see things in a amoral way, being a father to two boys I don’t think pedophiles are nice people whether they claim to be Christian or Atheist!

    • Pacific Babe

      JD: I’m going to try to respond to your thoughts. This will be my last response to you, if you choose to follow this with a rant.  If you respond in kind to my thoughts then we can keep this conversation going.  I’ll ask you first if you are trying to learn or if you just are using this as a source to rant?  I’ll know by how you respond.
       
      First ask yourself why atheist organizations have chosen to bring suits.  We are not wealthy like the churches and any money we spend needs to be spent prudently. We don’t collect money from members on Sunday’s.  Our money primarily comes from one source … Membership Fees which are very, very cheap.   Churches seem to have an unlimited amount of cash available, and when/if they run out they can simply tap their congregation for more.  They are not taxed, we are.
      In this country, the Religious Right have made some significant strides in the past 2 -3 decades.  They have managed to re-write the high school text books so that our founding fathers are not portrayed accurately.  The result is that our young people are not learning an accurate history of this country.  Would you rather your children be taught history as accurately as possible or do you care that the religious right put their own spin on it? We want children to learn our history as it occurred.  The Religious Right wants prayer in public school.  Fine, but who’s prayer needs to be said?  Is it a prayer for christians, muslims, jews, hindus, north american indians,?  Does the prayer include atheists, agnostics etc?  Since a christian prayer cannot possibly represent all those people, atheists recommend a moment of silence or a moment of reason.  If there is a religious child attending the school, they are free to pray during their moment of silence to whatever god they choose.  The Religious Right successfully petitioned to have “In God We Trust” stamped on every coin and dollar bill.  But who’s god are they referring to?  The Religious Right is fighting hard to have religion taught as a real alternative to evolution.  That results in the dumbing of America when children think that “intelligent design” is as valid as evolution.  Why should we teach children anything like intelligent design when there is NO and I mean NO facts supporting it?  Would you teach doctors the same way or would you want them to perform surgery based on facts that have been learned over time?  As an atheist, I have no problem with religious studies being taught in a school provided it is taught as comparative religion to cover more than christianity and provided it is taught as the myth it is, because again “we have no facts backing up any religious claim” … If there are ever facts … ie they find Moses’ or Noahs remains and can verify Noah lived to be 900 yrs old, then those facts could be introduced in school. To date everything that archeologists have unearthed has worked against religion instead of supporting it.  Archeology as a science started with the intent of finding evidence to support the christian myths … so far the only thing they’ve been able to verify is some historical events and the bible got most of those WRONG.  So archeologists if anything fell short of their goal of verifying the religious myths.
       
      You may be correct, there may be as many atheists who are pedophiles as their are christian pedophiles.  However, what you are overlooking is that the christian pedophiles use their church and their position as a way to approach the vulnerable children. Christian parents are willing to turn their child over to a priest or a minister because ‘they trust them” when they shouldn’t. 
       
      Ultimately, what atheists are attempting to do is to keep State and Church separate as our forefathers intended.  We do not attempt to convert any christian.  This blog exists for people to learn, regardless of which position they hold. For the most part, we have no interest in any “christian” being on our team.  What we do is protect your rights as a christian to worship as you see fit.  We protect this country from becoming similar to any theocracy such as Afghanistan, Iraq or Iran.  Religion corrupts government.  While no atheist is likely to get into congress today, support  is growing.  There are scientists who are considering running for elected office.  Obama has taken a strong stand and as far as I know he has not set foot in a church since he took office.  He was raised as an atheist and that’s a really positive point. If he’s re-elected I am hoping he puts more emphasis on science.  And, what’s the net result of that?  Well JD, your health, your children’s health and their education is likely to improve.  Christians (IMHO) are on the wrong side of every social issue.  I don’t know if you are sick or healthy, but if you have parkinsons, alzheimers etc stem cell research 15 yrs ago might have resulted in a solution to your problem by now.  While you disagree with my position on abortion, you must understand that by forcing a woman to have a child likely (more chances than not) will result in the child being raised in horrid poverty.  240 million children born around the world are living in disgusting conditions.  I am not saying that ALL those children should have been aborted, or even one.  I am only saying that IF a woman chooses to abort her fetus, then that is HER choice and the decision should be made between her and her doctor.   And, what about end-of-life decisions?  No one wants to force anyone to end their life if they are terminally ill.  However, some people when faced with that situation do want to end their life.  The state of Oregon had 300 people over a decade who chose to use legal assisted suicide … 30 people a year.  I personally would rather they die in the comfort of their home with their family present, then ever know that they chose to head out to their backyard or lock themselves in a bathroom and put a bullet thru their head.  The christian vote forces people to endure unbelievable pain when they fight end-of-life … and it’s very painful.  A close friend who’s father was terminally ill lost his dad to a bullet in the head.  His son’s pain went on for years.  If his dad had sat down with the family and expressed his desire to die and if the family had been given more time to accept dad’s decision it could have been easier for all parties concerned. 
       
      I won’t even get into the gay discussion, which by all means has caused more suffering, confusion, and death because of religionists ill thought out position.  No gay person will ever be anything but a second class citizen until they have every right that you have.  They aren’t asking to be better, they are asking to be equal.  It’s time. 
       
      Let’s see how you respond this time.  Surprise me.  Babe
       
      So, let’s recap … 1) don’t rant in your response. 2) If you disagree with any position then FINE … state why you disagree.  We want the same thing you do … happiness for each team.  We simply don’t want a theocracy AND we want to protect YOU and others who fail to understand that your rights are being whittled away by the Religious Right.  Don’t make any mistake, christian zealots are every bit as confused and frightening as the islamic extremists.  And, there are many christian zealots who are leading this country amock.
       
      It’s important for atheist organizations to lobby Congress and bring attention to christians and their desire to overtake the public school system as well as everything else.  We have to act as their balance.  We have no issue with religionists being involved with whatever church, synagogue, mosque or indian temple they care to join.  We are simply doing our best to keep reason and science up front where it needs to be. Most christians are poorly educated, therefore it’s important we make sure that we protect children from religious ‘zealots’. 

      • JD

        Wow, Christians are all lumped into one big stew pot if I read your “rant correctly”, sorry I have no fancy answer’s to make your anger subside, or your feelings of insecurity in this world where your in a minority, unfortunately for you, your angry at the wrong Christian, I got no agenda, am not a preacher of any kind, in fact I don’t let preachers, priests into my life, can read excellently, don’t need any man/woman to intercede on my behalf with God, Jesus, zealots exist in every category known to mankind, your brethren in the Atheist movement have them, the state leader came here posted denigrating me as “stupid” for having a different opinion than him, my guess is he just cannot argue with a simple fact, no one can prove god exists, nor can anyone prove he does not! This little fact of life destroys the Atheist movements main premise that no god, higher power than mankind exists, since its just as unprovable as any Christian’s belief God exists, my post’s are being censored not due to my prolific posting or my lengthy “rants” as you like to call them, but for the mere fact no one can answer the mystery of life if god exists or not, its one of them mysteries none of us will ever know with out any doubt till we die! Now if it angers you that I “exist & prefer to believe in god, jesus existence” sorry, that is the beauty of America I can do this and nothing you or your fellow zealots can ever do to stop me, no matter how many law suits one files, if only separation of church and state was your real motivations then why do you repeat we Christians are lying to our children and your not lying to yours? Neither view/opinion is provable, science cannot prove god exists or that he does not, that is a fact! I guess what really upsets the Atheist die hard zealots is if us “moderate non-zealot live and let live Christians” simply state what I have stated it drives some to brink of anger, misery, am not sure which since often using profanity, vulgarity, character assassination is a sign one is angry, upset, lost their composure, or cool!:-) I truly don’t see the issue, you can be a Atheist, teach your kids anything you wish too, whose stopping you? Not I! Your statement of your going to protect my kids from Christianity, belief in God or Jesus, may I ask who appointed you to this position in life? Many  of my comments have been pending the moderator’s approval all day long, one in particular where I posted a link to a infamous Atheist Pedophile, no doubt it upsets you that I exist, have 1st amendment rights and nothing you can really do except ask your fellow Atheist Jason, to please silence him, he is angering, upseting your apple cart here, what are you all afraid of? I have no degree’s except a meager high school diploma, and don’t worry about the splinter in your eye,  got a timber in mine to pluck out!;-)

        • Tip O’Neill

          >”my post’s are being censored not due to my prolific posting or my lengthy “rants” as you like to call them,”

          Wow – I had to search for that :)

          JD – People are trying to communicate with you – lovingly – that indeed your posts ARE more than “prolific” – they are spam.
          They also repeat hate speech and refuse to answer any polite objections, but just repeat the same again and again.

          We keep trying to explain to you that you aren’t censored because of your views – it is because you are an irrational d*ckhead.

          But your aren’t listening.

          Please do.