Talking about mental illness in one’s family has always been difficult.  The issues surrounding mental illness continue to be emotional and sometimes controversial.  Is that why Governor Brewer has abondoned her once passionate advocacy for people with mental illness?

According to recent press releases, Brewer’s involvement in state politics started with her activism pushing better treatment and care for our state’s seriously mentally ill population.  Her son is diagnosed with a serious mental illness and has spent time in-patient at the Arizona State Mental Hospital.  As a Mom with a son who had a serious mental illness, I certainly can understand her motivation to try and make a difference.  Stigma continues to be pervasive and some still believe it’s the Mother’s fault when a mental illness presents itself.  Character flaws, laziness, and violent behavior automatically get labeled as mental illnesses when medical science knows that these illnesses are actual biological brain disorders that are treatable.  With proper medical treatment and support people have and do live in recovery.

Given all the positive news about the potential for recovery, why in the world has Govenor Brewer decided to not only distance herself from the issues, but supported drastic slashes to budgets that assist people with mental illness?  I understand that we need to cut our spending, but why cut spending for our state’s most vulnerable?  In the long run, as Gov. Brewer knows, we will end up spending more for emergency room visits, hospitalizations and incarcerations for ignored people living with a treatable mental illness.  With all the publicity and nation wide visability she has created over the last several months, it seems a shame to me that she hasn’t used the opportunity to advance anti-stigma and the value of  proper treatment to some of our states most vulnerable…….including her son.  Is the illegal immigraton bandwagon the only issue she can focus on now?

Over 12,000 low income Arizona residents  loose much of their public mental health coverage today.  Important coverage like non-generic medications, group and individual therapy, case management, housing and transportation assistance as just an example.  Where are these people to go?  What are they to do?

Some have struggled for years to find the right medication “cocktail” and now the rug is being pulled out from under them. They won’t be able to afford the newer, more effective drugs that can cost thousands of dollars a month and they won’t have a therapist or case manager monitoring their changes.  Many are the “working poor” who make just a few too many dollars to qualify for the the state’s medicaid system, AHCCCS;  also  in jeopardy of loosing millions.

Yes, it looks like it could get even worse since  Congress may not extend the states Medicaid assistance. Medicaid assistance from the federal government was voted against by the U.S. Senate last week.  Without it, Arizona’s health care budget falls further into the red.  In a letter to Arizona members of Congress, Governor Brewer complained that “(I)t has become clear that Congress does not have the will to assist states in addressing the very problem that it created.” Based on her combative attitude displayed recently all over the media, I will be surprised if any “Fed” will pay attention.

I guess you can tell I’m angry, but instead of complaining, I wish she would use the same “take charge” attitude towards our state’s health care system as she does toward our illegal immigration issues where no expense spared is the mantra.  We’re soon to be using our local city and state law enforcement officers to enforce federal immigration laws.  Plus, there always seems to be more money to build more prisons to house the additional “illegal immigrants.”  What about using money to house and treat some of our state’s most vulnerable citizens?

The Obama administration launched a new health care reform website yesterday that provides information to the public on “the full range of public and private health insurance plans” that fits their specific circumstances. Mandated by the health reform law, the site will show users how their options “will change in coming years” as the law takes effect. – The Progress Report, July 1, 2010

I am a member of  “Linked in.”  It’s one of those social networks, but unlike Facebook or My Space, it’s members are mostly focused on business networking.  My profile not only includes my involvement in the mental health community, but I also use it as a tool for real estate related information. (that’s what I do in my “other life.”)

An email came in from Linked in  today from a “certified mental health recovery educator” asking for input.  I signed on to Linked-in and this is what I found…

“If you were interviewing a mental health professional to see if their beliefs are congruent with those of the “Recovery Model” of mental health care, what top 3-5 questions would you ask?

I have a client who wants to locate someone in my area that is recovery-oriented, and I found myself explaining the Recovery Model as I know it today to the very first psychiatrist I called. I don’t have time to talk to everyone like that, so I am trying to narrow my interviews down to just a few questions. Recovery IS possible. People DO recover and can live long and product lives. Yeah peer support and boo institutions, people know what’s best for themselves and all of that. What would your top 3-5 questions be?”

Imagine my shock when I read the first response:

“I suspect you are thinking about Substance Abuse rather than mental illness or psychothopathology. There is no such concept as recovery. Treatment or cure may be possible but not recovery.”

WHAT? I’m not printing his name because I don’t want him to be overwhelmed with angry phone calls, but how can it be that a person who is currently involved in the mental health community hasn’t even heard about mental health recovery?  As one responder who is currently living a life in mental health recovery said, ” it’s heartbreaking to read the response……”

I have talked about recovery in previous posts, but I think it needs to be stressed again.  Recovery is possible and very real! I have met dozens of people over the last several years who are in mental health recovery……..one girl I remember had been told while in the throes of a particularly intense psychotic episode that she would remain institutionalized all of her life!  I am here to say, she is not only living independently, but she has a great job and a happy life!  And, her story is NOT unusual!

My family and I recognize people in our community every year that are in recovery with the Daniel Moreno Recovery Award.  It is named after my son who died by suicide after being diagnosed with schizophrenia five years prior. Recovery does not come easy, but it is a reality and is probable with the correct medication if needed, support and treatment. The big problem – only half of those with mental illness receive treatment, yet estimates as high as 80% of those that do get proper treatment do recover.

If you or someone you know is seeking treatment for a mental health issue, I suggest the first question you ask the provider is:  “Do you believe in mental health recovery?” I wouldn’t want you to work with someone that didn’t.