Tucson Citizen.com

NRA and Antenori mock Tucson gun buyback program

by on Jan. 06, 2013, under Gun Control, NRA, Tucson Gun Buyback

Recently Tucson City Councilman Steve Kozachik (R-Ward 6) announced that he was putting together a voluntary gun buyback program to be held at the Tucson Police Dept Midtown Substation on Tuesday, January 8.  As you are no doubt aware, January 8 marks the second anniversary of the tragic shooting of Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords and 18 others.

Kovachik has pulled together this modest trial gun buyback program with assistance from the Safeway Corp, which has donated $1,000 to this event, and the Tucson Police Department (TPD).  The purpose of this program is to give persons who no longer want to own a gun an opportunity to dispose of that firearm, with the knowledge that it will be safely destroyed.  In return, participants will be receive a $50 Safeway gift card.  While I do not consider myself a particularly religious person, I admire Kovachik’s orchestrating this well conceived program that clearly resonates with the Biblical admonition to “beat our swords into plowshares”.

As of January 3 Kovachik had collected $7,000 in donations) for this program.  Since he announced the buyback he has been the subject of non-stop harassment by Todd Rathner, a Tucsonan who is a gun lobbyist and an NRA national board member.  Citing a state law that requires police departments to sell seized weapons to any authorized business, Rathner claims that the TPD cannot legally destroy the guns turned in at the buyback.  Tucson City Attorney Mike Rankin disagrees and contends that TPD can legally destroy the guns.  NRA lobbyist Rathner’s response: “If they destroy them they will be in violation of state law…(and) we will see them in the courtroom or we will change the law and have them sanctioned financially…If we can pass the legislation faster, we’ll pass a law that says we’ll charge the city of Tucson and the Police Department some exorbitant amount of money for every firearm they destroy.”  I don’t know how you feel about this, but I am totally fed up with NRA’s bullying tactics – they have definitely hit a new low with this one!

Adding insult to injury, according to a January 5 Daily Star front page article, on the day of the buyback former Republican State Senator Frank Antenori  and “a few others” will be setting up shop outside the midtown Police Station.  They will be offering gun owners “cold, hard cash” for desirable guns, as well as for ammunition.  Granted, Antenori claims that any guns he buys will be added to his own private collection, but what assurances do we have that his cronies will follow suit?

To be blunt, Antenori is engaging in blatant grandstanding to mock the city’s modest voluntary trial gun buyback program.  His goal is to undermine the buyback while scoring mega-points with the NRA.  In response, Kovachik correctly states that if Antenori goes forward with his plan, he will simply be underscoring Arizona’s current problem with the private gun sales loophole.

Shame on Antenori for engaging in political grandstanding at a time when the rest of our city will be mourning the tragic shooting of January 8,2010 – a massacre that took the lives of six innocent citizens!  But then, I guess the massive donations he will undoubtedly receive from the NRA for his next election bid  will make it all worthwhile.

 

 

 

 

 



  • Fraser007

    “Grandstanding”…sounds like Steve K. is grandstanding! So whats wrong with a little competion? $50.00 gift certificate from Safeway. Cheap.

    • alohapuna

      It’s not competetion. He’s just trying to undermine the purpose of the buyback. Antenori is just being a big jerk.

      • bose_sucks

        Says the Communist

        • http://www.facebook.com/alan.leibensperger Alan Leibensperger

          Why are so many Republicans so proud to advertise their ignorance?!

          • Tommy

            Why Democrats refuse to admit theirs.

          • bose_sucks

            Ignorant

            1. lacking in knowledge or training; unlearned:

            2. lacking knowledge or information as to a particular subject or fact:

            3. uninformed; unaware.

            I fail to see any instance of that in my post. And what is the “purpose” of the buy-back? I believe it is you Alan that are ignorant. You buy into the hype that taking “Assault Weapons” (which I am almost positive you don’t know the definition of) off the streets will lower crime. Over the last decade there were an average of 414 killings where a rifle was used. there were 1814 murders by knifing on average and 615 by hammer/bat. Where is the call to reduce Knife and Hammer violence? Where is the buy-back for those deadly instruments?

      • Fraser007

        It’s called democracy.

  • alohapuna

    I can’t even think of words for such a despicable act of defiance by Frank Antenori. It’s an affront to Gabby Giffords and a total disrespect for all decent people in Tucson. By doing so he is just begging for trouble. I hope most of the people who go wil renounce his childish behavior.

    • Mark

      Gabby Giffords is the affront. She should have resigned and had someone represent Arizona. Instead she stuck around. Frank is pointing out this is stupid. Calling it an affront is just being closed-minded. Gun buybacks programs everywhere fail. They get unwanted useless junk from innocent noncriminals. The criminals and the crazies don’t sign up for a $50 safeway feel-good card. Steve K is a moron.

      • Fraser007

        Maybe Gabby should have had a Sheriffs Deputy or her own armed security at the event where she was shot. How come nobody ever asks that question? How many lives and injuries would have been avoided.
        The coward who shot her perhaps would have thought twice about committing the crime. If he knew that he would have been shot the moment he drew the gun……….?

        • BajaDemocrats

          Maybe President Lincoln should have had his own armed security at Ford’s theater? Hindsight is always 20/20. But what does it say about our democracy if our elected officials need armed security to meet with those who elect them?

          • Fraser007

            Lincoln did have armed security at the Ford Theater. But he went for a drink across the street. Read your history! And yes elected officals need armed security when they meet the public.

        • Chrisk

          Top level armed security details didn’t stop the Kennedy assassination out the wounding of President Reagan, etc.

        • alohapuna

          There were several armed people present who were not able to prevent it. A crazed person like the killer was at the time would not likely be deterred by armed security. Beside that, why should we have to ive in a world of paranoia and fear.

          • Fraser007

            No, we live in a world where there are crazy people. The “several armed people who were not able to prevent it”. Those people(I only know of one who was the college aged student who was carrying) were not trained police officers or private security hired by Gabby.
            When i go to Speedway Outlet to buy stuff there is an armed TPD officer tere, when I go to the airport there are armed security people.
            I wish Gabby had armed and visable staff or Sheriff Deputies present there.

          • http://www.facebook.com/alan.leibensperger Alan Leibensperger

            So with that you are contradicting the standard rhetoric of “..if he had a gun.” And now you’re saying “If only he had a gun and was trained in law enforcement or armed security guard he could have prevented it”.
            A world of paranoia and fear is what the GOP, NRA and gun people are creating. What a sad condition.!

          • Fraser007

            It’s simple. When a leader like Gabby Giffords would go before the public she should have had professional security. Sherriffs, cops, private dedicated security staff. Got it!
            Its not paranoia its called common sense. I bet the victims families would have wanted more security. Ask them.

      • alohapuna

        It’s not about Gabby. It’s really about Frank Antenori being an a–hole. The intention is helping people get rid of their unwanted weapons. How do you know that everywhere such programs fail? Do you have anything of substance to back that up?

    • Dr John

      Right on Aloha!

  • Ado Egbdf

    Do as I say, not as I do? … Or more simply, just be hypocritical…

    “I know the sense of helplessness that people feel. I know the urge to arm yourself because that’s what I did. I was trained in firearms. I walked to the hospital when my husband was sick. I carried a concealed weapon and I made the determination if somebody was going to try and take me out, I was going to take them with me.”

    ~ Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)

    http://www.mrctv.org/videos/feinstein-1995-her-concealed-carry-permit-i-know-urge-arm-yourself-because-thats-what-i-did

    But then, being a radical LIB means never having to answer to anyone, or say you’re sorry. At least that’s what they tell me. Jus’ sayn…

  • I’ll be there paying cash

    Years ago after my great grandfather passed away my great grandmother took his “old revolver” to one of these buybacks. At the time trading that family hierloom for a gift certificate seemed like a good idea. To me my granfather’s gun would be priceless treasure. I am sad that a piece of my family history was bought cheap and destroyed by people who do not understand my way of life.

  • BajaDemocrats

    One of my favorite phrases of the New Year: “former State Senator Frank Antenori”.

    • Dr John

      (smile)

  • chrisk

    Rathner is reaching, as always. These will not be seized weapons. They will be voluntarily handed over for the purpose of destruction. Big difference.

    • Dr John

      Amen

    • Andy_Morales

      you are right. i just posted the law in question.

  • AZPaul

    I thought of this before Frank Antenori, but I want to thank him for acting on it.

  • Karyn_Zoldan

    At tonight’s “roast” at the Loft Cinema which Kozachik initiated, he addressed Antenori as his “soul mate” in the gun issue. Antenori was in the audience. He left shortly thereafter. Glad that Kozachik has the ideas and influence to carry them off. The audience was mostly but not totally responsive.

    • Carolyn_Classen

      Yes, Steve K was being facetious. I spoke with Senator Antenori before the town hall and he said he would be at the gun buy back by 8:30 a.m. tomorrow.

      • Karyn_Zoldan

        I realize he was being facetious. I’m not a fan of Antenori (voted for the other guy) so I got a chuckle as did much of the audience.

    • Andy_Morales

      that’s why they call it a “roast.” in thwe words of Jon Kyle, everythuing said at a roast is not meant to be truthful

    • Fraser007

      Bet its the last time Steve K. holds a “roast”.

  • StellaLuna

    Seriously? I once saw Antenori give a very moving presentation when he was still in uniform about one of the terrifying campaigns he was involved in while deployed. He was humble and human and he earned my respect and gratitude for his service. I would have hoped that his time in uniform, in harms way — his grace under fire — would have translated to grace in civilian clothing. He served us all: those who wanted him in Iraq and those who wished we hadn’t sent him there. He ran for office in order to continue to serve us – all of us, including those who didn’t vote for him. Why then is he taking such an unnecessary black-and-white confrontational stance against a purely voluntary program? I honor the soldier; I am disappointed by the man.

  • Andy_Morales

    I have just read the law in question and it says NOTHING about what to do about guns purchased by a city or town – ONLY with what to do with guns taken as a result of a CRIME:

    13-3105. Forfeiture of weapons and explosives
    A. On the conviction of any person for a violation of any felony in this state in which a deadly weapon, dangerous instrument or explosive was used, displayed or unlawfully possessed by the person, the court shall order the article forfeited and sold within one year after its forfeiture to any business that is authorized to receive and dispose of the article under federal and state law and that shall sell the article to the public according to federal and state law, unless the article is otherwise prohibited from being sold under federal and state law, in which case it shall be destroyed or otherwise properly disposed.
    B. On the conviction of any person for a violation of section 13-2904, subsection A, paragraph 6 or section 13-3102, subsection A, paragraph 1 or 8, the court may order the forfeiture of the deadly weapon or dangerous instrument involved in the offense.
    C. If at any time the court finds pursuant to rule 11 of the Arizona rules of criminal procedure that a person who is charged with a violation of this title is incompetent, the court shall order that any deadly weapon, dangerous instrument or explosive used, displayed or unlawfully possessed by the person during the commission of the alleged offense be forfeited and sold within one year after its forfeiture to any business that is authorized to receive and dispose of the article under federal and state law and that shall sell the article to the public according to federal and state law, unless the article is otherwise prohibited from being sold under federal and state law, in which case it shall be destroyed or otherwise properly disposed.

  • hadenough10

    a typical

  • Pattie

    Wow..this article isn’t biases at all!!!

  • bose_sucks

    I love gun buyback programs. It gets the guns out of STUPID people’s hands. If you are STUPID enough to sell a gun for $50 instead of put it on the Tucson backpages, you don’t deserve to own one. And Dr. John, as far as not liking Antenori buying the guns? you are not a “Centrist Democrat” (LOL), you are anti-capitalist at best, and communist at worst.

  • bose_sucks

    Over the last decade there were an average of 414 killings where a rifle
    was used. There were 1814 murders by knifing on average and 615 by
    hammer/bat. Where is the call to reduce Knife and Hammer violence? Where is the buy-back for those deadly instruments?

    • Fraser007

      Thanks for posting the stats. Well done. Could you post the source for us too. I need to refute some Progressives.
      Thanks.

  • Riley

    So Steve Kozachik
    (misspelled multiple times in the article) convinced people to forfeit one of
    their constitutional rights. He must be proud.
    Perhaps he can convince people not to vote for him, next time. He has certainly convinced me.

  • Machavalli

    ….your way of life? The move Afghanistan or Syria you should right at home.

  • Machavalli

    ….(revised)….your way of life? Then move to Afghanistan or Syria…..you should be right at home.