Comments on: NRA and Antenori mock Tucson gun buyback program

By: Machavalli

Machavalli — Thu, 10 Jan 2013 20:24:00 +0000

….(revised)….your way of life? Then move to Afghanistan or Syria…..you should be right at home.

By: Machavalli

Machavalli — Thu, 10 Jan 2013 20:23:00 +0000

….your way of life? The move Afghanistan or Syria you should right at home.

By: Riley

Riley — Wed, 09 Jan 2013 21:26:00 +0000

So Steve Kozachik
(misspelled multiple times in the article) convinced people to forfeit one of
their constitutional rights. He must be proud.
Perhaps he can convince people not to vote for him, next time. He has certainly convinced me.

By: Fraser007

Fraser007 — Wed, 09 Jan 2013 21:26:00 +0000

Thanks for posting the stats. Well done. Could you post the source for us too. I need to refute some Progressives.
Thanks.

By: bose_sucks

bose_sucks — Wed, 09 Jan 2013 20:03:00 +0000

Over the last decade there were an average of 414 killings where a rifle
was used. There were 1814 murders by knifing on average and 615 by
hammer/bat. Where is the call to reduce Knife and Hammer violence? Where is the buy-back for those deadly instruments?

By: bose_sucks

bose_sucks — Wed, 09 Jan 2013 20:01:00 +0000

Ignorant

1. lacking in knowledge or training; unlearned:

2. lacking knowledge or information as to a particular subject or fact:

3. uninformed; unaware.

I fail to see any instance of that in my post. And what is the “purpose” of the buy-back? I believe it is you Alan that are ignorant. You buy into the hype that taking “Assault Weapons” (which I am almost positive you don’t know the definition of) off the streets will lower crime. Over the last decade there were an average of 414 killings where a rifle was used. there were 1814 murders by knifing on average and 615 by hammer/bat. Where is the call to reduce Knife and Hammer violence? Where is the buy-back for those deadly instruments?

By: Tommy

Tommy — Wed, 09 Jan 2013 05:56:00 +0000

Why Democrats refuse to admit theirs.

By: Fraser007

Fraser007 — Wed, 09 Jan 2013 05:52:00 +0000

It’s simple. When a leader like Gabby Giffords would go before the public she should have had professional security. Sherriffs, cops, private dedicated security staff. Got it!
Its not paranoia its called common sense. I bet the victims families would have wanted more security. Ask them.

By: Alan Leibensperger

Alan Leibensperger — Wed, 09 Jan 2013 00:12:00 +0000

So with that you are contradicting the standard rhetoric of “..if he had a gun.” And now you’re saying “If only he had a gun and was trained in law enforcement or armed security guard he could have prevented it”.
A world of paranoia and fear is what the GOP, NRA and gun people are creating. What a sad condition.!

By: Alan Leibensperger

Alan Leibensperger — Tue, 08 Jan 2013 23:50:00 +0000

Why are so many Republicans so proud to advertise their ignorance?!