What is the difference between Raul Grijalva’s boycott and other boycotts related to Russell Pearce and Joe Arpaio?by Dee Dee Garcia Blase on May. 10, 2012, under Mexican-American / Chicano political activism, Mike Stauffer for Sheriff to Replace Joe Arpaio, National tequila party movement, Rise of Mexican-American / Chicano leaders as political realignment shapes in the southwest, Russell pearce Special Elections Recall
Explain to me how Rep. Raul Grijalva is any different than Russell Pearce and his minions again with regard to boycotting? Why is it not okay for Democrats to boycott businesses but it is okay for Republicans to boycott? No wonder there are more and more Independent voters in the State of Arizona.
Why hasn’t Russell Pearce banned or boycotted Sheriff Joe Arpaio when according to investigations by Arizona law enforcement agencies, Mr. Arpaio’s deputies failed to investigate or conducted only the sketchiest of inquiries into more than 400 sex crimes between 2005 and 2007? Many of those cases involved molested children.
So let’s calculate “sex crimes” shall we?
Let’s see we have 400 sex crimes that did not get investigated by Pearce’s friend via Joe Arpaio vs. 50 arrests that took place in 22 states. Which is worse? Well, we are glad arrests were made, however, what about the molested children where NO ARRESTS were made?
Furthermore, where is Pearce and Sean McCaffrey’s outrage at when JT Ready (known neo-nazi who was baptized into Mormon priesthood by Russell Pearce himself) killed a baby less than 2 years of age?
And lastly, I will be writing Harkins Theaters reminding them of how much money Latinos spend in the state of Arizona and how we perceive Russell Pearce as an extremist, bigot whacko.
A m e r i c a n P o s t – G a z e t t e
Distributed by C O M M O N S E N S E , in Arizona
Tuesday, May 8, 2012