It is no surprise to me to hear Mitt Romney is reversing his position on health care. He was for it before he was against it. Then he was against it before he was for it. Multiple choice Mitt is living up to the stigma of his constant changing views … so much that people all over the internet forums, social networking, blogs and etc. are talking about this constant reversals.
Here is a small example of how Americans are talking about Romney’s constant changing views from politicalforum.com below:
Once again Romney reverses himself. Not surprising. After the Supreme Court ruling Romney insisted that the court got it
wrong when characterizing the Obama Care mandate as a tax. His campaign agreed with Obama that it was a penalty.
Now in one of Romney’s characteristic sudden reversals he labels the penalty as a tax. Romney has reversed himself many times just in this year alone. So many times that it’s too numerous to mention. I’ve listed a few examples:
What Romney said July 2, 2012
While congressional Republicans have seized on the Supreme Court’s ruling that President Obama’s health care overhaul is constitutional as a tax, presumptive GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney’s top campaign strategist undercut that line of argument Monday, saying that the governor agrees with Mr. Obama that the law is not a tax.The governor has consistently described the mandate in Massachusetts as a penalty,” Eric Fehrnstrom, Mr. Romney’s strategist, said on MSNBC. “The governor disagreed with the ruling of the court; he agreed with the dissent that was written by Justice Scalia, which clearly states the mandate was not a tax.”
What Romney says on july 4 2012
In an interview with Jan Crawford of CBS News, Mr. Romney said: “While I agreed with the dissent, that’s taken over by the fact that the majority of the court said it’s a tax, and therefore it is a tax. They have spoken.”
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/…are-not-a-tax/
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/…are-not-a-tax/
What Romney said first:
Published: November 18, 2008
Let Detroit Go Bankrupt
IF General Motors, Ford and Chrysler get the bailout that their chief executives asked for yesterday, you can kiss the American automotive industry goodbye.
But don’t ask Washington to give shareholders and bondholders a free pass — they bet on management and they lost.
What his campaign said latter:
On 04/28/12 01:28 PM ET
One of Mitt Romney’s top advisers said Saturday that President Obama’s decision to bailout Chrysler and General Motors was actually Romney’s idea.
“[Romney's] position on the bailout was exactly what President Obama followed. I know it infuriates them to hear that,” Eric Fehrnstrom, senior adviser to the Romney campaign, said.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/19/op…mney.html?_r=1
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/…t-was-his-idea
What Romney Said First
JAN 7 2012
STEPHANOPOULOS: Now, there have been questions about that — that — that calculation of a hundred thousand jobs. So if you could explain it a little more. I — I’ve read some analysts who look at it and say that you’re counting the jobs that were created but not counting the jobs that were taken away.
Is that accurate?
ROMNEY: No, it’s not accurate. It includes the net of both. I’m a good enough numbers guy to make sure I got both sides of that.
But — but the — the simple ones, some of the biggest, for instance, there’s a steel company called Steel Dynamics in Indiana, thousands of jobs there. Bright Horizons Children’s Centers, about 15,000 jobs there; Sports Authority, about 15,000 jobs there. Staples alone, 90,000 employed. That’s a business that we helped start from the ground up.
What Romney’s campaign said later:
01/09/2012 TheWashingtonPost
Romney spokesman Eric Fehrnstrom on the record. “Fehrnstrom says the 100,000 figure stems from the growth in jobs from three companies that Romney helped to start or grow while at Bain Capital: Staples (a gain of 89,000 jobs), The Sports Authority (15,000 jobs), and Domino’s (7,900 jobs). This tally obviously does not include job losses from other companies with which Bain Capital was involved — and are based on current employment figures, not the period when Romney worked at Bain.”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/…AAiP_blog.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/…helP_blog.html
Yesterday:
February 29, 2012 Campaign stop:
Romney began his answer by saying that he wished he “could tell you that there’s a place to find really cheap money, or free money, and we could pay for everyone’s education.
But, Romney said, “that’s just not going to happen,” and he proceeded to argue that it’s not a good thing to have government too involved in student loans.
“Now that the government’s taking over the student loan business, I think you’ll get less competition. I’d rather have more competition, with private lenders as well as government lenders,” Romney said. “The right course for America is for businesses and universities and colleges to compete, and for us to make sure that we provide loans to the extent we possibly can at an interest rate that doesn’t have the taxpayers having to subsidize people who want to go to school.”Going a step further, Romney told the Ohio crowd that he wants loans to be accessible to people, but that if voters want somebody who “will be some who get up in a setting like this and talk about how they’re going to give you a bunch of government money … that’s not who I am.”
Romney Today:
Today: Mitt Romney generated quite few headlines Monday 4/23/12 when he voiced support for keeping federal student loan interest rates from going up – a position that puts him at odds with Republicans in Congress, and maneuvers him closer to the political center for the general election.
It’s also a stance that appears to clash with some of Romney’s rhetoric on the campaign trail during the Republican primary
What Romney said later:
Mitt Romney generated quite few headlines Monday 4/23/12 when he voiced support for keeping federal student loan interest rates from going up – a position that puts him at odds with Republicans in Congress, and maneuvers him closer to the political center for the general election.
It’s also a stance that appears to clash with some of Romney’s rhetoric on the campaign trail during the Republican primary