Tucson Citizen.com
Mexican-American Times - Chicano art, cultura, education, politics and news…

Archive for the ‘economic news’ Category

Sen Jeff Session supported billion$ in oil company welfare subsidies — yet blames economic situation on immigrants

Wednesday, May 22nd, 2013
Jeff Session received significant contributions from oil companies.

Jeff Session received significant contributions from oil companies.

Southern Republican Senator Jeff Sessions is insulting our intelligence.

Either he thinks we are a bunch of dumb Messicans who don’t know math — or, he is hoping to get away with spewing myths about legal immigration reform.

For instance, did you know that Sessions supported welfare for large oil companies that wastes BILLION$ of our American tax dollars?

According to Oil Change Int’l:  In the United States, credible estimates of annual fossil fuel subsidies range from $10 billion to $52 billion annually, while even efforts to remove small portions of those subsidies have been defeated in Congress.  Download your own pdf copy here.

Follow the money …  Jeff Sessions received approximately $286.5 K from Energy & Natural Resources contributors.

Ask Jeff Sessions: Why Are We Subsidizing Oil Companies?
DREAM Act activists launch above image describing "Gang of Hate"

DREAM Act activists launch above image describing “Gang of Hate”

 

It is disingenuous for Sessions to expose a ‘flawed’ bill when we all know the immigration system is broken and there is a clear need for LEGAL IMMIGRATION REFORM.

A healthy and legal immigration solution will secure our borders, create a safer North American Continent and promote a stronger relationship with our contiguous neighbors.  Enforcement-only initiatives promote a situation that emulates the failed days of Prohibition, which serves only to encourage the underground labor market.  Our government needs the additional tax revenues that new immigrants generate in order to sustain the burgeoning entitlement programs baby boomers require as they continue to retire.  By developing a reasonable legal immigration plan, we create a system where immigrants share American tax burdens as they continue to contribute millions of dollars into our tax coffers.  New immigrants sharing our tax burdens will help discourage our government from increasing taxes, because under the current system these entitlement programs will drain all federal revenues within 15 years.

We’ve been through this before.  It is much easier for politicians to blame immigrants who can’t defend themselves for our economic situation.  In fact, we ought to support common sense solutions, and we ought to not waste billions on oil welfare subsidies.

Economic think tank, CATO Institute writes:

“According to estimates from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, there are 3.1 related jobs off the farm for every job on the farm. Eliminating the on-farm jobs would put at risk many more jobs paying middle-class wages and employing native-born American workers.”

If the GOP Sen. Jeff Sessions wants more jobs he can start by slashing $40 million in farm subsidies

Wednesday, May 22nd, 2013
DREAM Act activists launch above image describing "Gang of Hate"

DREAM Act activists launch above image describing “Gang of Hate”

The Southern Republican Senator Jeff Sessions unfortunately has his economic facts mixed up as it relates to job creation and legal immigration.

Economic think tank, CATO Institute writes:

“According to estimates from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, there are 3.1 related jobs off the farm for every job on the farm. Eliminating the on-farm jobs would put at risk many more jobs paying middle-class wages and employing native-born American workers.”

The definition of a subsidy is:  A sum of money granted by the government or a public body to assist an industry or business. 

In other words, some Republicans who claim to be for small government and against welfare seem to be in support of billions of dollars via subsidies that will help corporations — or in other words welfare for businesses.

If Sessions is so concerned about jobs (even though immigrant labor provides more jobs), why doesn’t he reduce farm subsidies and create jobs from the $40 million in welfare given to these Alabama agricultural companies?

Indeed one of the BIGGEST disadvantages for farm subsidies has to do with the below:

Disadvantages

The subsidies work as a price control by paying farmers to leave fields unplanted in times when the market is experiencing a surplus. Instead of using the excess crops to feed the needy, the farmers are not growing, yet being paid to do so. Farm subsidies also inhibit the normal market cycle. With the exception of disaster payments, the cash from farm subsidies prevent the normal fluctuation in price due to supply and demand. This makes the price completely dependent on government intervention, according to the Environmental Working Group Farm Subsidy Primer.

A SOLUTION:  Jeff Sessions should work to reduce the millions and millions of Alabama farm subsidy recipients  that totaled $45,003,000 in  2011, and provide grants for small business investors with some of that money.  It is a stupidly thing for government to pay farmers that leave fields unplanted and “unworked.”

People want to WORK.  It is ridiculous to waste money in unattended fields.  We ought to put money to work.

 

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Subtotal, Farming Subsidies
2011
1 Devaney Brothers Farms ∗ Madison, AL 35756 $262,222
2 Martin Farm ∗ Courtland, AL 35618 $245,896
3 Haney Farms ∗ Athens, AL 35611 $244,592
4 Triple R Farms ∗ Benton, AL 36785 $228,745
5 Liikatchka Plantation General Par ∗ Eufaula, AL 36027 $208,290
6 Underwood Farms ∗ Leighton, AL 35646 $179,228
7 Newby Farms ∗ Athens, AL 35613 $170,700
8 Darden Bridgeforth And Sons ∗ Tanner, AL 35671 $168,436
9 Hamilton Farms ∗ Hillsboro, AL 35643 $162,474
10 Blythe Cotton Company ∗ Town Creek, AL 35672 $161,936
11 Shaw Farms ∗ Tanner, AL 35671 $156,821
12 Westover Planting Co ∗ Eufaula, AL 36027 $154,816
13 Isbell Farms ∗ Muscle Shoals, AL 35662 $151,536
14 Driskell Cotton Farms ∗ Grand Bay, AL 36541 $149,550
15 Moravec St Elmo Farms ∗ Saint Elmo, AL 36568 $145,195
16 Ward Farms ∗ Atmore, AL 36502 $136,267
17 Helton Brothers Farm ∗ Atmore, AL 36504 $133,884
18 J B Hain Co ∗ Sardis, AL 36775 $131,215
19 Mullek Farms ∗ Robertsdale, AL 36567 $126,778
20 Cannon Farms ∗ Theodore, AL 36590 $126,207

Carlos Slim: How the Wealthiest [Mexican] Man in the World Can Help Create a Stronger Continent and Western Hemisphere

Thursday, January 10th, 2013

Our country is broken. 

We can play the blame game all day long, but what good will it do?  An old commonplace pattern seems to be repeating with regard to our policies like an old broken record that can’t seem to get out of stuck mode. Politicians in Congress seem to have too much time on their hands because they spend more of their time bickering instead of creating solutions.  We should be developing and creating solutions that will help Americans, our economy and our national security in a practical manner.

In addition to our country being broken, we see other parts of the world falling apart as revolutions spread.  We can never seem to predict what is going to happen from one day to the next in the Middle East – so maybe it’s time to have a stronger back-up plan as we push for a stronger western hemisphere.  After all, we ought to know the ins-and-outs of what is going on in our front and backyard.  In fact, I believe we are putting too much emphasis on the Middle East and we need to balance it out with a push for a stronger western hemisphere.

A notable individual who stands out to me is Carlos Slim.   Slim is a Mexican-born citizen who acquired much of his wealth via communications. He is the richest man in the world and his telecommunications empire involves over 100 million subscribers in the Latin America.  Indeed Slim is no stranger in trying to help our United States economy by providing more jobs when he bought a stake in CompUSA in 1999 for $800 million. Unfortunately, the sales of computers were slowing down at the time because they were more and more obsolete as new technology became available. Carlos tried everything to keep the chain alive but it eventually closed.

Although I know Carlos is a very busy business man, I took some time to see what his views were as it relates to international government policy affecting our continent.  I found his innovative ideas regarding immigration and tourism a path we ought to consider – particularly if it is a win-win for both economies.  He is absolutely right when he said we ought to have more action tanks instead of just think tanks.  I have not seen much recent news with regard to Slim and policy out there, but was impressed when he did say government ought to take care of public education.  I agree.  We ought to introduce into our high school curriculums an educational scope that will offer skill sets in preparation of taking care of our elderly.  Although Slim does not appear active in helping create new policies, I believe he is influential enough to bend his ear a bit regarding education that will solve future challenges.

The Problem:  Aging population is exhausting much of our federal tax revenues coupled with declining birth rates.

The Solution:  Offering a skill set or educational curriculum that will help take care of our elderly, and creating new tax payers instead of burdening the existing ones in an effort that will ensure the security and well-being of our parents and grandparents.

Many of us are at a point where we need to look ahead and think about our parents.  Are we going to stick them in nursing homes?  Or, are we going to hire aids that will help check in on our parents in their own homes?  If you’re a Mexican-American, you will find that many of us choose to have our parents move in with us so that we can have them in our own homes where we can all take care of each other.  Grandparent time is important to us because we do value the older generation passing customs and family traditions to our children.

The United States, Canada and Mexico will soon be facing some serious challenges regarding our aging population particularly when the U.S.  and Mexico have rapidly plunging baby rates and a rapidly growing aging problem.  In 2011, the birth rate of the United States fell to its lowest level recorded in American history.

Eventually both the United States and Mexico will be competing for people to live in each of our own countries.

In addition to this, the AARP has made it extremely clear to Congress to not cut Social Security and Medicare in light of the fiscal cliff deal.  So let’s do the math, shall we?  Since 2010, Social Security has been paying out more in benefits than it collects in taxes.  How in the hell can we fund Social Security and Medicare without burdening existing tax payers with more tax increases?  It’s simple — we bring out the good hardworking people who are living in the shadows of society and are already contributing to gasoline, sales, liquor, tire taxes and etc., and we create new official tax payers through them — the immigrants.  It would be in AARP’s best interest to welcome a solution that will sustain our elderly without burdening existing tax payers.

As our elderly rely on prescription medication, and since prescriptions are much cheaper in Mexico we ought to make it easier for them to get cheaper medication.  Indeed one of the biggest complaints by our elderly is the cost of medicine and we know that many of them in the Southwest make trips to Mexico to obtain cheaper medication.  This is where it might be a good idea to look into Carlos Slim’s immigration and tourism ideas when he said:

“[Customs and Immigrations at airports] should not [be] this environment where you feel like you’re coming to an insecure place,” Slim said, in an interview with Mexico Secretary of Tourism Gloria Guevara Manzo and WTTC President and CEO David Scowsill. “[It should be] a warm welcome, not only when you go to the airport, but at the hotel. Immigrations officers and customs [officials] must have this relationship with the ministry of tourism, and bring a friendly aspect [to travel].”

It’s time for the 113th Congress to shit or get off the pot.  We need them to stop with their partisanship bickering and we need to see action now.  Our elderly are dependent upon solutions.  We must take care of our elderly and Homeland issues.  We ought to work on a stronger western hemisphere – especially as it relates to our continent.

Both Mexico and the United States are experiencing plunging birth rates

Wednesday, January 9th, 2013

Both Mexico and the United States are experiencing plunging birth rates and this is a concern particularly when the United States will have a smaller pool of migrant labour to recruit from.

What kind of labor should we be concerned about?

I am concerned about health services and taking care of our elderly.

What kind of education and skill set might we need in order to take care of our parents?

More importantly, I am not a big fan on sticking our aging parents in nursing homes.  For the most part, I think  Mexican-Americans are big believers in taking care of our parents in our own homes.  No offense to the nursing homes, and I believe there is a need for them, but I also believe it is unreasonable to have all of our parents in nursing homes when they get older.  We value our parents and we do not want to see them stuck in a home wasting away.

How do we prepare for the aging population?  Do we have schools available that will provide the skill set in taking care of our own?

According to the The Economist:

FENCES, soldiers, infra-red cameras: the United States goes to great lengths to hold back the teeming masses across its southern border (see article). But the masses are teeming less. Mexico’s birth rate, once among the world’s highest, is in free-fall. In the 1960s Mexican mothers had nearly seven children each (whereas women in India then had fewer than six). The average now is just over two—almost the same as in the United States. The UN reckons that from 2040 the birth rate in Mexico will be the lower of the two.  …  Today’s falling fertility rate will curb the flow. But the main motors of migration will still be economic boom or bust—on both sides of the border.

In 2011, the birth rate in America fell to the lowest level in recorded history.  According to Business TIME:

As our largest generation moves toward full-on retirement we are minting what promises to be our smallest generation, a group that from the very beginning of its working years will face the impossible task of supporting millions of entitled old fogeys. Something will have to give.

Indeed something will have to give, and the United States ought to prepare and have proactive solutions that will curb the influx of retirees and new challenges.

Just in: The United States GDP Grew 2% — Better than Expected

Friday, October 26th, 2012

It appears our economy grew better than expected and what U.S.  economists predicted. 

We are thankful for that since we are still recovering from the George W. Bush years when our housing market crashed catapulting us into recession among other things.

If you are an American patriot, we really do appreciate any kind of bounce and good news as it applies to our Nation.

From MarketWatch:

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) – The U.S. economy grew 2.0% in the third quarter, fueled by higher consumer and government spending and more home building, according to a preliminary government estimate. Economists surveyed by MarketWatch projected gross domestic product would rise to 1.7% from 1.3% in the second quarter. Consumer spending, which has the biggest impact on GDP, rose 2.0% in the July-to-September period, compared to 1.5% in the second quarter. Real final sales of U.S.-made goods and services advanced 2.1%, compared to 1.7% in the prior three-month period. Government spending jumped 3.7%, the biggest increase since mid-2009, mainly because of higher defense outlays. Also, investment in housing surged 14.4%. Net imports, which subtract from GDP, fell 0.2%. Exports dropped a sharper 1.6%. Business investment outside the residential sector fell 1.3%, the biggest drop since late 2009. Inflation as measured by the consumer PCE index rose 1.8%, or 1.3% excluding food and energy. Disposable income moved up 2.6%, but that was down from a 3.8% increase in the second quarter. The personal savings rate fell to 3.7% from 4.0%