Maricopa County leader Ann Wallack did not vet Paul Penzone properly because he has a domestice violence police record that has surfacedFriday, July 6th, 2012
…. look what the cat dragged in?
Apparently the candidate that Ann Wallack hand picked to try to replace Joe Arpaio via Paul Penzone had a a domestic violence incident with his wife in 2003.
Why would the Maricopa County Party leadership not properly VET a candidate to replace the corrupt Joe Arpaio?
What makes Paul Penzone different than the corrupt Russell Pearce who also had domestic violence incidents with his wife?
Indeed Democratic and liberal leaning journalists have written extensively about the ousted Senator Pearce’s violent background, but they appear to say very little with regard to Penzone domestic violent background.
Why is that?
The State of Arizona has a mandatory arrest law for such domestic violence cases … yet neither Penzone nor his wife were arrested.
Why did neither get arrested?
Is Paul Penzone and his wife above the law?
Isn’t the “law the law”?
Why is it okay for former law enforcement employees to avoid the mandatory arrest law, but regular people would be arrested?
I smell corruption already…and it is too bad Ann Wallack is supporting spoiling the vote against Sheriff Joe Arpaio.
What was she thinking?
Here is the police report regarding Paul Penzone who was a mere retired sergeant with no command experience trying to become the leader of the sheriff’s department of the 3rd largest county in the Country.