Tucson Citizen.com

Ning Probably Means “Unisex,” The Marginal Merits Of Wikipedia, And William Gibson Was Right Again

by on Aug. 10, 2009, under A-List (Best of the Lizard), Computers & Internet, Science Fiction, Technology, Writers and Writing

A while back, when I asked my personal tech guru what new software and networking developments I should be aware of, he recommended that I take a look at Ning. I was impressed. Combining a widget-based structure reminiscent of WordPress, with social networking (a bit like a grown-up version of Facebook), an easy-to-use blogging platform, photo and video sharing, and many other options, it’s a great choice for the savvy person looking to create an online community.

Whether it began as a kid's name, a peace-off, or something else, Ning is cool.

Whether it began as a kid's name, a peace off, or something else entirely, Ning is cool.

Being a devoted and near lifelong fan of Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, the first thing I thought of, obviously, was a ningy, which Douglas Adams described as “a triangular rubber coin 6,800 miles along each side.” The ningy was used, briefly, in one of his original radio episodes to make fun of money and galactic currencies. No, unfortunately, the Ning social networking service doesn’t have anything to with HHG, at least not that I’m aware of, but it did remind me of Neuromancer author William Gibson—another visionary science fiction writer.

Kathryn Bigelow’s Wild Palms (1993), a puzzling, intriguing, and very thinly-veiled poke at scientology and the extremely weird L. Ron Hubbard, includes a short but delightful cameo by Gibson, playing himself. At a chic party, Kim Cattrall introduces Gibson as “the man who coined the word ‘cyberspace,’” to which he sardonically replies: “And they won’t let me forget it.” And they haven’t.

In addition to his almost prescient science fiction novels, set in a future that seems to be literally around the corner, Gibson made a remarkable prediction during the early days of the Internet. He realized that when information becomes freely and readily available to anyone, at any time, the value of that information is determined by how reliable it is. In other words, can you believe what you read in Wikipedia?

I once had the pleasure of socializing with Mr. Gibson at a party in New York. Packed with beautiful and overly accomplished people, it was actually quite a bit like the party in Wild Palms. He is a very charming man, tall and perhaps slightly awkward physically, but friendly, sincere, and encouraging. I insisted on ordering a drink for him, as a “thank you” for giving the world such a great read with Neuromancer—still easily my favorite Gibson work.

I suppose once you’ve made spot-on predictions about what could be, or will be—with no mirrors attached—everyone then relentlessly asks for more and better predictions. It must get very tiresome. I hate to be predictable, so instead of asking him to reveal a glimpse of possible futures I bent Mr. Gibson’s ear with tales of my own writing and science work. He seemed relieved not to have to produce another virtual rabbit out of the hat. Or maybe I was just a little giddy on vodka and the company of a favorite science fiction writer. It matters not; it was a fine evening.

The extremely brilliant and very nice Mr. William Gibson. Photo by Fred Armitage/Courtesy of Wikipedia Commons. I guess the wicked Wiki is good for something after all.

The extremely brilliant and very nice Mr. William Gibson. Photo by Fred Armitage/Courtesy of Wikipedia Commons. I guess the wicked Wiki is good for something after all.

So, I was reminded of the fascinating William Gibson today because I became interested in the meaning of the word Ning. Wikipedia claims it is Chinese for “peace,” but that comes to you from an “informational site” compiled by anyone who has an opinion and spare time on their hands. I do not consider it the most reliable of resources. WikiAnswers states with great authority that Ning means “peaceful” in Chinese. Gili’s blog at avirtualexit.com delved considerably deeper and came up with a link to, of all things, a website that helps people name babies. Do parents really need help with such tasks? I thought we all had a few favorite names tucked away in case somebody accidentally gets knocked up (mine are Rachel, Dawn, Sam, Zack, and Evelyn if anyone cares). Anyway, I digress. The baby name site—with the rather silly title of yeahbaby.com—and doubtless a repository of the most authoritative information available anywhere, has the following wisdom to dispense:

Baby names – the name Ning.
Baby names info for Ning:
• Gender: a boy or girl name
• Pronounciation: not available
We know of no common nicknames for the name Ning

What about Ningy?

Further research suggested that Ning is actually a Chinese surname. At that point I became bored and thought I might rather be re-reading Neuromancer or learning more about the real Ning and its alluring CEO, Ms. Gina Bianchini.

William Gibson was right. Our worlds are rife with cheap information. We can ferret out the most obscure and arcane details with just a few seconds of typing. But when almost anyone can put up a website on any subject, with no checks or balances, how do we acquire reliable information? I’ll take the Encyclopedia Britannica over Wikipedia any day. You get what you pay for.

a-lizard-art-cp3


  • ldonyo

    I love Douglas Adams’  and William Gibson’s works, too. In fact, back in the 80′s, Infocom released computer games based on HHG and Neuromancer. They were text-based adventure games, but they were great fun.
     
    The HHG game had one part I will never forget involving the acquisition of a Babble fish. There were a total of 47 steps involved. I had to buy the hint book for the game to proceed any further. Even the hint book had Adams’ wry wit throughout.
     
    Wikipedia is definitely not a definitive source for information. Anything that politicians hire people to edit to make themselves look better can hardly be considered authoritative. The technology behind Wikipedia has turned out to be extremely useful for all sorts of other sites, so it isn’t a total loss.

  • http://tucsoncitizen.com/lizard/ Logical Lizard

    Dear Idonyo: Thank you for your comments. You are clearly a person of exceptional taste  : )  I remember the old text-based game for HHG. That was quite a while back  : )
    I agree with you that Wikipedia is not a total loss. In the early days, I was quite involved with it, and contributed a lot of text and photos on various science subjects. Over time, I saw more and more erroneous information creeping in to entries that were among my specialties. I would correct these facts, only to have them changed back to nonsense the following day. I no longer bother and consider it a waste of my time to try and correct errors in Wikipedia. There are plenty of accurate, printed reference books at our disposal. Thanks for reading; thanks for writing — LL

  • Elizabeth “Bjay” Woolley

    80′s text based gamer here too.  We showing our age?  lol.  Any of you happen to play Ultima Online?  It’s like a text-based game with cheesy graphics and attempts to modernize.  Nice article.  I wanted to chime in on Ning.  I LOVE it.  I started three social networking sites there myself.  SO EASY and so many powerful tools.  And free no less.
     
     

  • http://www.utahredrock.com Jim Breitinger

    You need to hear my full presentation titled: “Wikipedia and knowledge in the 21st century.” Wikipedia is simply, one of the most amazing collaborative projects of our times–and perhaps of all time. Is it a “reliable source?” Not always, but that completely misses the point of what it is. Among other things it is an amazing example of human ingenuity, collaboration, and knowledge. Visit http://www.utahredrock.com for a post near the top with links to The New Yorker, The NY Times, The Atlantic, and other places to deepen your knowledge of this great project. I’ll take a fresh, always being updated resources, over the always out of date Britannica any day (though both have a place). Cheers, Jim

  • http://www.lachtoday.com lach

    I’ve actually had Ning bookmarked for quite awhile as a “i’ll get to this one day’ site. still haven’t. it seems i usually learn just enough tech to get done what needs doing and then, as a result, never have time to learn more!
    as for wikipedia, i’ve been having fun not correcting the misinformation for ‘antifolk’ and just letting it slowly deform into a mire of ego and self-promotion by people i’ve never heard of. a tower of babel indeed

  • jim

    I’m pleased that you make a point of highlighting the lack of editorial integrity in sources such as wiki and the myriad blogs etc. There is a book that was written a few years ago whose title sums it up, “The Cult of the Amateur”. It only took the author a few pages to seal his argument; the inmates are running the asylum.
    Gibson, along with PKD, an all time favorite! I was/am gripped by ‘Pattern Recognition”.

  • Pingback: Search Engine Optimization And The Dangers Of April Fools Pranks - The Logical Lizard


Logical Lizard illustration by Timothy Arbon
On location filming "Meteorite Men"

RSS Meteorite Men on Twitter