Tucson Citizen.com
Caveat Lector - Politics, Government and the Free Press – by Mark B. Evans

Vote yes on Prop. 409, the city road repair bond

by on Oct. 15, 2012, under Politics

As reputations go, the city of Tucson’s stinks.

If you needed to hire a work crew off the street to clear brush around your house and your only choices were the city council and a gang of scary-looking street toughs, you’d choose the street toughs.

Because if you’re going to get robbed, you might as well know right away rather than have to wait for an audit.

The past half decade or so has been filled with fired city managers, failed sweetheart development deals and city workers repeatedly caught with their grubby hands in the taxpayer’s pocket. And on top of this festering pile of failure and scandal you can toss the rotting corpse of Rio Nuevo and its record of squandered millions and mismanagement.

Yet despite all of this, the city council has climbed atop this rubble pile of its own making and planted the flag of Proposition 409.

They want you to vote for higher property taxes over the next five years to get started on fixing the cracked, crumbling and pothole-filled streets of Tucson.

No, really, they’re serious….stop laughing.

It’s not funny.

The city streets are in serious trouble. It’s more than just potholes. The city’s road staff has evaluated all of the city’s streets and estimated about more than half of the main thoroughfares are desperately in need of repair and nearly all of the neighborhood streets.

It has estimated that it will cost between $600 million and $1 billion over 10 years just to overcome the years of “deferred maintenance,” which is a euphemism for neglect. And that’s on top of the $20 million to $25 million a year the city needs to spend on annual maintenance just to keep the problem from getting any worse.

Crumbling roads cost drivers thousands of dollars a year in higher maintenance costs and vehicle wear and tear. They’re also dangerous as they can cause a rise in accidents and collisions.

Opponents have argued that the money exists within the city budget to fix the streets and the new tax isn’t necessary.

They apparently have been living in some other city the past five years as the city council went through year after year of painful budget cuts due to the recession.

The city has cut about $50 million in annual spending and in doing so put every option on the table, including laying off cops and firefighters, closing parks and recreation centers, imposing rental taxes and raising bus fares. And for each sacred cow there were packed hearing rooms of angry citizens who stole all the council’s spears and said “no, no, no.”

If Prop. 409 fails, we’re back in that soup – fighting over cops or roads, firefighters or roads, buses or roads, parks or roads. And roads will lose every fight.

Which will cost us far more than the piddly tax increase being proposed to pay for fixing them. If you own a $200,000 house, it will cost you about $36 a year. A blown tire will cost you a lot more than that.

The council passed a truth in bonding ordinance and included language in the bond question that is supposed to ensure this extra tax money will actually be spent on road repairs. We have no choice but to trust them.

Hold your nose, cross your fingers and vote yes on Prop. 409



  • Oreshans

    Our property taxes were to have already paid for those road repairs. The City has decided to hire more employees to do the work of the ones that sit on their cell phones all day talking to their family and friends. Those same employees saunter around the offices rather than moving with an intended action of getting their work done. The City Planners decided to favor new projects of the “favorite” developers that take them to lunch all the time. Instead of using the money wisely, the plan that lovely Rio Nuevo project and waste the money that they were given by the taxpayers to fix their roads. Frankly, I think they should all be held accountable. Also, the City Manager and all of those Dept. Heads that get paid so much more than they are actually worth and more than the economy can support should return some of the money we have paid them to fix our roads. The problem is their priorities are out of balance, always putting themselves above all of the Cities needs. You know their kids are driving on those roads too and their cars are being damages too unless, of course, they are driving one of those City vehicles that we pay for too. I get tired of seeing the City vehicles out with their wives running errands in them on the weekend.

    Change your priorities and do the job that they are hired and paid to do. Our taxpayers are not an endless supply of money. Most of us are struggling just like the rest of the citizen; even those in the more expensive areas have calculated their budgets when they purchased and some have lost those job, some have taken pay cuts as TMC has required their employees to do in the past and some have had so many fees and taxes and increases added to their budgets that they can no longer give the extra money you keep asking for. Have a moral conscience. Do the right thing and fix those roads that we have already given you money for and take a pay cut or retirement pay cut. Even the most highly educated employees will never make as much as you do when they retire and they work hard for a living by not pretending to work.

    Yep. I am tired of it all. I think I am still voting “No” out of principle.

  • Fraser007

    If voting no sends the message and maybe changes the makeup of the City Council and the City managers I will vote NO.
    I want to send them a mesage. You stole $230,000,000 for frigging nothing. I will take more wear on my car if it gets rid of these idiots.
    I am ashamed of my community. Giving these crooks more money is crazy. Clone more Steve k.’s on the Council and I will vote ‘yes”. Otherwise go away. and to think they even considered for one second giving money to the marist College three story adobe boondoggle amazes me.