On his first day in office, President Obama signed a directive to make government records more open to the public, capping an election year in which the First Amendment was front and center – and also out-front and central.
On Inauguration Day, the amendment’s 45 words loomed large over the Pennsylvania Avenue presidential parade route for the first time, carved in Tennessee marble on a 74-foot high plaque on the front of the Newseum, visible to millions of inaugural visitors.
But all five freedoms in the First Amendment had their own moments in Obama’s journey to the Oval Office:
• Freedom of religion: The much-debated mix of church and state was involved from the start of the primary elections.
Then-candidate Obama faced rumors that questioned his Christian faith and declared him a “secret” Muslim.
Republican candidate Mitt Romney, a Mormon, felt compelled to make a public declaration that a Romney presidency would “serve no one religion, no one group, no one cause.”
And when former Ark. Gov. Mike Huckabee openly displayed his evangelical-Christian credentials in the early Iowa primary, he moved briefly to a leading position.
Just as the presidential campaign peaked in the autumn, 33 pastors in 20 states challenged Internal Revenue Service regulations that ban election politicking from the pulpit by religious groups with nonprofit status.
Religious controversy arose anew just recently when conservative Rev. Rick Warren was asked to deliver the inaugural invocation.
The criticism was muted somewhat by Obama’s asking Episcopal Bishop Gene Robinson, a vocal gay-rights leader, to offer a prayer at Sunday’s kick-off concert at the Lincoln Memorial.
And a few critics even attacked the tradition of concluding the presidential oath of office with the phrase, “So help me God.” But a lawsuit on the issue failed to gain legal traction in a federal courtroom.
• Freedom of speech: From televised debates and campaign attacks unfettered by government control, to party-pleasing declarations at political conventions, to protests outside George Bush’s ranch in Texas, Americans exercised their rights – and lung-power – with abandon.
But voicing individual and collective minds didn’t come without problems.
Periodically came news reports of individuals detained (and often later released) at rallies on vague “security concerns” – often for little more than wearing T-shirts, shouting slogans or carrying signs that seemed more impolite than threatening.
• Freedom of press: Journalists were criticized by many as favoring the eventual winner. Both Obama and Sen. John McCain endorsed a proposed federal “shield law” for journalists.
But the free-press headline this year likely belongs to the implosion of much of the nation’s traditional print press, beset by precipitate declines in profits, unprecedented staff cuts and loss of readers as Web-based competitors and bloggers saw a corresponding rise in reach and importance.
Obama’s campaign likely changed the nature of news reporting about presidential campaigns for years to come, combining a hugely successful blend of Internet fundraising with Web-based campaign “events” and an online team of supporters.
The effort circumvented conventional media in getting out Obama’s message and countering rumors and political attacks.
And at both political conventions, in Denver and St. Paul, journalists were swept up – some said “targeted” – along with protesters in pre-emptive police raids, only to see charges not filed or dropped when the conventions ended.
• Freedoms of assembly and petition: These freedoms – to assemble with like-minded people and to seek government change – took on a uniquely historic quality this year, beginning with early echoes of the civil rights movement and ending in the election of the first African-American president.
And the Obama campaign produced a new twist on petition: its “Citizen’s Briefing Book,” with more than 125,000 users submitting some 44,000 ideas and casting more than 1.4 million votes on issues they thought most important. The best-rated ideas will be delivered to the president.
Many issues beyond these First Amendment concerns arose in the 2009 election. But it was this amendment – unique to the United States – that guaranteed the nation could and will vigorously debate its concerns openly, without government control or penalty, in person, online or in print.
And that’s also worth parading down Pennsylvania Avenue to celebrate at least once every four years.