Tucson Citizen.com

Posts Tagged ‘Staff’

Arizona fourth for foreclosures

Wednesday, May 13th, 2009

One in every 164 housing units had filing in April

MIAMI — The number of U.S. households faced with losing their homes to foreclosure jumped 32 percent in April compared with the same month last year, with Nevada, Florida, California and Arizona showing the highest rates, according to data released Wednesday.

Arizona posted the fourth highest rate, with one in every 164 housing units receiving a foreclosure filing.

The 10 states with the most foreclosure filings accounted for more than 75 percent of April’s national total. California documented the highest total (96,560), followed by Florida (64,588), Nevada (16,266) and Arizona (16,245).

More than 342,000 households received at least one foreclosure-related notice in April, RealtyTrac Inc. said. That means one in every 374 U.S. housing units received a foreclosure filing last month, the highest monthly rate since the Irvine, Calif.-based foreclosure listing firm began its report in January 2005.

April was the second straight month with more than 300,000 households receiving a foreclosure filing, as the number of borrowers with mortgage troubles failed to abate.

The April number, however, was less than one percent above that posted in March, when more than 340,000 properties were affected. The March data was up 17 percent from February and 46 percent from a year earlier.

“We’ve never seen two consecutive months like this,” said Rick Sharga, RealtyTrac’s senior vice president for marketing. “It’s the volume that’s surprising.”

While total foreclosure activity was up, the number of repossessions by banks was down on a monthly and annual basis to their lowest level since March of last year, RealtyTrac said.

But that’s far from positive news. Because much of the foreclosure activity in April was in the default and auction stages — the first parts of the foreclosure process — it’s likely that repossessions will increase in coming months, RealtyTrac said.

About 63,900 homes were repossessed in April, down 11 percent from about 71,700 in March, RealtyTrac said. But the mortgage industry has resumed cracking down on delinquent borrowers after foreclosures were temporarily halted by mortgage finance companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, together with many other lenders.

“All of these loans are now being processed pretty rapidly by the servers,” Sharga said.

Help might be on the way. The Obama administration announced a plan in March to provide $75 billion in incentive payments for the mortgage industry to modify loans to help up to 9 million borrowers avoid foreclosure. But the extent of the relief remains unclear, with questions lingering about how much the lending industry will cooperate in modifying loans.

After banks take over foreclosed homes, they usually put them up for sale at deep discounts. Nationwide, sales of foreclosures and other distressed properties made up about half of the market in the first quarter, the National Association of Realtors reported.

First-quarter home sales fell in all but six states — Nevada, California, Arizona, Florida, Virginia and Minnesota — where buyers have been able to grab foreclosed homes at discounts, the realtors group said Tuesday.

On a state-by-state basis, Nevada had one in every 68 households receive a foreclosure filing, down 18 percent from March but still the nation’s highest rate. In Florida, one in every 135 households received a filing in April. For California, the rate was one in every 138 households.

Rounding out the top 10 were Arizona, Idaho, Utah, Georgia, Illinois, Colorado and Ohio.

Among large cities, Las Vegas led the way with one in every 56 households receiving a filing. That was a slightly higher rate than the southwest Florida metro area of Cape Coral-Fort Myers, which saw one in 57 housing units receive a filing.

Cities in California took the next six spots: Merced, Modesto, Riverside-San Bernardino, Bakersfield, Vallejo-Fairfield and Stockton. The Florida cities of Miami and Orlando were ninth and 10th, respectively.

Bankruptcies up 90 percent in Tucson area

Tuesday, April 14th, 2009

Despite law that makes it harder to escape debts

RALEIGH, N.C. – The number of U.S. businesses and individuals declaring bankruptcy is rising amid the recession, despite a three-year-old federal law that made it much tougher for Americans to escape their debts, an Associated Press analysis found.

In March, bankruptcy filings jumped the highest across the West. In Arizona, filings rose 91 percent from a year ago. They were up 84 percent in Idaho, 82 percent in California and 79 percent in Nevada, though those were trumped by Delaware, home to many large corporations, which saw a 127 percent jump.

“There’s no end in sight,” said bankruptcy lawyer Bryan Elliott of Hickory, N.C., who is working seven days a week and scheduling prospective clients a month in advance. “To be doing this well and having this much business, it is depressing. It’s not a laugh-a-minute job.”

Nearly 1.2 million debtors filed for bankruptcy in the past 12 months, according to federal court records collected and analyzed by the AP. Last month, 130,831 sought bankruptcy protection – an increase of 46 percent over March 2008 and 81 percent over the same month in 2007.

In the Tucson sector, total bankruptcy filings in March were up 90 percent over the previous year, with 628 filings. The sector includes Pima County, as well as Cochise, Graham, Greenlee, Pinal and Santa Cruz counties.

The majority of those filings were Chapter 7, which is liquidation for individuals and small businesses. There were 510 Chapter 7 filings in March, a 108 percent increase over March 2008.

Reorganization filings, or Chapter 13s, were up 44 percent.

Bob Lawless, a professor at the University of Illinois College of Law, said bankruptcies could reach 1.5 million this year and level off at 1.6 million next year – around the same time economists expect an economic recovery to begin.

The bankruptcy rate is climbing as well. In the past 12 months, about 4 people or businesses for every 1,000 people in the country filed for bankruptcy, according to the AP analysis. That is twice the rate in 2006, and close to the average of about 5 for every 1,000 in the decade leading up to the change in the law.

Lawless said the shame of bankruptcy may have eased somewhat in recent years, but added, “It’s still a very stigmatizing, traumatic event for most everyone who files.”

———

BANKRUPTCIES

A look at bankruptcy filings by state and their growth in the past year.

Rank. State: March 2009 filings; March 2008 filings; Percent change

1. Delaware: 479; 211; 127%

2. Arizona: 2,700; 1,414; 91%

3. Idaho: 682; 371; 84%

4. California: 16,917; 9,308; 82%

5. Nevada: 2,510; 1,405; 79%

6. Utah: 1,396; 804; 74%

7. Hawaii: 270; 158; 71%

8. Montana: 268; 157; 71%

9. Washington: 2,910; 1,745; 67%

10. Florida: 8,322; 5,146; 62%

11. Oregon: 1,651; 1,033; 60%

12. Illinois: 7,011; 4,551; 54%

13. South Carolina: 902; 593; 52%

14. Maine: 365; 241; 51%

15. District of Columbia: 110; 73; 51%

16. Michigan: 7,238; 4,828; 50%

17. Wyoming: 122; 82; 49%

18. New Mexico: 554; 377; 47%

19. Alabama: 3,138; 2,141; 47%

20. New Jersey: 3,011; 2,066; 46%

21. Rhode Island: 501; 344; 46%

22. Colorado: 2,488; 1,712; 45%

23. New Hampshire: 473; 327; 45%

24. Virginia: 3,278; 2,304; 42%

25. Maryland: 2,237; 1,573; 42%

26. Connecticut: 971; 684; 42%

27. Indiana: 4,904; 3,468; 41%

28. Iowa: 1,078; 765; 41%

29. North Carolina: 2,498; 1,779; 40%

30. Minnesota: 1,958; 1,409; 39%

31. Kentucky: 2,538; 1,828; 39%

32. Wisconsin: 2,533; 1,829; 38%

33. Oklahoma: 1,309; 946; 38%

34. Missouri: 2,827; 2,056; 38%

35. Tennessee: 4,885; 3,564; 37%

36. Kansas: 1,057; 776; 36%

37. Ohio: 6,954; 5,120; 36%

38. New York: 5,235; 3,876; 35%

39. West Virginia: 647; 480; 35%

40. Mississippi: 1,341; 995; 35%

41. Arkansas: 1,509; 1,132; 33%

42. Vermont: 141; 106; 33%

43. South Dakota: 181; 139; 30%

44. Georgia: 6,370; 4,944; 29%

45. Pennsylvania: 3,557; 2,800; 27%

46. North Dakota: 136; 110; 24%

47. Nebraska: 703; 592; 19%

48. Massachusetts: 1,849; 1,571; 18%

49. Texas: 4,521; 4,067; 11%

50. Alaska: 67; 65; 3%

51. Louisiana: 1,529; 1,584; -3%

Xavier coach Miller ‘follows heart’ to Arizona

Tuesday, April 7th, 2009
Sean Miller fights back tears after telling reporters he is leaving Xavier for Arizona.

Sean Miller fights back tears after telling reporters he is leaving Xavier for Arizona.

Sean Miller says he is following his heart – leaving Xavier University to become the head basketball coach at Arizona.

“I would never leave Xavier unless it was a place where I really felt you could win a national championship,” Miller said Monday at a news conference in Cincinnati. “When I say that, it does not mean you can’t win one here.

“(UA) is a place that has done it before, and has had a quarter of a century worth of excellence.

UA announced it would introduce Miller at noon Tuesday at McKale Center. Arizona athletic director Jim Livengood and school president Robert Shelton are expected to be present.

“If you watch and look at Arizona, you see they have done some amazing things in 25 years under one coach,” Miller added, referring to Hall of Famer Lute Olson, who retired before the season started. UA has gone to 25 straight NCAA tournaments, the nation’s longest active streak.

The 40-year-old Miller, considered one of the nation’s top young coaches, later teared up while talking about leaving Xavier after five seasons. He met with his players beforehand and said it was one of his toughest decisions.

“I did my best to follow my heart,” he said.

Arizona big man Jordan Hill, who is debating whether to declare early for the NBA Draft, said Miller’s hiring won’t affect his decision either way.

“Wow,” Hill said when told Miller took the UA job.

Livengood, in a statement released by UA, said he was “pleased the coaching-search process has been completed.”

“It’s been an exhaustive week, but it’s a good day to be a Wildcat. We believe we’ve brought in the best young coach in the country, a proven winner who will take this program into the future,” Livengood said.

Added Shelton, in a statement:

“Sean Miller is a perfect fit for the University of Arizona. Sean has had tremendous achievements on the court, but he has also done an extraordinary job of ensuring that his players succeed in the classroom. Arizona fans are going to be very proud of the way he approaches the game. He is absolutely the right person to lead our program forward.”

Various media outlets are reporting that Miller’s annual salary could be more than $2 million a year, with a possible $1 million signing bonus. It’s unclear if Miller would have a five-year contract, or longer.

CBS Sports.com, citing an unnamed source, reported that Livengood called Miller early Monday and “significantly changed” UA’s offer, which was initially around $2 million annually for a seven-year contract.

Miller also received assurances on schedules and the way the team would travel. (UA travels commercial, but books charter flights for certain occasions, such as the NCAA Tournament.

Livengood and Shelton met Sunday with Miller in New Mexico to persuade Miller to replace Olson, who was replaced last season by Russ Pennell on an interim basis. Miller returned to Cincinnati on UA booster Paul Weitman’s plane.

Miller apparently had told FoxSports.com late Sunday that he would not take the UA job, but changed his mind Monday.

Miller said he and Xavier athletic director Mike Bobinski were still talking about the Xavier job Monday morning in the coach’s kitchen. Miller added that he did not decide for sure to take the Arizona job until early afternoon.

“I respect his decision,” Bobinski said. “That doesn’t make me any less disappointed.”

Bobinski said coaches moving from job to job is simply a fact of life.

“If you’ve got coaches that other people aren’t interested in, you’ve got the wrong coaches,” he said. “The reason our coaches are in demand is we’re killin’ it.”

Miller said he wanted to make sure he left Xavier in the right way.

“I cannot say enough good things about this place. It defines who I am to a large degree,” Miller said.

He said he was grateful to Xavier for his three years as an assistant and five years as head coach and felt he had made a contribution.

“The legacy will certainly continue,” Miller said. “I know this machine will continue to move in a very positive direction.”

Bobinski called Miller “a terrific coach, a great friend.”

“He has helped bring us to the point where we are poised to be the very best we’ve ever been in our history,” Bobinski said. “We believe we are on the cusp of our greatest basketball ever.”

He said he realizes coaching at Xavier can be very different from a large state university.

“We’re not for everybody,” Bobinski said. “We need to find somebody who knows who we are and what we are all about.”

Miller will inherit a program with an elite reputation but short on talent because of its tenuous coaching situation. Olson took a leave of absence in the 2007-08 season but planned to return last fall. Just before the season started, he retired for health reasons.

Miller signed a contract extension at Xavier through the 2017-18 season, reportedly worth more than $800,000 a year.

Xavier advanced to the Sweet 16 in this season’s NCAA Tournament before losing 60-55 to top-seeded Pittsburgh. Xavier reached the Elite Eight in last year’s tourney before falling to UCLA.

Miller wasn’t Arizona’s first choice to succeed Olson. Tim Floyd rejected an offer to stay at Southern California.

Miller

Miller

ATTENDANCE SPIKES AT MATCH PLAY

Thursday, February 26th, 2009

First-round attendance Wednesday was 13,620 at the Ritz-Carlton Golf Club, Dove Mountain. That’s an increase from last year’s first round at The Gallery Golf Club, when there were 12,500 tickets sold.

Other tournament tidbits:

• A trend to remember for next year’s Accenture Match Play bracket pool: The better seed has won 19 of 32 first-round matches in seven of the past nine years, including Wednesday.

• Media credentials are up from last year, largely due to the interest in Tiger Woods’ comeback. There are 525 credentialed news people representing 187 news groups. There were 379 credentials for 128 outlets last year.

• As if losing to Davis Love III in 21 holes wasn’t painful enough, Henrik Stenson backed into a cholla cactus on the second extra hole during his second shot on the par-5, No. 2. As Stenson trudged back to the fairway, he had to pick a cluster of needles off his purple shirt. “I’ve got tweezers,” one fan called out.

The Bounce: Aussies troublesome for Tiger

Saturday, February 21st, 2009
<h4>Chips ahoy for Stricker </h4></p>
<p>Steve Stricker watches his chip to the second green in the second round of the Northern Trust Open golf tournament at Riviera Country Club in Los Angeles on Friday. He's two shots out of the lead after Friday's 6-under-par 66 put him at 8-under 134.

<h4>Chips ahoy for Stricker </h4>

Steve Stricker watches his chip to the second green in the second round of the Northern Trust Open golf tournament at Riviera Country Club in Los Angeles on Friday. He's two shots out of the lead after Friday's 6-under-par 66 put him at 8-under 134.

Tiger Woods likely will face Brendan Jones of Australia when he returns to competition for the first time in more than eight months. If a golfer drops out, Woods would face Australia’s Richard Green.

Either way, it’s not the greatest omen for the world’s No. 1 player at next week’s Accenture Match Play Championship.

Three of Tiger’s six losses in Match Play have come against Aussies, two of those to Nick O’Hern in the second round in 2005 and 2007. The other was a first-round loss to Peter O’Malley in 2002.

“I don’t doubt his game will be ready,” Stuart Appleby said Thursday. “Unless he plays an Aussie.”

Aussie Appleby laughed when told Woods was set to face Jones, who played one year on the PGA Tour and finished 144th on the money list. Jones has played most of his career in Japan, where he has won eight times.

Woods is 5-3 against Australians at the Match Play, beating Stephen Leaney twice, Adam Scott, Robert Allenby and Aaron Baddeley.

The other top seeds are Sergio Garcia, Padraig Harrington and Vijay Singh, who has missed the cut in his last two events since returning from minor knee surgery in January.

If Woods were to win his opening match, his next opponent could be the winner between Tim Clark and Retief Goosen.

Just Goose being silly

A Woods-Goosen match might be interesting based on the South African’s comments last year. A few days after Woods won the U.S. Open, where he winced and limped throughout the weekend in what ended in a dramatic playoff win, Goosen questioned the seriousness of the injury.

“Nobody really knows if he was just showing off or he was really injured,” Goosen said on the day before Woods announced he was having season-ending knee surgery. “I believe if he was really injured, he would not have played.”

Goosen later said he was only joking.

What has Britain atwitter is the possibility of Woods’ match against 19-year-old Rory McIlroy of Northern Ireland in the third round, if they both win their matches – and if the brackets are not changed.

Gathering momentum

If you believe in momentum, Steve Stricker and Phil Mickelson could come into next week’s Match Play with a chance to do some damage.

Both players are in contention for the title this weekend at the Northern Trust Open at Riviera Country Club in Los Angeles.

Stricker trails leader Scott McCarron by two strokes, and Mickelson is three back heading into Saturday. McCarron (10-under-par 132) birdied No. 18 on Friday to finish with a 3-under 68.

“This is the first time I’m in contention heading into the weekend, and I’m excited about it,” said Mickelson, who shot a 72 after a first round of 63.

Stricker had a 66 to get into contention, which was important for his psyche. A month ago, he had the lead at the Bob Hope Chrysler Classic on Sunday until a quadruple bogey at No. 10. And the next week, he missed the cut.

“I’ve had to pick myself up a number of times out here on tour, so I’m used to it,” he said.

Ryo Ishikawa, the 17-year-old sensation from Japan, had a 71 to finish at 2-over 144 and miss the cut by three shots.

In other tournaments:

• Vicente Fernandez and ex-Arizona Wildcat Don Pooley shot 4-under 68s to share the Champions first-round lead in The ACE Group Classic in Naples, Fla.

• American Anthony Kang, the Malaysian Open winner last week, shot his second straight 5-under 67 for a share of the second-round lead in the Johnnie Walker Classic with Ireland’s Damien McGrane in Australia.

They treat you right

There are reasons far beyond golf to go to Marana’s Ritz-Carlton Golf Course, which will be open to the public through next January after the Match Play Championship.

They treat you right. The $225 current rate includes a caddie. They have valet parking, quick service at the bar and locker room attendants ready to meet your every need. Including tips, you probably will shell out a cool $300, but it’s worth it.

B. POOLE

bpoole@tucsoncitizen.com (bpoole@tucsoncitizen.com)

Easier to walk course

The gallery – and reporters – at the new Ritz-Carlton will have a much easier time of it this year at Match Play.

The Gallery course plays in one huge loop, leaving the turn back toward the clubhouse a long hike from the start. The Ritz course is laid out in three loops, with open areas for the gallery in between. Getting from place to place on the course will be much easier and less time consuming, but bring your walking shoes. It is still a golf course.

POOLE

<br />
<h4>QUOTABLE </h4>
<p>‘I’m as curious as you.’</p>
<p>TIGER WOODS,</p>
<p>to the media Friday on how he thinks he’ll play next week at the Accenture Match Play Championship” width=”461″ height=”640″ /><p class=

QUOTABLE

'I'm as curious as you.'

TIGER WOODS,

to the media Friday on how he thinks he'll play next week at the Accenture Match Play Championship

Rescue for homeowners takes multiple forms; more aid weighed

Thursday, February 19th, 2009

U.S. plan arrives as 7,000 homes foreclosed upon here

President Obama delivers remarks about the home mortgage crisis Wednesday at Dobson High School in Mesa.

President Obama delivers remarks about the home mortgage crisis Wednesday at Dobson High School in Mesa.

About 7,000 metro Tucson homeowners fell into foreclosure last year as the local housing market continues to plummet – taking the values of many people’s largest investment down with it.

President Obama hopes to instill confidence under a sweeping $75 billion plan that would let those struggling with monthly mortgage payments refinance at lower rates and help keep folks who lose their jobs from losing their homes, too. The plan inveiled Wednesday would help up to 9 million homeowners nationwide.

Cut-rate foreclosure sales here pushed the median home price to $160,000 – down $40,000 from about a year ago, said John Strobeck, author of the Southern Arizona Housing Market Letter.

“The idea of adding financing at a lower rate and expanding the amount that can be borrowed is a positive from the market standpoint,” he said.

According to an analysis by the Center for Responsible Lending, more than 118,000 homes could go into foreclosure statewide.

Although the plan could trim that number, not everyone who needs help will get it. Some homeowners who owe more than their house is worth will get help, but many of those who are most severely “under water” with their mortgages won’t see a bailout.

Who qualifies for the assistance? What exactly will they receive and when will the help arrive?

Here are questions and answers about about Obama’s plan:

Q: What if I’m a homeowner on the brink of foreclosure?

A: Homeowners who are behind on their mortgage payments or are struggling to keep current may qualify for a mortgage modification.

To qualify, the house must be your primary residence, your mortgage payment must be greater than 31 percent of your monthly gross income and your loan mustn’t exceed current Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loan limits, which vary by region and max out at nearly $729,750.

Owners of two-, three- and four-unit properties are eligible as long as they use one unit as a primary residence. Just first mortgages are eligible for a modification.

More detailed requirements will be available March 4.

Q: What if I’m not near foreclosure? Do I get assistance?

A: Borrowers who are current on their mortgages but can’t refinance into lower interest rate loans because their homes have fallen in value are eligible to refinance into a 30- or 15-year, fixed-rate loan under the plan, but only if their loan is held by mortgage finance companies Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.

To qualify, homeowners can’t owe more than 105 percent of their home’s current value on their first mortgage. For example, if your home is worth $100,000, your first mortgage can’t exceed $105,000.

Borrowers with a second mortgage are eligible as long as their first mortgage isn’t more than 105 percent of their home’s value. The value of your property will be determined after you apply to refinance.

Skeptics say it’s going to be difficult for borrowers to figure out whether their loan is held by Fannie or Freddie. “I’m not sure people are always going to get a straight answer,” said Bert Ely, a banking industry consultant in Alexandria, Va.

Q: Any breaks for first-time homebuyers?

A: Under the economic stimulus plan that Obama signed Tuesday, first-time homebuyers who purchase a home between Jan. 1 and Dec. 1 will be eligible for a tax credit of 10 percent of the value of the home, up to $8,000.

Homeowners don’t have to pay back this credit over the next 15 years, the way they had to with the $7,500 tax credit enacted last summer. However, homebuyers would have to repay the credit if they sold their homes within three years.

First-time buyers are defined as those who haven’t owned a house for at least three years.

Q: Any other breaks for current homeowners?

A: Homeowners can qualify for a tax credit of up to $1,500 by making their homes more energy efficient this year or next. Many projects qualify, such as installing energy-efficient windows, doors, furnaces and air conditioners, and adding insulation. Homeowners can get back 30 percent of their expenses up to $1,500.

Q: Will there be more assistance down the road?

A: The Obama administration is working with lawmakers to pass a bill that would allow bankruptcy judges to modify the terms of primary home loans in court.

The lending industry is fighting this plan, arguing that it would make lending a risky proposition. But with support mounting, the industry’s efforts are primarily focused on limiting the scope of the bankruptcy proposal rather than blocking it completely.

Q: How soon can I expect to take advantage of these benefits?

A: The refinancing and loan modification programs start March 4. The first-time homebuyer tax credit is in effect from the first of the year through the end of November. The “green” home tax credit applies to energy-efficient improvements made through 2010.

Q: What should I do until March 4?

A: If you’re interested in refinancing or applying for a loan modification, collect all necessary documents to give to your lender.

These include your most recent pay stubs and other documents detailing the income you receive, your most recent tax return, information about your second mortgage if you have one, payment information on your credit cards if you carry a monthly balance and payment information on all other loans, like student loans and car loans.

Q: What if I’m facing foreclosure and can’t wait until March 4?

A: Contact your mortgage servicer or mortgage lender. Many lenders said they will postpone foreclosure sales on home loans that could qualify for the modification.

FORECLOSURE PROTECTION

The Obama plan would:

• Help up to 9 million families restructure or refinance their mortgages to avoid losing their homes.

• Get rid of a restriction that stops mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from refinancing mortgages they already own or guarantee.

• Create incentives for lenders to modify at-risk subprime loans.

• Keep loan rates low for millions of middle-class families seeking new mortgages.

• Pursue reforms to help families avoid foreclosure.

The home at 2385 W. Silver River Way is among thousands that went into foreclosure last year in the Tucson area. Experts say there are a lot more to come.

The home at 2385 W. Silver River Way is among thousands that went into foreclosure last year in the Tucson area. Experts say there are a lot more to come.

President Obama with Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer

President Obama with Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer

———

TEXT OF OBAMA’S SPEECH

I’m here today to talk about a crisis unlike any we’ve ever known – but one that you know very well here in Mesa, and throughout the Valley. In Phoenix and its surrounding suburbs, the American Dream is being tested by a home mortgage crisis that not only threatens the stability of our economy but also the stability of families and neighborhoods. It is a crisis that strikes at the heart of the middle class: the homes in which we invest our savings, build our lives, raise our families, and plant roots in our communities.

So many Americans have shared with me their personal experiences of this crisis. Many have written letters or emails or shared their stories with me at rallies and along rope lines. Their hardship and heartbreak are a reminder that while this crisis is vast, it begins just one house – and one family – at a time.

It begins with a young family – maybe in Mesa, or Glendale, or Tempe – or just as likely in suburban Las Vegas, Cleveland, or Miami. They save up. They search. They choose a home that feels like the perfect place to start a life. They secure a fixed-rate mortgage at a reasonable rate, make a down payment, and make their mortgage payments each month. They are as responsible as anyone could ask them to be.

But then they learn that acting responsibly often isn’t enough to escape this crisis. Perhaps someone loses a job in the latest round of layoffs, one of more than three and a half million jobs lost since this recession began – or maybe a child gets sick, or a spouse has his or her hours cut.

In the past, if you found yourself in a situation like this, you could have sold your home and bought a smaller one with more affordable payments. Or you could have refinanced your home at a lower rate. But today, home values have fallen so sharply that even if you made a large down payment, the current value of your mortgage may still be higher than the current value of your house. So no bank will return your calls, and no sale will return your investment.

You can’t afford to leave and you can’t afford to stay. So you cut back on luxuries. Then you cut back on necessities. You spend down your savings to keep up with your payments. Then you open the retirement fund. Then you use the credit cards. And when you’ve gone through everything you have, and done everything you can, you have no choice but to default on your loan. And so your home joins the nearly six million others in foreclosure or at risk of foreclosure across the country, including roughly 150,000 right here in Arizona.

But the foreclosures which are uprooting families and upending lives across America are only one part of this housing crisis. For while there are millions of families who face foreclosure, there are millions more who are in no danger of losing their homes, but who have still seen their dreams endangered. They are families who see “For Sale” signs lining the streets. Who see neighbors leave, and homes standing vacant, and lawns slowly turning brown. They see their own homes – their largest single assets – plummeting in value. One study in Chicago found that a foreclosed home reduces the price of nearby homes by as much as 9 percent. Home prices in cities across the country have fallen by more than 25 percent since 2006; in Phoenix, they’ve fallen by 43 percent.

Even if your neighborhood hasn’t been hit by foreclosures, you’re likely feeling the effects of the crisis in other ways. Companies in your community that depend on the housing market – construction companies and home furnishing stores, painters and landscapers – they’re cutting back and laying people off. The number of residential construction jobs has fallen by more than a quarter million since mid-2006. As businesses lose revenue and people lose income, the tax base shrinks, which means less money for schools and police and fire departments. And on top of this, the costs to a local government associated with a single foreclosure can be as high as $20,000.

The effects of this crisis have also reverberated across the financial markets. When the housing market collapsed, so did the availability of credit on which our economy depends. As that credit has dried up, it has been harder for families to find affordable loans to purchase a car or pay tuition and harder for businesses to secure the capital they need to expand and create jobs.

In the end, all of us are paying a price for this home mortgage crisis. And all of us will pay an even steeper price if we allow this crisis to deepen – a crisis which is unraveling homeownership, the middle class, and the American Dream itself. But if we act boldly and swiftly to arrest this downward spiral, every American will benefit. And that’s what I want to talk about today.

The plan I’m announcing focuses on rescuing families who have played by the rules and acted responsibly: by refinancing loans for millions of families in traditional mortgages who are underwater or close to it; by modifying loans for families stuck in sub-prime mortgages they can’t afford as a result of skyrocketing interest rates or personal misfortune; and by taking broader steps to keep mortgage rates low so that families can secure loans with affordable monthly payments.

At the same time, this plan must be viewed in a larger context. A lost home often begins with a lost job. Many businesses have laid off workers for a lack of revenue and available capital. Credit has become scarce as the markets have been overwhelmed by the collapse of securities backed by failing mortgages. In the end, the home mortgage crisis, the financial crisis, and this broader economic crisis are interconnected. We cannot successfully address any one of them without addressing them all.

Yesterday, in Denver, I signed into law the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act which will create or save three and a half million jobs over the next two years – including 70,000 in Arizona – doing the work America needs done. We will also work to stabilize, repair, and reform our financial system to get credit flowing again to families and businesses. And we will pursue the housing plan I am outlining today.

Through this plan, we will help between seven and nine million families restructure or refinance their mortgages so they can avoid foreclosure. And we are not just helping homeowners at risk of falling over the edge, we are preventing their neighbors from being pulled over that edge too – as defaults and foreclosures contribute to sinking home values, failing local businesses, and lost jobs.

But I also want to be very clear about what this plan will not do: It will not rescue the unscrupulous or irresponsible by throwing good taxpayer money after bad loans. It will not help speculators who took risky bets on a rising market and bought homes not to live in but to sell. It will not help dishonest lenders who acted irresponsibility, distorting the facts and dismissing the fine print at the expense of buyers who didn’t know better. And it will not reward folks who bought homes they knew from the beginning they would never be able to afford. In short, this plan will not save every home.

But it will give millions of families resigned to financial ruin a chance to rebuild. It will prevent the worst consequences of this crisis from wreaking even greater havoc on the economy. And by bringing down the foreclosure rate, it will help to shore up housing prices for everyone. According to estimates by the Treasury Department, this plan could stop the slide in home prices due to neighboring foreclosures by up to $6,000 per home.

Here is how my plan works:

First, we will make it possible for an estimated four to five million currently ineligible homeowners who receive their mortgages through Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac to refinance their mortgages at lower rates.

Today, as a result of declining home values, millions of families are “underwater,” which means they owe more on their mortgages than their homes are worth. These families are unable to sell their homes, and unable to refinance them. So in the event of a job loss or another emergency, their options are limited.

Right now, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac – the institutions that guarantee home loans for millions of middle class families – are generally not permitted to guarantee refinancing for mortgages valued at more than 80 percent of the home’s worth. So families who are underwater – or close to being underwater – cannot turn to these lending institutions for help.

My plan changes that by removing this restriction on Fannie and Freddie so that they can refinance mortgages they already own or guarantee. This will allow millions of families stuck with loans at a higher rate to refinance. And the estimated cost to taxpayers would be roughly zero; while Fannie and Freddie would receive less money in payments, this would be balanced out by a reduction in defaults and foreclosures.

I also want to point out that millions of other households could benefit from historically low interest rates if they refinance, though many don’t know that this opportunity is available to them – an opportunity that could save families hundreds of dollars each month. And the efforts we are taking to stabilize mortgage markets will help these borrowers to secure more affordable terms, too.

Second, we will create new incentives so that lenders work with borrowers to modify the terms of sub-prime loans at risk of default and foreclosure.

Sub-prime loans – loans with high rates and complex terms that often conceal their costs – make up only 12 percent of all mortgages, but account for roughly half of all foreclosures.

Right now, when families with these mortgages seek to modify a loan to avoid this fate, they often find themselves navigating a maze of rules and regulations but rarely finding answers. Some sub-prime lenders are willing to renegotiate; many aren’t. Your ability to restructure your loan depends on where you live, the company that owns or manages your loan, or even the agent who happens to answer the phone on the day you call.

My plan establishes clear guidelines for the entire mortgage industry that will encourage lenders to modify mortgages on primary residences. Any institution that wishes to receive financial assistance from the government, and to modify home mortgages, will have to do so according to these guidelines – which will be in place two weeks from today.

If lenders and homebuyers work together, and the lender agrees to offer rates that the borrower can afford, we’ll make up part of the gap between what the old payments were and what the new payments will be. And under this plan, lenders who participate will be required to reduce those payments to no more than 31 percent of a borrower’s income. This will enable as many as three to four million homeowners to modify the terms of their mortgages to avoid foreclosure.

So this part of the plan will require both buyers and lenders to step up and do their part. Lenders will need to lower interest rates and share in the costs of reduced monthly payments in order to prevent another wave of foreclosures. Borrowers will be required to make payments on time in return for this opportunity to reduce those payments.

I also want to be clear that there will be a cost associated with this plan. But by making these investments in foreclosure-prevention today, we will save ourselves the costs of foreclosure tomorrow – costs borne not just by families with troubled loans, but by their neighbors and communities and by our economy as a whole. Given the magnitude of these costs, it is a price well worth paying.

Third, we will take major steps to keep mortgage rates low for millions of middle class families looking to secure new mortgages.

Today, most new home loans are backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which guarantee loans and set standards to keep mortgage rates low and to keep mortgage financing available and predictable for middle class families. This function is profoundly important, especially now as we grapple with a crisis that would only worsen if we were to allow further disruptions in our mortgage markets.

Therefore, using the funds already approved by Congress for this purpose, the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve will continue to purchase Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac mortgage-backed securities so that there is stability and liquidity in the marketplace. Through its existing authority Treasury will provide up to $200 billion in capital to ensure that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac can continue to stabilize markets and hold mortgage rates down.

We’re also going to work with Fannie and Freddie on other strategies to bolster the mortgage markets, like working with state housing finance agencies to increase their liquidity. And as we seek to ensure that these institutions continue to perform what is a vital function on behalf of middle class families, we also need to maintain transparency and strong oversight so that they do so in responsible and effective ways.

Fourth, we will pursue a wide range of reforms designed to help families stay in their homes and avoid foreclosure.

My administration will continue to support reforming our bankruptcy rules so that we allow judges to reduce home mortgages on primary residences to their fair market value – as long as borrowers pay their debts under a court-ordered plan. That’s the rule for investors who own two, three, and four homes. It should be the rule for ordinary homeowners too, as an alternative to foreclosure.

In addition, as part of the recovery plan I signed into law yesterday, we are going to award $2 billion in competitive grants to communities that are bringing together stakeholders and testing new and innovative ways to prevent foreclosures. Communities have shown a lot of initiative, taking responsibility for this crisis when many others have not. Supporting these neighborhood efforts is exactly what we should be doing.

Taken together, the provisions of this plan will help us end this crisis and preserve for millions of families their stake in the American Dream. But we must also acknowledge the limits of this plan.

Our housing crisis was born of eroding home values, but also of the erosion of our common values. It was brought about by big banks that traded in risky mortgages in return for profits that were literally too good to be true; by lenders who knowingly took advantage of homebuyers; by homebuyers who knowingly borrowed too much from lenders; by speculators who gambled on rising prices; and by leaders in our nation’s capital who failed to act amidst a deepening crisis.

So solving this crisis will require more than resources – it will require all of us to take responsibility. Government must take responsibility for setting rules of the road that are fair and fairly enforced. Banks and lenders must be held accountable for ending the practices that got us into this crisis in the first place. Individuals must take responsibility for their own actions. And all of us must learn to live within our means again.

These are the values that have defined this nation. These are values that have given substance to our faith in the American Dream. And these are the values that we must restore now at this defining moment.

It will not be easy. But if we move forward with purpose and resolve – with a deepened appreciation for how fundamental the American Dream is and how fragile it can be when we fail in our collective responsibilities – then I am confident we will overcome this crisis and once again secure that dream for ourselves and for generations to come.

Thank you, God Bless you, and God bless America.

Arizona court overturns local government budget payment

Wednesday, February 4th, 2009

High court orders state to give up claim to $30 million

PHOENIX – The Arizona Supreme Court put red ink back into the state budget on Tuesday by overturning a provision requiring local governments to pay nearly $30 million to help balance the current state budget.

The ruling on the provision, enacted last year, came on a special-action lawsuit filed directly with the state high court by the League of Arizona Cities and Towns.

The ruling has the effect of worsening the state’s budget trouble for the current fiscal year but relieving some pressure on local governments.

For Tucson, the ruling meant $2.1 million more in city coffers, though the money will not offset any planned cuts.

“Because of the lawsuit, we were expecting not to have to pay it,” finance specialist Wendy Gomez said Monday.

Legislators last weekend approved spending cuts and other changes to close a projected $1.6 billion shortfall in the $9.9 billion state budget, but officials have warned that the state probably will face another shortfall before the end of the fiscal year June 30.

The $29.7 million payment provision was included in the budget that was approved by the Legislature last June at the behest of former Gov. Janet Napolitano.

A lawyer for the state argued that the provision merely reclaimed some of the money that the state regularly distributes to local governments.

However, the court’s unanimous opinion agreed with the cities that the provision was unconstitutional on grounds that it was not an appropriation that could be included in the budget legislation.

“The Legislature did not expressly attach the assessed amount to any public revenue that it had previously set aside for the cities and towns,” Vice Chief Justice Rebecca White Berch wrote. “Because (the provision) fails to identify any prior appropriation, it fails to meet the definition of an appropriation.”

Justice W. Scott Bales and another Napolitano appointee wrote separately to say that the budget would have been written to legally deduct the $29.7 million from money paid to local governments.

The ruling, Bales wrote, not only honors the Arizona Constitution’s provisions on appropriations “but also promotes accountability and transparency in the state’s budgeting process.”

The judge’s statement, however, doesn’t altogether clarify the process by which the state can decrease its contribution to local governments.

“The court did not decide some of the other legal issues that were raised,” Tucson City Attorney Mike Rankin said Tuesday.

Local officials still worry that chunks of highway-user fund money, urban revenue-sharing money or the tax-increment financing funds that support downtown development could be withdrawn.

The ruling did not specify whether the Legislature would need a super-majority to pass such measures.

Gov. Jan Brewer, a Republican who replaced her Democratic predecessor on Jan. 20, issued a statement saying she agreed with the Supreme Court’s ruling and would review options with legislative leaders.

The payment requirement “appears to be the latest example of unsound and improper budget management decisions that have contributed significantly to state budget impacts being felt throughout Arizona,” Brewer said.

Texas Instruments cutting fewer than 20 jobs here

Tuesday, January 27th, 2009

Nationally 3,400 will be out of work

DALLAS – Texas Instruments Inc., which makes chips for cell phones and other gadgets, said Monday that it will cut 3,400 jobs because demand has slackened amid a slowing economy.

The company said it will cut 12 percent of its work force – 1,800 jobs through layoffs and another 1,600 jobs through voluntary retirements and departures. Between those and another round of job cuts announced in October, the company expects annual savings of $700 million.

The job cuts will be completed by the third quarter.

In Tucson, fewer than 20 people are expected to lose their jobs, said Brett Schroer, spokesman for TI’s facility here.

Schroer said the majority of the layoffs will be among support staff, such as information technology and human resources. He did not have exact numbers on Monday.

Schroer also said some employees have taken voluntary retirement.

In October 2007, TI announced it was consolidating manufacturing in Texas, eliminating about 300 jobs at the Tucson facility. That cut left about 300 jobs here.

Schroer said TI is still has a long-term commitment to its Tucson facility, where the company does product design for analog semiconductors.

TI’s job-cut announcement came as the chip maker reported sharp declines in fourth-quarter profit and revenue.

During the quarter the company earned $107 million, or 8 cents per share, compared to $753 million, or 54 cents per share, during the same period of 2007. TI estimated last month that it would earn 10 cents to 16 cents per share.

The latest period includes restructuring charges of 13 cents per share. Excluding those charges, TI earned 21 cents per share, higher than 12 cents per share forecast by analysts polled by Thomson Reuters.

Revenue slid to $2.49 billion from $3.56 billion in 2007 but topped the Wall Street forecast of $2.37 billion. Last month, TI predicted revenue between $2.3 billion and $2.5 billion.

For the first quarter, TI estimated its results would range from a loss of 11 cents a share to a profit of 3 cents per share. Analysts project a profit of 3 cents per share.

“We are realigning our expenses with a global economy that continues to weaken,” said Rich Templeton, chairman and chief executive, in a statement. “By reducing expenses now, we keep TI financially strong and able to invest for future growth.”

Tucson Citizen to cease publication March 21 if no buyer found

Saturday, January 17th, 2009

Gannett Co. Inc. will close the Tucson Citizen on March 21 if it does not find a buyer for the newspaper.

Robert J. Dickey, president of Gannett U.S. Community Publishing, made the announcement in a brief meeting with employees Friday.

“The Tucson Citizen has been part of Gannett since 1976, and we deeply regret having to take this step,” Dickey said. “But dramatic changes in our industry combined with the difficult economy – particularly in this region – mean it is no longer viable for our partnership with Lee Enterprises Incorporated to produce two daily newspapers in Tucson.”

The Citizen’s average daily circulation has been eroding for more than a decade and now stands at about 17,000 newspapers, compared to the Arizona Daily Star’s 117,000.

The Citizen, an afternoon newspaper that started publication in 1870, operates under a joint operating agreement with the Star, a morning paper owned by Davenport, Iowa-based Lee Enterprises Inc.

Print production, distribution, sales and other noneditorial functions for both the Citizen and the Star operate under the name Tucson Newspapers Inc.

Gannett and Lee Enterprises split any profits from TNI equally. Dickey told Citizen employees the paper as its own entity is losing money and the newspaper had become an increasing drain on Gannett operations over the last eight months.

However, through the JOA, Gannett received about $13 million in 2007, TNI President Mike Jameson said. He added that the profit split will be much less in 2009. He did not specify the amount.

Gannett spokeswoman Tara Connell said the company was selling “the softer assets” of the Citizen, “the name, the Web site, the url, the contact list, advertising list, contracting list, subscriber list.”

Asked whether Gannett would sell or retain its interest in the JOA, she said “there are discussions going on, but right now, let’s get it sold, and then we can talk about what happens next.”

Dickey declined to announce an asking price or the estimated value of the newspaper.

The Citizen and the Star maintain separate newsrooms and the editorial operations are independent.

The Citizen, which publishes Monday through Saturday, is Arizona’s oldest continually published newspaper. It has 65 full-time and three part-time employees.

Employees who stay with the paper through March 21 if it isn’t sold will receive severance pay of one week for every year of employment, to a maximum of 26 weeks.

Tucson becomes the latest city on the verge of losing its second daily newspaper as the industry suffers from the poor economy, falling retail advertising and circulation declines.

Denver’s Rocky Mountain News, owned by E.W. Scripps Co., was recently put up for sale and could close if a buyer isn’t found soon. Hearst Corp. put Seattle’s oldest newspaper, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, up for sale last week and said it would likely close or exist only online if a buyer wasn’t found by March.

Gannett, based in McLean, Va., publishes 85 daily newspapers in the United States, including The Arizona Republic and USA Today, and operates 23 television stations

———

Gannett News Release

Text of Gannett Co, Inc.’s news release on the sale of the Tucson Citizen:

McLEAN, VA – Gannett Co., Inc. (NYSE: GCI) today said it is offering to sell certain assets of the Tucson (Arizona) Citizen. If a sale is not completed by March 21, 2009, Gannett said it will have to close the newspaper.

“The Tucson Citizen has been part of Gannett since 1976 and we deeply regret having to take this step. But dramatic changes in our industry combined with the difficult economy – particularly in this region – mean it is no longer viable for our partnership with Lee Enterprises Incorporated to produce two daily newspapers in Tucson,” said Bob Dickey, president of the U.S. Community Publishing division of Gannett. “We applaud the hard work and ongoing efforts of our employees at the newspaper. Their dedication to journalism and to the community of Tucson deserves the highest praise. We hope for a quick and positive response to this offer.”

The Tucson Citizen is an afternoon newspaper that publishes Monday through Saturday. It is one of the two newspapers produced by TNI Partners as part of a joint operating arrangement (JOA) under the Newspaper Preservation Act. The Arizona Daily Star, which is owned by a subsidiary of Lee Enterprises Incorporated, is the second newspaper in the JOA. TNI Partners provides the production, distribution, sales and other non-editorial business functions for both the Citizen and The Star.

Each newspaper maintains a separate newsroom and the editorial operations of the newspapers are entirely independent. Average daily circulation of the Citizen is 19,851, according to the latest Audit Bureaus of Circulation report. Founded in 1870, the Tucson Citizen has been part of a JOA since 1940. Offers should be directed to Robert J. Broadwater, managing director of Broadwater & Associates LLC, at (914) 961-5700 or broadwater@broadwaterllc.com.

Gannett Co., Inc. is a leading international news and information company that publishes 85 daily newspapers in the USA, including USA TODAY, the nation’s largest-selling daily newspaper. The company also owns nearly 900 non-daily publications in the USA and USA WEEKEND, a weekly newspaper magazine. Gannett subsidiary Newsquest is the United Kingdom’s second largest regional newspaper company. Newsquest publishes 17 daily paid-for titles, more than 200 weekly newspapers, magazines and trade publications, and a network of award-winning Web sites. Gannett also operates 23 television stations in the United States and is an Internet leader with sites sponsored by its TV stations and newspapers including USATODAY.com, one of the most popular news sites on the Web.

Cardinals sell out game, avoid TV blackout

Friday, January 2nd, 2009
Will fans sell out University of Phoenix Stadium to watch Kurt Warner and the Cardinals on Saturday?

Will fans sell out University of Phoenix Stadium to watch Kurt Warner and the Cardinals on Saturday?

The Arizona Cardinals will play on television Saturday after all.

After being up against the clock, the team sold the remaining 2,400 seats to meet an NFL-mandated sellout of Saturday’s game against the Atlanta Falcons.

After two 24-hour extensions, the NFL had given the team a deadline of 2:30 p.m. Friday to avoid a blackout in the Phoenix area.

Cardinals spokesman Chris Melvin says they started the day with 2,400 tickets remaining and sales have been brisk.

The Cardinal’s Web site reports that there are tickets remaining, including tickets returned from the visiting team’s allotment and club seats that did not count against the blackout numbers.

Club seats start at $164.75 each and are available through Ticketmaster by phone at (800) 745-3000 or on-line at www.ticketmaster.com. They’re also on sale at the team’s Tempe training facility box office and at the University of Phoenix Stadium box office.

Now Playing

Thursday, November 6th, 2008
Anne Hathaway (left, with Rosemarie DeWitt) is generating Oscar buzz for her portrayal of a recovering drug addict in "Rachel Getting Married."<a href="http://www.tucsoncitizen.com/ss/movies"/>

Anne Hathaway (left, with Rosemarie DeWitt) is generating Oscar buzz for her portrayal of a recovering drug addict in "Rachel Getting Married."<a href="http://www.tucsoncitizen.com/ss/movies"/>

What’s new this week: “Battle in Seattle,” “Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa,” “Rachel Getting Married,” “Role Models,” “Soul Men,” “Sukiyaki Western Django”

OPENING THIS WEEK

“Battle in Seattle,” written and directed by Stuart Townsend. Washington Post’s grade: D. Synopsis: Dramatization of the five volatile days of protest that rocked the Northwest city during the 2000 World Trade Organization summit. With Charlize Theron, Woody Harrelson and Channing Tatum. Rating: R for language and violence. Length: 98 minutes. Web site: www.battleinseattlemovie.com

“Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa,” trying to cash in on the success of the first one. AP’s grade: D+. Synopsis: Zoo animals are stranded again in this animated sequel reuniting voice stars Ben Stiller, Chris Rock, David Schwimmer and Jada Pinkett Smith. Rating: PG for some mild crude humor. Length: 89 minutes. Web site: www.madagascar-themovie.com/index.html

“Rachel Getting Married,” Jonathan Demme directs. AP’s grade: C. Synopsis: An addict (Anne Hathaway) rekindles tension and tragic family memories at her sister’s wedding. Rating: R for language and brief sexuality. Length: 113 minutes. Web site: www.sonyclassics.com/rachelgettingmarried

“Role Models,” from “Wet Hot American Summer” director David Wain. AP’s grade: B. Synopsis: Two adult adolescents (Paul Rudd and Seann William Scott) are sentenced to community service as youth mentors. Rating: R for crude and sexual content, strong language and nudity. Length: 99 minutes. Web site: www.rolemodelsmovie.com

“Soul Men,” featuring Bernie Mac’s final performance. AP’s grade: C. Synopsis: Samuel L. Jackson and Mac are an estranged singing duo reunited for a tribute concert. The late Isaac Hayes co-stars. Rating: R for pervasive language, and sexual content including nudity. Length: 100 minutes. Web site: www.soulmen-movie.com

“Sukiyaki Western Django,” with a brief appearance by Quentin Tarantino. Los Angeles Times’ grade: C-. Synopsis: A gunman is caught up in a deadly battle between two clans in this Japanese take on spaghetti Westerns. Rating: R for strong violence, including a rape. Length: 98 minutes. Web site: www.sukiyakimovie.com

Voting is heavy across Arizona

Wednesday, November 5th, 2008

Voters fulfilled state officials’ expectations for the presidential election, lining up in droves at numerous polling sites Tuesday.

With about 92 percent of state precincts reporting, about 62 percent of the state’s nearly 3 million registered voters cast a ballot, about a third of them early.

In Tucson, few long lines were reported but voting was steady through most of the day at many polling places.

At Temple Emanu-El, 255 N. Country Club Road, Maurice Grossman, 81, a retired UA art professor, voted for Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama.

“We need a government that will embrace a more moderate view,” said the registered Democrat. “So many of the policies for the last eight years have been extremely far conservative.”

Pima County’s vote counting lagged the rest of the state and about 7 percent of precincts hadn’t been counted as of 1:15 a.m. Wednesday. Nevertheless, about 63 percent of the county’s nearly 500,000 registered voters cast a ballot.

The county has been heavily criticized lately, including by Secretary of State Jan Brewer, about how it conducts elections.

Despite the slow results, county election officials said there were few if any problems Tuesday.

Lines were dying down at several Tucson precincts by late afternoon. But voting inspector Darrell Jolley said about 50 people were lined up outside at the Sabino Road Baptist Church just outside the Tucson at 5:25 a.m., a half-hour before the polls opened. The lines remained for the first hour.

At another polling place on the city’s northeast side, voting inspector Joe Walsh said that by 4:30 p.m., 84 percent of 1,687 eligible voters had either requested early ballots or cast votes on Tuesday.

At polls throughout metro Phoenix, workers were greeted by long lines as early as 5:30 a.m.

By midday, traffic slowed to a trickle at many locations. In Tempe, several Arizona State University students were pleasantly surprised at not having to wait during the lunch hour.

“I was shocked. I walked over here and I figured there’d be a line out the door, around the corner,” said Chelsea Courtney, an ASU freshman. “It was harder to find because of that.”

Latest: Landrieu keeps Senate seat

Tuesday, November 4th, 2008

A running update of national election results

amara Nathan of Columbus, Ohio, reacts after seeing a projection that Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama,  D-Ill., won Ohio at the Democratic election night party at the  Renaissance Hotel in Columbus, Ohio, Tuesday. <a href="http://10.4.149.24/archives/apphoto/search/?search%5Bform%5D%5Bfulltext%5D=PAUL+VERNON+within+BYLINE"/>

amara Nathan of Columbus, Ohio, reacts after seeing a projection that Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., won Ohio at the Democratic election night party at the Renaissance Hotel in Columbus, Ohio, Tuesday. <a href="http://10.4.149.24/archives/apphoto/search/?search%5Bform%5D%5Bfulltext%5D=PAUL+VERNON+within+BYLINE"/>

Barack Obama has capped off his historic victory with wins in several Western states.

He defeated John McCain in California, Oregon and Washington state — and tossed in New Mexico, Colorado, Hawaii and Nevada.

Obama had earlier defeated McCain both in Democratic strongholds in the East and Midwest and also in battleground states that had held the last hopes of a Republican victory.

As Democrats take some Senate seats that had been held by Republicans, they’re avoiding any losses of their own seats.

The only Democratic senator who appeared to face a serious challenge, Mary Landrieu of Louisiana, has been re-elected, defeating Republican John Kennedy.

Democratic gains came in North Carolina, New Hampshire, Virginia, New Mexico and Colorado.

And two of those winners were cousins named Udall. Reps. Tom and Mark Udall take over Senate seats that were held by retiring Republicans. Tom Udall takes over for Pete Domenici in New Mexico, while Mark Udall will fill the Colorado seat held by Wayne Allard.

Entering this election, Democrats held control of the Senate by a slim 51-49 margin, counting two independents who vote with them

Barack Obama has won Virginia, a state that last voted for a Democrat for president in 1964.

The win came as Obama cemented his lead over John McCain, moving him closer to becoming the nation’s first black president.

He earlier captured other key states that were central to McCain’s hopes, including Ohio and Pennsylvania.

In addition to its choice of Obama, Virginia also turned over the second of its two Senate seats to the Democrats, with Mark Warner defeating Republican former governor Jim Gilmore.

Obama also won in New Mexico, with five electoral votes, while McCain took Mississippi with its six electors.

Barack Obama is leading narrowly in some states that represent John McCain’s remaining hopes of winning the presidency.

Obama has already won in Ohio and Pennsylvania. He’s leading narrowly in Florida and has even smaller leads in Virginia and North Carolina.

Obama has 202 electoral votes, out of the 270 needed to be elected. McCain, with the help of 34 electoral votes from Texas, has 114.

Obama’s wins came throughout traditionally Democratic states in the East and Midwest. McCain took states that are normally secure for Republicans.

Democrats, meanwhile, are gaining strength in both houses of Congress.

Barack Obama has now added Iowa’s seven electoral votes to his total, as he builds on his commanding lead over John McCain.

Obama now has 202 electoral votes out of the 270 he needs for the nomination.

He earlier won in Pennsylvania and in Ohio — both states that were key to John McCain’s hopes. No Republican has ever been elected president without capturing Ohio.

McCain adds five electoral votes with his victory in Utah. That gives him 75 in all.

Democrats are adding to their Senate majority. Among the Democrats re-elected to Senate seats are Tom Harkin in Iowa and Max Baucus in Montana.

Republican Thad Cochran won re-election in Mississippi.—

Barack Obama has built a commanding lead, capturing another sought-after prize.

He wins Ohio and its 20 electoral votes, giving the Democrat a total of 195 to John McCain’s 70. Obama needs 270 to clinch the nomination.

He’d earlier won in neighboring Pennsylvania. Both states were seen as key to McCain’s victory chances.

Obama also swept the states in the East and Midwest that traditionally go blue.

McCain’s latest wins are in Kansas, North Dakota, Arkansas, Alabama and Louisiana, with 33 electoral votes in all.

MSNBC is reporting Arizona as “too close to call.”

Democrats have picked up Republican Senate seats in Virginia, North Carolina, New Hampshire and New Mexico. But Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell has won re-election to his Senate seat in Kentucky.

Republicans Jeff Sessions in Alabama and Pat Roberts in Kansas were also re-elected.

—–

McCain wins Arkansas, Kansas and North Dakota, according to the Associated Press.

After capturing the sought-after prize of Pennsylvania, Barack Obama has added New York, Michigan, Minnesota, Rhode Island and Wisconsin.

That gives him a total of 175 electoral votes of the 270 needed to win.

John McCain picks up a win in Wyoming, bringing his electoral vote total to 37.

There have been two more Democratic captures of Republican Senate seats. In New Hampshire, Democrat Jeanne Shaheen defeated Republican John Sununu. In New Mexico, Democrat Tom Udall wins the seat that had been held by Republican Pete Domenici.

Republicans John Barrasso and Michael Enzi captured Wyoming’s two Senate races

Democrat Carl Levin was re-elected to the Senate from Michigan, and Democrat Jack Reed won in Rhode Island, as did Democrat Tim Johnson in South Dakota.

—-

It’s a state that John McCain badly needed to win, but Pennsylvania has gone to Barack Obama. The state’s 21 electoral votes go to the Democrat.

The loss of Pennsylvania narrows the possible paths to victory for McCain.

Obama now leads with 99 electoral votes, to McCain’s 34.

Democrats are picking up another Senate seat from the South: Democrat Kay Hagan has defeated Republican incumbent Elizabeth Dole in North Carolina.

Dole had appeared to be headed to re-election, but she’s been hurt by revelations that she’s spent little time in North Carolina in the past year.

Dole is the wife of former GOP presidential candidate Bob Dole.

Earlier, Democrat Mark Warner captured the Virginia Senate seat that had been held by retiring Republican John Warner.

Republicans, meanwhile, have held onto a Senate seat in Oklahoma with the re-election of James Inhofe.

—-

Barack Obama picks up four more electoral votes with a win in New Hampshire.

He now has 82 electoral votes, to John McCain’s 34.

In Arkansas, Democratic Sen. Mark Pryor won re-election by defeating Green Party candidate Rebekah Kennedy.

New Hampshire’s Democratic Gov. John Lynch has been re-elected. Democrat Jack Markell won Delaware’s gubernatorial race, and Democrat Jay Nixon won in Missouri.

Obama is the winner in New Hampshire, New Jersey and Massachusetts — and in his home state of Illinois.

He’s also captured Maryland, Connecticut, Maine and the District of Columbia, as well as running mate Joe Biden’s home state of Delaware.

John McCain, meanwhile, has won in South Carolina, Tennessee and Oklahoma.

In all, that gives Obama 78 electoral votes so far. McCain has 34.

Biden is also the winner in his Delaware Senate race. The state’s Democratic governor would appoint a successor if Biden becomes vice president.

Democrats John Kerry of Massachusetts, Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey and Richard Durbin of Illinois have held onto their Senate seats, as have Republicans Lamar Alexander of Tennessee and Susan Collins of Maine.

West Virginia has re-elected its Democratic governor along with Sen. Jay Rockefeller. But in the presidential race, the outcome of the fight for the state’s five electoral votes isn’t yet known.

Rockefeller defeated Republican Jay Wolfe to hold onto his Senate seat.

Gov. Joe Manchin is the winner over Republican challenger Russ Weeks.

John McCain has led recent polls in West Virginia, which went for President Bush in 2000 and 2004.

PRESIDENT

Obama wins Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Iowas, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Michigan, New York, Rhode Island, Wisconsin

McCain wins Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Kentucky, Utah, Wyoming

SENATE

Elected:

Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn.

Joe Biden, D-Del.

Susan Collins, R-Maine

Richard Durbin, D-Ill.

John Kerry, D-Mass.

Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J.

James Inhofe, R-Okla.

Kay Hagan, D-N.C.

Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H.

Jonn Barrasso, R-Wyo.

Michael Enzi, R-Wyo.

Tim Johnson, D-S.D.

Carl Levin, D-Mich.

Jack Reed, D-R.I.

Tom Udall, D-N.M.

Pat Roberts, R-Kan.

Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.

Thad Cochran, R-Miss.

Mike Johanns, R-Neb.

Max Baucus, D-Mont.

Tom Harkin, D-Iowa

John Cornyn, R-Texas

Mark Udall, D-Colo.

GOVERNOR

Elected:

John Lynch, D-N.H.

Jack Markell, D-Del.

Jay Nixon, D-Mo.

John Hoeven, R-N.D.

Jon Huntsman, R-Utah

Brian Schweitzer, D-Mont.

Jim Douglas, R-Vt.

Wanda Taylor cheers as Obama is announced as winning Ohio at 7:28 p.m. at Raul Grijalva's election party on South Stone Ave.

Wanda Taylor cheers as Obama is announced as winning Ohio at 7:28 p.m. at Raul Grijalva's election party on South Stone Ave.

Barack’s big win

Obama’s big win

Around the country and around the world, many celebrated the election of Barack Obama to the White House.

Producer: JUDY CARLOCK and DYLAN SMITH/Tucson Citizen

Slide 1 of 19.
President-elect Barack Obama speaks in Chicago.
Source: The Associated Press

Gannett: Another 10 pct job cut at local papers, including Citizen

Tuesday, October 28th, 2008

NEW YORK — Gannett Co., the nation’s largest newspaper publisher, said Tuesday it will lay off another 10 percent of the work force in its local newspapers division as advertising revenue continues to plummet during the economic downturn.

The latest reductions, to come by early December, follow a 10 percent cut announced in August. Neither round affects USA Today.

Gannett owns the Tucson Citizen. Interim Editor Jennifer Boice said she doesn’t know much more than what was announced in a letter to all Gannett employees Tuesday by Robert J. Dickey, president of Gannett’s U.S. Community Publishing division.

She said she didn’t yet know whether the Citizen would be included with Tucson Newspapers Inc. as one entity or whether the two companies would have to make the 10 percent cut separately. Boice, the senior editor for news, has been running the Citizen since July when Publisher and Editor Michael Chihak retired.

Tucson Newspapers handles all non-news functions for the Citizen and the Arizona Daily Star, including advertising, circulation and printing.

The Citizen has about 70 full-time equivalent employees and TNI has about 670, meaning as many as 74 people may lose their jobs.

Gannett isn’t revealing a specific number to cut, but said all would be involuntary. Some 600 of the 1,000 cuts in the first round were achieved through layoffs.

Newspaper companies including Gannett are seeing ad revenue declines accelerate as the weak economy puts additional pressure on an ad market already suffering from a migration of readers to the Internet.

Gannett said Friday that advertising revenue at its publishing business fell nearly 18 percent during the July-September quarter compared with the same period last year.

“As all of you are painfully aware, the fiscal crisis is deepening and the economy is getting worse,” Dickey, said in his letter. “Gannett’s revenues continue to be severely impacted by this downturn, and our local operations are suffering.”

Gannett had said Friday it was considering more cuts by year’s end. The layoffs announced Tuesday are part of that; other divisions are likely to see job cuts, too.

Besides the general cuts at local Gannett newspapers, which include The Arizona Republic and the Detroit Free Press, the company in September eliminated 100 management jobs as it consolidated circulation, finance and other operations into four regional groups.

The company also offered voluntary buyouts to about 30 corporate employees last week, on top of reductions of about 45 positions in that division since 2007.

USA Today cut 45 jobs last November.

Publishers of individual newspapers were asked Tuesday to develop local job reduction plans by mid-November to achieve the 10 percent division-wide cut.

“Decisions will be made locally because each of our markets is unique, with differing market conditions and individual needs in light of our previous reductions,” Dickey wrote.

Employees who are laid off will be offered as much as 26 weeks of severance pay — one week for each year of service.

“While this is more bad news, it is a sign of Gannett’s determination to remain healthy and viable as a company during these turbulent economic times,” Dickey said.

Despite the sharp reduction in ad revenue and the need to cut costs, analysts consider Gannett stronger than many of its peers.

Citi Investment Research analyst Catriona Fallon initiated coverage on three newspaper publishers late Monday and assigned only Gannett a “Buy” rating. Fallon placed a “Sell” rating on The New York Times Co. and The McClatchy Co.

Gannett shares have lost more than 75 percent during the past 52 weeks. Fallon said the company’s broadcast segment, which saw some gains from the Olympics and political advertising, also provides some downside protection to the investment.

Shares in Gannett rose 57 cents, or 6.2 percent, to $9.70 in late afternoon trading.

Tucson job loss forecast through 2009 put at 2.5%

Friday, October 3rd, 2008

The job-loss rate in the Tucson area is expected to be greater than Arizona’s through 2009, according to a new forecast from the Arizona Department of Commerce.

The metropolitan area is expected to lose about 9,600 jobs, or 2.5 percent of its nonfarm work force, by the end of next year. Most of the job losses are expected this year, with about 2,900 to be lost in 2009.

Slight growth in the natural resources and mining, education and health services and government sectors were the only bright spots in the forecast.

Not surprisingly, the biggest job loss rates are in the financial and construction sectors, at 18 percent and 15.9 percent respectively. Close behind is the information sector, with a 13 percent job loss rate. Those three sectors account for 7,900 of the expected job losses.

The report says the state could lose nearly 2 percent of its nonfarm jobs before the economy begins recovering late next year.

The forecast predicts 34,000 job losses this year and another 13,500 in 2009,, for a total of 47,500 fewer jobs.

The state had about 2.6 million nonfarm jobs in August and the unemployment rate jumped to 5.6 percent.

The Commerce Department report released Thursday makes major revisions to its forecast issued in May. That report estimated just 9,200 nonfarm jobs would be lost in 2008 and 2009.

The gloomy new report says lower consumer spending is expected to create a domino effect in industries such as trade, transportation, leisure and hospitality.

———

On the Net:

Arizona Department of Commerce: www.azcommerce.com/Home