Tucson Citizen.com

Posts Tagged ‘Development’

County seeks ways to control cell tower spots

Wednesday, May 13th, 2009

Citizen Staff Writer

GARRY DUFFY

gduffy@tucsoncitizen.com

It has been virtually impossible to stop telecommunications companies from placing cell phone towers in residential areas because of federal law, but Pima County officials will look for ways to reject some towers anyway.

The county Board of Supervisors on Tuesday directed planning staffers to look at code amendments that would require telecommunications companies to prove the necessity of towers in certain locations.

“We can’t just take their word for it,” Supervisor Sharon Bronson said of accepting telecommunications companies’ declarations that new towers must be placed in specific locations to improve cell phone service.

The issue arose from a federal lawsuit against the county by T-Mobile, a subsidiary of the German telecommunications giant Deutsche Telekom, over a conditional use permit for a cell tower the company wants to locate in the Picture Rocks area northwest of Tucson.

The county rejected the tower because of its proximity to existing homes and its probable visual impacts to the scenic area. The company sued.

Supervisors and T-Mobile reached a tentative settlement last week allowing T-Mobile to erect the tower at a different location pending later approval of a conditional use permit.

Still, county officials are grasping for a legal means to gain more control over the placement of cell towers.

The federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 prohibited local jurisdictions from banning cell phone towers outright. It also does not allow communities to ban cell phone towers at specific locations because of public health or safety concerns.

“We can’t consider health effects at all,” Bronson said.

That restriction should be abandoned, Bronson said.

No studies have directly linked long-term exposure to radiofrequencies emitted by the towers to negative health effects in humans or animals.

But the National Research Council, a branch of the National Academy of Sciences, in 2008 released a report that said not enough study has been done to determine if there are negative health impacts, particularly on children, pregnant women and fetuses.

Supervisor Ann Day said a recent California court ruling “breaks the locks” on the strict interpretation of the telecommunications law and will allow local governments more leeway when considering the pros and cons of where cell towers should be placed.

DEVELOPER’S SHAMEFUL ECODAMAGE

Thursday, December 27th, 2007

Citizen Staff Writer
Our Opinion

Land development is a major business in booming Arizona with the vast majority of developers operating in legal, ethical, environmentally sound ways.

But a legal settlement last week against a developer who despoiled part of southern Arizona in an especially heinous and offensive manner should serve as a warning to those who would skirt or ignore regulations designed to preserve this state’s beauty and heritage.

Insurance companies for developer George Johnson and his partners agreed to pay $12.1 million – the largest environmental enforcement action in Arizona history.

The payment settles a lawsuit in which Johnson and others were accused of polluting the state’s water, bulldozing protected land, fatally infecting bighorn sheep and destroying archaeological sites.

The millions of dollars cannot come close to making up for the irreplaceable damage.

In 2003, Johnson planned to build a 67,000-home development – a community the size of Tempe – north of the Pima County line and west of Interstate 10 in an areas known as La Osa Ranch.

But the deal collapsed when some landowners rejected Johnson’s purchase offers and complained of strong-arm tactics intended to bully them into selling.

However, before he gave up the project, Johnson’s contractors bladed 270 acres of state trust land near Ironwood Forest National Monument. They also bulldozed 2,000 acres of private land without a permit and seven Hohokam sites up to 1,200 years old.

The suit accused Johnson of ordering the contractors to work “from dawn to dusk seven days a week” to clear the land. Mesquite trees were leveled as federal officials considered protective rules for pygmy owls that lived there.

Domestic goats that Johnson illegally brought to the land infected at least 70 rare bighorn sheep which became blind and bled from the mouth. At least 21 died, some by falling from cliffs to their death, the state said.

Johnson’s irresponsible moves stain the reputation of all developers. Yet this was not the first time he has been accused of such actions.

Records show agencies cited Johnson 31 times from 1999 to 2005 for 93 alleged violations in Apache and Pinal counties.

Court papers show that in 2001, Johnson was accused of trying to intimidate a woman into selling her Apache County ranch for development. When she refused, he set up a pigpen near her land, named a pig after the woman and told her, “I don’t get permits. I do what I want.”

We would like to hope that this $12.1 million hit would lead Johnson to reform his ways. But he has become rich, with a fortune he estimates is in excess of $100 million, while ignoring rules and regulations.

The state has done what it can. Now Johnson’s fellow developers should shun him, letting him know his actions shame them all.

Downtown condos to get off ground soon?

Monday, September 17th, 2007

Citizen Staff Writer

TEYA VITU

tvitu@tucsoncitizen.com

The developer of The Post lofts downtown said construction should start by the end of the year, several months beyond the deadline set in the development agreement with the city.

Rio Nuevo officials and City Council members have had little clear indication when BP Post Investors LLC planned to start building the $22 million, six-story, 52-unit condo complex at 20 E. Congress St.

The sticking point was slow sales of condominiums priced from $230,000 to $1 million-plus.

“We’re looking for clarity on sales progress,” Rio Nuevo director Greg Shelko said. “They’re working diligently to get the last sales to get construction going. They say they will start very soon, Octoberish, Novemberish.”

BP Post, a Tucson-based Bourn Partners subsidiary, bought the city-owned Thrifty Block on May 14 for $100.

The deal came with a string of conditions, including that construction start within 60 days of the sale closing and finish within 18 months.

That means construction should have started July 13 and be finished by November 2008.

The city has taken no action against Bourn.

“We’ve had some correspondence and conversation with Bourn,” Shelko said. “We’re waiting patiently for them to reach a milestone.”

Don Bourn, managing partner at Bourn Partners, said his team has sold more than 40 percent of the condos and wants to hit the 50 percent mark before starting construction.

Also, details must be worked out with the construction contract and BP Post must still get a building permit.

“I think we’re getting close,” Bourn said. “Our presales are going well. We’re pretty optimistic.

“I don’t want to overpromise and underdeliver. We feel very comfortable we can start before the end of the year.”

Bourn said he was unaware of the 60-day requirement to start construction.

“I look at that as a technical issue that maybe we should have had everything ready before we closed,” Bourn said.

Shelko stressed that BP Post had an obligation to start construction in July.

“If they’re not going to get the sales they need in the next 30 to 40 days, we have to take something to the council to amend the agreement,” Shelko said.

Bourn himself suggested a visit to the council.

“We may want to go back to the City Council and give them an update if we have to make some minor adjustments to the contract,” Bourn said.

He said construction would take 15 to 18 months, meaning The Post would not be finished until about mid-2009

That would be about a half-year beyond the November 2008 deadline spelled out in the agreement with the city.

The development agreement does allow “reasonable delay for force majeure events,” a legal term meaning unforeseen events beyond the control of the party.

Shelko doesn’t think force majeure applies here.

“We’re talking hurricanes and acts of God,” Shelko said. “I don’t think a softening of the real estate market is a force majeure.”

City Council members Nina Trasoff and José Ibarra, both on the council’s Rio Nuevo subcommittee, view The Post delays from opposing sides.

“There’s a need to acknowledge that there is a downturn in the housing market,” Trasoff said. “We have a project that holds tremendous potential.

“I think this is being realistic about today’s situation right now, and we are holding on to a concept that will be valuable later on.”

Ibarra voiced “frustration and disappointment” at two years of delays and unfulfilled promises from several development projects that still have not brought a single crane downtown to signal significant progress with downtown revitalization.

CHÍLE

Friday, August 6th, 2004

FINAL DAY OF A FIVE-DAY SERIES

Chile’s a natural for ecotourism

Tension grows between developers, environmentalists

By JIMMY KLEPEK and EMILY WAKILD

Special to the Tucson Citizen

Chris Spelius went searching for the perfect river, and he’s pretty sure he found it a thousand miles south of Santiago, Chile.

Two years after the 1984 Olympic Games, the American kayaker got a call from the Olympic Committee to help develop kayaking in the South American nation.

A thousand miles south of Santiago, he found rivers fed by glaciers and 20 feet of annual rain pouring into Andean fjords. After seeing the rapids of a river named Futaleufú, he never left.

For the past two decades Spelius has made his living river-running there, and he’s not alone. As Chile seeks new revenue sources, it has begun to capitalize on the appeal of wilderness.

“People looking for special experiences are a very important economic sector. We are searching for these tourists,” said Gonzalo Salamanca of Fundación Chile, a state organization promoting global competitiveness.

Government and private entities view ecotourism as a sustainable alternative to industries such as forestry and fisheries, Salamanca says.

And in an era of global tension, Chile’s remoteness attracts growing numbers of visitors, and its expanses of untouched wilderness are increasingly rare in industrialized countries.

Entrepreneurs such as Spelius are trying to ensure these places continue to exist in Chile, but they have competition.

The forestry industry, looking to double Chile’s production by 2010, eyes these lands for hardwoods. The lucrative hydroelectric potential of Andean rivers has not escaped the notice of transnational energy corporations.

In a further twist of globalization, Douglas Tompkins, American founder of the outdoor equipment company North Face and co-founder of Esprit clothing, bought a pristine swath of southern Chile larger than Rhode Island to preserve it from development. His radical investment caused a firestorm of controversy over who is to control natural resources.

For Spelius and visitors to Futaleufú, the draw is the glacial water filtered by a series of lakes in shades of turquoise. It flows from small quiet eddies to technical Class 5 rapids that can toss and bend 14-foot rafts like plastic toys.

Towering conifers and a patchwork of pasture shelter the river while distant rolling hills merge into jagged mountains topped by white snowfields and pale blue glaciers.

More than half the town works in summer tourism from January through mid-March, said Arturo Carvallo, mayor of Futaleufú, population 1,800. They work as rafting, fishing, and hiking guides or in hotels and restaurants.

But the wet, nine-month winters and the town’s isolation prove a formidable obstacle to expanding tourism.

Futaleufú is only recently accessible by road without crossing into Argentina, and the bumpy 96-mile bus trip from the nearest airport takes longer than four hours. Buses run only sporadically in winter. Carvallo is seeking government subsidies to make the town accessible year round.

Transportation wouldn’t be a problem for international corporations wishing to harness the river’s energy.

During the 1980s privatization efforts by dictator Augusto Pinochet’s military regime, the state energy company was auctioned off. The purchaser, Spanish energy giant Endesa, also acquired rights for hydroelectric development.

Today, the company owns about 85 percent of the total water rights granted by Chile, including the entire flow of the Futaleufú.

One proposal is for a hydroelectric dam that would inundate the town of Futaleufú and the surrounding valley to produce cheaper electricity.

Daniel Gonzalez, executive director of FutaFriends, an organization dedicated to preventing the industrialization of the river, sees little economic justification at the moment. But with electricity demand increasing 7 percent a year and a new agreement allowing Chile and Argentina to exchange energy freely, this could change.

Estimates of when construction could begin vary from five to 10 years.

“The issue is not just about this incredible place being dammed,” Gonzalez said. “Doing so would set a dangerous model that would hurt the region as a whole.”

But the free market provides opportunities in surprising places. Just as a Spanish company may utilize privatized water rights for hydroelectric development, Douglas Tompkins seeks to privatize to prevent such things.

Tompkins visited the country for the first time in 1961 and fell in love with the Chilean wilderness. Cashing in his interest in the clothing business, he gave up his career in San Francisco and settled on an abandoned ranch in the coastal south.

Since then he has spent more than $50 million to buy nearly 750,000 acres to make sure it remains wild. The seventh largest of Chile’s protected areas, Parque Pumalín is managed by Tompkins’ foundation, the Conservation Land Trust.

Named for the resident pumas, the park contains a combination of temperate rain forests and fjords overlooked by the 7,887-foot volcano, Michinmahuida. The park is home to the deerlike pudu, sea lions and some of the last oceanside old growth forests on Earth.

“Most people desire to be out in nature although they cannot articulate why,” said Tompkins. “There is still a need inside of us to see not every square meter of Earth has been humanized.”

Tompkins hopes to ensure that this wilderness lasts forever, but his work isn’t without controversy. He has been accused of violating national sovereignty with a reserve that stretches almost from the Pacific Ocean on the west to Argentina on the east.

“If a foreigner came into the United States and bought a piece of land that stretched from California to Philadelphia, what would Americans say?” asks Francisco Perez of INFOR, a Chilean forestry research organization.

Juan Eduardo Corea, vice president of CORMA, a forestry trade group, concurs. “Tompkins earned his money as businessman. Now he comes to a poor country and is preventing the use of natural resources important for our development.”

Tompkins and a growing number of private conservationists are simply using the same provisions of Chilean laws that encourage foreign ownership of property to attract investment.

Some praise his efforts.

“We are very thankful that Tompkins has protected this wonderful area. We wish there were more people like him,” says park visitor Juan Ravilet Mariano.

Chilean botanist Adrianna Hoffman, who wrote a book on the flora of southern Chile, agreed.

Hoffman was appointed director of CONAMA, the Chilean environmental protection agency by Chilean President Ricardo Lagos. Hoffman was the first environmentalist to head CONAMA, but she said the organization had little power to influence government policy and left after six months.

Hoffman now heads the private foundation Defenders of the Forest.

“Today private investment is the only way to conserve areas that the government does not have the means to protect,” she said.

The logging industry, though, is eying Pumalín’s forests. It is home to Chile’s largest remaining stand of 4,500 year-old alerces, a native cypress. With trunks up to 12 feet in diameter, alerces are prized for wood resistant to insects and weather.

Chilean law forbids substituting old growth forests for tree plantations. Nevertheless, the industry envisions a renewed emphasis on the sustainable harvest of native forests in southern Chile, which includes Douglas Tompkins’s eco-reserve. Perez believes that more than 14 million tons of native forest, equivalent to the size of 7,000 full-sized redwoods, can be harvested annually without jeopardizing the environment.

“There is no doubt we can use native forest. We are in the process of evaluating its precise condition to make use profitable,” Perez says.

Although protected by the government, alerce wood still has value on the black market. Most foresters admit clandestine logging and trafficking happen, but their interest is with more profitable exotic species, such as eucalyptus or Monterey pine, which grow where native forests once stood.

Several types of eucalyptus, native to Australia and valued for firm pulp and rapid growth, flourish in reforested areas of Chile.

“Our main assets are the forests,” says Charles Kimber, the Chilean executive director of Arauco, the third largest forestry-products company in the world. Arauco controls 709 thousand acres of eucalyptus and Monterey pine plantations.

By carefully managing every step of a sapling’s life, plantations cultivate harvestable, defect-free trees in 15 years.

Many of the eucalyptus are turned into wood chips, which are processed into paper and cardboard. Monterey pines become paneling, plywood, particleboard and pulp for shipment all around the world.

Since tariffs have long been reduced for Chilean forestry products coming to the United States, the new free trade agreement will change little.

Project examines impact of free trade

Chile became the first South American country to become a free trade partner with the United States on Jan. 1.

That puts Chile on the same footing as Canada and Mexico in eliminating import tariffs, which makes goods traded either way cheaper. The agreement also creates a level playing field for investment, trade in services, government procurement, and intellectual property.

In a joint project among the University of Arizona’s journalism and Latin American Studies departments and the Tucson Citizen, nine students went to Chile to determine the effects of the free trade agreement of Chile.

The Tucson Citizen is publishing their reports.

PHOTO CREDIT: JIMMY KLEPEK/Special to the Tucson CItizen

A raft from Expediciones Chile travels on southern Chile’s Futaleufú River, a magnet for rafters from around the globe. Some Chileans – and American investors – believe tourism can create jobs and preserve natural resources.

Parque Pumalín, a private nature preserve that stretches nearly the width of Chile, is the brainchild of Douglas Tompkins, the American founder of outdoor gear company North Face.

Dock workers in Puerto Calbulco, Chile, prepare wood chips for shipment. Growers in Chile nurture Australian eucalyptus trees for years, then shred the trees into wood chips that become paper.

Vote delayed on next step for homes near Silverbell Golf Course

Thursday, July 29th, 2004

Citizen Staff

By DAVID PITTMAN

dpittman@tucsoncitizen.com

West Side residents are grateful the city will delay a decision that would allow a developer to move forward with a plan to build 151 homes next to Silverbell Golf Course.

The city Board of Adjustment yesterday postponed a vote on requests by Estes Development Co. that the plan be allowed to vary from codes related to Silverbell Road’s designation as a scenic corridor.

The matter has been continued until Aug. 25 to allow the builder to alter the plan and try to gain support of nearby residents.

Gerri Saleh, president of Sombras del Cerro Homeowners Association, presented 125 signatures against the project to the board. Petitions were signed by area residents and shoppers at a strip mall at West Grant and North Silverbell roads.

“I am pleased this matter has been continued,” Saleh said.

Homeowners spoke out overwhelmingly against the project yesterday. The proposed subdivision is in a flood plain, includes poor drainage and would bring more traffic to overloaded Silverbell Road, they said.

Residents said the neighborhood would be too close to an abandoned landfill and a gas pipeline that burst in summer 2003.

Other opponents said the project is destined for approval because the city owns the 31 acres on which the homes would be built. The City Council has approved sale of that land to the Estes Co. for $2.3 million.

The council has approved spending $1 million to haul dirt to the property to raise it above the 100-year flood level.

Area resident Chuck Brookshire believes the board is trying to pave the way for approval of the development.

“The board has the city’s interest at heart because it would like to approve variances for land the city is trying to sell,” he said. “It is a conflict of interest.”

Concessions from the city are needed to develop the property, William Estes III said.

He said the company is waiting for variances before it closes on the land sale.

“The property as it sits now is undevelopable,” he said.

Estes said 18 of the 31 acres would be developed. The rest would be used for drainage and open space, and though zoning would allow 162 units, he is planning 11 fewer.

A landscape architect employed by Estes said the builder will add vegetation and landscaping to enhance the area along Silverbell.

City staffers said that because the pipeline is on the east side of the Santa Cruz River, it would be too far from the homes to be dangerous.

The landfill beneath the golf course also presents no danger, the staff said.

The council approved the land sale to Estes to raise money for upgrades to El Rio Golf Course.

Improvements to the course, Tucson’s oldest, would qualify it for the World Golf Foundation’s First Tee program, a national effort designed to introduce young people to golf.

Vote delayed on next step for homes near Silverbell Golf Course

Thursday, July 29th, 2004

Citizen Staff

By DAVID PITTMAN

dpittman@tucsoncitizen.com

West Side residents are grateful the city will delay a decision that would allow a developer to move forward with a plan to build 151 homes next to Silverbell Golf Course.

The city Board of Adjustment yesterday postponed a vote on requests by Estes Development Co. that the plan be allowed to vary from codes related to Silverbell Road’s designation as a scenic corridor.

The matter has been continued until Aug. 25 to allow the builder to alter the plan and try to gain support of nearby residents.

Gerri Saleh, president of Sombras del Cerro Homeowners Association, presented 125 signatures against the project to the board. Petitions were signed by area residents and shoppers at a strip mall at West Grant and North Silverbell roads.

“I am pleased this matter has been continued,” Saleh said.

Homeowners spoke out overwhelmingly against the project yesterday. The proposed subdivision is in a flood plain, includes poor drainage and would bring more traffic to overloaded Silverbell Road, they said.

Residents said the neighborhood would be too close to an abandoned landfill and a gas pipeline that burst in summer 2003.

Other opponents said the project is destined for approval because the city owns the 31 acres on which the homes would be built. The City Council has approved sale of that land to the Estes Co. for $2.3 million.

The council has approved spending $1 million to haul dirt to the property to raise it above the 100-year flood level.

Area resident Chuck Brookshire believes the board is trying to pave the way for approval of the development.

“The board has the city’s interest at heart because it would like to approve variances for land the city is trying to sell,” he said. “It is a conflict of interest.”

Concessions from the city are needed to develop the property, William Estes III said.

He said the company is waiting for variances before it closes on the land sale.

“The property as it sits now is undevelopable,” he said.

Estes said 18 of the 31 acres would be developed. The rest would be used for drainage and open space, and though zoning would allow 162 units, he is planning 11 fewer.

A landscape architect employed by Estes said the builder will add vegetation and landscaping to enhance the area along Silverbell.

City staffers said that because the pipeline is on the east side of the Santa Cruz River, it would be too far from the homes to be dangerous.

The landfill beneath the golf course also presents no danger, the staff said.

The council approved the land sale to Estes to raise money for upgrades to El Rio Golf Course.

Improvements to the course, Tucson’s oldest, would qualify it for the World Golf Foundation’s First Tee program, a national effort designed to introduce young people to golf.

Fed, private land swap may protect sensitive areas here

Wednesday, July 28th, 2004

Citizen Staff

Tumamoc Hill is among those that could preserved while a developer took more than 4,000 acres in southern Pima County.

By BLAKE MORLOCK

bmorlock@tucsoncitizen.com

A proposed federal and private land swap would shift growth away from environmentally sensitive areas and make two federal land preserves easier to manage, officials say.

The deal also would help preserve Tumamoc Hill, which offers an archaeological link to Tucson’s past.

The deal was struck last week among environmentalists, two congressmen, former Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt and Tucson developer Don Diamond.

The swap involves more than 4,000 acres in southern Pima County.

Diamond would buy two parcels totaling 3,110 acres and give them to the federal government in return for 1,280 acres he can develop south of Tucson, near the intersection of Kolb and Sahuarita roads.

The land to be preserved would be inside Ironwood Forest National Monument and adjacent to the Las Cienegas National Conservation Area.

The deal gives federal land managers a stronger hand in managing the preserves, said Matt Skroch, field director of the Sky Island Alliance.

“Both of them are threatened by development, and now they will be preserved in perpetuity,” Skroch said.

Democratic U.S. Rep. Raúl Grijalva and his Republican colleague, Rep. Jim Kolbe, have introduced jointly the federal legislation needed for the deal.

Also included in the legislation is a “friendly” federal condemnation of 290 acres of state land on Tumamoc Hill, on the West Side of Tucson. Pima County would buy part of the hill for $3 million.

The process could take 18 months, said Philip Aries, a consultant who is working with Babbitt on behalf of Diamond.

“It really is a win-win-win-win for everyone involved, and if it wasn’t, it wouldn’t work,” Aries said.

Negotiations for the deal began more than a year and a half ago, when Diamond sought 20,000 acres of federal land in Pinal County. That proposal was drastically scaled back to accommodate the parties involved, Aries said.

Neal Simonson wanted to sell 2,490 acres of his Empire Ranch, 20 miles southeast of Tucson, for development. That deal would likely have stirred the environmental community to protest, Aries said.

The Lebrecht-Moore family, which owns 620 acres smack in the middle of the Ironwood Forest Monument, was looking for a buyer, too. That land is 30 miles northwest of the city.

Now, Diamond wants to buy those parcels and turn them over to the feds, who would hand him less environmentally sensitive land, Aries said.

The Simonsons sweetened the deal for environmentalists by retiring their right to use 1,050 acre-feet of water a year from the Cienega Creek watershed.

“That alone would finally ensure the integrity of water available and the riparian habitat in Las Cienegas,” Skroch said.

MAP: RANDY HARRIS/Tucson Citizen

Proposed land swap

GUEST OPINION

Wednesday, July 28th, 2004

Readers

By State Sen. Jorge Garcia and State Reps. Olivia Cajero Bedford and Phil Lopes

Preserve ‘Gateway to the Tucson Mountains’

In 1997, and again this May, the voters of Pima County approved bond measures to buy open space. Both times, the list of recommended purchases included the Painted Hills.

This series of saguaro-studded ridges rise west of Tucson between Speedway and Anklam Road.

These parcels’ beauty long has been admired. Unfortunately, the land was not acquired with the 1997 bond money because increasing costs limited how much land the money could buy.

Now, though this property again has been approved for purchase, it may be lost to development.

A subdivision plan has been submitted to Pima County for the eastern two-thirds of this land, and another proposal is being submitted for the western third.

Because the property is zoned one house per acre, houses will be densely lined up on the Anklam and Speedway sides.

The land is steep and rocky, so much blasting and grading will have to occur, destroying forever the property’s scenic and habitat values.

With development happening furiously all over the Tucson basin, why should we care about these properties in particular?

This site is part of the principal gateway into the Tucson Mountains. Their fate is not a local or neighborhood issue. The two roads that edge this land are the two most popular routes to take visitors to Tucson Mountain Park, Saguaro National Park West and the Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum.

Today these routes pass through relatively pristine desert – hills rich with imposing desert vegetation and washes that provide corridors for wildlife.

In winter, it is common to see out-of-state visitors stopping to take their first pictures of saguaros, even before reaching Tucson Mountain Park.

Retaining these hills in their natural condition is important to all of us whose reasons for living here include our love for the desert.

If the county fails to acquire this land, the consequences will be serious. Not only will homes and driveways crowd the slopes where saguaros once stood, but also nearby roads will be crowded.

An additional 1,400 daily vehicle trips would commence on these narrow, two-lane roads. Their capacity is no greater now than in the mid-1950s when they first were paved.

The result will be a textbook example of poor planning – multivehicle homes, built beyond public transportation, destroying an unspoiled portion of the desert enjoyed by residents and tourists alike.

As happened in 1997, the cost of all approved open space properties now exceeds the bond funds available, and decisions must be made.

County supervisors and the Conservation Acquisition Commission must choose between two starkly different fates for the Gateway to the Tucson Mountains.

We urge both groups to preserve a scenic resource valuable to us all and protect against yet another example of insensitive sprawl.

Money is available, and this purchase will not reduce the funds approved for species protection. The correct decision will be to keep these highly visible, steep, imposing ridges in their natural state as a close-to-town example of the Sonoran Desert for all to enjoy.

Then the public, which twice approved protection of this land, will get what it voted for.

State Sen. Jorge Garcia and Reps. Olivia Cajero Bedford and Phil Lopes are all Democrats who represent Tucson’s District 27 in the Arizona Legislature.

Fed, private land swap may protect sensitive areas here

Wednesday, July 28th, 2004

Citizen Staff

Tumamoc Hill is among those that could preserved while a developer took more than 4,000 acres in southern Pima County.

By BLAKE MORLOCK

bmorlock@tucsoncitizen.com

A proposed federal and private land swap would shift growth away from environmentally sensitive areas and make two federal land preserves easier to manage, officials say.

The deal also would help preserve Tumamoc Hill, which offers an archaeological link to Tucson’s past.

The deal was struck last week among environmentalists, two congressmen, former Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt and Tucson developer Don Diamond.

The swap involves more than 4,000 acres in southern Pima County.

Diamond would buy two parcels totaling 3,110 acres and give them to the federal government in return for 1,280 acres he can develop south of Tucson, near the intersection of Kolb and Sahuarita roads.

The land to be preserved would be inside Ironwood Forest National Monument and adjacent to the Las Cienegas National Conservation Area.

The deal gives federal land managers a stronger hand in managing the preserves, said Matt Skroch, field director of the Sky Island Alliance.

“Both of them are threatened by development, and now they will be preserved in perpetuity,” Skroch said.

Democratic U.S. Rep. Raúl Grijalva and his Republican colleague, Rep. Jim Kolbe, have introduced jointly the federal legislation needed for the deal.

Also included in the legislation is a “friendly” federal condemnation of 290 acres of state land on Tumamoc Hill, on the West Side of Tucson. Pima County would buy part of the hill for $3 million.

The process could take 18 months, said Philip Aries, a consultant who is working with Babbitt on behalf of Diamond.

“It really is a win-win-win-win for everyone involved, and if it wasn’t, it wouldn’t work,” Aries said.

Negotiations for the deal began more than a year and a half ago, when Diamond sought 20,000 acres of federal land in Pinal County. That proposal was drastically scaled back to accommodate the parties involved, Aries said.

Neal Simonson wanted to sell 2,490 acres of his Empire Ranch, 20 miles southeast of Tucson, for development. That deal would likely have stirred the environmental community to protest, Aries said.

The Lebrecht-Moore family, which owns 620 acres smack in the middle of the Ironwood Forest Monument, was looking for a buyer, too. That land is 30 miles northwest of the city.

Now, Diamond wants to buy those parcels and turn them over to the feds, who would hand him less environmentally sensitive land, Aries said.

The Simonsons sweetened the deal for environmentalists by retiring their right to use 1,050 acre-feet of water a year from the Cienega Creek watershed.

“That alone would finally ensure the integrity of water available and the riparian habitat in Las Cienegas,” Skroch said.

MAP: RANDY HARRIS/Tucson Citizen

Proposed land swap

GUEST OPINION

Wednesday, July 28th, 2004

Readers

By State Sen. Jorge Garcia and State Reps. Olivia Cajero Bedford and Phil Lopes

Preserve ‘Gateway to the Tucson Mountains’

In 1997, and again this May, the voters of Pima County approved bond measures to buy open space. Both times, the list of recommended purchases included the Painted Hills.

This series of saguaro-studded ridges rise west of Tucson between Speedway and Anklam Road.

These parcels’ beauty long has been admired. Unfortunately, the land was not acquired with the 1997 bond money because increasing costs limited how much land the money could buy.

Now, though this property again has been approved for purchase, it may be lost to development.

A subdivision plan has been submitted to Pima County for the eastern two-thirds of this land, and another proposal is being submitted for the western third.

Because the property is zoned one house per acre, houses will be densely lined up on the Anklam and Speedway sides.

The land is steep and rocky, so much blasting and grading will have to occur, destroying forever the property’s scenic and habitat values.

With development happening furiously all over the Tucson basin, why should we care about these properties in particular?

This site is part of the principal gateway into the Tucson Mountains. Their fate is not a local or neighborhood issue. The two roads that edge this land are the two most popular routes to take visitors to Tucson Mountain Park, Saguaro National Park West and the Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum.

Today these routes pass through relatively pristine desert – hills rich with imposing desert vegetation and washes that provide corridors for wildlife.

In winter, it is common to see out-of-state visitors stopping to take their first pictures of saguaros, even before reaching Tucson Mountain Park.

Retaining these hills in their natural condition is important to all of us whose reasons for living here include our love for the desert.

If the county fails to acquire this land, the consequences will be serious. Not only will homes and driveways crowd the slopes where saguaros once stood, but also nearby roads will be crowded.

An additional 1,400 daily vehicle trips would commence on these narrow, two-lane roads. Their capacity is no greater now than in the mid-1950s when they first were paved.

The result will be a textbook example of poor planning – multivehicle homes, built beyond public transportation, destroying an unspoiled portion of the desert enjoyed by residents and tourists alike.

As happened in 1997, the cost of all approved open space properties now exceeds the bond funds available, and decisions must be made.

County supervisors and the Conservation Acquisition Commission must choose between two starkly different fates for the Gateway to the Tucson Mountains.

We urge both groups to preserve a scenic resource valuable to us all and protect against yet another example of insensitive sprawl.

Money is available, and this purchase will not reduce the funds approved for species protection. The correct decision will be to keep these highly visible, steep, imposing ridges in their natural state as a close-to-town example of the Sonoran Desert for all to enjoy.

Then the public, which twice approved protection of this land, will get what it voted for.

State Sen. Jorge Garcia and Reps. Olivia Cajero Bedford and Phil Lopes are all Democrats who represent Tucson’s District 27 in the Arizona Legislature.

Developers may need to minimize air pollution

Monday, July 19th, 2004

The Associated Press

The Associated Press

PHOENIX – State environmental regulators could require housing developers do more in helping minimize air pollution.

Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Director Steve Owens said he is considering making requirements on indirect sources of air pollution. That would include housing subdivisions, which don’t directly cause pollution but the cars from them do.

“Some of the people who are making the most off rapid growth aren’t participating in any way in keeping down the emissions here,” Owens said. “But the net result of what they’re doing is increasing ozone and other pollution.”

One possibility to ease the pollution problem could involve asking new development designs to cut down on car traffic. The requirements could range from bus shelters and other features that encourage mass transit use, to synchronized traffic lights and bike lanes.

The measures could help metro Phoenix curb its pollution now and avoid problems later, Owens said. Phoenix and surrounding suburbs don’t meet tougher ozone standards that went into effect this year and the area must comply with the rule within five years.

“If we’re not going to figure out how to deal with the air quality of growth, we’re either going to have bad air quality here or the burden on business will be so great (they could leave),” Owens said.

But new requirements can be difficult to pass, particularly when they seem to threaten growth.

“I’m still trying to understand the link between development and car use,” said Spencer Kamps, vice president of legislative affairs for the Home Builders Association of Central Arizona. “Until the pollutants from cars are dealt with, we’ll have a problem.”

Developers may need to minimize air pollution

Monday, July 19th, 2004

The Associated Press

The Associated Press

PHOENIX – State environmental regulators could require housing developers do more in helping minimize air pollution.

Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Director Steve Owens said he is considering making requirements on indirect sources of air pollution. That would include housing subdivisions, which don’t directly cause pollution but the cars from them do.

“Some of the people who are making the most off rapid growth aren’t participating in any way in keeping down the emissions here,” Owens said. “But the net result of what they’re doing is increasing ozone and other pollution.”

One possibility to ease the pollution problem could involve asking new development designs to cut down on car traffic. The requirements could range from bus shelters and other features that encourage mass transit use, to synchronized traffic lights and bike lanes.

The measures could help metro Phoenix curb its pollution now and avoid problems later, Owens said. Phoenix and surrounding suburbs don’t meet tougher ozone standards that went into effect this year and the area must comply with the rule within five years.

“If we’re not going to figure out how to deal with the air quality of growth, we’re either going to have bad air quality here or the burden on business will be so great (they could leave),” Owens said.

But new requirements can be difficult to pass, particularly when they seem to threaten growth.

“I’m still trying to understand the link between development and car use,” said Spencer Kamps, vice president of legislative affairs for the Home Builders Association of Central Arizona. “Until the pollutants from cars are dealt with, we’ll have a problem.”

GUEST OPINION

Thursday, July 8th, 2004

Readers

By Mathew Somers

New Plaza Antigua should include some of past

As the country changed from the hippie and free spirit culture of the 1960s and early 1970s to a tougher economy of the later ’70s, there was also a change in Tucson. Students at the University of Arizona campus were becoming more conservative, and the number of business majors was increasing yearly.

Tucson’s parochial economy was starting to be absorbed by nationwide chains. The mines were closing, leaving less disposable income in the community. Like small puddles from a drying lake, the hippies and free spirits were relegated to smaller areas. Plaza Antigua was one of those places.

Many years ago, when I had a lot more hair and a lot less weight, I was apartment hunting. I needed a place somewhat near the UA, yet also toward my family home close to the Flowing Wells area.

Intrigued by the mystique of Plaza Antigua, I called a number and was given the directions.

The entrance to the apartments was down an alley near another apartment building. It was a magical tunnel from the busy Limberlost Road to the quiet apartments surrounded by large cottonwood trees near Plaza Antigua.

I rented a lower-floor apartment, No. 12. Unlike a conventional apartment building, the next door apartment was not 13 or 11. In the spirit of the location, I wasn’t too surprised that the next door apartment was letter G.

At the time, Casa Molina had a small restaurant near Campbell where I occasionally ate. The aroma of incense from nearby stores floated in the air. With a light breeze, the leaves of the cottonwood trees lightly clicked thousands at a time, giving the little shopping area a wonderful ambiance.

At the corner of Campbell and Limberlost was a gas station. A bar with a weekend band stood behind it. Even at a time when the drinking age was 19, it wasn’t surprising to see some awfully young students sipping suds.

Probably the biggest difference between this apartment and any of the dozen other places I rented as a UA student was the Plaza Antigua version of an alarm clock. The first morning, after working a Christmastime job at Woolco at Alvernon and 22nd Street, I was awakened by the screaming of what could be described as a cross between a baby and a cat.

I looked outside and saw a peacock perched on a solitary telephone pole, silhouetted by the morning light. Every once in a while, it would cry again. I looked around and saw a few more peacocks strutting about.

I had seen the peacocks and some feathers around the area and found out the owners of the businesses in Plaza Antigua took care of them. But I did not realize the loudness of their cries, especially when it was foggy or raining at dawn. Although it took some getting used to, waking up in the morning to the sound of the peacocks was the most exotic thing I had ever experienced up to that time. It was my signature remembrance of Plaza Antigua.

There have been times when Plaza Antigua was close to disappearing.

There were fires a few years after I left. Before the solidifying of the riverbank due to the 1983 floods, I remember one Christmas Eve when my landlord told me to pack what I needed in a suitcase that night because the Rillito might crest and wash away the apartments.

Now the little quaint “rustic” buildings are partly abandoned and do not meet much of anyone’s code. And the hippie, free-spirit lifestyle has become an anachronism.

As Tucson grows larger with new people who have no remembrance of Plaza Antigua, the corner of the Rillito and Campbell became something to pass, a place not to stop.

A golden nugget of Tucson history soon will be buried by anonymity and sprawl. The apartments are pretty rundown now, some buildings dilapidated. The gas station and bar are closed. Even the peacocks are gone.

But the cottonwoods stand. I hope the new development will use those beautiful trees as a frame for the development.

And I hope they use the peacock as a symbol of the new Plaza Antigua.

Matthew Somers graduated from Flowing Wells High School in 1974 and from the University of Arizona in 1983. He has been a Tucson resident for more than 40 years.

GUEST OPINION

Thursday, July 8th, 2004

Readers

By Mathew Somers

New Plaza Antigua should include some of past

As the country changed from the hippie and free spirit culture of the 1960s and early 1970s to a tougher economy of the later ’70s, there was also a change in Tucson. Students at the University of Arizona campus were becoming more conservative, and the number of business majors was increasing yearly.

Tucson’s parochial economy was starting to be absorbed by nationwide chains. The mines were closing, leaving less disposable income in the community. Like small puddles from a drying lake, the hippies and free spirits were relegated to smaller areas. Plaza Antigua was one of those places.

Many years ago, when I had a lot more hair and a lot less weight, I was apartment hunting. I needed a place somewhat near the UA, yet also toward my family home close to the Flowing Wells area.

Intrigued by the mystique of Plaza Antigua, I called a number and was given the directions.

The entrance to the apartments was down an alley near another apartment building. It was a magical tunnel from the busy Limberlost Road to the quiet apartments surrounded by large cottonwood trees near Plaza Antigua.

I rented a lower-floor apartment, No. 12. Unlike a conventional apartment building, the next door apartment was not 13 or 11. In the spirit of the location, I wasn’t too surprised that the next door apartment was letter G.

At the time, Casa Molina had a small restaurant near Campbell where I occasionally ate. The aroma of incense from nearby stores floated in the air. With a light breeze, the leaves of the cottonwood trees lightly clicked thousands at a time, giving the little shopping area a wonderful ambiance.

At the corner of Campbell and Limberlost was a gas station. A bar with a weekend band stood behind it. Even at a time when the drinking age was 19, it wasn’t surprising to see some awfully young students sipping suds.

Probably the biggest difference between this apartment and any of the dozen other places I rented as a UA student was the Plaza Antigua version of an alarm clock. The first morning, after working a Christmastime job at Woolco at Alvernon and 22nd Street, I was awakened by the screaming of what could be described as a cross between a baby and a cat.

I looked outside and saw a peacock perched on a solitary telephone pole, silhouetted by the morning light. Every once in a while, it would cry again. I looked around and saw a few more peacocks strutting about.

I had seen the peacocks and some feathers around the area and found out the owners of the businesses in Plaza Antigua took care of them. But I did not realize the loudness of their cries, especially when it was foggy or raining at dawn. Although it took some getting used to, waking up in the morning to the sound of the peacocks was the most exotic thing I had ever experienced up to that time. It was my signature remembrance of Plaza Antigua.

There have been times when Plaza Antigua was close to disappearing.

There were fires a few years after I left. Before the solidifying of the riverbank due to the 1983 floods, I remember one Christmas Eve when my landlord told me to pack what I needed in a suitcase that night because the Rillito might crest and wash away the apartments.

Now the little quaint “rustic” buildings are partly abandoned and do not meet much of anyone’s code. And the hippie, free-spirit lifestyle has become an anachronism.

As Tucson grows larger with new people who have no remembrance of Plaza Antigua, the corner of the Rillito and Campbell became something to pass, a place not to stop.

A golden nugget of Tucson history soon will be buried by anonymity and sprawl. The apartments are pretty rundown now, some buildings dilapidated. The gas station and bar are closed. Even the peacocks are gone.

But the cottonwoods stand. I hope the new development will use those beautiful trees as a frame for the development.

And I hope they use the peacock as a symbol of the new Plaza Antigua.

Matthew Somers graduated from Flowing Wells High School in 1974 and from the University of Arizona in 1983. He has been a Tucson resident for more than 40 years.

Vail parents say kids at risk until Cienega Road goes in

Monday, July 5th, 2004

Citizen Staff

By GARRY DUFFY

gduffy@tucsoncitizen.com

Students are at risk as the city and county spar over who will pay for a road linking the community of Vail to South Houghton Road, some Vail Unified School District parents say.

Neither government wants to come up with the entire estimated $3.6 million to build the 3 1/2-mile road. The proposed Cienega Road would link Cienega High School, 12901 E. Colossal Cave Road, to the planned Empire High School, due to open east of Houghton in fall 2005.

The current clogged roads are “a recipe for disaster,” said Helen Tschirhart, a Rita Ranch resident who will have three sons at Cienega this fall.

Growth has exploded on the Southeast Side, where the district is located. The district had about 500 students in the mid-1980s and has nearly 6,500 now.

But no major roads, called collector roads, have been built or improved in recent years to accommodate traffic.

Cienega High, which opened in fall 2001, is expected to be at its 1,650-student capacity next year. The smaller Empire High, about 3 1/2 miles west of Cienega, is to open in fall 2005.

Besides connecting the two schools, the road would eliminate a roundabout route that school buses must take to avoid a railroad bridge not rated for heavy vehicles. A school bus going from Vail to Rita Ranch must make a 12-mile trip that the new road would cut to fewer than four.

Some, including Vail Superintendent Calvin Baker, believe the city, which annexed the area in the 1990s, should build the road.

City Manager James Keene wants Pima County to cover a hefty portion of the road costs because the area was in the unincorporated county when subdivisions in the area were approved.

The city has an obligation to pay some of the road costs, Keene said.

County officials don’t want to pay for a road inside city limits and have come up with a plan that involves having developers pay some of the road’s cost.

County Administrator Chuck Huckelberry has proposed lending the city at least $3 million with money from 1997 bonds. He wants the city to repay the money at least in part by charging development impact fees for two planned subdivisions in the area. The city has no such fees.

Huckelberry said the deal is contingent on the city approving fees for the area that are at least the $3,500-per-unit average the county charges for new housing in unincorporated areas.

“There are private property owners who will benefit from the new road, and they ought to be contributing to its cost,” he said.

Keene countered that the $3 million Huckelberry is offering already is pledged as part of $20 million the county agreed to spend on Houghton improvements.

That deal was part of a pact between the county and city to eliminate potential city opposition to the county’s May bond election. The bonds passed.

City Councilwoman Shirley Scott and fellow Democrats Steve Leal and José Ibarra advocate development impact fees but have been blocked by the council majority, Scott’s chief of staff, Byron Howard, said last week.

The city has spent more than $200,000 on design and engineering for the road, said Andrew Greenhill, chief of staff for Mayor Bob Walkup.

“They mayor wants to see the road get built,” Greenhill said. “He won’t stand on ceremony.”

County supervisors tomorrow will discuss whether districts should be required to have roads in place or planned before new school sites are picked.

In the meantime, area residents are trying to turn up the heat on city and county officials.

Nine-year Rincon Valley resident Linda Wirta has watched three grandchildren go through Vail schools. She also has seen traffic increase.

“There is so much traffic out here, especially when the schools are in,” Wirta said. “It is a danger to put kids in a bus on the highway and make them cross railroad tracks.”

On the Net: www.cienegaroad.com