Citizen Staff Writers
ERIC SAGARA and MARY BUSTAMANTE
news@tucsoncitizen.com
Pima County schools mirrored the flat gains made by students across Arizona on the 2007 AIMS test, the state exam that measures whether students are up to state standards.
The scores, in reading, writing and math, were released Wednesday.
As usual, Tucson schools showing the highest proficiency in general were on the East and North sides.
The exceptions, which topped both traditional and charter high school lists, were the midtown University High School in Tucson Unified School District and the charter BASIS Tucson, both intensive college preparatory schools.
BASIS and UHS students usually have passed Arizona’s Instrument to Measure Standards by sophomore or junior year.
Steve Holmes, TUSD’s assistant superintendent for teaching and learning, said some West Side schools, historically on the lower end of AIMS scores, made substantial progress over the last year.
Lawrence Intermediate, a far West Side school deemed “failing” by the state in 2005, made increases across the board. For example, 49.5 percent of its fifth-graders passed AIMS math, up from only 20.7 percent in 2006. That was the best increase at that grade level in math in Pima County. And 82.2 percent of Lawrence third-graders passed writing, compared to 59.4 percent the previous year.
The state report shows a high level of third-grade writing gains across Arizona for 2007. However, that could be because of an anomaly. In 2006, the report showed plummeting third-grade writing scores, possibly from scoring errors or a harder test.
Statewide this year, AIMS scores showed slight increases across the board in math – from 68 percent proficiency in 2006 to 70 percent in 2007 – and in reading – from 68 percent to 69 percent over that same period.
Writing proficiency in Arizona increased the most, from 72 percent in 2006 to 78 percent in 2007.
“Adding this year’s gains to last year’s confirms the benefit of our emphasis on academic rigor in the classroom,” state Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Horne said. “Arizona students perform above the national average on standardized tests measuring academic proficiency, including the TerraNova, the Scholastic Aptitude Test and the ACT college entrance test.”
Overall, he said, “Arizona students have shown increased proficiency consistently over the past four years.”
Locally, education leaders had precise reasons why schools made substantial gains, but they often were at a loss as to why some schools did poorly.
Robison Elementary, for example, had the highest decrease in the county for public school in third-grade reading and math. While only 18 percent of third-graders failed AIMS math in 2006, but 77 percent did so in 2007.
While 24 percent of that same Robison third-grade level failed reading in 2006, it went up to 73 percent in 2007.
“The scores were quite disappointing across the board,” said Maggie Shafer, a TUSD principal supervisor. “They are undeniably unacceptable. We have to make some significant changes in programs and instructional strategies.”
Asked what she thought happened at the school, at 2745 E. 18th St., she said, “I really don’t know.”
Another principal supervisor, Maria Patterson, said she had “no idea what happened” at TUSD’s Wakefield Middle School, 101 W. 44th St., where seventh-graders went from 7 percent failing writing in 2006 to 35 percent in 2007, also the worst decrease in Pima County public schools.
“They were emphasizing math, but that didn’t do well, either. It’s a concern to us,” said Patterson, who was principal at Wakefield for six years before being promoted to principal supervisor.
It is targeted for improvement, she said. “We need to reaffirm the need to look at support, see what we can do. There will be an in-depth review of what we need to do.”
But there was good news from Patterson about C.E. Rose Elementary, identified with Lawrence, 4850 W. Jeffrey Road; Manzo Elementary, 855 N. Melrose Ave.; Warren Elementary, 3505 W. Milton Road; and Tully Accelerated Magnet, 1701 W. El Rio Drive, as TUSD’s five top AIMS gaining schools.
All but Warren are Title I schools, meaning they receive money from the federal government because they have high percentages of students on free or reduced lunches. And all are on the West Side.
Rose, at 710 W. Michigan Drive, was “drilling down to that one child and figuring out how they learn,” Patterson said.
And at Warren, she said, “teachers were working together. No teacher was an island.”
At Tully, said Shafer, “the entire faculty was committed to student achievement, and Principal Roman Soltero met with every single teacher and targeted students that needed help most.”
Faculty looked at data individually. Teachers and the principal looked at quarterly assessments and went back and retaught. There was remediation. Title I money was spent for tutoring by regular teachers in the school, so often the student had his or her own teacher for an hour after school.
“They knew the students could do better. They believed they could,” Shafer said.
Patterson said targeting students who need help and finding out exactly where they need it “makes a world of difference in our schools.”
Principal Supervisor Ross Sheard said that at Lawrence, there was a TUSD “school board that had the courage to reconstitute the school (meaning replacing administrators, teachers and staff) and a principal in Ana Gallegos who was willing to step into the ring and take the leadership role with the staff she’d put together.”
He also credited Johnson Primary, another West Side school, at 6060 S. Joseph Ave., which feeds students into Lawrence, for preparing students well.
In Sunnyside Unified School District, Sunnyside High, 1725 E. Bilby Road, had the best gain in the county in 12th-grade writing, and Desert View High, 4101 E. Valencia Road, had the best county gain in 11th-grade reading.
Sunnyside High has better focus on individual student instruction, and it worked closely with students to make sure they would get over the bar so they could graduate, said Alex Duran, Sunnyside’s director of research assessment and evaluation.
Passing the high-stakes test was a requirement for graduation, starting in 2006, so that “definitely was an impetus,” he said.
At Desert View there have been changes in instruction.
“It’s more a small-school concept, ensuring there is more individualized focus on each student. That helps them identify and meet their needs.”
TUSD’s Holmes summed it up: “When scores are low, it’s not the kids. It’s the quality of education.”
•
School-by-school AIMS results in a searchable database at
www.tucsoncitizen.com/know
Get school-by-school AIMS scores in a searchable database at
www.tucsoncitizen.com/know
TUCSON-AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS WITH BIGGEST JUMPS IN PASSING RATES
READING
35 pct. pts.
2006 to 2007 for 12th grade Santa Rita High School
TUSD
WRITING
74 pct. pts.
2006 to 2007 for 3rd grade
Continental Elementary Continental Elementary District
MATH
28 pct. pts.
2006 to 2007 for 5th grade
Anna Lawrence Intermediate School
TUSD
TUCSON-AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS BIGGEST INCREASES IN FAILURE RATES
READING
49 pct. pts.
2006 to 2007 for 3rd grade
Robison Elementary
TUSD
WRITING
28 pct. pts.
7th grade
Wakefield Middle School
Tucson Unified School District
MATH
59 pct. pts.
3rd grade
Robison Elementary
Tucson Unified School District
AIMS SCORES
WHAT THE SCORES MEAN
These charts show how well students did on AIMS, which ranks students in four categories:
• Exceeds the standard
Academic performance goes substantially beyond the state’s goals.
• Meets the standard
Solid academic performance with challenging subject matter. Students
at this level are ready to begin working on material required for the
next grade.
Reaching this level is the state’s goal for all students.
• Approaches the standard
Partial understanding of subject matter. Students demonstrate
competency in required skills but do not demonstrate full understanding.
• Falls far below the standard
Insufficient evidence of skills needed to meet standards. Students
at this level have serious gaps in knowledge and probably will require
more work on skills needed at the current grade level.
For lower grade levels, the Tucson Citizen labeled the students who
fell far below the standard or approached the standard as failing.
Students who met or exceeded the standard were labeled as passing.
• NA
Denotes that no data were available because not enough students took
the test. Arizona’s Department of Education does not release scores for
districts or schools where 10 or fewer students were tested. Tanque
Verde Unified School District does not have a 12th grade.
Note: The Arizona Department of Education numbers, rounded for
individual categories, sometimes do not equal 100 percent when the
categories are added.
Class of 2008, by high school
MATHEMATICS
% % % %
School below approach meet exceed
AMPHI 40 30 27 4
Amphitheater 49 28 23 0
Canyon del Oro 29 32 29 9
Ironwood Ridge 31 31 31 8
MARANA 39 19 36 5
Marana 43 21 32 4
Mountain View 31 16 44 8
SUNNYSIDE 47 24 26 2
Desert View 55 20 25 0
Sunnyside 38 27 31 4
TUSD 45 25 28 3
Catalina 44 35 18 2
Cholla 40 34 26 0
Howenstine 0 0 0 0
Palo Verde 51 18 30 1
Project MORE 66 11 20 2
Pueblo 38 26 36 0
Rincon 51 18 29 3
Sabino 3 13 69 16
Sahuaro 41 24 31 4
Santa Rita 35 18 40 7
TAPP 58 33 8 0
Tucson 48 31 21 1
University 0 0 0 0
VAIL 25 22 44 8
Cienega 13 28 47 13
Empire 36 7 50 7
OTHER HIGH SCHOOLS
Ajo 39 11 44 6
Baboquivari 44 29 26 0
Catalina Foothills 6 0 44 50
Flowing Wells 44 22 29 4
Sahuarita 40 17 38 4
Tanque Verde 0 0 0 0
ARIZONA 42 23 32 4
READING
% % % %
School below approach meet exceed
AMPHI 16 39 36 9
Amphitheater 17 52 31 0
Canyon del Oro 25 44 25 6
Ironwood Ridge 8 21 50 21
MARANA 13 35 42 10
Marana 15 37 42 6
Mountain View 9 32 45 15
SUNNYSIDE 22 34 41 3
Desert View 14 29 54 4
Sunnyside 24 37 37 3
TUSD 19 32 43 6
Catalina 24 24 48 4
Cholla 21 34 45 0
Howenstine 25 50 17 8
Palo Verde 23 41 31 5
Project MORE 27 34 39 0
Pueblo 20 35 45 1
Rincon 20 32 41 8
Sabino 4 11 70 16
Sahuaro 16 25 47 12
Santa Rita 14 24 51 11
TAPP 0 0 0 0
Tucson 18 37 40 4
University 0 0 0 0
VAIL 9 21 59 11
Cienega 11 16 59 14
Empire 0 36 57 7
OTHER HIGH SCHOOLS
Ajo 42 33 25 0
Baboquivari 16 58 26 0
Catalina Foothills 0 21 55 24
Flowing Wells 12 26 45 17
Sahuarita 19 39 25 17
Tanque Verde 0 0 0 0
Arizona 15 35 43 7
WRITING
% % % %
School below approach meet exceed
AMPHI 9 47 30 14
Amphitheater 11 64 25 0
Canyon del Oro 10 44 31 15
Ironwood Ridge 5 29 36 31
MARANA 12 26 46 16
Marana 19 26 40 15
Mountain View 0 27 54 20
SUNNYSIDE 13 43 39 5
Desert View 11 39 41 9
Sunnyside 16 41 39 3
TUSD 12 40 42 6
Catalina 13 34 46 7
Cholla 12 57 31 0
Howenstine 33 42 17 8
Palo Verde 20 48 28 3
Project MORE 13 40 48 0
Pueblo 18 39 43 0
Rincon 9 35 46 9
Sabino 4 11 63 22
Sahuaro 13 29 50 8
Santa Rita 3 40 46 11
TAPP 0 0 0 0
Tucson 9 48 39 4
University 0 0 0 0
VAIL 0 21 66 13
Cienega 0 21 58 21
Empire 0 19 81 0
OTHER HIGH SCHOOLS
Ajo 28 33 39 0
Baboquivari 33 50 17 0
Catalina Foothills 0 8 65 27
Flowing Wells 3 45 39 13
Sahuarita 7 36 55 2
Tanque Verde 0 20 80 0
ARIZONA 9 39 45 8
Elementary, jr. high results by district
MATH, 3RD GRADE
District % fail % pass
Ajo 44 57
Altar Valley 42 57
Amphitheater 16 84
Catalina Foothills 6 94
Continental 13 88
Flowing Wells 25 75
Indian Oasis 40 60
Marana 19 81
Sahuarita 21 79
Sunnyside 29 71
Tanque Verde 9 91
TUSD 31 70
Vail 8 91
ARIZONA 26 74
READING, 3RD GRADE
District % fail % pass
Ajo 57 43
Altar Valley 48 52
Amphitheater 20 80
Catalina Foothills 3 97
Continental 10 90
Flowing Wells 32 67
Indian Oasis 52 48
Marana 21 79
Sahuarita 23 77
Sunnyside 35 64
Tanque Verde 7 93
TUSD 31 69
Vail 10 91
ARIZONA 29 72
WRITING, 3RD GRADE
District % fail % pass
Ajo 25 74
Altar Valley 35 66
Amphitheater 11 89
Catalina Foothills 4 96
Continental 3 98
Flowing Wells 19 81
Indian Oasis 25 75
Marana 15 86
Sahuarita 13 88
Sunnyside 16 84
Tanque Verde 5 95
TUSD 18 82
Vail 7 92
ARIZONA 18 82
MATH, 5TH GRADE
District % fail % pass
Ajo 42 58
Altar Valley 46 54
Amphitheater 19 80
Catalina Foothills 6 94
Continental 15 85
Flowing Wells 25 74
Indian Oasis 59 40
Marana 22 79
Sahuarita 26 75
Sunnyside 37 64
Tanque Verde 4 96
TUSD 34 66
Vail 9 90
ARIZONA 29 71
READING, 5TH GRADE
District % fail % pass
Ajo 37 64
Altar Valley 46 55
Amphitheater 21 78
Catalina Foothills 5 95
Continental 21 80
Flowing Wells 26 74
Indian Oasis 44 56
Marana 20 79
Sahuarita 22 77
Sunnyside 43 57
Tanque Verde 7 94
TUSD 31 69
Vail 10 90
ARIZONA 28 72
WRITING, 5TH GRADE
District % fail % pass
Ajo 45 56
Altar Valley 48 52
Amphitheater 21 78
Catalina Foothills 10 90
Continental 29 71
Flowing Wells 30 70
Indian Oasis 55 45
Marana 27 73
Sahuarita 26 75
Sunnyside 33 67
Tanque Verde 8 92
TUSD 29 71
Vail 18 82
ARIZONA 30 70
MATH, 8TH GRADE
District % fail % pass
Ajo 38 62
Altar Valley 49 51
Amphitheater 27 73
Catalina Foothills 8 93
Continental 22 78
Flowing Wells 35 64
Indian Oasis 81 20
Marana 36 64
Sahuarita 30 70
Sunnyside 57 43
Tanque Verde 11 89
TUSD 48 52
Vail 16 84
ARIZONA 38 62
READING, 8TH GRADE
District % fail % pass
Ajo 34 65
Altar Valley 39 61
Amphitheater 26 74
Catalina Foothills 8 92
Continental 19 81
Flowing Wells 37 64
Indian Oasis 72 28
Marana 28 72
Sahuarita 27 73
Sunnyside 49 51
Tanque Verde 16 84
TUSD 43 56
Vail 19 81
ARIZONA 35 65
WRITING, 8TH GRADE
District % fail % pass
Ajo 16 84
Altar Valley 35 64
Amphitheater 16 84
Catalina Foothills 6 94
Continental 22 78
Flowing Wells 30 71
Indian Oasis 63 37
Marana 17 83
Sahuarita 21 79
Sunnyside 30 70
Tanque Verde 6 94
TUSD 26 74
Vail 17 83
ARIZONA 25 75
High school results by district
MATH, 10TH GRADE
District % fail % pass
Ajo 67 34
Amphitheater 22 78
Catalina Foothills 4 95
Flowing Wells 29 71
Indian Oasis 85 14
Marana 29 72
Sahuarita 30 70
Sunnyside 50 50
Tanque Verde 22 79
TUSD 35 66
Vail 19 82
ARIZONA 32 69
READING, 10TH GRADE
District % fail % pass
Ajo 29 71
Amphitheater 15 85
Catalina Foothills 6 94
Flowing Wells 25 76
Indian Oasis 69 32
Marana 17 83
Sahuarita 24 77
Sunnyside 45 55
Tanque Verde 17 83
TUSD 28 72
Vail 12 88
ARIZONA 27 74
WRITING, 10TH GRADE
District % fail % pass
Ajo 57 43
Amphitheater 16 84
Catalina Foothills 4 95
Flowing Wells 26 74
Indian Oasis 73 27
Marana 21 79
Sahuarita 24 76
Sunnyside 41 59
Tanque Verde 19 80
TUSD 26 74
Vail 10 91
ARIZONA 25 74
MATH, 12TH GRADE
District % fail % pass
Ajo 63 36
Amphitheater 84 16
Catalina Foothills N/A N/A
Flowing Wells 57 44
Indian Oasis 81 19
Marana 77 23
Sahuarita 85 15
Sunnyside 86 14
TUSD 79 21
Vail 57 44
ARIZONA 75 25
READING, 12TH GRADE
District % fail % pass
Ajo N/A N/A
Amphitheater 67 33
Catalina Foothills 10 90
Flowing Wells 21 78
Indian Oasis 65 35
Marana 65 35
Sahuarita 70 30
Sunnyside 56 44
TUSD 61 39
Vail 6 94
ARIZONA 33 67
WRITING, 12TH GRADE
District % fail % pass
Ajo N/A N/A
Amphitheater 78 22
Catalina Foothills N/A N/A
Flowing Wells N/A N/A
Indian Oasis 94 6
Marana 69 31
Sahuarita 47 53
Sunnyside 45 55
TUSD 67 33
Vail N/A N/A
ARIZONA 32 68