Tucson Citizen.com
Telling Stories - Creating Community One Story at a Time

Posts Tagged ‘censorship’

To Jury or Not to Jury

Sunday, August 16th, 2009

jurying-scales

Have you ever been to a spoken word or performance art event where there was no jurying and appeared to be no criteria for what constituted an acceptable presentation?  Like an open mic where anyone can have their five minutes of fame or the event formerly known as 7-Up where anyone can volunteer to take the spotlight and present what they are interested in.  They can be pretty exciting!  You never know what to expect and you can make some amazing discoveries.

On the other hand, it’s possible to sit through some pretty painful performances so a measure of control seems to make the audience’s experience smoother.

There’s a philosophical difference in these two approaches that seems to divide spoken word into two camps.  I’ve recently had an email discussion with Traci Moore, the editor of Monsoon Voices, the Live Literary Magazine.  Her method is to have people submit their stories just as they would with a print or online magazine.  She edits just as an editor would and that give her some assurance that the end product – the performance – will be up her standards.  As she says, “the selections we make are based on the quality of the writing/music and whether the content fits with our guidelines/mission.”

I was on the other side of the debate (well not entirely because we do have a theme and a rehearsal for Odyssey Storytelling.) My idea is to get as many diverse people on stage as possible and let the audience possibly suffer through a not-very-good story in exchange for hearing some spectacular ones. At the very least, they are learning about other peoples life experiences that may be very different than their own.

It always amazes me that when I do my informal poll at the end of a show on “which story and storyteller did you like the best / didn’t like at all”, I get a different answer from everyone.  The ones I thought were questionable always have a defender – someone who the story touched.   The ones I thought were clever and well done always have their detractors.  That’s what keeps it interesting to me.  I can never predict the impact of the event.

Do you like to be surprised or do you like to know that there will be a predictable level of skill and talent?

Swearing Can Make It Better

Friday, August 7th, 2009

cussing-2Swearing may actually reduce the physical pain of something like stubbing your toe or cutting yourself.  You can ease the discomfort and increase your pain tolerance when you let loose with a few choice four-letter words after a minor injury. The research surmises that cathartic cursing has persisted for many centuries and across cultures because it makes us feel somewhat better when we’re in pain.

This made me think back to the first storytelling performance I produced more than 5 years ago.  I went out into the audience to ask for feedback after the show and one man told me that he liked the performance very much but he objected to a curse word that was uttered by one teller.  I told him that he probably shouldn’t come back because I wasn’t going to censor the tellers.

So, how am I making the leap from swearing in order to alleviate pain to using four-letter words on stage?  Just as cussing can change your experience of pain, it can change the experience of hearing a story or poem or reading.  When used appropriately it can stress a point, give an impression that might be impossible to portray any other way, or just reflect real life.

I think that there’s an appropriate place to use off-color language.  My very unscientific survey showed me that it can be offensive to certain people but, if I remember the incident correctly, the insertion of that curse word was in context and painted the picture that the teller wanted to portray.

One alternative to using a cuss words is to use a minced oath, “an expression based on a profanity that has been altered to reduce the objectionable characteristcs of the original expression, for example darn or dang instead of damn, heck instead of hell . . . ”

So why the heck don’t we just get rid of dirty language on stage?  Our movie rating system includes “strong language” as an offense punishable by a R or possibly even X rating.  Should we have the same for spoken word events?

What do you think?