By Matt Lewis
Freelance Journalist

Ernie Els at a press conference on Monday, Feb. 20 at the the WGC Accenture Match Play tournament. Today was the practice round and he said he's happy with his putting and accuracy. He switched golf balls recently. (Photo by Matt Lewis)

Have press badge will travel. I hadn’t officially received my press credentials and I still got in unscathed (also known as without paying for a ticket) before I had the proper documentation. For those who wish to follow my updates I will be live blogging at www.TucsonCitizen.com on Facebook @ http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=10135664 and on Twitter at the handle @themattmonitor.

Watching these players is like going to the zoo in the sense that they are behind the ropes, and given special treatment. These players this week are the 64 best (or almost – Ernie Els excluded) male professional golfers in the FedEx Cup Points standings for the Professional Golf Association of America.

These players deserve special treatment, but to be behind the ropes? Are we animals? The short answer is yes. I would love to say that we are evolved, civilized and professional people; but I can’t speak for everyone.

Today was the first press conference of a sports-related nature I ever attended. I rubbed elbows with local and national media professionals and talked about everything from golf, to Jeremy Lin to Pinal County Sheriff Paul Babeu. I won’t name names, that’s not the type of journalist I am. I respect professional courtesy and understand that everything we discussed was deep-background and even off-the-record. I work hard to remain professional, but am still young. Please forgive me if I go astray this week.

Mr. Els answered a few questions to only about 15 journalists. As the week goes on the press conferences will be packed. Wait until Sunday, I won’t get in because I’m a lowly blogger.

Both Ryan and Patrick Finley, from the Arizona Daily Star Sports Department, were there to cover the press conference. Ernie Els apparently is a big deal to the local media. Els is from South Africa. (Photo by Matt Lewis)

Mr. Els is sponsored in part by Callaway Golf and said he is switching to a hex-patterned golf ball this week. For all you non-golfers who still follow the sport, a hex pattern is simply the shape of the little dimples on the golf ball. The hext has been tried (and unproven) for years. It is an alternative to rounded dimples, but Mr. Els says it helps his golf game.

The ball goes higher and further, he said sort of laughing it off. This man is tied for the bottom-of-the-barrel when it comes to driving distance – so he needs all the help he can get.

One reporter asked him why he publicly said that this tournament was not his favorite. He responded, I intentionally didn’t take notes, because who cares?! Some people like some things, other people like others. They have their reason, it’s not important to what he does as a profession. He’s here to make money, plain and simple.

A journalists question: There’s some uncertainty about the long-term future of this tournament here at this venue and in this area. Where do you stand on it being held here not only at the Ritz-Carlton [at Dove Mountain] but in the Tucson area?

Mr. Els answer: “I think it’s the perfect venue. You’ve got the world class resort right here. The airport is pretty close. We get good crowds out here. We’ve got an exciting venue in the design.” (His response goes on, but it’s not exciting.

My favorite question of the conference was a question about Phil Mickelson and his dropping out of the tournament this week; which gave Mr. Els a spot in the field. He was given the opportunity and publicly told Mr. Mickelson that he would buy him a steak dinner. He went back on his word, but said he has a few nice bottles of wine to give Mr. Mickelson.

By Julio Cammarota, Ph. D.
University of Arizona

Arizona state superintendent of public instruction, John Huppenthal implemented anti-Ethnic Studies bill HB2281/ARS15-112, which effectively banned Tucson Unified School District’s (TUSD) Mexican American Studies (MAS) program.  This ban is an affront to the educational sovereignty of the Tucson community and democracy everywhere.  It seems that the bottom-up approach of MAS was too democratic for Huppenthal and other state and local officials who feel the need to maintain a top-down, authoritative rule over education.

Mexican American Studies upholds democratic ideals by embracing an educational sovereignty that entails building education from the ground. Educational sovereignty is a conceptual term articulated by University of Arizona Professors Luis Moll and Richard Ruiz to delineate the best approach for communities to educate children. This approach requires a bottom-up perspective in which local history, culture, and experience are revered for the potential to scaffold and thus develop knowledge. Educational sovereignty nurtures and enhances young people’s intellectual capacities by drawing from the cultural and social resources of a local ecology that consists of students, families, and communities. The end result amounts to young people who not only know about their own culture and history but also embrace a framework and the confidence to comprehend ideas and concepts linked to the expansion of global knowledge.   Fans of democracy would certainly appreciate the bottom-up approach of allowing students’ historical and cultural backgrounds to guide them to construct new, broader knowledge for the advancement of humanity.

Tucson Unified School District’s Mexican American Studies (MAS) program represents the best example of educational sovereignty. This program has promoted the academic success of numerous students for reasons stated above.  In fact, many MAS students have demonstrated the connection between local and broader knowledge by passing the math (a subject not taught by MAS teachers) section of the AIMS test (standardized exit exam) at higher rates than non-MAS students.  What accounts for this difference is the MAS students’ comprehension that they originate from cultural and historical backgrounds that posses and cultivate knowledge and therefore they realize that they too possess and cultivate knowledge.  Unfortunately, the state of Arizona and TUSD have terminated educational sovereignty and the MAS program, which means that these successes will cease for the time being.

Although MAS was terminated, it is still critical to identify the aspects of the bottom-up approach that make the program so successful. 1) Several MAS teachers grew up and attended public school in Tucson and therefore have first-hand knowledge of the kinds of experiences, families, and communities from which their students derive.  2) The curriculum draws from the cultural and historical backgrounds of the students, which allows them to recognize the relevance of the material as well as the possibilities for their intellectual development. 3) The community participates in the students’ education through guest educators who are members of the community or students and faculty from the local university and college. 4) Finally, students are NEVER perceived in a deficit mode or as blank slates but as individuals who can contribute to the education of everyone in the classroom, including the teacher. These four aspects contribute to the effectiveness of the bottom-up approach and lead to an enriched program.

But why would the state of Arizona and TUSD ban MAS’ enriched curriculum? The answer lies in recognizing that the bottom-up approach of educational sovereignty provides more power and control to ‘the people’ (teachers, students, families, communities) and less to the state. More power to the people suggests that one day there will be those, particularly young people, who might question the authority and decision-making of state leaders.  This questioning has come to fruition as many young people continue to protest the state’s ban of Mexican American Studies.  The one message we can tell them is that there is nothing wrong with questioning the state’s authority; this keeps democracy vibrant and healthy. However, history reveals that sometimes governments prefer to maintain authoritarian rule, power, and control by suppressing the will of the people.  In the past, governments have imposed bans and black listings similar to the state of Arizona’s extrication of Mexican American studies. The most infamous of these were Torquemada’s inquisition in Spain, Hitler’s Nazi censorship in Germany, Afrikaans’ Bantu Education in South Africa, and McCarthy’s Un-American Activities Committee in the United States.  Now we have Huppenthal’s order encouraging TUSD to silence teachers, ban books, and punish students in modern day Arizona.

Professors Moll and Ruiz first articulated educational sovereignty more than decade ago, and we have the good fortune of seeing it blossom into practice through Mexican American studies. This good fortune has run into a wall of state repression. Because MAS students no longer have access to the country’s most effective program for closing the achievement gap, the ban on Mexican American studies represents a sad moment for them. Sadness also extends to democracy as the state of Arizona and TUSD look to reinsert a top-down, authoritative approach to education.  The irony is that most would agree, regardless of political stripe, that local community control of schools is the best way to teach our children.  Democracy should not be pushed to the wayside by denying educational sovereignty to Mexican American studies.

—-

Julio Cammarota is an associate professor in Mexican-American Studies at the University of Arizona. His research focuses on participatory action research with Latina/o youth, institutional factors in academic achievement, and liberatory pedagogy. He has published articles on family, work, and education among Latinas/os and on the relationship between culture and academic achievement. He is the co-editor of two volumes in the Critical Youth Studies series published by Routledge/Falmer Press:  Beyond Resistance! Youth Activism and Community Change: New Democratic Possibilities for Practice and Policy for America’s Youth (2006) and Revolutionizing Education: Youth Participatory Action Research in Motion (2008). Dr. Cammarota has published an ethnography of Latina/o youth entitled, Sueños Americanos: Barrio Youth Negotiate Social and Cultural Identities (University of Arizona Press, 2008). His work has been instrumental with advancing social justice in education and youth development. Currently, he is the co-director of the Social Justice Education Project in Tucson, Arizona.

By Senator Al Melvin,
Legislative District 26

Recent articles about my proposed education fund and related spent nuclear fuel recycling program have produced some uninformed and negative reactionary responses.  I urge everyone in the media, political arena and the voting public to educate themselves about this important subject.

First, commercial recycling of used nuclear fuel has a long and successful history, mostly outside of the United States. The French company AREVA has successfully managed a recycling complex for more than forty years.

Second, approximately 60,000 tons of spent nuclear fuel are stored at nuclear reactor sites never designed for storing such material.  Deep geologic salt beds are the recommended sites for retrievable storage of spent nuclear fuel.  To maximize storage capacity at the site, it makes sense to co-locate a recycling facility at the storage site. In terms of mass, 96% of the used fuel is reusable.  As with so many other materials it makes environmental sense to recycle the used fuel.

Why would a community want to host a nearby recycling site? Let’s look at Carlsbad, New Mexico, which entered into a partnership with the Department of Energy, the State of New Mexico and a company called URS to build the first Waste Isolation Pilot Project (WIPP) for nuclear materials storage.  Carlsbad sits at the southern end of the Permian Salt Basin.  This partnership resulted in a storage facility 2,150 feet below ground.  I’ve been there to visit the facility and it is a marvelous site.  The WIPP consortium employs more than 1,000 people and brings in $250 million annually to Carlsbad.  What problems have arisen due to WIPP?  None.  In fact, unemployment there has been just above 4% over the past years while national unemployment surpassed 9%.  As of my visit to Carlsbad last month, more than 700 jobs were unfilled and developers could not keep up with housing demand.

Arizona has an opportunity to build a recycling and storage facility that will bring the host community $500 million annually over 50 years, create 18,000 construction jobs over a ten year period, with 5,000 direct jobs and 30,000 indirect jobs, post-construction.

As an added benefit, we can dedicate part of the revenue stream to K-12 and Universities.  The proposed AZ Energy-Education Fund will generate a minimum of $100 million a year for 50 years for education in our state, over and above what we are now spending.  We have already met with representatives from K-12, Universities, the Arizona Department of Education, power companies, technical experts and others, and these ideas have been well received.

Arizonans should understand that this is not a project that can or will be rushed.  It is likely to be a ten-year process between planning, site determination, working with the local communities to make a proper presentation, and passing the needed legislation at the State and Federal levels, all before we can break ground.

The naysayers have already begun sniping at the idea.  These people have been overreacting to the ghost of “China Syndrome” for too long.  The United States, France and other countries have long established safety records with nuclear materials.  The United States Navy has operated nuclear powered submarines and aircraft carriers for 50 years without incident.  New Mexico’s WIPP facility has received nearly 11,000 shipments since 2000, without incident.

Arizona has a number of sites that contain (1) remoteness, (2) deep geologic salt formations and (3) existing transportation infrastructure.   It is time to let potential host communities nearest these sites make the decision.  If the people say ‘yes’, the community benefits, education benefits and all Arizonans benefit.

For more information on the Arizona Energy-Education Fund, go to www.azedcoalition.org  You’ll find the latest information on the Fund and links to The Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future and media coverage of the topic.