Tucson Citizen.com
The Other Side of the Coin - the proposed open pit copper mine in the Coronado national Forest near Tucson Arizona

Posts Tagged ‘Water’

History of Augusta Resource (Rosemont Copper Mother Company) Upper Management and CYANIDE BEACH

Friday, August 24th, 2012

There is a new player in town, with the ability to do investigative reporting and the web site for the organization is as follows:   http://www.investigativemedia.com/

Last night I had the honor of attending the premiere opening of a documentary they produced. The name of the documentary was “Cyanide Beach” and dealt with an open pit gold mine in Sardinia, Italy , near the small farming town of Furtei.

Photo courtesy of investigativemedia

Open non-reclaimed

photo from “Cyanide Beach”

A link on the primary website connects the executives of the corporation known as “Augusta Resources” to the disaster of the gold mine in Italy, same players just a different playing field. Now it is the Augusta Resources power-play in relation to the proposed open pit copper mine in the Santa Rita mountains of the Coronado national Forest .

The main website contains other information, which should be mandatory reading for any Arizona resident that wishes to be informed concerning the Rosemont copper mine proposal.

 

TENORM Potential Killer or Potential Snag for Rosemont

Sunday, September 4th, 2011

TENORM, an acronym for a process as dangerous as it is mysterious. The entire name of it is, ” Technologically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material”. A well-known phenomenon by the agencies that are supposed to protect the citizens from environmentally hazardous material.

The subject was brought to the attention of the forest service during the scoping comments on the proposed open pit Rosemont copper mine in the Santa Rita mountains. An example was also pointed out in relation to the uranium plume in the Green valley neighborhood. So far I can find no example of the subject being discussed in any of the freedom of information act documents released by the forest service.

At a recent meeting in Corona De Tucson a representative from Pima County Department of environmental quality stated his primary objective was to evaluate dust control. References were also made to the limited number of personnel available. If their primary concern with the Rosemont copper proposal is a dust control then who is going to evaluate the potential effects of radiation enhancement? We are now at the beginning of public comments concerning the Pima County permit for the proposed open pit mine, perhaps we should inquire of the Pima County Department of environmental quality who is studying and evaluating this potential problem.

Following are some excerpts from that report compiled by the United States EPA and the Arizona Department of environmental quality. The data show that dump leaching operations and solvent extraction – electro winning procedures, as well as the practice of recycling raffinate at copper mines may extract and concentrate soluble radioactive materials,  the results show increases of up to two orders of magnitude over background levels for all radio chemicals tested except R– 222.

Nearly all rocks, soils, and water contain small amounts of radioactive materials such as uranium, thorium, radium, radioisotopes of potassium, lead, polonium, and their decay products. When naturally occurring radioactive materials in their undisturbed natural state (NORM) become purposefully or inadvertently concentrated either in waste byproducts or in a product, they become technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive materials (TENORM). TENORM is defined as any naturally occurring radioactive materials whose radionuclide concentrations or potential for human exposure has been increased above levels encountered in the natural state as a result of human activities.

The EPA and other regulatory entities have become increasingly aware of the immense volume of TENORM produced annually throughout the United States. The potential threat posed by these wastes cannot be dismissed as below radiological concern or below exempt concentration levels. TENORM concentrations often reach levels comparable to typical low-level radioactive waste.

At the dead center of the patented mining claims owned by Rosemont copper, and more specifically dead center of the proposed open pit, there is an abandoned mine, the King mine. It is located in section 24, Township 18 S., range 15 E. and this mine is specifically noted in the report concerning TENORM.

The King mine is an old silver and copper underground operation south of Tucson. The mine is situated in a contact alteration zone, where pitchblende occurs with sulfide ores in quartz-calcite gangue in pockets along a limestone/quartz monzonite contact. Assays show uranium ranging from 0.14 to 0.93 percent. This number is it’s (NORM) natural state. The TENORM numbers after processing will be much higher.

The regulation of radioactive waste has generally been limited to the atomic energy act, the clean air act, the safe drinking water act, and the comprehensive environmental response, compensation and liability act

EPA has been working with the Arizona Department of environmental quality to assemble the available data on TENORM and metal mining sites in Arizona. As part of its groundwater and surface water  protection programs, they require mining companies to submit aquifer protection permit applications that include facility specific radiological characterizations. As a result, ADEQ and EPA have accumulated in excess of 3200 analysis of radionuclides at 15 mining sites in the copper industry.

Levels in excess of the federal maximum contamination level and state guidelines were found in groundwater and surface water samples, as well as soil and sediment samples and abandoned and active copper mines. TENORM exceedances were also found in groundwater at active and inactive copper mines.

The solvent extraction process acts to concentrate TENORM. Technological advances in SX – EW procedures have created new waste streams that were not assessed in earlier EPA studies. The natural leaching process tends to extract and concentrate radioactive materials in the acid mine drainage at waste dumps. Dump or heap leaching operations also extract and concentrate the soluble radioactive materials.

The impacts of copper mining are noteworthy because of the unique conditions, such as the presence of trace uranium minerals and the mining and extraction methods that unintentionally extract radioactive materials and enhance its environmental mobility.

Several Arizona copper ore bodies are either too deep or are too low-grade to be mined by conventional surface or underground methods. There are several in-situ solution copper mines in the Arizona copper mining belt. High levels of TENORM have been found in the PLS of two in-situ leach operations in Arizona.

Typically, an in-situ copper mining company will be required to undergo a joint ADEQ-EPA permitting process. EPA issues a federally-administered Class III Underground Injection Control (UIC) permit and an aquifer exemption permit that focus on the subsurface injection and restoration activities. ADEQ initiates an APPA process that focuses on both subsurface activities and the surface facilities and impoundments.

A proposed operation must meet both of the following two criteria for an aquifer exemption: 1) the aquifer must not currently serve as a source of drinking water and 2) the permit applicant must demonstrate that the deposit contains minerals that are expected to be commercially producible. The permit covers the construction, operation, and eventual closure of the injection and recovery wells system and surface facilities and impoundments. The permit also defines the lateral and vertical boundaries of the proposed aquifer exemption.

This information and much more, a total of 124 pages, is available to the general public in report number EPA 402 – R – 99 – 002 .The US Environmental Protection Agency released report number EPA 402 – R – 99 – 002 in October of 1999.

Rosemont Copper Mine Reclaimation Study Not Finished

Friday, August 26th, 2011

Among the tens of thousands of documents submitted To the National Forest Service are a group of documents known as the “Reclamation Plan”. The reclamation plan for the Rosemont copper project in Pima County Arizona was prepared by tetra Tech, Incorporated under the direct supervision of David R Krizek, Arizona professional engineer.the report was submitted September 2008. . During September 2009 heavy equipment was used to reshape three parcels of land and phase 3 of the reclamation testing began.

The Arizona State mine inspector, Joe Hart, approved the reclamation plan in July of 2009. One interesting fact concerning the approval of state mine inspector Joe Hart is that he only has authority over the private property. He cannot control or approve a reclamation plan for federal or state public property. This means that his approval of the reclamation plan covers the area where the open pit will be and at the present time the reclamation of the open pit will be to simply leave it as an open hole eventually being approximately 2600 feet deep and a drain hole evaporation point for the local aquifer.

On May 20, 2010 the Rosemont copper EIS cooperating agency coordination meeting was held to discuss the reclamation vegetation studies. One of the attendees  at the meeting, newly hired and representing Rosemont copper was Holly Lawson, a research assistant for Dr. Jeffrey S. Fehmi, the assistant professor commissioned by Rosemont copper to research alternative revegetation procedures. The length of the project has been described as seven years in some paperwork and 10 years in others As of today August 24, 2011 she is still listed on Dr. Jeffrey S Fehmi’s website as a student researching the native species and techniques to best reclaim mine lands in the American southwest.

Following is a photograph presented by Rosemont copper and Holly Lawson to the national forest service as an example of vegetation growth.

picture used in the presentation to the national forest service

picture source is Rosemont presentation to national forest service

Following is a photograph taken in June 2010 by a private individual showing the same relative position, the difference is quite dramatic.

June 20, 2010 photograph by private individual

dead grass after nine months

Following is a photograph taken in May of 2011 showing the minimum vegetation growth on the test plot.

May 5, 2011 photo by private individual

lack of growth after almost 2 years

The report, written in July of 2007, is quite specific on the cost estimates for revegetation. In part two of the reclamation plan are the cost estimates for the revegetation.

Dr. Jeffrey Fehi’s research project final results concerning revegetation of the mine property are not due to be completed for possibley another five years. The point that I’m trying to hammer in is that the reclamation plan cannot truly be completed until the requirements for the revegetation are known.One of the conclusions reached during the research concerns the agave plant it is widely acknowledged that agave seedlings in the wild are extremely rare; Nobel’s (1977) research on A. deserti concluded that only one in 1.2 million seeds survive to maturity.

Latest photograph taken Aug 16, 2011 after the monsoon season started

Latest photo after rain fall

The two primary questions related to the reclamation project are:

number one:

How can an uncompleted research project which has a forecast finished date of 10 years from the beginning possibly influence decisions concerning the validity of a reclamation proposal?

number two:

How can the Arizona State mine inspector approve a reclamation plan which basically covers nothing except the pit which will be left as an empty hole?

Welcome to the other side of the coin.

 

The Opposition to the Proposed Rosemont Open Pit Copper Mine

Wednesday, August 17th, 2011

Welcome “The Other Side of the Coin,” a discussion blog for opposing views concerning some southern Arizona issues and developments. Many times in life “we flip a coin to make a decision” but in this circumstance the term is not used to determine the outcome of the situation by luck. It’s to present to you “the Southern Arizona residents” the alternatives to statements presented by others, those alternatives consisting of verifiable facts and data.

An example of an important issue that concerns many people in southern Arizona is the proposed “open pit copper mine in the Santa Rita mountains.”

One of the latest articles concerning Rosemont copper portrays the local residents and landowners as rabble-rousers exaggerating the effects of the proposed open pit mine. The other side of the coin would be the residents endeavoring to educate and disseminate information to the general public.

One example of that information would be the amount of acreage placed under non-patented mining claims. One side of the coin is Rosemont’s statement they will require approximately 4000 acres of national forest for tailings and waste rock. The other side of the coin is Rosemont copper has placed approximately 14,000 acres of non-patented mining claims in the Coronado national Forest. 14,000 acres is approximately 20 square miles of national forest that is supposed to be under the protection of  The National Forest Service.

The second issue for this article concerns water use , Rosemont is quite willing and proud to discuss the “CAP water recharge in the Tucson AMA ” , the other side of the coin deals with the water used on the East side of the Santa Rita Mountains where the pit will be located. If Rosemont copper is granted permits to develop the open pit mine there will be a factor involved called pit dewatering which involves pumping the water out of the pit that seeps in through the walls. It has been estimated by Rosemont studies as  500 gallons per minute as the amount. The proposed Rosemont open pit mine sits in the Cienega Aquifer which is supposed to be a protected water source.

Some are quite proud of a legal document protecting approximately 100 homeowners in the Sahuarita area but that document does nothing to protect the people who are closest to the proposed mine. It also does nothing to mitigate the loss of water in the Davidson Canyon.

Those examples should be enough to illustrate the function of “The Other Side of the Coin.” Welcome to the blog, its biggest function is not to educate or propagandize but its major function is to get you the residents of southern Arizona to explore, ask questions and make your own decisions.