Comments on: Occupy Tucson’s Craig Barber outs Mayor and Council on national TV (video)

By: Jack Bybee

Jack Bybee — Sun, 30 Oct 2011 21:13:20 +0000

Thank you for your recent article in support of Occupy Tucson.

I spoke to the City Council on Tuesday night. What I said I meant. I am DISGUSTED with Democrats. Republicans, for their support of the apartheid regime, I have absolutely no time. The fact that City Council can sit on their hands, while, the three things I came to this country for, the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the First Amendment are, to some degree or another, trampled on by government, is appalling. “We are the People” and occupying Armoury Park is my First Amendment right – to petition the government (Democrats of the City Council) for a redress of grievances. What is that grievance?: Do something, anything, that does not feed your ego nor the ego of corporations – something for us, the People – like how about supporting Occupy Tucson publicly? Well Regina? Karen? Paul? To Shirley… aah yes, “just a bunch of outsider troublemakers and vagabonds….” Nuff said.

– Jack Bybee.

By: Saguaro Sol

Saguaro Sol — Fri, 21 Oct 2011 14:25:04 +0000

Occupy Tucson has revealed that our supposedly progressive city, as it likes to be thought of by the rest of the nation — “an island of blue in a sea of red” — is in fact run by such mildly tinged officials that when push comes to shove, they side with the forces of stasis and reaction. In Atlanta, the mayor by executive order set aside the city, for the next three weeks, as a safe zone for Occupy movement members. In Tucson, the mayor and the council members — and the candidates for mayor and council in the next election — sit quietly by while TPD officers armed to the teeth, wearing riot gear despite not one act of violence by the protesters, arrive in the night to issue $1000 tickets to Occupiers whose “crime” consists of violating a law against sleeping in city parks although none were sleeping when the police arrived. What a mockery of Tucson’s much-vaunted reputation. The whole world is watching Tucson lower itself almost to the depths of such paragons of liberty as Phoenix, Nogales, and the whole of Maricopa County. In fact, possibly lower than Maricopa County, because there even the evil Sheriff Joe Arpaio has come out and said that while he doesn’t agree with them, the Occupiers have every right to exercise their First Amendment rights enshrined in the US and Arizona Constitutions. Has one Tucson elected dared to say as much? Their shrinking violets who not only do a pretty sad job of running Tucson, but can’t even speak out for what most Tucsonans would like to see happen here: economic justice and equal treatment for all residents of the city. What an embarrassment.

By: firstamendlover

firstamendlover — Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:54:02 +0000

The First Amendment covers speech, not camping. Camping, squating, or parking are NOT forms of free speech. I am embarrassed for Risner.

By: Papoosie

Papoosie — Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:52:36 +0000

This is a peaceful protest and our Constitutional right under the 1st Amendment. The passive agressive approach taken by TPD is a transparent attempt to “squeeze” the protesters financially. Mayor, City Council and TPD will realize as other city leadership across the country have come to realize that it is in their best interest to comply with the civil rights awarded us by the Constitution. 1st Amendment rights trump City Parks & Recreation codes.

By: Jim Hannley

Jim Hannley — Thu, 20 Oct 2011 18:52:17 +0000

Craig is very poised and articulate; a noble representative of Occupy Tucson. It is a disgrace that Mayor and Council have been silent or oppositional to the occupiers. This city has been economically stagnant for decades; limping along on construction, the U of A, Raytheon and Davis Monthan AFB while failing to find a solid industrial base. Mayor and Council have offered no solutions to the disgraceful 24% poverty rate. TPD and Parks and Recreation are under the aegis of Mayor and Council; they cannot hide behind ordinances and rules. They need to respect the occupiers since they are standing up to the economic injustice and lack of opportunity for young and old alike.