<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tucson Progressive &#187; Tucson sign code</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tucsoncitizen.com/tucson-progressive/tag/tucson-sign-code/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tucsoncitizen.com/tucson-progressive</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 17:11:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Historic Landmark Signs: Should Tucson preserve its neon heritage? (video)</title>
		<link>http://tucsoncitizen.com/tucson-progressive/2011/06/27/historic-landmark-signs-should-tucson-preserve-its-neon-heritage-video/</link>
		<comments>http://tucsoncitizen.com/tucson-progressive/2011/06/27/historic-landmark-signs-should-tucson-preserve-its-neon-heritage-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pamela Powers Hannley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucson City Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucson sign code]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tucsoncitizen.com/tucson-progressive/?p=783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tucson&#8217;s stringent 1980s sign code (plus multiple street-widening projects) have done much to clean up the billboards and over-sized signs on our streets, but every good law can stand some refinement from time to time. Under the sign code, if you have a non-compliant sign and you want to take it down to fix it, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tucsoncitizen.com/tucson-progressive/2011/06/27/historic-landmark-signs-should-tucson-preserve-its-neon-heritage-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Historic preservation: Is history becoming fashionable in Tucson?</title>
		<link>http://tucsoncitizen.com/tucson-progressive/2011/06/22/historic-preservation-is-history-becoming-fashionable-in-tucson/</link>
		<comments>http://tucsoncitizen.com/tucson-progressive/2011/06/22/historic-preservation-is-history-becoming-fashionable-in-tucson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pamela Powers Hannley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historic architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feldman Neighborhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[historic homes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jefferson Park Neighborhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mini-dorms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucson City Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucson sign code]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tucsoncitizen.com/tucson-progressive/?p=772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When we first went house-hunting in Tucson in the early 1980s, our realtor thought we were crazy because we wanted a house with architectural style and wooden floors. Having lived in Columbus&#8217; city core in an old Victorian-era brick double, we didn&#8217;t realize what a tall order this was in Tucson, our new home. We [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tucsoncitizen.com/tucson-progressive/2011/06/22/historic-preservation-is-history-becoming-fashionable-in-tucson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Save Tucson&#8217;s Sign Code: Will tinkering bring back the ugliest street in US?</title>
		<link>http://tucsoncitizen.com/tucson-progressive/2011/06/14/save-tucsons-sign-code-will-tinkering-bring-back-the-ugliest-street-in-us/</link>
		<comments>http://tucsoncitizen.com/tucson-progressive/2011/06/14/save-tucsons-sign-code-will-tinkering-bring-back-the-ugliest-street-in-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pamela Powers Hannley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Walkup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historic architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karin Ulich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regina Romero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Fimbres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Kozachik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business friendly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucson City Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucson sign code]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tucsoncitizen.com/tucson-progressive/?p=759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cluttered with so many signs that you can hardly see the street, Speedway Blvd. was dubbed the ugliest street in American by Life Magazine in 1970. Being known as &#8220;ugly&#8221; is not a good designation for a town that lives on tourism. In the 1980s, Tucsonans passed landmark sign code legislation that has gradually whittled [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tucsoncitizen.com/tucson-progressive/2011/06/14/save-tucsons-sign-code-will-tinkering-bring-back-the-ugliest-street-in-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Contemplating Tucson: Kozachik releases city&#8217;s Strategic Work Plan</title>
		<link>http://tucsoncitizen.com/tucson-progressive/2011/05/24/contemplating-tucson-kozochik-releases-citys-strategic-work-plan/</link>
		<comments>http://tucsoncitizen.com/tucson-progressive/2011/05/24/contemplating-tucson-kozochik-releases-citys-strategic-work-plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 14:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pamela Powers Hannley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Kozachik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucson City Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucson sign code]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tucsoncitizen.com/tucson-progressive/?p=740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent e-mail blast, Ward 6 City Councilman Steve Kozachik released a long and varied list of projects that the City Council will be contemplating and potentially voting upon in the coming months. The list is below. In addition, rumor has it that the City Council is considering scrapping or at least knee-capping the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tucsoncitizen.com/tucson-progressive/2011/05/24/contemplating-tucson-kozochik-releases-citys-strategic-work-plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>City Council unanimously votes &#8216;business friendly&#8217;&#8211; twice</title>
		<link>http://tucsoncitizen.com/tucson-progressive/2011/03/23/city-council-unanimously-votes-business-friendly-twice/</link>
		<comments>http://tucsoncitizen.com/tucson-progressive/2011/03/23/city-council-unanimously-votes-business-friendly-twice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pamela Powers Hannley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business friendly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucson City Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucson Jewish Community Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucson sign code]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tucsoncitizen.com/tucson-progressive/?p=624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tucson City Council unanimously voted business friendly twice at last night&#8217;s meeting&#8211; approving a new Land Use Code requiring fewer parking spaces and approving a billboard along Tucson&#8217;s scenic corridor for the Jewish Community Center (JCC). Parking and the Land Use Code The Land Use Code changes to vehicle and bicycle parking were contentious [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tucsoncitizen.com/tucson-progressive/2011/03/23/city-council-unanimously-votes-business-friendly-twice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tucson Sign Code: Big sign cheerleaders need effectiveness data (updated)</title>
		<link>http://tucsoncitizen.com/tucson-progressive/2011/03/21/tucson-sign-code-big-sign-cheerleaders-need-effectiveness-data/</link>
		<comments>http://tucsoncitizen.com/tucson-progressive/2011/03/21/tucson-sign-code-big-sign-cheerleaders-need-effectiveness-data/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 15:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pamela Powers Hannley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business friendly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shaun McClusky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucson Jewish Community Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucson sign code]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tucsoncitizen.com/tucson-progressive/?p=617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Business-friendly whiners made the front page of the Arizona Daily Star today&#8211; with old news. The story&#8211; Tough Times Make City&#8217;s Sign Code a Target&#8211; features three business owners who are perpetual complainers about Tucson&#8217;s sign code. (Although two of them were allowed to use the offending signs after appeal, they&#8217;re still whining about them.) [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tucsoncitizen.com/tucson-progressive/2011/03/21/tucson-sign-code-big-sign-cheerleaders-need-effectiveness-data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>7-0: Mayor and Council sell out to sign industry on scenic route vote</title>
		<link>http://tucsoncitizen.com/tucson-progressive/2010/12/15/7-0-mayor-and-council-sell-out-to-sign-industry-on-scenic-route-vote/</link>
		<comments>http://tucsoncitizen.com/tucson-progressive/2010/12/15/7-0-mayor-and-council-sell-out-to-sign-industry-on-scenic-route-vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pamela Powers Hannley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Walkup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karin Ulich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regina Romero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Fimbres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Kozachik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business friendly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucson City Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucson sign code]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tucsoncitizen.com/tucson-progressive/?p=386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After hearing several Tucsonans&#8211; including former City Councilman Brent Davis&#8211; speak in favor of keeping the current Scenic Corridor Sign Code or fixing just the problem area along Houghton Road, Tucson&#8217;s Mayor and Council voted in solidarity to allow larger signs on all scenic corridors in Tucson. Three plans were considered: Plan A which was [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tucsoncitizen.com/tucson-progressive/2010/12/15/7-0-mayor-and-council-sell-out-to-sign-industry-on-scenic-route-vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should Tucson&#8217;s scenic routes be cluttered with signs? Come to today&#8217;s City Council meeting</title>
		<link>http://tucsoncitizen.com/tucson-progressive/2010/12/14/should-tucsons-scenic-routes-be-cluttered-with-signs-come-to-todays-city-council-meeting/</link>
		<comments>http://tucsoncitizen.com/tucson-progressive/2010/12/14/should-tucsons-scenic-routes-be-cluttered-with-signs-come-to-todays-city-council-meeting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pamela Powers Hannley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karin Ulich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Kozachik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business friendly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucson sign code]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tucsoncitizen.com/tucson-progressive/?p=382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tucson is surrounded by the natural beauty of the desert and the majesty of the sky islands. Less than 15 minutes, from little abode in midtown is the scenic route along River Road and access to the Rillito River Park trail. Maybe there is something primal about being surrounded by the natural world, but all [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tucsoncitizen.com/tucson-progressive/2010/12/14/should-tucsons-scenic-routes-be-cluttered-with-signs-come-to-todays-city-council-meeting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
