Tucson Citizen.com

Author Archive

BCS will be replaced by very basic name

Tuesday, April 23rd, 2013

Source: USA TODAY

PASADENA, Calif. – The upcoming college football playoff will be known as – drum roll – the College Football Playoff.

Catchy, huh?

“Is that really the name?” Oklahoma athletic director Joe Castiglione asked reporters Tuesday afternoon “Or is that just a space-filler?”

A couple of hours later, the name was announced at a news conference at the posh Langham Huntington Hotel, where the latest round of Bowl Championship meetings is taking place.

“It’s really simple. It gets to the point — nothing cute, nothing fancy,” BCS executive director Bill Hancock said. “The name of the new playoff is just that. … At the end of the day, we just decided to call it what it is: College Football Playoff.”

Yeah, cue the jokes – like this one from Twitter: “I bet Bill Hancock’s dog is named Dog.”

Although generic, the new name is certainly descriptive of the process. And as much as it simply explains the format for the new postseason format, which will begin with the 2014 season – four teams, selected by a committee – it’s a constant reminder of what it’s not. College football’s movers and shakers are more than ready to fill their sport’s space with something other than controversy.

“I’m OK with simple,” SEC commissioner Mike Slive said. “And I’m OK with different.”

Good riddance, BCS – and did you know there’s a College Football Playoff?

Big Ten commissioner Jim Delany, whose league was among the last to embrace both the BCS era and then its successor, provided further evidence of the sea change. The commissioners cannot wait to retire a battered brand.

“The BCS did a lot of good for college football,” Delany said, “but it also became a burden, a huge branding burden. The evolution happened. We all did it together and came out on I think the right side.”

The evolution happened quickly. It was only a year ago that commissioners first openly used the word “playoff.” Previously, they’d been so opposed to the concept that when the topic came up at all, euphemisms like “plus-one” were preferred.

Hancock also announced a fan contest to pick one of four logos designed by Premier Sports Marketing, the Overland Park, Kan., firm retained to help with the image makeover. Pac-12 commissioner Larry Scott said the contest, which will run through 3 p.m. Eastern Monday at www.collegefootballplayoff.com, “reflects a new mindset.”

“College Football Playoff was responsive to the fans, for the fans, and (choosing the logo) lets the fans have some control, some power they’ve never had before,” Scott said.

The subcommittee on branding batted around “in the neighborhood of three dozen” names for the playoff, Hancock said, but the commissioners voted on only one proposal. The phrase “College Football Playoff” was trademarked last month (apparently coincidentally, ESPN has owned the Internet domain name www.collegefootballplayoff.com since 2003). But the goal was to create something classic rather than corporate. Big 12 commissioner Bob Bowlsby said earlier this month the aim was to be “more like the Masters than NASCAR.”

“Phil Knight once said to me, ‘It’s not the name, it’s what you do with it,’” said Scott, referring to the Nike founder. “This is going to be a hugely important event. It’s going to have iconic status from the get-go. This will be considered, I promise you, a hugely successful brand regardless of what you think about the creativity or how avant-garde it is or isn’t. it’s what you do with it and it’s what it means.”

For the record, Hancock said, he has never owned a dog. If he did?

“I’d name it Beethoven,” he said.

PHOTOS: What the top 25 should look like in 2013

Copyright © 2013 USA TODAY, a division of Gannett Co. Inc.

BCS will be replaced by very basic name

Tuesday, April 23rd, 2013

Source: USA TODAY

PASADENA, Calif. – The upcoming college football playoff will be known as – drum roll – the College Football Playoff.

Catchy, huh?

“Is that really the name?” Oklahoma athletic director Joe Castiglione asked reporters Tuesday afternoon “Or is that just a space-filler?”

A couple of hours later, the name was announced at a news conference at the posh Langham Huntington Hotel, where the latest round of Bowl Championship meetings is taking place.

“It’s really simple. It gets to the point — nothing cute, nothing fancy,” BCS executive director Bill Hancock said. “The name of the new playoff is just that. … At the end of the day, we just decided to call it what it is: College Football Playoff.”

Yeah, cue the jokes – like this one from Twitter: “I bet Bill Hancock’s dog is named Dog.”

Although generic, the new name is certainly descriptive of the process. And as much as it simply explains the format for the new postseason format, which will begin with the 2014 season – four teams, selected by a committee – it’s a constant reminder of what it’s not. College football’s movers and shakers are more than ready to fill their sport’s space with something other than controversy.

“I’m OK with simple,” SEC commissioner Mike Slive said. “And I’m OK with different.”

Good riddance, BCS – and did you know there’s a College Football Playoff?

Big Ten commissioner Jim Delany, whose league was among the last to embrace both the BCS era and then its successor, provided further evidence of the sea change. The commissioners cannot wait to retire a battered brand.

“The BCS did a lot of good for college football,” Delany said, “but it also became a burden, a huge branding burden. The evolution happened. We all did it together and came out on I think the right side.”

The evolution happened quickly. It was only a year ago that commissioners first openly used the word “playoff.” Previously, they’d been so opposed to the concept that when the topic came up at all, euphemisms like “plus-one” were preferred.

Hancock also announced a fan contest to pick one of four logos designed by Premier Sports Marketing, the Overland Park, Kan., firm retained to help with the image makeover. Pac-12 commissioner Larry Scott said the contest, which will run through 3 p.m. Eastern Monday at www.collegefootballplayoff.com, “reflects a new mindset.”

“College Football Playoff was responsive to the fans, for the fans, and (choosing the logo) lets the fans have some control, some power they’ve never had before,” Scott said.

The subcommittee on branding batted around “in the neighborhood of three dozen” names for the playoff, Hancock said, but the commissioners voted on only one proposal. The phrase “College Football Playoff” was trademarked last month (apparently coincidentally, ESPN has owned the Internet domain name www.collegefootballplayoff.com since 2003). But the goal was to create something classic rather than corporate. Big 12 commissioner Bob Bowlsby said earlier this month the aim was to be “more like the Masters than NASCAR.”

“Phil Knight once said to me, ‘It’s not the name, it’s what you do with it,’” said Scott, referring to the Nike founder. “This is going to be a hugely important event. It’s going to have iconic status from the get-go. This will be considered, I promise you, a hugely successful brand regardless of what you think about the creativity or how avant-garde it is or isn’t. it’s what you do with it and it’s what it means.”

For the record, Hancock said, he has never owned a dog. If he did?

“I’d name it Beethoven,” he said.

PHOTOS: What the top 25 should look like in 2013

Copyright © 2013 USA TODAY, a division of Gannett Co. Inc.

Bowl sites to be chosen for college football playoff

Monday, April 22nd, 2013

Source: USA TODAY

PASADENA, Calif. – The next phase of college football’s postseason arrives today.

OK, so there’s still one more season of the much-maligned Bowl Championship Series before we arrive, in 2014, at a four-team playoff. But as commissioners of 11 Football Bowl Subdivision conferences and Notre Dame athletic director Jack Swarbrick arrive for another round of meetings Tuesday-Thursday, they’re prepared to unveil answers to several questions – including what it’s called and where it will be played.

NEXT?: Will football programs split from NCAA?

But we might have to wait a while longer to learn who will choose the teams, and how.

The site of the first championship game could be announced as early as Tuesday. Set for Jan. 11, 2015, it has been considered a lock to be played at Cowboys Stadium in Arlington, Texas. But according to several published reports, Raymond James Stadium in Tampa made a strong bid and had gained consideration. Although the championship game is expected to rotate among several cities, only the first site is expected to be announced this week.

When it comes to the name and logo of the playoff, don’t expect flashy. Big 12 commissioner Bob Bowlsby said last week the aim was for something classic, not corporate. “We want it to be more like the Masters than NASCAR,” he said. Do not expect anything like “BCS.” That brand, battered by controversy that ultimately led to the current postseason metamorphosis, will be retired after this season’s championship game, which will be played Jan. 6, 2014, at the Rose Bowl.

“It will be simple,” BCS executive director Bill Hancock said. “It will not be cutesy. And it will be descriptive. I’ve seen too many people make mistakes by trying to be cutesy.”

The Fiesta, Cotton and Chick-fil-A bowls are expected to be named as the three so-called “host” bowls, which will join the “contract” bowls (Rose, Sugar and Orange) as rotating hosts for semifinal games.

The most important issue probably won’t be finalized this week. Although the commissioners have spent plenty of time working on the composition of the committee that will select playoff participants, and the criteria it will use, it hasn’t been settled. There’s consensus that each FBS conference will be represented, as well as several “at-large” representatives; the committee could number from 14-20. Candidates could include current administrators, but also former college administrators, retired coaches and even retired media members.

“You need people that know the game and understand the game and have experience and wisdom and integrity and respect,” ACC commissioner John Swofford told USA TODAY Sports in February, when the commissioners last met.

The commissioners also have worked to determine what guidelines the committee would use in ranking and choosing participants. Although it is expected to function much like the NCAA basketball committee does in filling out the NCAA Tournament bracket, the smaller field (four teams vs. 68) and sample size (12 or 13 games vs. 35) significantly raises the stakes. Commissioners hope to deemphasize polls and won-loss records, and to develop more comprehensive data and reports.

“I know the commissioners are very interested in moving the needle on it,” Hancock said. “I’m sure it will get a fair amount of discussion.”

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

PHOTOS: What top 25 should look like in 2013

Copyright © 2013 USA TODAY, a division of Gannett Co. Inc.