Crime Victims and Witnesses Are Collateral Damage of “Secure Communities”by Hugh Holub on Aug. 27, 2011, under atf, immigration law reform, politics
Immigration Experts: Crime Victims and Witnesses Are Collateral Damage of “Secure Communities”
New Report, Outcry from Public Show How this and Other Programs Have Hindered Crime-Fighting and Destroyed Community Trust
Washington, DC – Local and national immigration experts spoke on a call with reporters to relate stories and highlight concerns that Secure Communities and other police-immigration collaboration efforts are destroying the relationship between police and immigrants and making communities across the country less safe. The federal Secure Communities (S-Comm) program has come under fire from law enforcement, elected officials, and immigrant advocates from across the country for its lack of focus and dangerous impacts on community security. Tonight, the Arlington, VA community will speak out about this damaging program in the final field hearing of Department of Homeland Security Secure Communities Task Force. The Task Force is a non-governmental body convened by DHS to examine the program and make recommendations to improve it.
During the press call, America’s Voice Education Fund (AVEF) released a new report, “Public Safety on ICE: How Do You Police a Community That Won’t Talk to You?”, documenting how immigration enforcement by local police creates a “chilling effect” in immigrant communities, making victims and witnesses of crimes afraid to get help from cops who might deport them. The report includes cases from community advocates and law enforcement officials, demonstrating that the “chilling effect” is being felt in communities around the country as a result of Secure Communities and other policies that blur the distinction between local police and federal immigration agents.
Lynn Tramonte, Deputy Director of America’s Voice Education Fund, who moderated the call, said, “We want criminals to be afraid of the police, not immigrants. Programs that involve state and local police in immigration enforcement—like S-Comm, 287(g), inherent authority, and state laws—are destroying the relationship between police and the immigrant community. These programs violate the core principles of community policing, because they make immigrants afraid of having any contact with the police. This means immigrants are less likely to report crimes, more criminals go free, and entire communities are less safe.”
Alexsa Alonzo, Associate Director of Advocacy for the American Immigration Lawyers Association, said “Using local law enforcement efforts as a gateway to immigration enforcement erodes immigrant communities’ trust in the police and local governments and makes us less safe. Police are perceived as no longer just protecting public safety but also as enforcing immigration law.”
“Fear of police in immigrant communities along the U.S.-Canada border is palpable and only heightened by Border Patrol’s increased collaboration with local law enforcement,” said OneAmerica Policy Director, Ada Williams Prince. “Put simply, immigrants stop calling the police during emergencies when they know that Border Patrol will follow close behind.”
Marisa Vertrees, Social Justice Coordinator of St. Charles Borromeo Catholic Church in Arlington, has been working with members of the community to prepare for tonight’s Task Force hearing. Like earlier field hearings in Dallas, TX; Los Angeles, CA; and Chicago, IL, the Arlington hearing will no doubt demonstrate the level of frustration and fear that Secure Communities has caused in immigrant communities. Arlington County has been trying to opt-out of the program, but has been unable to do so because of the federal government’s mandate that all cities and states participate.
According to Vertrees: “Through our work with the immigrant community, we in the faith community have seen the harm that local enforcement does to the community. Tonight at the hearing we will bring forward the stories we have heard from families who have been torn apart by overly aggressive enforcement programs, as well as immigrants, both documented and not, who are now afraid to deal with the police and are forced to live in the shadows. And because for the first and only time translation services will be available at the hearing, the Task Force will have the chance to hear these stories from the immigrant community themselves. We hope that bringing forward what we have seen will convince the administration to end the deeply flawed Secure Communities program.”
- Link to New Report: Public Safety on ICE: How Do You Police a Community That Won’t Talk to You?
- Link to Recording of Today’s Press Call: http://americasvoiceonline.org/page/-/americasvoice/audio/Scomm_aug24_2011.mp3
COMMENTARY: As the former City Attorney of a border city I can speak first hand to the problem of crime victims being afraid of reporting being victimized when the consequences are deportation.
Just because someone entered the country illegally does not take away their basic human rights….but the way our system has worked the result has been to create an underclass of people who can be the targets of criminals with no consequences because the victims cannot report the crimes.
The real solution is to find a way to legalize the existing illegal immigrant community…my recommendation is “probationary preserce”, tighten up the border to stop further illegal entery, create a worker visa program, and really crack down on drug smugglers.
Alas…there is too much poilitical gain in the status quo….
and if the prosecutorial discretion being used by the Obama Administration is a form of amnesty…well what is the alternative? ICE totally blew it trying to jack up their statistics by deporting crime victims. Dumbass plan…just like ATF’s dumbass gun walking scheme.
Obama’s Adminustrration has been a disaster for progress on securing our border and immigration reform because Obama’s leaders at DHS, Border Patrol, ICE and ATF have not played straight, have lied, have manipulated statistics…and are getting caught.
None of this makes anyone want to trust the feds with broad scale immigration law reform.