Tucson Citizen.com
Views From Baja Arizona - brought to you by Hugh Holub

Tucson Ghost Giraffe talks about zoo

by on Sep. 09, 2011, under politics

Hi. I am Tucson’s Ghost Giraffe. Remember me? I was the one they fed oleanders to.

The Reid Park Zoo is a really cool place and I hope you come and visit my friends there.

The zoo was originally started by Gene Reid, Tucson Parks Director, without approval from City Hall. He started off with a prarie dog village and it sort of grew. My channeler here admits to donating a possum to Gene for the zoo.

The zoo is one of the best things Tucson does….even if they can’t figure out that oleander is poisonous. I blame City Hall for that.

I wonder how many city elected officials and top city staff have ever actually been to the zoo? I’ll bet a whole bunch of them have never seen our zoo. We’re not that big a deal to City Hall like rainbow bridges and fantasy aquariums.

And that’s symbolic of the problems with your city…your elected officials and city staff have their heads in the clouds spending hundreds of millions on stuff like Rio Nuevo

But something that really makes Tucson a much better place to live…our zoo…gets short shrift at City Hall.

If you haven’t been to the zoo please come on down…you’ll love the place…..and you’ll ask why they don”t get rid of that golf course over east of us and expand our zoo to make it even a better place. Imagine giraffes and zebras and elephants grazing on what are now the fairways.

But City Hall would have to hire a bunch of consultants and spend a hundred million dollars deciding the zoo was more important than 18 holes of golf in the city.


Full Text of Obama speech to Congress on jobs

by on Sep. 08, 2011, under politics

The following are President Obama’s remarks on his jobs plan as delivered to Congress on Sept. 8, 2011:

Thank you so much. Everyone, please have a seat. Thank you.

Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice President, members of Congress, and fellow Americans, tonight we meet at an urgent time for our country. We continue to face an economic crisis that has left millions of our neighbors jobless and a political crisis that’s made things worse.

This past week, reporters have been asking, “What will this speech mean for the president? What will it mean for Congress? How will it affect their polls and the next election?”

But the millions of Americans who are watching right now, they don’t care about politics. They have real-life concerns. Many have spent months looking for work. Others are doing their best just to scrape by, giving up nights out with the family to save on gas or make the mortgage, postponing retirement to send a kid to college.

These men and women grew up with faith in an America where hard work and responsibility paid off. They believed in a country where everyone gets a fair shake and does their fair share, where if you stepped up, did your job, and were loyal to your company, that loyalty would be rewarded with a decent salary and good benefits, maybe a raise once in awhile. If you did the right thing, you could make it — anybody could make it in America.

But for decades now, Americans have watched that compact erode. They have seen the decks too often stacked against them. And they know that Washington has not always put their interests first.

The people of this country work hard to meet their responsibilities. The question tonight is whether we’ll meet ours. The question is whether — in the face of an ongoing national crisis — we can stop the political circus and actually do something to help the economy.

The question — the question is whether we can restore some of the fairness and security that has defined this nation since our beginning.

Those of us here tonight can’t solve all our nation’s woes. Ultimately, our recovery will be driven not by Washington, but by our businesses and our workers. But we can help. We can make a difference. There are steps we can take right now to improve people’s lives.

I am sending this Congress a plan that you should pass right away. It’s called the American Jobs Act. There should be nothing controversial about this piece of legislation. Everything in here is the kind of proposal that’s been supported by both Democrats and Republicans, including many who sit here tonight, and everything in this bill will be paid for, everything.

The purpose of the American Jobs Act is simple: to put more people back to work and more money in the pockets of those who are working. It will create more jobs for construction workers, more jobs for teachers, more jobs for veterans, and more jobs for long-term unemployed. It will provide…

It will provide a tax break for companies who hire new workers, and it will cut payroll taxes in half for every working American and every small business.

It will provide a jolt to an economy that has stalled and give companies confidence that, if they invest and if they hire, there will be customers for their products and services. You should pass this jobs plan right away.

Everyone here knows that small businesses are where most new jobs begin. And you know that while corporate profits have come roaring back, smaller companies haven’t. So for everyone who speaks so passionately about making life easier for “job-creators,” this plan’s for you. Pass this jobs bill.

Pass this jobs bill, and starting tomorrow, small businesses will get a tax cut if they hire new workers or if they raise workers’ wages. Pass this jobs bill, and all small-business owners will also see their payroll taxes cut in half next year. If you have 50 employees…

If you have 50 employees making an average salary, that’s an $80,000 tax cut. And all businesses will be able to continue writing off the investments they make in 2012.

It’s not just Democrats who have supported this kind of proposal. Fifty House Republicans have proposed the same payroll tax cut that’s in this plan. You should pass it right away.

Pass this jobs bill, and we can put people to work rebuilding America. Everyone here knows we have badly decaying roads and bridges all over this country. Our highways are clogged with traffic. Our skies are the most congested in the world. It’s an outrage.

Building a world-class transportation system is part of what made us an economic superpower. And now we’re going to sit back and watch China build newer airports and faster railroads, at a time when millions of unemployed construction workers could build them right here in America?

There…

There are private construction companies all across America just waiting to get to work. There’s a bridge that needs repair between Ohio and Kentucky that’s on one of the busiest trucking routes in North America, a public transit project in Houston that will help clear up one of the worst areas of traffic in the country.

And there are schools throughout this country that desperately need renovating. How can we expect our kids to do their best in places that are literally falling apart? This is America. Every child deserves a great school, and we can give it to them, if we act now.

The American Jobs Act will repair and modernize at least 35,000 schools. It will put people to work right now fixing roofs and windows, installing science labs and high-speed Internet in classrooms all across this country. It will rehabilitate homes and businesses in communities hit hardest by foreclosures. It will jump-start thousands of transportation projects all across the country.

And to make sure the money is properly spent, we’re building on reforms we’ve already put in place. No more earmarks. No more boondoggles. No more Bridges to Nowhere. We’re cutting the red tape that prevents some of these projects from getting started as quickly as possible. And we’ll set up an independent fund to attract private dollars and issue loans based on two criteria: how badly a construction project is needed and how much good it will do for the economy.

This idea came from a bill written by a Texas Republican and a Massachusetts Democrat. The idea for a big boost in construction is supported by America’s largest business organization and America’s largest labor organization. It’s the kind of proposal that’s been supported in the past by Democrats and Republicans alike. You should pass it right away.

Pass this jobs bill, and thousands of teachers in every state will go back to work. These are the men and women charged with preparing our children for a world where the competition has never been tougher.

But while they’re adding teachers in places like South Korea, we’re laying them off in droves. It’s unfair to our kids; it undermines their future and ours. And it has to stop. Pass this bill, and put our teachers back in the classroom where they belong.

Pass this jobs bill, and companies will get extra tax credits if they hire America’s veterans. We ask these men and women to leave their careers, leave their families, risk their lives to fight for our country. The last thing they should have to do is fight for a job when they come home.

OBAMA: Pass this bill, and hundreds of thousands of disadvantaged young people will have the hope and the dignity of a summer job next year. And their parents…

… their parents, low-income Americans who desperately want to work, will have more ladders out of poverty.

Pass this jobs bill, and companies will get a $4,000 tax credit if they hire anyone who has spent more than six months looking for a job.

We — we have to do more to help the long-term unemployed in their search for work. This jobs plan builds on a program in Georgia that several Republican leaders have highlighted, where people who collect unemployment insurance participate in temporary work as a way to build their skills while they look for a permanent job.

The plan also extends unemployment insurance for another year.

If the millions of unemployed Americans stopped getting this insurance and stopped using that money for basic necessities, it would be a devastating blow to this economy. Democrats and Republicans in this chamber have supported unemployment insurance plenty of times in the past. And in this time of prolonged hardship, you should pass it again, right away.

Pass this jobs bill, and the typical working family will get a $1,500 tax cut next year, $1,500 that would have been taken out of your pocket will go into your pocket. This expands on the tax cut that Democrats and Republicans already passed for this year.

If we allow that tax cut to expire, if we refuse to act, middle- class families will get hit with a tax increase at the worst possible time. We can’t let that happen.

I know that some of you have sworn oaths to never raise any taxes on anyone for as long as you live. Now is not the time to carve out an exception and raise middle-class taxes, which is why you should pass this bill right away.

This is the American Jobs Act. It will lead to new jobs for construction workers, for teachers, for veterans, for first responders, young people, and the long-term unemployed. It will provide tax credits to companies that hire new workers, tax relief to small-business owners, and tax cuts for the middle-class.

And here’s the other thing I want the American people to know: The American Jobs Act will not add to the deficit. It will be paid for. And here’s how.

The agreement we passed in July will cut government spending by about $1 trillion over the next 10 years. It also charges this Congress to come up with an additional $1.5 trillion in savings by Christmas. Tonight, I’m asking you to increase that amount so that it covers the full cost of the American Jobs Act. And a week from Monday, I’ll be releasing a more ambitious deficit plan, a plan that will not only cover the cost of this jobs bill, but stabilize our debt in the long run.

This approach is basically the one I’ve been advocating for months. In addition to the trillion dollars of spending cuts I’ve already signed into law, it’s a balanced plan that would reduce the deficit by making additional spending cuts, by making modest adjustments to health care programs like Medicare and Medicaid, and by reforming our tax code in a way that asks the wealthiest Americans and biggest corporations to pay their fair share.

What’s more, the spending cuts wouldn’t happen so abruptly that they’d be a drag on our economy or prevent us from helping small businesses and middle-class families get back on their feet right away.

Now, I realize there are some in my party who don’t think we should make any changes at all to Medicare and Medicaid, and I understand their concerns. But here’s the truth: Millions of Americans rely on Medicare in their retirement. And millions more will do so in the future. They pay for this benefit during their working years; they earn it.

But with an aging population and rising health care costs, we are spending too fast to sustain the program. And if we don’t gradually reform the system, while protecting current beneficiaries, it won’t be there when future retirees need it. We have to reform Medicare to strengthen it.

I’m also…

I’m also well aware that there are many Republicans who don’t believe we should raise taxes on those who are most fortunate and can best afford it. But here’s what every American knows: While most people in this country struggle to make ends meet, a few of the most affluent citizens and most profitable corporations enjoy tax breaks and loopholes that nobody else gets.

Right now, Warren Buffett pays a lower tax rate than his secretary, an outrage he has asked us to fix. We need a tax code where everyone gets a fair shake and where everybody pays their fair share.

And, by the way, I believe the vast majority of wealthy Americans and CEOs are willing to do just that, if it helps the economy grow and gets our fiscal house in order.

I’ll also offer ideas to reform a corporate tax code that stands as a monument to special interest influence in Washington. By eliminating pages of loopholes and deductions, we can lower one of the highest corporate tax rates in the world.

Our tax code should not give an advantage to companies that can afford the best-connected lobbyists. It should give an advantage to companies that invest and create jobs right here in the United States of America.

So we can reduce this deficit, pay down our debt, and pay for this jobs plan in the process. But in order to do this, we have to decide what our priorities are. We have to ask ourselves, “What’s the best way to grow the economy and create jobs?”

Should we keep tax loopholes for oil companies, or should we use that money to give small-business owners a tax credit when they hire new workers? Because we can’t afford to do both.

Should we keep tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires, or should we put teachers back to work so our kids can graduate ready for college and good jobs?

Right now, we can’t afford to do both.

This isn’t political grandstanding. This isn’t class warfare.

This is simple math. These are real choices. These are real choices that we’ve got to make. And I’m pretty sure I know what most Americans would choose. It’s not even close. And it’s time for us to do what’s right for our future.

Now, the American Jobs Act answers the urgent need to create jobs right away. But we can’t stop there. As I’ve argued since I ran for this office, we have to look beyond the immediate crisis and start building an economy that lasts into the future, an economy that creates good, middle-class jobs that pay well and offer security.

We now live in a world where technology has made it possible for companies to take their business anywhere. If we want them to start here and stay here and hire here, we have to be able to out-build, and out-educate, and out-innovate every other country on Earth.

This task, of making America more competitive for the long haul, that’s a job for all of us, for government and for private companies, for states and for local communities, and for every American citizen. All of us will have to up our game. All of us will have to change the way we do business.

My administration can and will take some steps to improve our competitiveness on our own. For example, if you’re a small-business owner who has a contract with the federal government, we’re going to make sure you get paid a lot faster than you do right now.

We’re also planning to cut away the red tape that prevents too many rapidly growing start-up companies from raising capital and going public.

And to help responsible homeowners, we’re going to work with federal housing agencies to help more people refinance their mortgages at interest rates that are now near 4 percent. That’s a step…

I know you guys must be for this, because that’s a step that can put more than $2,000 a year in a family’s pocket and give a lift to an economy still burdened by the drop in housing prices.

So some things we can do on our own. Other steps will require congressional action.

Today, you passed reform that will speed up the outdated patent process so that entrepreneurs can turn a new idea into a new business as quickly as possible. That’s the kind of action we need.

Now it’s time to clear the way for a series of trade agreements that would make it easier for American companies to sell their products in Panama, and Colombia, and South Korea, while also helping the workers whose jobs have been affected by global competition.

If Americans can buy Kias and Hyundais, I want to see folks in South Korea driving Fords and Chevys and Chryslers.

I want to see more products sold around the world stamped with the three proud words, “Made in America.” That’s what we need to get done.

And on all of our efforts to strengthen competitiveness, we need to look for ways to work side by side with America’s businesses. That’s why I’ve brought together a jobs council of leaders from different industries who are developing a wide range of new ideas to help companies grow and create jobs.

Already, we’ve mobilized business leaders to train 10,000 American engineers a year, by providing company internships and training. Other businesses are covering tuition for workers who learn new skills at community colleges.

And we’re going to make sure the next generation of manufacturing takes root not in China or Europe, but right here in the United States of America.

If we provide the right incentives, the right support, and if we make sure our trading partners play by the rules, we can be the ones to build everything from fuel-efficient cars to advanced biofuels to semiconductors that we sell all around the world. That’s how America can be number-one again. And that’s how America will be number-one again.

Now, I realize that some of you have a different theory on how to grow the economy. Some of you sincerely believe that the only solution to our economic challenges is to simply cut most government spending and eliminate most government regulations.

And — well, I agree that we can’t afford wasteful spending, and I’ll work with you, with Congress, to root it out. And I agree that there are some rules and regulations that do put an unnecessary burden on businesses at a time when they can least afford it.

That’s why I ordered a review of all government regulations. So far, we’ve identified over 500 reforms, which will save billions of dollars over the next few years. We should have no more regulation than the health, safety and security of the American people require. Every rule should meet that commonsense test.

But what we can’t do — what I will not do — is let this economic crisis be used as an excuse to wipe out the basic protections that Americans have counted on for decades.

I reject the idea that we need to ask people to choose between their jobs and their safety. I reject the argument that says, for the economy to grow, we have to roll back protections that ban hidden fees by credit card companies, or rules that keep our kids from being exposed to mercury, or laws that prevent the health insurance industry from shortchanging patients.

I reject the idea that we have to strip away collective bargaining rights to compete in a global economy.

We shouldn’t be in a race to the bottom, where we try to offer the cheapest labor and the worst pollution standards. America should be in a race to the top, and I believe we can win that race.

In fact, this larger notion that the only thing we can do to restore prosperity is just dismantle government, refund everybody’s money, and let everyone write their own rules, and tell everyone they’re on their own, that’s not who we are. That’s not the story of America.

Yes, we are rugged individualists. Yes, we are strong and self- reliant. And it has been the drive and initiative of our workers and entrepreneurs that has made this economy the engine and the envy of the world.

But there’s always been another thread running throughout our history, a belief that we’re all connected, and that there are some things we can only do together as a nation.

We all remember Abraham Lincoln as the leader who saved our union, founder of the Republican Party. But in the middle of a Civil War, he was also a leader who looked to the future, a Republican president who mobilized government to build the transcontinental railroad, launch the National Academy of Sciences, set up the first land grant colleges. And leaders of both parties have followed the example he set.

Ask yourselves: Where would we be right now if the people who sat here before us decided not to build our highways, not to build our bridges, our dams, our airports? What would this country be like if we had chosen not to spend money on public high schools, or research universities, or community colleges?

Millions of returning heroes, including my grandfather, had the opportunity to go to school because of the G.I. Bill. Where would we be if they hadn’t had that chance?

How many jobs would it have cost us if past Congresses decided not to support the basic research that led to the Internet and the computer chip? What kind of country would this be if this chamber had voted down Social Security or Medicare just because it violated some rigid idea about what government could or could not do? How many Americans would have suffered as a result?

No single individual built America on their own. We built it together. We have been — and always will be — one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all, a nation with responsibilities to ourselves and with responsibilities to one another.

And, members of Congress, it is time for us to meet our responsibilities.

Every proposal I’ve laid out tonight is the kind that’s been supported by Democrats and Republicans in the past. Every proposal I’ve laid out tonight will be paid for. And every proposal is designed to meet the urgent needs of our people and our communities.

Now, I know there’s been a lot of skepticism about whether the politics of the moment will allow us to pass this jobs plan, or any jobs plan. Already, we’re seeing the same old press releases and tweets flying back and forth. Already, the media has proclaimed that it’s impossible to bridge our differences. And maybe some of you have decided that those differences are so great that we can only resolve them at the ballot box.

But know this: The next election is 14 months away. And the people who sent us here, the people who hired us to work for them, they don’t have the luxury of waiting 14 months.

Some of them are living week to week, paycheck to paycheck, even day to day. They need help, and they need it now.

I don’t pretend that this plan will solve all our problems. It should not be — nor will it be — the last plan of action we propose. What’s guided us from the start of this crisis hasn’t been the search for a silver bullet. It’s been a commitment to stay at it, to be persistent, to keep trying every new idea that works and listen to every good proposal, no matter which party comes up with it.

Regardless of the arguments we’ve had in the past, regardless of the arguments we’ll have in the future, this plan is the right thing to do right now. You should pass it. And I intend to take that message to every corner of this country.

And I ask — I ask every American who agrees to lift your voice, tell the people who are gathered here tonight that you want action now. Tell Washington that doing nothing is not an option. Remind us that, if we act as one nation and one people, we have it within our power to meet this challenge.

President Kennedy once said, “Our problems are manmade; therefore, they can be solved by man. And man can be as big as he wants.”

These are difficult years for our country, but we are Americans. We are tougher than the times that we live in, and we are bigger than our politics have been. So let’s meet the moment, let’s get to work, and let’s show the world once again why the United States of America remains the greatest nation on Earth.

Thank you very much. God bless you, and God bless the United States of America.


An Open Letter From the Cowboy Libertarian to President Obama, Congress and the Mainstream Media

by on Sep. 08, 2011, under politics

My buddy Patrick Dorinson…the Cowboy Libertarian … got a big burr under his saddle this week:

An Open Letter From the Cowboy Libertarian to President Obama, Congress and the Mainstream Media

By Patrick Dorinson

Dear Mr. President, Members of Congress, and the Mainstream Media,

Well, summer is now unofficially over and with Labor Day in the rearview mirror, it is “back to work” time. I hope all of you had swell vacations, in your case Mr. President, on high falutin’ Martha’s Vineyard. And in the case of some members of Congress on taxpayer paid junkets to exotic locales. Many Americans could not afford to take vacations and would love to get back to work as well but there are no jobs.

While you were gone, the economy sunk further — as did all of your poll numbers.

More… http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2011/09/08/open-letter-from-cowboy-libertarian-to-president-obama-congress-and-mainstream/#ixzz1XOsPL0R9

Among opther things Dorison tells Obama: “As the saying goes, if you’ve got nothing much to say, don’t take an hour to prove it.”


Tucson ghost giraffe haunts City Hall

by on Sep. 08, 2011, under politics

Hi. I am Tucson’s Ghost Giraffe. Remember me? I was the one they fed oleanders to.

I’ve decided to haunt Tucson’s City Hall. You know…remind them there are more important things than sky bridges and aquariums. I mean, if you can’t even feed your giraffes safe food what kind of city are you running here?

I see where the City Manager resigned effective a year from now and wrote a 7 page letter blaming everyone else for his problems. The city council fired him effective Friday. That’s cool. 

So the first issue is who is going to run the city now that Letcher is gone?.

I’m sending an oleander plant down to City Hall to put on the City Manager’s desk to remind whoever gets the job that it is the little stuff that counts.


Four Tucsonans indicted for mortgage fraud conspiracy

by on Sep. 08, 2011, under crime, politics

Press Release from US Attorney’s Office – Arizona September 8, 2011:

FOUR DEFENDANTS INDICTED IN MULTIMILLION DOLLAR MORTGAGE FRAUD CONSPIRACY

TUCSON, Ariz. – A federal grand jury returned an indictment charging four defendants in a mortgage fraud conspiracy. The indictment charged 20-counts including conspiracy to commit bank fraud, false statement to influence a financial institution, and conspiracy to commit transactional money laundering. 

The defendants charged in various counts of the indictment are: Real Estate Developers, William Michael Naponelli and Walter Scott Fruit; escrow officer, Sandra Jackson; and real estate agent, Brian Atwood.  The defendants will be required to appear in federal court for their arraignment. 

“The indictment alleges that the defendants fraudulently obtained loans for nineteen properties that eventually ended in foreclosure,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Ann Birmingham Scheel.  “As mortgage fraud continues to impact our communities we also continue working closely with the IRS and FBI to hold those responsible for this fraud accountable.”

The indictment alleges that the defendants conspired to commit mortgage fraud to obtain nineteen loans totaling approximately $5.85 million between the years 2006 through 2007.

According to the indictment, Naponelli and Fruit purchased properties using various business entities with which they were associated.  Thereafter, Naponelli and Fruit sold these properties to straw buyers for a profit. 

The indictment further alleges that the defendants submitted to lenders loan applications and other documents that contained material false representations relating to the purchase of the nineteen properties.  After the fraudulently obtained loan proceeds were received portions of the loan proceeds were diverted into bank accounts under the control of some of the co-conspirators. 

As a result of the mortgage fraud scheme, each of the properties referenced in the indictment went into foreclosure.  

A conviction for conspiracy to commit bank fraud and false statement to influence a financial institution carries a maximum penalty of thirty years in prison, a $1,000,000 fine, or both.  A conviction for Conspiracy to Commit Transactional Money Laundering carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine.

An indictment is simply a method by which a person is charged with criminal activity and raises no inference of guilt. An individual is presumed innocent until competent evidence is presented to a jury that established guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The investigation preceding the indictment was conducted by the Internal Revenue Service – Criminal Investigations and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The prosecution is being handled by Jonathan B. Granoff, Assistant U.S. Attorney, District of Arizona, Tucson.

CASE NUMBER:      CR11-3046-CKJ(JJM)

And…

Obama wants major federal role in home mortgages…just when you thought it was safe to come out of your storm shelter


Latino Voters Not Buying “Border-First” Sound Bite

by on Sep. 08, 2011, under border issues

From AmericasVoice.org:

On Immigration in GOP Debate: Latino Voters Not Buying “Border-First” Sound Bite

Candidates Must Answer Key Question: As President, What Would You Do About the 11 Million Undocumented Immigrants in U.S. Today?

Washington, DC – Last night’s Republican presidential debate at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library featured an important discussion prompted by Noticiero Telemundo anchor José Díaz-Balart.   The dominant line from GOP 2012 candidates on immigration these days is: we need to get tough on immigrants in a number of ways, and put off any discussion about legalization or visa reforms until the border is “finally” secure.  Last night, Díaz-Balart challenged some of the candidates to move beyond their vacuous “border security first” talking point, and get concrete about what conditions would prompt them to declare the border “secure,” and what they would do about the 11 million undocumented immigrants in our country at that point.  Needless to say, there was a lot of fumbling and not a lot of straight answers from most of the candidates.    

Their answers also confirmed what we have been saying for some time – that the current GOP field has strayed far from President Reagan’s centrist, problem-solving approach when it comes to the issue of immigration, and this simple fact will have serious consequences for GOP outreach to Latino voters in the general election.  Spanish-language media coverage of last night’s debate and recent polling both raise some uncomfortable truths for the Republican field: 1) Latino voters see the “border first” plan for what it is—a political sound bite and excuse for more enforcement only, not a comprehensive solution; and 2) Latino voters really do want to know what the candidates’ plans are to deal with undocumented immigrants.  Instead of talking straight, most of the Republicans seem intent on walking a rhetorical tightrope to present a more friendly image to Latino voters, while not changing their actual policy positions to avoid inciting right-wing primary voters.

 Indicative of this is the Spanish language coverage of last night’s debate.  In La Opinion, the largest Spanish language daily newspaper in the country, the lead article was unequivocal in criticizing the non-answers of the GOP field on immigration. Entitled “None of the Republican Candidates Want to Talk About the Legalization of the 11 Million Undocumented in the Country,” Antonieta Cadiz’s article noted that yesterday’s debate made something crystal clear (translated), “none of the Republican candidates want to talk about the possibility of legalizing the 11 million undocumented (immigrants) currently in the country…The candidates instead ‘shielded’ themselves with the ‘secure the border first’ argument.”

June 2011 polling from Latino Decisions and impreMedia shows why this is such a problem for the GOP.  When asked, “When you hear Republicans say that immigration reform must wait until the border is secure, do you think that is a legitimate concern that needs to be addressed, OR they are using that as an excuse to block action on immigration reform?” by a 55% – 30% margin, Latino voters said GOP candidates are “Using it to block action” on immigration reform instead of representing a “Legitimate concern.”  These voters know that border security is already in place.  But what hasn’t been tackled is the rest of reform, including the status of 11 million immigrants in the country without papers.  The same poll also found that by a 65% – 19% margin, Latino voters trust President Obama and Democrats more “to make the right decisions when it comes to immigration policy” compared with Republicans. 

Notably, the two Republican contenders leading in the polls, Gov. Rick Perry (R-TX) and Gov. Mitt Romney (R-MA), escaped Díaz-Balart’s follow-up questioning regarding what specifically they would do with the undocumented population in the nation, provided the border was secured to their satisfaction.  Both Gov. Perry and Gov. Romney waxed poetic about border security but ducked the elephant in the room – the 11 million undocumented immigrants whose status will not be resolved by building a fence of any size.  Romney went even further – no doubt to tweak Perry who has supported in-state tuition for undocumented kids who grew up in Texas – by suggesting that allowing talented young people who grew up in America and have no papers through no fault of their own is a magnet for illegal immigration.  Puh-leeze.

Interestingly, the only candidate to answer the question directly was Newt Gingrich, who followed up nods to border security and assimilation with this statement: “And then find a way to deal with folks who are already here, some of whom, frankly, have been here 25 years, are married with kids, live in our local neighborhood, go to our church. It’s got to be done in a much more humane way than thinking that to automatically deport millions of people.”

According to Frank Sharry, Executive Director of America’s Voice, “The leading candidates for the GOP nomination may have been standing on Ronald Reagan’s stage but they did not stand in his shoes.  Reagan supported legalization, immigration and a welcoming America.  The top-tier 2012 GOP candidates do not.  It’s pure fantasy to think the Party can appeal to Latino voters simply by changing their tone on immigration, and not actually changing their positions.”  And it’s hard to imagine how they reach the threshold of 40% of the Latino vote they need to re-take the White House with that approach.” 

America’s Voice — Harnessing the power of American voices and American values to win common sense immigration reform.

www.americasvoiceonline.org

###


What Would Reagan Say to Republican 2012 Field on Immigration?

by on Sep. 07, 2011, under immigration law reform

Press Release from AmericasVoice.org:

What Would Reagan Say to Republican 2012 Field on Immigration? 

Experts, New Report Show that GOP Field, Including Gov. Perry, Doesn’t Live up to Reagan Legacy on Immigration  

Washington, DC – On the day of the Republican presidential debate at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library, we are reminded of President Reagan’s immigration legacy and his vision for America.  Yet at tonight’s debate, according to experts on immigration and Latino politics who participated in a press call held earlier today, we will likely hear a very different message from the GOP’s 2012 presidential candidates on the issue. 

Upon signing the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act, which granted residency to nearly 2.7 million undocumented immigrants, President Reagan said, “The legalization provisions in this act will go far to improve the lives of a class of individuals who now must hide in the shadows, without access to many of the benefits of a free and open society.”

Yet according to the experts and a new report from America’s Voice, “Why Do Elephants Put Their Heads in the Sand?” the Republican field has fallen far from President Reagan’s centrist immigration approach, adopting a hard-line, anti-immigrant platform that will only further the Party’s dismal showing with Latino voters in 2012 and beyond.  While some Republicans are starting to realize that Latino voters are, in fact, important players in modern-day politics – judged by such developments as early Spanish-language advertising buys from Republican-allied Super PACs – the GOP has not yet shown a willingness to shed its hard-line, anti-immigrant policy agenda for a more Reagan-esque and inclusive approach. 

According to Frank Sharry, Executive Director of America’s Voice, “The Republican Party may try to have it both ways when it comes to immigration and Latino voters this cycle.  They may try to present a less incendiary image to Latino voters while subtly reminding hard-line primary voters that their policies haven’t changed one bit.  Yet even if they put the dog whistle in their pocket, there’s no evidence that they’ve thrown it away.”

Experts and strategists from both sides of the aisle agree that the Republican Party needs to win at least 40% of the Latino vote in a presidential election year in order to win the general election – a task made inordinately difficult given the Party’s current brand image with Latino voters.  Polling released in June 2011 by Latino Decisions and impreMedia found that by a 65% – 19% margin, Latino voters trust President Obama and Democrats more “to make the right decisions when it comes to immigration policy” compared with Republicans.  In the 2010 elections, Latinos voted for Democrats over Republicans by roughly 75%-25%, or a 3-1 margin according to election-eve polling of Latino voters conducted by Latino Decisions in eight key states (AZ, CA, CO, FL, IL, NM, NV, TX).

Dr. Matt Barreto, Ph.D., Associate Professor, University of Washington and Latino Decisions noted, “the tracking poll data from Latino Decisions show very clearly that the Republican Party has an image problem with Latino voters.  So far, we have not seen any signs whatsoever that the Republican presidential candidates are reaching out to Latino voters.  Without serious outreach and a new positive message, the GOP will do very badly with Latinos again in 2012.”

Maria Cardona, Principal at the Dewey Square Group and expert on Latino politics added “There is no question that the road to the White House goes straight through Latino communities across the country.  If the GOP does not address their jaw-dropping deficit of support within the Latino electorate – they need at least 40% support among Latino voters to win and they are currently at  18% – their nominee, no matter who he or she is, will never see the inside of La Casa Blanca.”

The new report from America’s Voice documents GOP 2012 presidential candidates’ past and current positions on immigration and analyzes the politics of the issue for the Republican Party.  For example, even though rivals of Governor Perry (R-TX) are spinning it that he has a moderate record on the issue, such is not the case.  For Perry and the rest of the field, hiding behind vacuous sound bites such as “border security first” – which really means “comprehensive immigration reform never” – or pledging to expel 11 million undocumented immigrants — the vast majority of whom are Latino, and then defending anti-immigrant and anti-Latino laws like Arizona’s SB 1070, simply won’t go over well with the Latino electorate, even if it is said with a smile. 

In reference to Gov. Perry’s immigration stance, Mitch Ackerman, International Executive Vice President of SEIU said, “Will we see the Rick Perry who once campaigned for Texas Latino support or the one who turned his back on Hispanics this year with an agenda that included a harsh immigration bill with many of the components of the Arizona law he originally opposed, as well as a congressional redistricting plan that diluted the voting strength of Latino ad minority voters, and a budget that severely slashed funding for public education in Texas with a student enrollment that is 51 percent Latino? In a short amount of time, it seems, Rick Perry became a born again nativist.”

America’s Voice — Harnessing the power of American voices and American values to win common sense immigration reform.

www.americasvoiceonline.org

###

COMMENT: Then again Reagan might’ve suggested charging all the undocumented folks $10,000 a piece to get legal ($5,000 of they agreed to vote Republican) and using the proceeds to pay off some of the national debt.


SolarGate and green jobs

by on Sep. 07, 2011, under politics

As we contemplate Obama’s latest scheme to spur the economy, Investors.com has a stunning article up about how a crony of Obama’s  managed to get a $535 million loan guarantee for a dubious solar scheme…which recently went bankrupt.


Solargate

….Despite a warning from Solyndra’s own accountants at PricewaterhouseCoopers that the company’s business model was suspect and raised “substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern,” President Obama visited the company and gave it a glowing endorsement as a government-picked winner alongside electric cars and high-speed rail.

More…

And David Brooks has an excellent commentary on how the green jobs efforts has cost a lot of money and produced few new jobs:


Where the Jobs Aren’t

There’s a wealth of other evidence to suggest that the green economy will not be a short-term jobs machine. According to Investor’s Business Daily, executives at Johnson Controls turned $300 million in green technology grants into 150 jobs — that’s $2 million per job.

More…

More

Solar company to file for bankruptcy despite $535 million loan guarantee