Tucson Citizen.com
Views From Baja Arizona - brought to you by Hugh Holub

Posts Tagged ‘solar energy’

SolarGate and green jobs

Wednesday, September 7th, 2011

As we contemplate Obama’s latest scheme to spur the economy, Investors.com has a stunning article up about how a crony of Obama’s  managed to get a $535 million loan guarantee for a dubious solar scheme…which recently went bankrupt.


Solargate

….Despite a warning from Solyndra’s own accountants at PricewaterhouseCoopers that the company’s business model was suspect and raised “substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern,” President Obama visited the company and gave it a glowing endorsement as a government-picked winner alongside electric cars and high-speed rail.

More…

And David Brooks has an excellent commentary on how the green jobs efforts has cost a lot of money and produced few new jobs:


Where the Jobs Aren’t

There’s a wealth of other evidence to suggest that the green economy will not be a short-term jobs machine. According to Investor’s Business Daily, executives at Johnson Controls turned $300 million in green technology grants into 150 jobs — that’s $2 million per job.

More…

More

Solar company to file for bankruptcy despite $535 million loan guarantee

Solar company to file for bankruptcy despite $535 million loan guarantee

Thursday, September 1st, 2011

 From The Hill

Solar company to file for bankruptcy despite $535 million loan guarantee

A California-based solar company that received a $535 million loan guarantee from the Obama administration announced Wednesday that it will shut down.

More…

COMPANY PRESS ANNOUNCEMENT:

Solyndra Suspends Operations to Evaluate Reorganization Options

FREMONT, Calif., August 31, 2011 –

Solyndra LLC, the American manufacturer of innovative cylindrical solar systems for commercial rooftops today announced that global economic and solar industry market conditions have forced the Company to suspend its manufacturing operations. Solyndra intends to file a petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code while it evaluates options, including a sale of the business and licensing of its advanced CIGS technology and manufacturing expertise.

As a result of the suspension of operations approximately 1,100 full-time and temporary employees are being laid off effective immediately.

Despite strong growth in the first half of 2011 and traction in North America with a number of orders for very large commercial rooftops, Solyndra could not achieve full-scale operations rapidly enough to compete in the near term with the resources of larger foreign manufacturers.

This competitive challenge was exacerbated by a global oversupply of solar panels and a severe compression of prices that in part resulted from uncertainty in governmental incentive programs in Europe and the decline in credit markets that finance solar systems.

We are incredibly proud of our employees, and we would like to thank our investors, channel partners, customers and suppliers, for the years of support that allowed us to bring our innovative technology to market. Distributed rooftop solar power makes sense, and our customers clearly recognize the advantages of Solyndra systems,” said Solyndra’s president and CEO, Brian Harrison. “Regulatory and policy uncertainties in recent months created significant near-term excess supply and price erosion. Raising incremental capital in this environment was not possible. This was an unexpected outcome and is most unfortunate.”

Customers who have implemented Solyndra solutions can be assured that their systems will generate economical, clean, solar power for decades.

The Hill Reported last Febrary that the House Energy and Commerce Committee was already investigating this loan guarantee.

Upton targets DOE solar loan guarantee

House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-Mich.) is launching an investigation into a decision by the Department of Energy to authorize a $535 million stimulus-law loan guarantee for a California solar company.

More…

NBC News San Francisco:

Solyndra Filing a Disaster for Obama

President Obama faces political catastrophe in the form of Solyndra — a San Francisco Bay area solar company that he touted as a gleaming example of green technology. It has announced it will declare Chapter 11 bankruptcy. More than 1,100 people will lose their jobs.

More…

COMMENTARY: How do these companies get so much money when they are sinking like stones…and the average American who lost his or her job ended up getting thrown out on their butts and lost their homes?

Another example of environmental extortion

Monday, August 15th, 2011

Press Release August 9, 2011:

• SunPower Corp.  • First Solar, Inc.  • Defenders of Wildlife  • Sierra Club  • Center for Biological Diversity 

Statement on Settlement Agreement Between National Environmental Organizations and Solar Development Companies Regarding San Luis Obispo Solar Projects

Governor Brown Commends Agreement

August 9, 2011

SAN LUIS OBISPO, Calif. (August 9, 2011) – Sierra Club, Defenders of Wildlife and Center for Biological Diversity issued a statement today with SunPower Corp. (NASDAQ: SPWRA, SPWRB) and Topaz Solar Farms, LLC, a subsidiary of First Solar, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLR), on a settlement agreement regarding two solar photovoltaic (PV) power plant projects in development in San Luis Obispo County, Calif.

With regard to the agreement, California Governor Jerry Brown said, “This is another step in positioning California as the national leader in solar technology. These projects and California’s overall renewable energy industry will help create hundreds of thousands of jobs.”

The conservation organizations and solar development companies said: “Defenders of Wildlife, Center for Biological Diversity, Sierra Club, Topaz and SunPower have reached an agreement to provide additional conservation protections for the Carrizo Plain in eastern San Luis Obispo County, Calif., where SunPower’s 250-megawatt California Valley Solar Ranch and Topaz’s 550-megawatt Topaz Solar Farm are planned for the generation of renewable solar power for delivery to California’s grid.

Governor Brown’s office facilitated the discussions leading to this agreement and the organizations and companies appreciate the Governor’s leadership in this matter.

The projects are located in the Carrizo Plain, a core recovery area for endangered San Joaquin kit fox and giant kangaroo rats. While both companies have previously agreed to significant commitments to protect and preserve species in this important habitat area and have received project approvals based on environmental reviews by various federal, state and local agencies, with this agreement SunPower and Topaz commit to provide a suite of additional environmental benefits to further increase protection of the area. This agreement provides for additional conservation for the remaining unprotected lands in the northern Carrizo Plain above and beyond those provided under existing local, state and federal permits.

The significant, additional environmental benefits under the agreement include:

  • -More than 9,000 acres will be added to the 17,000 acres of land required to be permanently protected and preserved under the permits, resulting in a total of approximately 26,000 acres, or about 40 square miles, of the Carrizo Plain receiving protection as a result of these projects.
  • -Thirty miles of fencing will be removed from the area, allowing for greater wildlife movement around the projects. Additional beneficial enhancements will be made to the wildlife-friendly fencing around the solar system arrays.
  • -No rodenticides will be used in the construction or operation of the projects, and the solar companies will help fund efforts to eliminate rodenticides on the Carrizo Plain and in other San Joaquin kit fox conservation areas.
  • -Topaz and SunPower will make additional significant financial contributions to help San Luis Obispo County acquire lots in the largely undeveloped subdivision in the Carrizo Plain to restore for wildlife conservation.

The parties negotiated in good faith and recognize that many challenges may be minimized or avoided in the future through earlier, more comprehensive communication between conservation groups and the solar companies with the goal to locate projects outside of important wildlife areas and sensitive natural resources. Our organizations strongly support the development of renewable energy in California to reduce carbon emissions and transition away from fossil fuels, and believe that renewable energy projects must be located and designed in the most sustainable manner possible to ensure that projects move forward expeditiously and avoid, minimize, and mitigate their impacts on our native wildlife and natural landscapes.”

For First Solar Investors
This release contains forward-looking statements which are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The forwardlooking statements in this release do not constitute guarantees of future performance. Those statements involve a number of factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, including risks associated with the company’s business involving the company’s products, their development and distribution, economic and competitive factors and the company’s key strategic relationships and other risks detailed in the company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. First Solar assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking information contained in this press release or with respect to the announcements described herein.

SunPower’s Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are statements that do not represent historical facts and may be based on underlying assumptions. SunPower uses words and phrases such as “”will,” “agreement to,” “commit,” and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements in this press release. Such forwardlooking statements are based on information available to SunPower as of the date of this release and involve a number of risks and uncertainties, some beyond its control, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by these forwardlooking statements, including risks and uncertainties such as: (i) the impact of regulatory changes and the continuation of governmental and related economic incentives promoting the use of solar power; (ii) construction difficulties or potential delays, including obtaining land use rights, permits, license, other governmental approvals, and
transmission access and upgrades, and any litigation relating thereto; (iii) the significant investment required to construct power plants and SunPower’s ability to sell or otherwise monetize power plants; and (iv) other risks described in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 2, 2011, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 3, 2011 and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as representing the company’s views as of any subsequent date, and the company is under no obligation to, and expressly disclaims any responsibility to, update or alter its forwardlooking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

COMMENT: I doubt there is a single solar energy project in the West that is not the target of radical environmental groups. No matter where one goes, it seems a project is always impacting some endangered species. SDolar projects in soputheastern California in the Mohave Desert are claimed to be imparing the habitat of the Mohave desert tortoises for example.

Litigious environmental groups can block projects for years. Or…as they seem to be doing mnore and more..agree to drop all their opposition if they get what they want.

And that is on top of whatever US Fish and Wildlife extracts from projects to grant an “incidental take permit”.

At least this solar project gets a green light…with the added cost of saving foxes and kangaroo rats. Next time you turn on your lights, remember some rats are saying thank you.

_____________________________________________

Western water rights imperiled by Endangered Species Act

Fish and Wildlife Service Proposes To Revise Critical Habitat For Endangered Southwestern Willow Flycatcher

The endangered species tax

Enviro-Marxists seek to protect the environment by destroying capitalism

Stop The Drilling! A Lizard Is Imperiled

It is Time to Reform the Endangered Species Act

Reformation of the Endangered Species Act
_____________________________

More on the envionmental litigation factory war on America….

Center for Biological Diversity — a multi-million dollar environmental litigation factory

Army of Western Lawmakers to Introduce Legislation to Combat Frivolous Lawsuits on Taxpayer Dime

Extreme environmental groups hurt environmental cause

Center for Biological Diversity seeks to destroy Fort Huachuca to save the San Pedro River

White House reveals plan to streamline Endangered Species Act

The Endangered Species Act series of articles:

Endangered Species Act…it ain’t what you think it is — Part 1

Endangered Species Act — Part 2– this land is not your land

Endangered Species Act – Part 3 – Never swat a fly

Background info on Endangered Species Act:

Endangered Species Act — an Introduction

Endangered Species Act — Which Animals and Plants are “Threatened” or “Endangered”?

Endangered Species Act — Section 7 Consultation

Endangered Species Act — USF&W Introduction and Key Sections

Endangered Species Act — Definition of ”Harm” and “Take”

Endangered Species Act–Listing and Critical Habitat

Endangered Species Act–Habitat Conservation Plans

_________________________________________________________

News about litigious environment group activities:

Dispatches from the litigious environmental group war on America

Center for Biological Diversity demands Rosemont Mine site be included in protected habitat for frog

EPA Doles-Out Taxpayer Dollars to Environmentalist Activist Groups

Legislation to stop huge legal fee payments to environmental litigation factories poised to be introduced

Environmental groups bury feds with Endangered Species petitions

New high recorded in frivolous environmental litigation

Background info on Endangered Species Act:

Endangered Species Act — Introduction and Key Sections

Endangered Species Act — Definition of:”Harm”

Endangered Species Act–Listing and Critical Habitat

Endangered Species Act–Habitat Conservation Plans

Here’s another story you will never read about Tucson: First Solar picks Mesa for big plant

Friday, March 18th, 2011

Here’s another story you will never read about Tucson:

From the Arizona Republic

First Solar picks Mesa for big plant

by Gary Nelson on Mar. 17, 2011, under Arizona Republic News

A leading solar-power company has decided to build a large factory in the Valley, a significant step in Arizona’s efforts to be part of the growing solar-energy industry. The decision also will create much-needed jobs.

Tempe-based First Solar Inc., one of the world’s top solar-panel makers, announced Thursday that it plans to begin work within weeks on a $300 million, 600-employee factory on the former site of the General Motors Desert Proving Ground in Mesa.

When the manufacturing plant begins production about a year from now, First Solar anticipates its output of photovoltaic panels will have an annual total generating capacity of more than 250 million watts of electricity. That’s enough to power about 86,200 homes.

About 400 to 500 people will be employed during construction of the plant, which will rely on solar power for electricity.

First Solar’s Mesa plant, only its second manufacturing facility in the United States, is the latest phase of the fast-growing company’s expansion plans as it positions itself for what it sees as an inevitable global shift to using more alternative energy.

“Solar power still makes up only a tiny fraction of the world’s energy,” company CEO Robert Gillette said during the announcement at company headquarters. “Our goal is to compete with fossil-fuel power on a sustainable basis.”

First Solar is buying 135 acres from Scottsdale-based DMB Associates and has an option on an additional 100 acres. That’s enough room, Mesa City Manager Chris Brady said, to add more assembly lines that could create up to 4,800 jobs in the future.

Bill Jabjiniak, Mesa’s economic development director, said the plant will pay an average wage of $48,000 for a range of positions including assembly work and engineering professions.

The factory’s panels, which transform sunlight into electricity, will be produced primarily for power plants.

Company President Bruce Sohn said in addition to on-site jobs, the plant will generate “a sizable multiplier of supply-chain and service jobs” in the state.

Competition for the plant was fierce across several states, Sohn said, but the company chose Mesa because of its proximity to burgeoning solar-power markets in the Southwest and because state, county and local officials worked closely with his company and DMB to pull the deal together.

First Solar is building a 17-megawatt solar power plant in Gila Bend for Arizona Public Service Co. and erecting a massive solar array in Yuma.

The announcement comes as the world anxiously watches the frantic attempts to prevent catastrophe at a crippled Japanese nuclear power plant, raising inevitable questions about the safety of nuclear power.

“The terrible events that happened in Japan have just heightened the awareness, I think, of alternatives but also the debate around nuclear power,” Gillette said. “Solar obviously is an alternative to power generation. It’s not a replacement, but it certainly is something we think will grow over time and be a much more significant contributor to power generation.”

First Solar’s Mesa plant will be the first step in redeveloping the GM site, which was the automaker’s premier test facility for more than half a century before closing in 2009.

DMB bought the northern 5 square miles of the GM land in 2006 and began talking about how, over the next couple of generations, it had potential to become a large residential and industrial area around Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport.

Mesa and DMB worked together on an innovative zoning plan for the property, stressing environmental sustainability in transitioning from a semirural environment.

Karrin Taylor, a DMB vice president, said First Solar meshes perfectly with those plans.

First Solar’s campus will almost certainly spur other development on DMB’s land, which is expected to include homes, retail centers and, eventually, dense urban cores.

Scott Somers, who represents southeast Mesa on the City Council, said First Solar’s announcement is evidence that the city’s long-term Gateway area strategy is beginning to bear fruit. “This is the Mesa Gateway plan,” Somers said. “This is all that hard work starting to pay off.”

Tempe Mayor Hugh Hallman said, “This is going to be great for Tempe as well as Mesa. It’s going to be great for all of us.”

He said solar energy is a natural way to expand Arizona’s economic base, which has been ravaged over the past decade by two recessions and an epic housing-market collapse.

First Solar officials said they considered the region’s talent pool when making their decision, even though new employees will need special training. First Solar also praised state and federal policies for promoting clean energy in general and this deal in particular.

During Thursday’s announcement, Gov. Jan Brewer said First Solar’s decision validates the viability of her new Arizona Commerce Authority and her other economic-development policies.

“First Solar could have located anywhere,” she said. “We are serious about making Arizona the solar capital of the world.”

Mesa Mayor Scott Smith, who participated in the announcement, said economic policies and even business tax incentives are fine, but landing big projects depends on an educated workforce and the viability of Arizona’s cities.

“As we go through the debates down at the state Capitol, I hope that we understand that on the front-end policies, tax reductions, things (like that) get people in the door,” Smith said.

“To ensure long-term success, we cannot pull the rug out from under our educational institutions, our cities,” he said.

“If . . . we cannot provide the type of educated workforce, all the tax policy in the world will not create a winning solution,” Smith added in his latest swipe at lawmakers’ budget policies.

See also: Why isn’t Tucson the solar capitol of Arizona?

Why isn’t Tucson the solar capitol of Arizona?

Saturday, June 5th, 2010
solar panels on commercial building

solar panels on commercial building

One of the things that puzzles me about Tucson is why it isn’t the solar capitol of the region?

You’d think that between all our sunshine, the environmentally oriented public and the desperate need to develop a real economy in the region, there would be a huge push to maximize solar energy development in the area.

The only thing that seems to be pushing solar development in the region is the Arizona Corporation Commission’s mandate that regulated electric utilities must produce 15% of their energy from renewable sources by 2025.

Tucson Electric Power has several large projects in the works. TEP will add 1.8 megawatts of additions to TEP’s photovoltaic plant near the coal-fired Springerville Generating Station which alread has 4.6-megawatts of capacity. The Springerville project is one of the nation’s biggest utility-owned solar plants. TEP will also construct a 1.6-megawatt solar array at Tucson International Airport.

The City of Tucson has a number of solar projects in the works for city buildings, and has proposed that a major solar facility be located on lands it owns in the Avra Valley. The city’s Avra lands are a perfect site for a large solar facility because the property was formerly irrigated farm land the city bought for water rights decades ago.

Davis Monthan AFB is in the process of looking at a major solar project to supply the base with electricity, similar to one developed for Nellis AFB in Nevada.

There are lots of pending applications for huge solar projects north of Tucson on state lands along the I-10 corridor, mostly in Pinal County.

But one does not get the sense that there is a really major push to maximize solar energy development in the area.

One reason may be that TEP is heavily invested in coal-fired power plants in northern Arizona and must recapture its investment in those plants before relying more heavily on solar. Were that utility facing major energy demand growth and needed another new major power source, more solar might make sense. Oddly growth could fuel more solar development in the city.

Rather than build giant new central generating facilities, some utilities have opted for more “distributed generation” meaning small sources all over the place. In Sacramento, for example, their electric utility leases warehouse rooftops for solar panel generation. Californbia has a mandate that their utilitiers get 20% of their energy from renewabkle sources by 2016.

When one flies in or out of Tucson one thing is obvious…there are a lot of large flat roofed buildings in the industrial and commercial areas of the city. A lot of solar energy generation capacity could be developed on these rooftops without destroying virgin desert.

There are some innovating financing options for governments wanting to go solar. Called “third party financing” companies will come in and install and operate solar systems at “host” sites, with the host agreeing to buy solar generated electricity from the project for 20 years.  This is a great benefit to governments who get a secure flat rate for their energy. Since the governments cannot get the tax credits available for solar installations, the third party financing outfits get the tax credits. An example of this type of project is a deal the Sahuarita School District recently made. Tucson’s school districts could insulate themselves from rising energy costs by doing third party financing deals and putting solar systems on the roofs of all area schools. Add the U of A, Pima College, Pima County and all the other governments in the area and that’s a lot of solar energy development potential in the region.

This gets really interesting when you consider that most schools are closed in the summer, and their rooftops could be generating summer peak period energy to power everyone else’s air conditioning, making money for the third party solar generators.

One of the drawbacks to more solar energy development is Arizona’s approach to selling solar energy back to the grid from homes and businesses. The sell-back rate is an average number, and doesn’t recognize the difference between costs of generating electricity during summer peak demand periods.

In some jurisdictions the amount one can get paid for selling home-generated energy back to the grid is based on time-of-day pricing. For example, solar energy which is generated during the day in the summer when energy production costs are the highest brings a premium price. Not so here.

A huge energy demand exists in the region due to summer air conditioning needs. Using solar to power that air conditioning demand makes enormous sense. Having time-of-day pricing for both energy use and rooftop energy generation would radically alter the economics of solar.