Tucson Citizen.com

Utah to join league in 2011; no further expansion planned

by on Jun. 17, 2010, under Sports
Pac-10 commissioner Larry Scott said the newly expanded league will examine the potential for a football championship game and how the league's divisions will be set (Pac-10 photo)

Pac-10 commissioner Larry Scott said the newly expanded league will examine the potential for a football championship game and how the league's divisions will be set (Pac-10 photo)

Some of the more important developments to come out of today’s press conference at Rice-Eccles Stadium that announced Utah’s inclusion in the Pac-10, soon to be Pac-12 (Thanks to Jon Wilner of the San Jose Mercury News for supplying some of the information):

  • Utah will begin competing in the Pac-10 in the 2011-12 academic year. Expect Colorado to follow suit because Nebraska is slated to join the Big Ten in 2011-12.
  • A Pac-10 TV network is definitely in the works, according to league commissioner Larry Scott.
  • Scott dismissed the talk about the league expanding further (which means the conference rivalry between Utah and BYU will come to an end).
  • The league format (for example, if the conference will have a North and South division) is not yet decided. “There’s a process we’ll now go through, working closely with our athletic directors, to dig into those questions — whether to have a championship football game and whether to have divisions,” Scott is quoted as saying.
  • Wilner, who has followed the expansion news from Day One, believes a championship football game is imminent with a revenue of $10-15 million a year. The decision of where the game will be played (neutral or at a campus site) is still up in the air, which is holding up the formal announcement of such a game.
  • Colorado has maintained all along, according to the Denver Post, that the Buffaloes have been told they will be in the South Division with Utah and the Arizona and L.A. schools (which makes the most geographic sense).
  • Wilner reports that some league athletic directors — perhaps those from the Bay area — are not OK with being in a division without California counterparts USC and UCLA.
    “I am getting all kinds of proposals,” Scott is quoted as saying. “I don’t think we need to look at a lot of models, and I don’t think we’ve given our members a chance to express all the considerations they have. This is all, especially lately — things happened quickly, in a very tight way, without a lot of consultation from a lot of people…”
  • According to Wilner, the Pacific northwest schools don’t want to be separated from USC and UCLA for reasons of ticket sales and recruiting exposure. Also, L.A. is a major area for alumni of all conference schools.


  • Pingback: Pac-10 undecided about new league format | "Tell them … tell the team to bear down"

  • http://www.landrovergeeks.com/freelander LR2

    Just hope the division breakdown comes out so Arizona benefits!

  • Mark B. Evans

    If there is a North/South football division, Cal is the big winner. A Cal, OU, OSU, Stanford, UW and WSU conference makes Cal the power team in football, the way things are now. Oregon, OSU and U-dub could challenge Cal for the division title each year, but right now Cal is the odds on favorite. .
     
    In the South, if USC is decimated by the Bush sanctions and Carrol leaving, as everybody expects (hopes), the door is wide open in football for who the south division football power will be. After USC, all the south division teams have been mired in mediocrity with patches of good the past five years. We’ll see if Utah can put together 10-win seasons with USC, UCLA, ASU, UA and Colorado on its schedule every year.
     
    But who will dominate the Pac-12 in basketball,  UA or UCLA? Cal or U-Dub? If the teams play all 11 opponents, it will be even harder to earn Nos. 1 and 2 seeds in the NCAA tourney as most of the records of the top Pac-12 teams will have 6 and 7 losses.
     
    While this power conference will be good for football, basketball may suffer.