Tucson Citizen.com

Arizona Wildcats have no answer for UCLA’s attacking style inside

by on Feb. 26, 2011, under Sports

UCLA's Josh Smith (left) and Reeves Nelson celebrate yet another inside basket agianst Arizona; the Bruins had 51 of their 71 points inside the paint (US PRESSWIRE PHOTO -- Jayne Kamin-Oncea)

Arizona’s players should withstand the criticism of media and fans this week after hearing all they wanted from coach Sean Miller after the UCLA game Saturday.

The Wildcats’ players and coaches were in the locker room for at least a half-hour after the Bruins won convincingly 71-49 at Pauley Pavilion. When Miller emerged, he was barely audible during the KCUB (1400-AM) postgame radio interview with veteran play-by-play man Brian Jeffries.

“We need a few days to regroup,” Miller said. “This trip (the fourth time Arizona was swept in L.A. in the last six years) taught us some lessons. … We played a team (UCLA) that is playing at a high level. We need to play at a high level.”

No doubt, Arizona will hear these words this week from the media: The Wildcats have been exposed and overrated. They will be reminded of their shortcomings — especially their interior defense — until they play Thursday against Oregon State at McKale Center.

How will the Wildcats respond at a time when they need an answer? Entering Saturday, the Beavers were in ninth place in the Pac-10 with a 5-10 conference record and 10-16 overall. But Oregon State coach Craig Robinson is 3-0 against Sean Miller at Arizona, the only conference coach who has not lost to the second-year Arizona coach.

The Wildcats (23-6 overall, 12-4 in the Pac-10) had no answers for UCLA’s frontcourt players Reeves Nelson, Tyler Honeycutt and Joshua Smith. The trio combined for 59 of UCLA’s points on 23-of-36 shooting from the field.

Smith, a freshman center, had 17 points, four rebounds, a career-high three assists, and one blocked shot. He shot 7-for-11 from the field.

Nelson, a sophomore power forward, finished with a career-high 25 points.

Arizona’s first-team All-American candidate Derrick Williams, the likely Pac-10 Player of the Year, was matched often against both of them. Williams finished with a quiet 15 points and made the four free throws attempted.

“Derrick will probably be a Top 5 pick in the (NBA) draft next year if he decides to go,” Nelson said when asked by Fox broadcaster Samantha Steele why he played well against him. “I just like taking on challenges.”

Taking on challenges is what Miller meant by matching UCLA’s high level of intensity when the Wildcats play Oregon State and Oregon next weekend in Tucson. The Bruins and Wildcats are tied atop the conference standings with 12-4 records. Washington will likely close the gap to one game behind (11-5) after it hosts Washington State Sunday night.

If Washington beats UCLA and Arizona beats Oregon State Thursday night, the Wildcats can claim an outright league title by defeating Oregon at McKale Center on Saturday.

If UCLA and Arizona remained tied for the regular-season title after next weekend, the tiebreaker is the team’s record against league opponents starting from the top. At this point, it’s too early to tell what that scenario would involve.

“We are tied for first place and we have to take advantage of playing at home,” Miller said, simply to Jeffries.

What will not be so simple is getting Arizona’s offense back on track against Oregon State’s pesky 2-3 zone. Against USC and UCLA, the Wildcats achieved only nine assists. As a result, Williams had only 23 in the games combined.

“We played two teams that are excellent on defense,” Miller told Bruce Pascoe of The Arizona Daily Star afterward. “That took our scoring away and it really exposed our defense.”

And then Miller,whose team was 6-0 in the critical month of February before this trip, added this revelation: “As we’ve gone on this win streak, our defense has steadily slipped, regressed.”

Can Miller fix it in a week? Will the Wildcats respond at a time when they need an answer the most?



  • STR

    Well I hate to say it but DWill is a terrible defender and it appears opposing teams have figured this out now. Starting with the Washington game, teams have consistently gone inside and attacked him in the post. I thought he was strong and athletic but he gets pushed around and nearly always lets the opposing player establish position. The worst is that the beating he takes on the defensive side also effects his offensive game.
    That being said, I do hope KO gets fined for what he said last week. Yes, DWill gets calls but that is because he takes it to the basket very well. Today he got zero calls. Reeves Nelson is a complete hacker on defense and yet Derrick hardly went to the line.
    Overall the players need to realize that they won’t get many calls going forward. They had some things go their way and they need to stand tough when things don’t go their way. Today they folded and it took a long time before they put up a teeny bit of a fight.
    Kyryl played well today. Maybe he just needs more minutes to get comfortable. For some guys it might be hard to get their head properly into the game if they only play 4 minutes. So next time we face a team with a decent big, sit Hill and start Kyryl. Hill actually made some decent drives today (one negated by a BS charge call once again) but overall his offense is lacking to such an extent that we won’t miss too much replacing him with Kyryl.

  • macjoneszona

    What should concern Zona fandom is how U.C.L.A. took away Miller’s squad’s bloody MANHOOD, metaphorically speaking. And the Wildcat’s didn’t respond.
    Baby, when Reeves is gloating and rubbing it in Arizona’s face, like he did yesterday. That should be the wake up call, and more than enough to fuel the Wildcat’s competitive edge. But sadly they never responded. Accept for about a eight minute stretch in the second-half.
    Yeah, yeah it’s alright for any major college hoop’s player to bring that court enthusiasm and what not. But Reeves was ” rubbing it in ” Arizona’s face and the Cats let it happen.
    Another athletic tangible which should concern Wildcat fandom is this,  TEAM LEADERSHIP. Because when Arizona was facing dire straits in the first-half, the squad leaders need to get in their teammates faces and bloody say MAN-THE-FREAK-UP!
    Yeah, yeah Arizona is a relatively young team, but when the going gets tough a leader rallies the fella’s. And from my telly vantage point, I just didn’t see any Wildcat getting the team focused and settled down again.
    Miller and his staff can only do so much to motivate and fire-up the player’s. Then, it’s up to a team leader(s) to get everybody on the same page. Especially when everything is going down hill on the hardwood.
    Bottom is this, Arizona was MOLESTED and BYTCH-SLAPPED yesterday. And that is never absolutely acceptable for a program which has high standards and elite-status tradition on the hardwood.
    So, it’s up to the Wildcat player’s to look in the mirror and decide how they want the rest of the season to play out. On a positive ascending not. Or a tumbling free fall.
    Because I bloody guarantee you-all Zona fandom this absolute. There are plenty of major college hoop’s squads that are ” twice as nasty ” than Howling Howland’s team and Arizona doesn’t wanna’ face these teams in the N.C.A.A. tournament. Especially if they are going to play like a 16-15 team.

    • STR

      Wow, that sums it up pretty darn well. Nice post. I guess I was too chicken to put it that bluntly.

  • Pingback: Final Lap: Arizona Wildcats still in the Pac-10 driver’s seat…if they can grab the wheel - UAsports.net

  • GDBruin

    To offer something from the other side, ‘zona just ran into a UCLA team that has been on the rise for two months, the talent is finally meshing, guys know their roles and have bought in to playing solid defense wire to wire, the stupid mistakes I saw in November and December are disappearing, and they’re playing good team ball on both ends of the court.  This was probably UCLA’s best collective game of the year.  Miller had to know going in this was going to be a very tough game to win.

    I didn’t catch any of the “rubbing it in” Nelson was doing, other than him gesturing to the crowd to get on their feet and cheer.  You have to do that every few minutes in LA, we’re the most casual fans in the country.

    Maybe there was a carry-over benefit from Oneill’s comments, but I didn’t see the officiating as being one-sided.  If Williams didn’t get every call, that’s ok, Smith never gets a fair shake because of his ridiculous size.  There were plenty of fouls against him in that game that went uncalled.

    Bottom line is the refs let ‘em play and UCLA was just bigger and stronger inside.  And next year the Wear twins will be playing, get used to UCLA being a legit contender again…