I sure hope that President Obama is too busy to respond to the likes of you. This article is despicable. You point readers toward your own previous writings in order to support your new points? That is laughable sir.
If you’re looking for evidence, your not going to find it in the rhetoric of politicians. It might help to actually read the extensive reports done by scientists. See http://www.ucsusa.org for a comprehensive guide to climate change, and links to official reports done by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and hundreds of other scientists and scientific organizations.
Reality check: 99% of scientists agree that global climate change is occurring, and that it is anthropogenic.
Reality Check: Carbon Dioxide levels are higher today than they have been over the past 650,000 years.
I suggest you take a 101 level environmental biology course and see if any of your theories hold up.

Jonathan: Your sources are suspect and generally obscure.  Of course, you are doing the same thing I would do if I were a defender of my own point of view; i.e., citing sources which back your claims.  But, like it or not, the consensus in the scientific community is caused by the majority of the facts pointing to evidence for AGW and its increase. The petition you referred to has been widely discredited as containing the names of veterinarians, oil company shills, and weathermen, and not a substantial number of climatologists or any other scientists with an extensive knowledge of climate and climate history. Ten years does not a trend make but deniers will use it when they can, if they think it proves their point.  But I keep hearing from them that the earth has been cooling for the past ten years.  It has not.  What has happened is that the pace of warming has slowed.  We have been in a warming lull in the past decade, not a cooling period, and world average temperatures are still higher than in the previous 150 years.  In the decade of 1998-2008, the Arctic was warmer than it has been in 2000 years.  And the latest word is that sunspot activity may account for only 1% of changes in climate. Yes, temperatures have been rising and falling all these millennia, long before people started using fossil fuels to heat and cool on the scale that they do now, pouring millions of tons of pollution into the atmosphere.  Sea level has been rising and falling for millennia, but that really didn’t matter much before New Orleans, New York, Miami, and Galveston came into being.  Droughts have come and gone and they never mattered much either before the founding of Wichita, Los Angeles, and Flagstaff.  Now it matters.  And I doubt you can find any instance in history where these changes occurred over the span of two or three hundred years. You are absolutely right that whomever is controlling carbon controls energy, and therein lies our current problem.  Industry and politics control the carbon, and what the Goliaths fear is thousands of new Davids making and controlling their own energy, to the exclusion of the giants. Conversely, to paraphrase your statement, with foreign governments controlling our energy supply, foreign governments will control our methods and means of production, and our politics, and that is the definition of vulnerability, if not colonialism.As for your asking “where is the evidence?”; if you have eyes, then see. The global warming theory was formulated from gathered evidence. The evidence, accepted by most of the world’s academies of science, most civilized governments, most of the world’s scientists, and the military leaders of the United States, Russia, and Canada, suggests that man-made global climate change is occurring.  If this is a conspiracy, it is the most widespread in history. If you don’t like the scientific evidence though, you can just look at what people and governments are doing.  Russia is suing to establish the limits of its continental shelf so as to have access to oil lying beneath the Arctic Ocean (UN).  Two German freighters recently sailed the Northeast passage for the first time in history, cutting 3500 miles off the usual route, thanks to thinning ice.  The United States is planning to open a new Coast Guard base on the northern coast of Alaska to facilitate more patrols in case any of the increasing numbers of fishing vessels and cruise ships get into trouble.  (USCG)  Royal Dutch Shell has spent $2.1 billion for leases in preparation for exploratory drilling off the northern coast of Alaska. (NY Times)  Alaskan coastal villages, once protected by ice shelves, are collapsing into the sea from tides that have never touched the land before. (geology.com) Canadian botanists and biologists are seeing southern species of plants and animals in the north that have never been seen before. (Nature) Greenland’s citizens are planting potatoes, carrots, and broccoli for the first time and grazing more sheep than they ever have in the past, as well as selling leases to oil companies eager to drill on the warming subcontinent. (The Independent) All of these groups don’t believe man-made global warming is a hoax. 

Don’t get me wrong i do believe in the global warming thing. My question is that how come we never hear about the waters rising in NY, california, florida, mexico, Cuba? Or am i not reading the right articles?

Just wondering.
thanks!

Even is “global warming” isn’t correct, doesn’t it make sense for us to stop polluting and abusing our Mother Earth?