<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Book Review: Reporting On Climate Change, Understanding the Science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tucsoncitizen.com/wryheat/2011/08/02/book-review-reporting-on-climate-change-understanding-the-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tucsoncitizen.com/wryheat/2011/08/02/book-review-reporting-on-climate-change-understanding-the-science/</link>
	<description>by Jonathan DuHamel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://tucsoncitizen.com/wryheat/2011/08/02/book-review-reporting-on-climate-change-understanding-the-science/comment-page-1/#comment-9384</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 10:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tucsoncitizen.com/wryheat/?p=834#comment-9384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The book will be worthless if Professor Murray Salby&#039;s research holds up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The book will be worthless if Professor Murray Salby&#8217;s research holds up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell C</title>
		<link>http://tucsoncitizen.com/wryheat/2011/08/02/book-review-reporting-on-climate-change-understanding-the-science/comment-page-1/#comment-9371</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 20:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tucsoncitizen.com/wryheat/?p=834#comment-9371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For me, the tip about the book being propaganda is the sentence you quote, &quot;...&lt;em&gt;it means giving equal voice to a tiny minority of opinions&lt;/em&gt;...&quot; In order for this to work for journalists, nobody must ever quantify the number of skeptics vs IPCC scientists. From my own research into what I call the &#039;96-to-present smear of skeptic scientists, this &#039;tiny minority&#039; thing may have first originated with a scientist on the man-caused global warming side, Stephen Schneider back in the early &#039;90s, but it was most successfully promoted by anti-skeptic book author Ross Gelbspan starting around late 1995. I detailed that in my online article, &quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/06/02/media-too-fair-to-climate-skeptics-say-reporters-whove-been-unfair-to-skeptics/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&#039;Media Too Fair to Climate Skeptics&#039;, say reporters who&#039;ve been unfair to skeptics&lt;/a&gt;&quot;.

The &quot;Environmental Law Institute&quot; book authors group also looked familiar to me here, so I threw the name into my mega-notes pile and immediately came up with a specific page reference to another of their publications, &quot;Creative Common Law Strategies for Protecting the Environment&quot;, which nicely shows a citation in its &lt;a href=&quot;http://books.google.com/books?id=j7YOQQIed0EC&amp;pg=PA120&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;footnotes on page 120&lt;/a&gt; by chapter author attorney Matt Pawa.

I wrote about Pawa&#039;s ties to Ross Gelbspan in my article, &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://biggovernment.com/rcook/2010/11/27/global-warming-nuisance-lawsuits-are-based-on-a-fatal-flaw/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Global Warming Nuisance Lawsuits Are Based on a Fatal Flaw&lt;/a&gt;&quot;

I wrote about the literal words Pawa cites in his page 120 footnote - &quot;Low-Income Women, Less-Educated Men / reposition global warming as theory rather than fact&quot; - in my article &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.climatedepot.com/a/11168/Climate-Depot-Exclusive-Smearing-Skeptic-Scientists-What-did-Gore-know-and-when-did-he-know-it&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Smearing Skeptic Scientists: What did Gore know and when did he know it?&lt;/a&gt;&quot;

Funny how any publication that says anything against skeptic scientists always seems to ultimately source the &#039;corrupt&#039; skeptic scientists idea to just one single bit of unseen evidence.....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me, the tip about the book being propaganda is the sentence you quote, &#8220;&#8230;<em>it means giving equal voice to a tiny minority of opinions</em>&#8230;&#8221; In order for this to work for journalists, nobody must ever quantify the number of skeptics vs IPCC scientists. From my own research into what I call the &#8217;96-to-present smear of skeptic scientists, this &#8216;tiny minority&#8217; thing may have first originated with a scientist on the man-caused global warming side, Stephen Schneider back in the early &#8217;90s, but it was most successfully promoted by anti-skeptic book author Ross Gelbspan starting around late 1995. I detailed that in my online article, &#8221; <a href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/06/02/media-too-fair-to-climate-skeptics-say-reporters-whove-been-unfair-to-skeptics/" rel="nofollow">&#8216;Media Too Fair to Climate Skeptics&#8217;, say reporters who&#8217;ve been unfair to skeptics</a>&#8220;.</p>
<p>The &#8220;Environmental Law Institute&#8221; book authors group also looked familiar to me here, so I threw the name into my mega-notes pile and immediately came up with a specific page reference to another of their publications, &#8220;Creative Common Law Strategies for Protecting the Environment&#8221;, which nicely shows a citation in its <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=j7YOQQIed0EC&amp;pg=PA120" rel="nofollow">footnotes on page 120</a> by chapter author attorney Matt Pawa.</p>
<p>I wrote about Pawa&#8217;s ties to Ross Gelbspan in my article, &#8220;<a href="http://biggovernment.com/rcook/2010/11/27/global-warming-nuisance-lawsuits-are-based-on-a-fatal-flaw/" rel="nofollow">Global Warming Nuisance Lawsuits Are Based on a Fatal Flaw</a>&#8221;</p>
<p>I wrote about the literal words Pawa cites in his page 120 footnote &#8211; &#8220;Low-Income Women, Less-Educated Men / reposition global warming as theory rather than fact&#8221; &#8211; in my article &#8220;<a href="http://www.climatedepot.com/a/11168/Climate-Depot-Exclusive-Smearing-Skeptic-Scientists-What-did-Gore-know-and-when-did-he-know-it" rel="nofollow">Smearing Skeptic Scientists: What did Gore know and when did he know it?</a>&#8221;</p>
<p>Funny how any publication that says anything against skeptic scientists always seems to ultimately source the &#8216;corrupt&#8217; skeptic scientists idea to just one single bit of unseen evidence&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denis Ables</title>
		<link>http://tucsoncitizen.com/wryheat/2011/08/02/book-review-reporting-on-climate-change-understanding-the-science/comment-page-1/#comment-9370</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis Ables</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 20:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tucsoncitizen.com/wryheat/?p=834#comment-9370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another review on climate science, likely another perspective.
 
https://docs.google.com/a/ablesfamily.com/View?id=ddrj9jjs_0fsv8n9gw&amp;pli=1

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another review on climate science, likely another perspective.<br />
 <br />
<a href="https://docs.google.com/a/ablesfamily.com/View?id=ddrj9jjs_0fsv8n9gw&#038;pli=1" rel="nofollow">https://docs.google.com/a/ablesfamily.com/View?id=ddrj9jjs_0fsv8n9gw&#038;pli=1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
