Tucson Citizen.com
Wry Heat - by Jonathan DuHamel

Occupying the Wrong Place

by on Nov. 02, 2011, under Politics

The Occupy Wall Street movement consists of demonstrations in many cities protesting some hazy dissatisfaction with the way things are.  The movement claims participants are “The 99% that will no longer tolerate the greed and corruption of the 1%.” Based on news videos of the protesters, they seem to be the 1% of mostly incoherent and inarticulate young people who do not know what is going on.

 I can sympathize with part of the demonstrators’ dissatisfaction, but they are demonstrating against the wrong perceived perpetrators.  They should be occupying Washington, D.C. and the halls of Congress.

The blame for the current financial crisis lies squarely with Congress, with its practice of crony capitalism and with its machinations for “social justice” .

The proximal cause of our financial state lies squarely with Congress who encouraged, even mandated, that banks lend money to unqualified real estate buyers in the name of social justice.  The banks probably realized the folly, so they repackaged the mortgages in a variety of derivatives and sold them far and wide.  When, not surprisingly, it turned out that the unqualified borrowers could not repay the loans, the whole thing collapsed.

And what is social justice?  “Social justice is the complete economic equality of all members of society. While this may sound like a lofty objective, what it really means is that wealth should be collected by the government and evenly distributed to everyone. In short, social justice is communism. It is rooted in the Marxist idea that the money people make and the property they own do not rightfully belong to the people who make the money and own the property.” – Jayme Sellards  in the American Thinker.

The occupiers rage against big corporations, and they are not entirely wrong, just unfocused.  Certain corporations, large and small, court special privilege from Congress in the form of subsidies, tariffs, and bailouts.  Again it is the fault of Congress for succumbing to these pleadings.  This is crony capitalism not the free market.  The free market provides equal opportunity but does not guarantee equal outcomes.

“Free market capitalism is unforgiving. Producers please customers, in a cost-minimizing fashion, and make a profit, or they face losses or go bankrupt.” – Walter Williams

“I have never known much good done by those who affected to trade for the public good. It is an affectation, indeed, not very common among merchants, and very few words need to be employed in dissuading them from it.” – Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations

“I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it.” –Benjamin Franklin

So what should be done?  The protesters and we should demand of our senators and congressmen that the federal government get back to strictly Constitutionally authorized management rather than trying to be social engineers, energy dictators, automobile manufacturers, and micro-managers of everything. The feds should eliminate all subsidies to all businesses and let the market determine who fails and who succeeds.  For every dollar the federal government spends, that is a dollar denied to private businesses and individuals.  It is a dollar of lost opportunity in the free market.  Congress should repeal unnecessary restrictive regulations that hamper or deny our ability to produce the things we want and need. Let the great engine of the free market work.

See also:

Capitalism is not a zero sum game

Dereliction of Duty by Congress and Obama

The economy, the deficit, and the blame game

 

 


  • http://tucsoncitizen.com/tucson-progressive Pamela

    The proximal cause of our financial state lies squarely with Congress who encouraged, even mandated, that banks lend money to unqualified real estate buyers in the name of social justice.  The banks probably realized the folly, so they repackaged the mortgages in a variety of derivatives and sold them far and wide.  When, not surprisingly, it turned out that the unqualified borrowers could not repay the loans, the whole thing collapsed.

    This is an interesting bit of revisionist history. The all-too-cozy relationship between Congress and the corporatists is at the root of our country’s financial meltdown. The Congress repealed the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933– legislation that kept banking under control to avoid another Great Depression. Less than 10 years after that repeal, the worldwide financial system collapsed– thanks to Wall Street gamblers. Don’t blame the poor people who were duped into interest-only loans and encouraged to buy something they couldn’t afford. You’re blaming the victims– the 99%.

    • Jonathan DuHamel

      Hi Pamela,
      No, I am blaming Congress and those corporations seeking special privilege. By proximal, I mean the latest trigger of our current financial condition. In a sense, perhaps we are all to blame for letting Congress get away with it for so long.

      • The Baron

        Wall Street and the banks welcomed the legislation “mandating” that they offer loans to otherwise unqualified people because it not only gave them a fresh pool of high-risk dupes to target and sell (fraudulently)to multiple investors while betting on their collapse but would also provide cover when the scheme inevitably imploded.  You honestly expect people to believe that Congress’ biggest contributors couldn’t have quashed that legislation with a half-dozen phone calls?  No, the banks were the equivalent of B’rer Rabbit begging not to be thrown into the thorn patch they wanted to end up in all along. 

    • GREECE AHOY

      “Poor people”  ”duped”  “encouraged to buy something they couldn’t afford”?

      What…They have a seventh grade education? They graduate from TUSD or something…Oh, wait. 

      • tunkashila

        Yeah, funny what 3 generations of intentionally dumbing down a country will result in!  It’s not to big business’ benefit to have informed, intelligent consumers-they might be smart enough to say “no”!

  • John Doe

    It’s irresponsible to say that those willing in taking zero interest loans are “victims.”  I, too, was offered a zero interest loan and (after asking questions and doing research, what a novel idea!) found quickly that I was at the mercy of the interest rates when my loan was due.  

    To say that they’re victim’s and only victim’s, sharing no burden in their choice making, is both irresponsible and untrue.  

  • John

    I love how Americans claim they are the best, and live in a democracy, elect liars, then get made that the liars screw them over. What did you think was going to happen? Anyway, occupy nothing, the people who screwed you over are rich and laughing at you, you holding signs in a park does nothing.

    • leftfield

      “…you holding signs in a park does nothing.”

      Sounds like wishful thinking to me.  One little man who wanted to operate a cart selling goods in Tunis, Tunisia didn’t pay the right people.  When his cart was confiscated, out of abject frustration and loss of hope, he set himself aflame in protest.  The aftermath to date has been regime change in Egypt, Tunisia and Libya.  The people who “screwed him over” are not laughing today.

  • leftfield

    “…banks probably realized the folly”.

    Banks – good.  People – bad. 

    • The Baron

      Had banks really realized the folly, they would have fought the legislation legislatively and/or legally.  Instead, they happily set to the task of defrauding people by enticing them into unpayable loans and betting against them via credit default swaps to make sure they got their nut, then grouping the bad loans together and selling them illegally to multiple investors to add to their ill-gotten gains.  And yet you still have people like “John” and “John Doe” (great creativity on the names there, trolls!) claiming there were no victims among customers because they didn’t read the fine print or couldn’t afford to pay lawyers to do it for them.  Just because you’re smart enough to avoid scams doesn’t mean everyone else is equally endowed.  Grow a compassion gland and quit blaming people who actually believed what the scammers said to them!

      • JUST LIKE GREECE

        So, to compress your wordy screed - People will do and sign anything put in front of them if they are stupid enough- Sheeple do not understand that if it is too good to be true- It is. 
        You left out the HUGE greed factor- Not the institutional one, the  poor victims greed- Please  how many people we are actually talking about- Millions? I would gladly enforce every single fraud case- But not “I’m too stupid” case.    

        • tunkashila

          Apparently, wanting to better your station in life is termed as greed if you’re poor and ripping off the poor via banking fraud is just good business.  Guess it all depends on your perspective…

  • jpass

    As I warned all of you not long ago,these are not just demostrations,these are the beginnings of a complete takeover of our nation by Obama who has instigated these demonstrations that have turned into riots.He wants total chaos so he can call for marshal law so as to stop all voting in 2012 where he stands to lose the presidency.This is only part 2 of his plan to destroy the nation.First was the economy and now the revolution.It’s beginning to get real dirty.I only hope that some of the Democratic politicians will wake up and see that Obama is not the Messiah but a revolutionary Islamic bent on the destruction of the USA.

    • leftfield

      Meanwhile, back here on planet earth…