Tucson Citizen.com
Wry Heat - by Jonathan DuHamel

Posts Tagged ‘global warming’

Norwegian research shows that current warming is not unusual

Wednesday, January 25th, 2012

Researchers from the University of Bergen and the University of Colorado studied marine sediment cores from the Norwegian continental margin.  They were able to get accurate dates from lead isotope dating of interspersed volcanic rocks in the core.  They examined oxygen-18 isotopes from the calcium carbonate in the shells of planktonic foraminifera to reconstruct temperature. (Oxygen-18 is a proxy for temperature, see NASA’s Earth Observatory explanation of the method here.)

This allowed the researchers to come up with what they call “”near surface water summer temperature.” for the past 2,000 years.  The following graph depicts their temperature reconstruction:

The graph shows that the current warm period is cooler than the Medieval and Roman warm periods.  The researchers report a statistically significant correlation with the Gleissberg solar cycle.  This is more evidence that the forces of natural variability overcome the effect, if any, of anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions, and it shows that current warming is neither unprecedented nor unusual.

Reference:

Sejrup, H.P., Haflidason, H. and Andrews, J.T. 2011. A Holocene North Atlantic SST record and regional climate variability. Quaternary Science Reviews 30: 3181-3195.   Abstract here.

 

 

 

Ice core bubbles and carbon dioxide

Thursday, January 12th, 2012

It has been gospel among proponents of dangerous anthropogenic global warming that atmospheric content of carbon dioxide has never, in the last 400,000 years, risen above about 280ppmv (parts per million by volume) prior to the industrial revolution and its consequent burning of fossil fuels. Current concentration of atmospheric carbon dioxide is approximately 390ppmv. That contention is based on analysis of bubbles entrained in glacial ice and the unproven assumption that the composition of the bubbles accurately reflect the composition of earth’s atmosphere at the time the bubbles were formed. There is much uncertainty about that assumption. There are also the troubling facts that values of pre-industrial carbon dioxide derived from Antarctic ice core estimates are inconsistent with those derived from most other proxy methods and that carbon dioxide values derived from Antarctic cores often don’t agree with the much higher values derived from Greenland ice cores. I will address some of those uncertainties in this post.

As snow falls and accumulates, the weight of the snow causes it to eventually recrystallize into ice granules called “firn.” At this point the spaces between firn granules are open, allowing migration of gases. With sufficient burial, the firn becomes glacial ice with closed off bubbles. This process can take tens to thousands of years with the result that what eventually becomes trapped in bubbles may be different from the atmosphere.

After the bubbles are encased in solid ice, it was assumed that the relative amount of gases in the bubble could not change, but that is an unwarranted assumption. It has been shown that super-cooled water exists in the bubbles even at very low temperatures. This super-cooled water preferentially dissolves carbon dioxide compared to nitrogen, oxygen, and argon, leaving the gas component depleted in carbon dioxide. Also, at high pressure and low temperature, carbon dioxide is further sequestered in gas hydrates. The very act of drilling to collect ice cores decompresses the ice, and some of the gas hydrates decompose allowing carbon dioxide to escape into the drilling fluid thereby giving uncertain readings. For instance, Neftel et al. (1982) found gas bubbles with carbon dioxide ranging from 237ppmv to 436ppmv from a Greenland core and values of 257ppmv to 417ppmv from an Antarctica core. (They arbitrarily choose the lower values to represent the “true” reading.)

Another proxy, plant stomata can be used to estimate pre-industrial carbon dioxide content. Stomata are the microscopic pores in leaves and stems of plants that are used for gas exchange. The density of stomata varies inversely with carbon dioxide concentration. These stomata can be empirically calibrated by comparing plant stomata density to known carbon dioxide concentrations. The stomata of fossil plants can be used to estimate past carbon dioxide concentrations. Estimates of carbon dioxide from stomata show much higher and more variable values compared to ice core estimates. The stomata proxy shows that pre-industrial carbon dioxide levels where similar to those today: 360- to 390ppmv.

It is true that humans have been pumping more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere of late, but warming since the “little ice age” has also caused more carbon dioxide to exsolve from the oceans. Human contribution to the total carbon dioxide flux is only about 3% (source) and it seems that the contention that we alone have raised atmospheric carbon dioxide 100ppmv in the last 100 years is fraught with much uncertainty.

 

References:

Jaworowski, Z., Segalstad, T.V. and Ono, N., 1992b. “Do glaciers tell a true atmospheric CO2 story?” The Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 114, pp. 227-284. Elsevier Science Publications.

Kouwenberg et al., 2005. Atmospheric CO2 fluctuations during the last millennium reconstructed by stomatal frequency analysis of Tsuga heterophylla needles. GEOLOGY, January 2005.

Neftel et al., 1982, Ice core measurements give atmospheric CO2 content during the past 40,000 years. Nature, 295, 220-223.

Wagner et al., 2004. Reproducibility of Holocene atmospheric CO2 records based on stomatal frequency. Quaternary Science Reviews 23 (2004) 1947–1954.

 

 

Global warming and malaria, another myth debunked

Wednesday, January 4th, 2012

Among the many scary scenarios attributed to a warming world is the claim that malaria will spread.  But new research, reported in Nature says: “that warmer temperatures seem to slow transmission of malaria-causing parasites, by reducing their infectiousness.”  The researchers say “that there are several possible explanations for why parasite survival falls as temperature increases: the parasite may not be able to cope with the higher temperatures, or mosquito immune systems may work better at warmer temperatures.”  This seems to support an earlier paper in Nature that found, “widespread claims that rising mean temperatures have already led to increases in worldwide malaria morbidity and mortality are largely at odds with observed decreasing global trends in both its endemicity and geographic extent.”

Although malaria is often thought of as a tropical disease, it was actually much more widespread.

In Canada:

“It was an important cause of illness and death in the past century in Upper and Lower Canada and out into the Prairies.”  -MacLean and Ward,  Journal of the Canadian Medical Association, Jan. 26, 1999.

In England:

“Present global temperatures are in a warming phase that began 200 to 300 years ago. Some climate models suggest that human activities may have exacerbated this phase by raising the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. Discussions of the potential effects of the weather include predictions that malaria will emerge from the tropics and become established in Europe and North America. The complex ecology and transmission dynamics of the disease, as well as accounts of its early history, refute such predictions. Until the second half of the 20th century, malaria was endemic and widespread in many temperate regions, with major epidemics as far north as the Arctic Circle. From 1564 to the 1730s—the coldest period of the Little Ice Age—malaria was an important cause of illness and death in several parts of England. Transmission began to decline only in the 19th century, when the present warming trend was well under way. The history of the disease in England underscores the role of factors other than temperature in malaria transmission.”  – Paul Reiter, Emerging Infectious Diseases, Vol. 6, No. 1, January–February 2000.

In the United States:

“Historically, malaria was a significant cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the western United States” as well as in the Mississippi, Ohio, and Missouri river valleys and along the Atlantic coast.  -Hayden et al. Journal of Medical Entomology, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 341-343, 2001.

Malaria has largely disappeared from temperate climes through economic development and disease control.  Recent warming seems to have had no effect.  However, malaria remains a scourge in many undeveloped areas, a scourge made worse by another environmental policy: the banning of DDT, but that’s another story.