Tucson Citizen.com

They Don’t Represent Us

by on Feb. 06, 2013, under 113th congress, BPS & Immigration Related, Democrats, DHS, Dream Act, ICE, Immigration, Immigration Reform, Latinos, National Politics, President Obama, Republicans, Uncategorized, United States, White House

Why do media outlets label Republican Latinos as key players in the Immigration reform dialogue? I am sick of seeing the likes of Marco Rubio (R) Florida and Raul Labrador (R) Idaho advanced as somehow representative of Latinos throughout the United States.

Not only are Rubio and Labrador not representative of the Latinos in the U.S., they certainly are not representative of the Immigrants in America. Rubio with Cuban roots and Labrador born in Puerto Rico have no idea what it’s like to suffer in the United States. I would best be represented by a white man with a good grasp on the complexity of Latino issues than two politicians that have been placed at the forefront of this Immigration debate because of their affiliation to communities that have been labeled by some as being Hispanic or Latino, such as the Cuban and Puerto Rican communities have been. Rubio and Labrador represent and understand the necessities of today’s Immigrants about as much as Black politicians understand the needs and the plight of the current Haitian or African Immigrant. Just because the pigment of their skin is identical, that doesn’t mean the modern day black politician can remember or relate to what their ancestors felt when they were brought here as Immigrant slaves in the seventeenth century.

Rubio and Labrador are so far removed from the day to day struggle of the modern Immigrant and Latino, that they couldn’t possibly understand the needs or the intricacies involved with today’s Immigrant community. That detachment and their insistence on utilizing code words floated by Republican politicians and pundits creates a credibility problem for Rubio and Labrador. Your average Latino, and most definitely today’s Immigrant doesn’t recognize Rubio or Labrador as politicians looking to serve the best interest of the Latino community.

As an Immigrant from Mexico and as an active member of the Immigrant community in Arizona, I find it truly offensive every time I see a news story referencing either of these two politicians as key players. Why does the Republican party feel a need to pick someone who at best shares the same pigmentation I do to take the lead on an issue that affects my community?

Here’s where we can separate Rubio and Labrador and define them by lack of knowledge and extreme hypocrisy. Rubio is riding the political wave, and after years of trying to blend in to Anglo communities and political mixers with a name like “Marco Rubio”, he’s willing to be labeled the key Latino of the Republican party. It’s all about political opportunism and advancement for Rubio, who I’m sure aspires to be the first Latino POTUS. Rubio’s willing to take one for the team as long as he is accepted as “one of them” in the Republican party.

As for Labrador, we can go one further. Labrador is a blatant hypocrite. After working for years as an Immigration attorney representing clients who yearn to adjust their legal status in the United States, Labrador pleads ignorance when it comes to understanding the Immigration process. What else can I deduce when Labrador utilizes rhetoric like “get at the back of the line” and his comments during the 2012 campaign in which Labrador indicated that the Republican party needed to be an inclusive party, a “party of legal immigration.”

On his congressional page he states his position in this manner:

In order for us to have real immigration reform, our top priority needs to be to first secure our nation’s borders and start enforcing the immigration laws already enacted. To do so we must give our law enforcement officials the resources they need to enforce the laws on the books and secure our borders. I also believe that undocumented immigrants must return to their country of origin and then reapply to legally come to the United States. Finally, I believe that we need a guest worker program that actually works because guest workers play an important role in the American economy and more specifically in the state of Idaho. This guest worker program will not include a pathway to citizenship or amnesty.

Why is Labrador’s hard stance on Immigration hypocritical you might ask? Well, primarily because as an Immigration attorney for 15 years, Labrador claims to have had undocumented workers as clients. One has to assume that if in fact these workers were undocumented, they either stole someone’s identity, invented a social security number or borrowed a friend or relatives identity. In any event that would mean that Labrador was assisting people he knew to be in the country unlawfully in requesting a pardon (amnesty in Republican rhetoric) from a Federal Immigration Judge. I can’t think of a more hypocritical situation, one in which you claim to want legal Immigration, yet you are part and parcel to filing paperwork for undocumented workers to request a pardon for what many call criminal behavior. Can we assume then that Labrador feels that undocumented workers that can afford to pay an attorney like him are exempt from prosecution and do not in fact have to get at the “back of the line”, wherever that may be?

Fact: The Republican party is replete with hypocrites, and Rubio and Labrador are simply part of that same system. The difference is, the rest of the party is comprised primarily of old white men that don’t hide their disdain for Immigrants, legal or otherwise, Rubio and Labrador on the other hand lend themselves to being the brown skinned snake oil salesmen for the GOP.

If I haven’t made it clear enough yet, as an Immigrant, a Latino, a U.S. Citizen, and current President of the Immigrant Advocacy Foundation, Inc., I will repeat it, Marco Rubio and Raul Labrador do not represent us.

Oh, and don’t even get me started on Rafael “Ted” Cruz (R) Texas. That’s a blog in itself.

Carlos E. Galindo is a radio talk show host & political analyst conducting radio shows in both English and Spanish on four radio stations in Arizona. Mr. Galindo is a weekly contributor to KPFK 98.7 FM Los Angeles and has appeared on CNN, Univision and Telemundo as a political analyst. Mr. Galindo is also an Op-Ed columnist on Prensa Hispana Arizona. Carlos Galindo is a founding member and President of the Immigrant Advocacy Foundation, Inc.

http://www.carlosgalindo.com



  • Fraser007

    Guess you dont think that any Hispanics can be Republican? Your right.

  • Maria

    I would offer a comment but it is clear that Mr Galindo is simply offering yet another stunning example of hate filled rhetoric to pump his ratings and is not interested in resolving the serious problems of the nation. Polarization is the key to all radical talk and media of all political persuasions. It sells sadly.

    • BajaDemocrats

      Hate filled? You should read the comments section at RedState.com or, even worse. WND.com. Carlos made a very clear and good point: “Rubio and Labrador are not representative of the Latinos in the U.S.”. The large majority of U.S. Latinos are of Mexican or Central & South American descent. Cuban Americans like Mr. Rubio and Puerto Rican AMericans like Mr. Labrador share little cultural similarities with Latinos of Mexican and Central/South American heritage, and know nothing about the challenges they face. Puerto Ricans are US citizens and can come and go throughout America as they wish. Cubans are given highly preferential immigrant status with higher immigration quotas and the preferential “wet foot / dry foot” policy – if a Cuban would be immigrant is caught out at sea they’re (usually) turned back, but if they manage to get one foot on American soil they’re automatically granted immigrant status. Mexican and Central/South Americans who set one foot on American soil without a Visa are reviled as “wetbacks” and and are regarded as nothing but lowly illegals for the rest of their lives, doomed to live in the shadows no matter how highly talented they may be.

      Rubio and Labrador aren’t representative of U.S. Latinos, and receive so much media attention only because of the rarity of minority politicians who are Republican.

      • Tucsonense

        Well said!!!

  • Fraser007

    This is all just preperation to ensure the hispanic populations dont vote Republican. The odds that they would are small anyway. And with the hope that Obama will make all the illegal mexicans citizens why would they vote for the Republicans? They will vote for their relatives and friends.
    I would sure hate to be a Border Patrol officer. They just got a knife in the back. Their morale has ot to be destroyed. all of their work has been wasted.
    And of course Obama will boost security for the border!! LOL No way. Not unless he increases the Border Patrol by 200%.
    How about sealing the border with the U.S. Army. And I am not talking about 400 National Guardsmen without guns. Bring an Infantry Division here. They could do it in 2 weeks. Just leave the tanks and artillery behind but bring the Humvees and helicopters. I asked my son (who has had 4 combat tours in such a unit). He said “no problem”. He also said that Obama wont do it because ” they could do it” Thats why Obama wont!
    Any country that doesnt even try to protect their own border, doesnt deserve to be a country.

    • BajaDemocrats

      “Bring an Infantry Division here” – slight problem with that. It’s called the Posse Comitatus Act, passed in 1878, at the urging of the former Confederate states. It prohibits the use of federal military personnel to enforce law within the US. The National Guard is exempt because it’s not considered a “federal” military force, but actually even the Nat. Guard can’t be deployed without a former invitation by a state’s Governor.

      But I absolutely agree with you that our borders must be secure. If Manuel from El Salvador can simply walk across the border in search of a better life then so can Abdulah from Yemen, possibly with much less innocent intentions.

      • Fraser007

        So just because Manuel from El Salvador needs a job doing drywall here means we have to open our border and country? The very fact that immigration has “slacked off” recently means that that is the only reason they are coming. And that many are going home shows that the illegal aliens really dont want to invest in the USA. can you imagine 11 million Irish, German or English etc “going back home” when the economy got bad?
        What would happen if those European immigrants (legal ones that is) bugged out when WWI or WWII started, or when the Depression happened. etc. etc.
        I say that the country select what groups need to come here. I for one would trade 11 hispanic illegal aliens for 11 Indian computer engineers. When was the last time you heard about Indian crimes, Indian gangs, Indian MS13 Gangs, They already speak English and bring much to the country.

  • old white man

    I’m pissed off too. Carlos, everyone knows YOU are the only one who can speak for all Latinos! LA-TIN-OS! LA-TIN-OS! CAR-LOS! LA-TIN-OS! What do we want? Mexican-American Studies! When do we want it? NOW! What don’t we want? American History! When do we want it? NEVER!