Tucson Citizen.com
Medicare and More -

What’s in the Health Care Bill for Medicare: Part 2

by on Mar. 20, 2010, under Health

A tax increase and lower payments to Medicare Advantage plans are expected to cut the Medicare budget by $400 billion over ten years.   I found a summary of provisions on the Kaiser Family Foundation website. 

The Senate bill, which the House of Representatives will vote on this weekend…

*Increases the Medicare Part A (Hospital Insurance) payroll tax in 2013 by 0.9% (from 1.45% to 2.35%) on earnings over $200,000/individual, $250,000/couple; funds deposited into the Medicare Part A Trust Fund. This should bring in $86.8 billion in new revenue.

*Establishes new Independent Payment Advisory Board and requires the Board to submit a proposal with recommendations for reducing Medicare spending, while maintaining quality and access, if Medicare per capita growth rates exceed targets, beginning in January 2014. Requires proposals to be automatically implemented unless Congress enacts alternative proposals that achieve same level of savings, or the Secretary had implemented recommendations in the prior year.

*Reduces payments to hospitals with excess preventable readmissions and hospital-acquired infections.

*Establishes pilot programs for bundling payments for post-acute care.

*Establishes new standard fraud liability in Federal health care programs; expands the Recovery Audit Contractors program to Medicaid, Medicare Advantage, and Part D.

On the Health Beat blog I found the following information related to Medicare Advantage plans:

The bill will freeze  Medicare Advantage payments in 2011. Then, beginning in 2012, the provision reduces Medicare Advantage benchmarks relative to current levels.

In high-spending areas, insurers will be paid 95% of what it would cost Medicare to care for patients. In low-cost areas, they will be paid 115% of what it would cost Medicare to provide coverage. The changes will be phased in over three, five, or seven years, depending on the level of payment reductions.  My comment: Florida and California are high-cost areas while Arizona is on the low end of payments to Medicare Advantage plans. This could be good news for southern Arizona.

The provision also creates an incentive system to increase payments to high-quality plans by at least 5%.  In addition, Medicare Advantage Plans would have to spend at least 85% of revenue on medical costs or activities that improve quality of care, rather than profit and administration.


  • easttxisfreaky@live.com

    Medicare will be cut by 500 BILLION and this money will NOT be used to make the plan more secure – but will used to build another bureaucracy for the YOUNG and the HEALTHY.

    Today in the Rules Committee Meeting, it was stated and not refuted – that Social Security would be broke in four years and that this program will be eliminated in the near future.

    Why Arizonans have elected Harry Mitchell as a Representative is BEYOND ME.

    Just because he has gray hair and shakes your hand does NOT mean that he is not a Progressive.  He is working against you – and has a hand in bringing our country to its knees.

    VOTE OUT HARRY MITCHELL.

  • Robert Darling

    Bureaucracy for the YOUNG and the HEALTHY?  That makes absolutely no sense.  If you are going to make such an absurd statement at least atempt to explain your point.  By the way the root word of Progressive is \progress\.  The last time I checked, progress was a good thing.

    • greenway157@yahoo.com

      Progress in the case is a relative term.  Just because you are making a change does not mean it is good. THIS IS NOT A GOOD CHANGE.  If the government was doing such a good job with healthcare, Medicare would be a shining example of what we would want our medical benefits to resemble.  If you have not noticed, Medicare “run by the government” is not working.  Every time Medicare rates are reduced does not mean the cost for the coverage has gone down and the government has done a more efficient job, it is just shifted to cost to the private sector.  They either do that, cut benefits,  or increase taxes.  By making healthcare a government controlled, this means the benefits will go down, the taxes will go up and you no longer have choices.

      • Robert Darling

        Medicare IS working.  If you don’t believe me, try and take it away from people and see the kind of uproar you get.  Go to any Tea Party rally and you’ll see signs saying “keep your government hands off my medicare”.  The cuts you are refering to are related to the fact that medicare increases it’s paymentnts about 4% each year; that’s going to be cut to a 2% increase.  It looks like a cut because of the excessive increases in the cost of services (in the private sector by the way) can’t keep up with these runaway costs.  Health care is FAR from a govt controlled entity.  It is still in the hand of private insurance companies who are going to get 30 million new customers.  This bill was not a healthcare reform, it was a health insurance bill.  It is just a start, we need more reform to make the whole thing work.

  • Pingback: uberVU - social comments

  • leftfield

    So, the wringing of hands and the dire predictions begin.