Arizona will gain 9th Congressional Seat
by Hugh Holub on Dec. 21, 2010, under politicsThe US Census released is “Apportionment Counts” on December 21st. This sets the basis for reallocating Congressional Seats. Arizona will gain 1 new seat in Congress.
Since the majority of the populaion growth has been in Maricopa and Pinal counties, the new Congressional Seat will probably be up that way.
Each Congressional Seat will represent 710,767 people.
Chances are pretty good that given that the GOP will be carving out the new district and realigning the rest of them, that Pima County will come out on the short end. Currently Pima has a piece of Raul Grijalva’s district and Gabrielle Giffords’ district.
Watch as the GOP pushes Giffords’ district into a more solid Republican opportunity to unseat her in 2012, and try and shrink the chances of Grijalva and Ed Pastor to both hold onto their Democratic seats.
The U.S. Census Bureau announced today that the 2010 Census showed the resident population of the United States on April 1, 2010, was 308,745,538.
The resident population represented an increase of 9.7 percent over the 2000 U.S. resident population of 281,421,906. Commerce Secretary Gary Locke, Acting Commerce Deputy Secretary Rebecca Blank and Census Bureau Director Robert Groves unveiled the official counts at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C.
“A big thanks to the American public for its overwhelming response to the 2010 Census,” U.S. Commerce Secretary Gary Locke said. “The result was a successful count that came in on time and well under budget, with a final 2010 Census savings of $1.87 billion.”
Rebecca Blank, now Acting Deputy Secretary of Commerce who has overseen the 2010 Census as Under Secretary for Economic Affairs, echoed Locke. “The 2010 Census was a massive undertaking, and in reporting these first results, we renew our commitment to our great American democracy peacefully, fairly and openly for the 23rd time in our nation’s history.”
The U.S. resident population represents the total number of people in the 50 states and the District of Columbia.
The most populous state was California (37,253,956); the least populous, Wyoming (563,626). The state that gained the most numerically since the 2000 Census was Texas (up 4,293,741 to 25,145,561) and the state that gained the most as a percentage of its 2000 Census count was Nevada (up 35.1% to 2,700,551).
Regionally, the South and the West picked up the bulk of the population increase, 14,318,924 and 8,747,621, respectively. But the Northeast and the Midwest also grew: 1,722,862 and 2,534,225.
Additionally, Puerto Rico’s resident population was 3,725,789, a 2.2 percent decrease over the number counted a decade earlier.
Just before today’s announcement, Locke delivered the apportionment counts to President Obama, 10 days before the statutory deadline of Dec. 31. The apportionment totals were calculated by a congressionally defined formula, in accordance with Title 2 of the U.S. Code, to divide among the states the 435 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives. The apportionment population consists of the resident population of the 50 states, plus the overseas military and federal civilian employees and their dependents living with them who could be allocated to a state. Each member of the House represents, on average, about 710,767 people. The populations of the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico are excluded from the apportionment population, as they do not have voting seats in Congress.
“The decennial count has been the basis for our representative form of government since 1790,” Groves said. “At that time, each member of the House represented about 34,000 residents. Since then, the House has more than quadrupled in size, with each member now representing about 21 times as many constituents.”
President Obama will transmit the apportionment counts to the 112th Congress during the first week of its first regular session in January. The reapportioned Congress will be the 113th, which convenes in January 2013.
Beginning in February and wrapping up by March 31, 2011, the Census Bureau will release demographic data to the states on a rolling basis so state governments can start the redistricting process.
Article I, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution calls for a census of the nation’s population every 10 years to apportion the House seats among the states. The 2010 Census is the 23rd census in our nation’s history.


December 21st, 2010 on 10:52 am
YES!!!!!!
“Elections have consequences…”
December 21st, 2010 on 11:51 am
Consequences meaning jiggering details so the base of the ‘other’ party lose representation? Somehow I suspect the very existence of ‘others’ makes you furious.
December 21st, 2010 on 11:52 am
Just my way of pointing out that conservatives just hate democracy and crave conquest and hegemony.
December 21st, 2010 on 12:44 pm
Right Jim, you seem to be missing one factor in your statement. Truth.
The democratic party is doing everything it can to turn our country into a socialist totalitarian government, and all you can do is point fingers at whosoever your masters tell you to direct your hate.
But.. I guess you have a good view of your own colon from that position.
December 21st, 2010 on 4:31 pm
Fascists see socialists under every bed. Funny.
If anyone has had totalitarian leanings it is the right. Its the right who championed the patriot act. Its the right who championed domestic spying. Its the right who championed torture. Its the right who championed criminal wars. Its the right that looted the treasury under Bush of trillions. It was the right (Nixon) who said if the president does something it is therefor not illegal. Its the right who legislated the use of taxpayer money to expatriate not only US jobs but US intellectual property to China.
… and more.
Notagain … you provide no facts. Do you need facts? Who is really hating here?
December 21st, 2010 on 5:49 pm
The democratic party is doing everything it can to turn our country into a socialist totalitarian government
Socialism takes a variety of forms. In the strictest definition though, what distinguishes socialism from capitalism and vice versa is who controls the means of production. Under capitalism, the bourgeoisie are defined by their control of the means of production. Under socialism, the working class controls the means of production.
Fear not, the Democrats are just as much under the control of the bourgeoisie as the Republicans. Any revolutionary change would require initiation by the working class as a whole anyway and is not something that could be acheived by a political party acting independently.
My point is that, to anyone who knows the least little bit about socialism, this nonsense about Obama and/or the democrats being socialist is just that, nonsense; nonsense intended only to inflame the right-wing party faithful. It has no basis in fact. Liberalism is something quite distinct from socialism.
December 21st, 2010 on 1:02 pm
Conquest? hegemony?
Ironic coming from a German/English fella
December 21st, 2010 on 4:27 pm
Wow, open bigotry … how unsurprising.
Yes, conquest and hegemony. I have no issues accepting election results. But there are those that never relent … like congressional conservatives for example … who see the meaning of life as a process of destroying enemies. Did elections have consequences in the senate to the conservatives? No. They never relented and played a 2 year stall on the US for their own purposes.
Its about victory to conservatives no democracy.
December 21st, 2010 on 7:34 pm
Bwahahahahaha….
December 21st, 2010 on 1:11 pm
Every passing day makes me realize that Idiocracy is the most prophetic film ever made.