Tucson Citizen.com

Playing season-opener at Toledo more risky than playing Iowa in Glendale

by on Aug. 13, 2010, under Sports

RELATED POLL: Make your vote on the matter at our partner site WILDABOUTAZCATS.com

Toledo's Glass Bowl has an official seating capacity of 26,248 but you can expect much more when the Wildcats come to town Sept. 3. (University of Toledo photo)

In the recent interview UA football coach Mike Stoops did with Todd Walsh of Fox Sports Arizona, the controversial topic of playing a “home” game in Glendale was discussed.

The topic drew much conversation at Anthony Gimino‘s blog here at TucsonCitizen.com.

When Walsh asked Stoops about his thoughts of playing a game at University of Phoenix Stadium, Stoops said, “We want to do it …I’ve wanted to do it,” and he proceeded to discuss what it will take to make it happen.

“Getting to where we’re good enough to go away from home,” Stoops told Walsh. “You have to look at the opponent that you want to bring in. Going there to play an Iowa this year, I’d love to, we’re just not at that … you know, we need to be at our stadium.”

Stoops is entering his seventh season with the momentum of two consecutive bowl appearances and the promising development — finally — of a quarterback in Nick Foles who could play beyond his Wildcat career. With all due respect to Stoops, who was the best hire for the job following the John Mackovic disaster, it’s time to discard the booster seat and take the driver’s seat.

Granted, Arizona’s football program is only two years removed from a dismal stretch of 10 consecutive non-winning seasons and a 3-8 record just five years ago. The Wildcats have not been ranked higher than No. 18 in the The Associated Press Top 25 Poll since 1999. Because of this, I can understand Stoops’ hesitancy. But I also believe, given that Stoops has the program back on its feet, that it’s time to run and not crawl when it comes to scheduling risks.

Playing Iowa last year and this season is encouraging to the overall effort of playing the best. Like Stoops alluded to, playing the Hawkeyes in Glendale would be ideal. It would be a made-for-TV game with a national audience. The 63,400-seat stadium would be mostly filled with Arizona fans from Tucson and Phoenix. Arizona’s recruiting effort in the Phoenix-area would get a boost, although Stoops has held his own against ASU in that regard in recent years.

I think it could have worked this season under different circumstances.

If the UA did not play in Iowa City last year, facing Iowa in a one-game arrangement in Phoenix would have been a good move for the program. How it would have affected businesses around Arizona Stadium is a different story worth debating.

Essentially, playing in Glendale should not be categorized as a home game for the Wildcats. It is a neutral-site game that is played in Arizona, similar to when the Wildcat basketball team played Gonzaga in Phoenix during the 2008-09 season. Arizona had more fans, but McKale Center is its home, not the U.S. Airways Center in downtown Phoenix. The UA also was not required to play at Gonzaga.

In terms of being good enough to go away from home, as Stoops put it, the Wildcats are in their best position since the 12-1 season in 1998. It’s time to get this program thinking big instead of believing it’s not quite big enough. Think of it this way: How often will Arizona’s season have more potential for success than USC and UCLA?

Toledo, the UA’s season-opening opponent, recently scheduled a home-and-home arrangement with Miami (Fla.) starting in 2015. After Toledo plays Arizona at its Glass Bowl this season, the Rockets will host Boise State (2011), Navy (2013), Missouri (2014), and Iowa State and Miami (2015).

In recent years, the Rockets have secured home dates against Colorado, Fresno State, Kansas, Minnesota, Navy, Pittsburgh, Purdue, and Syracuse.

“When we go into recruits’ homes, it’s such a positive to be able to tell them that coming to the Glass Bowl, you’ll be competing against the likes of Miami and other BCS schools that we have coming here,” Toledo athletic director Mike O’Brien told the Toledo Blade.

“That’s such a huge thing to tell your recruits.”

It’s true that Toledo has no other choice but to schedule top-flight competition because it plays in the second-tier Mid-American Conference. Give the Rockets credit for following through on that philosophy and securing home dates against Arizona, Boise State and Miami. Those three programs gain little or nothing from traveling to Toledo in the grand scheme of things.

At least in Arizona’s case Stoops gets an opportunity to return to his Ohio roots. The game is also a good tuneup for the Cats, who won’t play on the road again until Oct. 16, when they play Washington State in Pullman.

The bottom line, however, is that Arizona is playing with fire, especially with the mindset of being a two-touchdown favorite at a small stadium with a listed seating capacity of only 26,248. The largest crowd in the Glass Bowl’s history is only 36,852 against Navy in 2001. Expect a raucous, over-capacity crowd that would savor a win over Arizona the rest of the season.

Playing a dangerous MAC team on the road, especially to start the season, is more risky at this stage of Stoops’ program development than scheduling a neutral-site game against Iowa in Glendale.


  • Kevin

    Actually, we were ranked in all four major polls at least one time each last year.

  • http://www.wildaboutazcats.com Javier Morales

    Thanks Kevin. I updated it to show that Arizona has not been ranked higher than No. 18 in the AP Top 25 poll since 1999. But this only fuels my argument that Arizona has turned the corner, or should at least start thinking that way.

  • Pingback: @TC.com: Is UA ready for prime time? In Glendale? | "Tell them … tell the team to bear down"

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Playing season-opener at Toledo more risky than playing Iowa in Glendale - Wild About AZ Cats -- Topsy.com

  • Carlos J. M.

    Brad over at Wildcat Sports Report has a pretty good idea.  Of the 3 or 4 pre-12 PAC games the ‘Cats are bound to play each year, how’s about the one road game be in Glendale at Uof Phx Stadium?  A big time opponent to the UA this day wouldn’t mind sacrificing and bringing the faithful to the Valley with all that would be at play here.  And this way Coach Stoops & Co. don’t have to give up the 2 or 3  home games or their home field advantage at all.  The economy of the Old Pueblo and surrounding area is not only saved in this scenario but potentially bolstered by, in essence, 1 bonus “home” game about 125 miles up the road.  Doesn’t have to be a night game, either, like some fear, putting them back in Tucson at 10pm or so.  It could be a made for TV matinee, with plenty of time afterward to reflect and do it up, or…Well, we won’t even bother thinking that.  Positive’s the way! 

  • http://www.wildaboutazcats.com Javier Morales

    Carlos: That’s what I meant by the one-game arrangement that would be a neutral site game. The UA should tap into its road schedule for that, not its home schedule.

  • Rob

    Well, you know if you’re worried that your program might lose a football game then why even compete? Why not just shut the d@mn program down?

  • Carlos J. M.

    Gotcha Javier.  One-time, neutral-site game is the key here.  My bad.  Should’ve seen that.  And I love your Gonzaga b-ball game in Phoenix analogy.  Same thing and there were no complaints from anyone.  Well maybe the ‘Zags – and our good buddy Katz – who got pasted by an interim coach-led, Pennell-coached ‘Cat team on the prowl up I-10.  Shot Katz’s theory on his beloved western powerhouse Bulldogs and his idol  Few to pieces.

    And don’t you just love these people like Rob who come on here from we all know where (here, I’ll give you a hint: Their AD and coaches have never seen a 4 pre-conf. home game, patsy-laiden, let’s not leave home ’til November schedule they didn’t Love) to get their kicks?  Might be time to check the air quality under that big ‘ol plastic stuff that passes as a practice facility in them there parts.  Can’t be any worse than what’s outside though, I know.