Comments on: Failure of the Anthropogenic Global Warming Hypothesis

By: fhljsdfiludfhlizsdhflisdayhgfo

fhljsdfiludfhlizsdhflisdayhgfo — Fri, 08 Feb 2013 08:11:00 +0000

Great article Jon. AGW cultists are dogmatic zealous loons.

By: Mike435

Mike435 — Sun, 03 Feb 2013 09:07:00 +0000

Most of the claims made by Carter are false or badly out of context. He is recycling talking point developed by political think tanks that have bee refuted many times. While he is a scientist his training is in a different field and he has recently chosen political advocacy as his main vocation. It is likely best to read the views of professional scientists who work in the field.

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/GlobalWarming/

http://dels.nas.edu/Report/America-Climate-Choices/12781

http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/education/literacy.html

By: alohapuna

alohapuna — Sun, 03 Feb 2013 03:36:00 +0000

Your study is over 3 years old. You keep insisting on physical evidence. Unfortunately, I can’t take you there personally and show you.
World News March 2012.
As sea levels rise, Kiribati eyes 6,000 acres in Fiji as new home for 103,000 islanders.
International relations of climate change
(President) Tong said some villages have already moved and there have been increasing instances of sea water contaminating the island’s underground fresh water, which remains vital for trees and crops. He said changing rainfall, tidal and storm patterns pose as least as much threat as ocean levels, which so far have risen only slightly.
From Wikipedia
As one of the world’s most vulnerable nations in terms of the effects of climate change, Kiribati has been an active participant in international diplomatic efforts relating to climate change, most importantly the UNFCCC conferences of the parties (COP). Kiribati is a member of the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS), an intergovernmental organization of low-lying coastal and small Island countries. Established in 1990, the main purpose of the alliance is to consolidate the voices of Small Island Developing States (SIDS) to address global warming. AOSIS has been very active from its inception, putting forward the first draft text in the Kyoto Protocol negotiations as early as 1994.

By: Ali Babba

Ali Babba — Sun, 03 Feb 2013 01:39:00 +0000

what is your doctorate in kyle, mine is in physics

By: Ali Babba

Ali Babba — Sun, 03 Feb 2013 01:38:00 +0000

idiot

By: Jonathan_Duhamel

Jonathan_Duhamel — Sat, 02 Feb 2013 22:10:00 +0000

Recent studies have shown that South Pacific islands are not in danger from sea level rise and many are actually increasing in size: http://www.co2science.org/articles/V16/N4/EDIT.php

And see: http://tucsoncitizen.com/wryheat/2010/08/18/sea-level-rise-in-the-south-pacific-none/
But, if you want to do something, show me some physical evidence that what you do will actually help.

By: alohapuna

alohapuna — Sat, 02 Feb 2013 20:05:00 +0000

To adapt is passive. In other words, doing nothing. Example, the people of Kiribati in the South Pacific. If they “adopted”, most would be up to their knees in water now. The small nation group of islands is have to relocate ther population as their home soon will no longer exist.

By: Jonathan_Duhamel

Jonathan_Duhamel — Fri, 01 Feb 2013 13:41:00 +0000

We should, as we have in the past, adapt to climate change. The evidence shows that natural variation vastly overwhelms any warming induced by our carbon dioxide emissions, therefore, thinking we can modify climate by regulating carbon dioxide is an exercise in futility, and a harmful one at that.

By: alohapuna

alohapuna — Fri, 01 Feb 2013 04:17:00 +0000

I wonder what it is that Mr. DuHamel hopes to gain by continually seeking material that reaffirms his opinions to help him debunk widely accepted information.
Except in a case where the process of elimination may lead you to it, you can spend all day determining what did not cause a problem. Meanwhile, it’s not addressing the problem and nothing is done.
My conclusion is that Mr. DuHamel believes we should simply ignore the problem of global climate change and just hope it goes away.

By: Philip Haddad

Philip Haddad — Thu, 31 Jan 2013 18:55:00 +0000

Carbon dioxide is NOT the cause of global warming. Combustion of fossil fuels supplies 80% of our energy and it is the heat released by this combustion, as well as that from nuclear energy that is causing the slight rise in temperature that we see and the alarming rate of glacial melting. Its really very simple. For example in 2008 our energy consumption was 16 terrawatts, equivalent to 50x10E16 btus a year (also equivalent to 500 Mount Saint Hellen’s eruptions. Our atmosphere has a mass of 1166X10E16 pounds and a specific heat of 0.24 btu/#-*F.This had the potential to raise the temperature by 0.17*F. Actual rise was 1/4th that due to cooling by photosynthesis and glacial melting,(750billion tons) .The climate is changing. We don’t need more studies. We need to recognize that HEAT is the problem, build no more fossil or nuclear plants and replace existing ones as fast as possible. This will take too long but we have no alternative other than reducing our energy consumption. There is no point in my discrediting the CO2 myth at this point but it is not difficult to do so. Also don’t believe everything that some respected “scientists” publish. They already have too much at stake to admit that they believe such a simple explanation as HEAT being the cause and will not even acknowledge having received correspondence from me.